Effect of screening by clinical breast examination on breast cancer incidence and mortality after 20 years: prospective, cluster randomised controlled trial in Mumbai

Indraneel Mittra, Gauravi A Mishra, Rajesh P Dikshit, Subhadra Gupta, Vasundhara Y Kulkarni, Heena Kauser A Shaikh, Surendra S Shastri, Rohini Hawaldar, Sudeep Gupta, C S Pramesh, Rajendra A Badwe, Indraneel Mittra, Gauravi A Mishra, Rajesh P Dikshit, Subhadra Gupta, Vasundhara Y Kulkarni, Heena Kauser A Shaikh, Surendra S Shastri, Rohini Hawaldar, Sudeep Gupta, C S Pramesh, Rajendra A Badwe

Abstract

Objective: To test the efficacy of screening by clinical breast examination in downstaging breast cancer at diagnosis and in reducing mortality from the disease, when compared with no screening.

Design: Prospective, cluster randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 20 geographically distinct clusters located in Mumbai, India, randomly allocated to 10 screening and 10 control clusters; total trial duration was 20 years (recruitment began in May 1998; database locked in March 2019 for analysis).

Participants: 151 538 women aged 35-64 with no history of breast cancer.

Interventions: Women in the screening arm (n=75 360) received four screening rounds of clinical breast examination (conducted by trained female primary health workers) and cancer awareness every two years, followed by five rounds of active surveillance every two years. Women in the control arm (n=76 178) received one round of cancer awareness followed by eight rounds of active surveillance every two years.

Main outcome measures: Downstaging of breast cancer at diagnosis and reduction in mortality from breast cancer.

Results: Breast cancer was detected at an earlier age in the screening group than in the control group (age 55.18 (standard deviation 9.10) v 56.50 (9.10); P=0.01), with a significant reduction in the proportion of women with stage III or IV disease (37% (n=220) v 47% (n=271), P=0.001). A non-significant 15% reduction in breast cancer mortality was observed in the screening arm versus control arm in the overall study population (age 35-64; 20.82 deaths per 100 000 person years (95% confidence interval 18.25 to 23.97) v 24.62 (21.71 to 28.04); rate ratio 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.01); P=0.07). However, a post hoc subset analysis showed nearly 30% relative reduction in breast cancer mortality in women aged 50 and older (24.62 (20.62 to 29.76) v 34.68 (27.54 to 44.37); 0.71 (0.54 to 0.94); P=0.02), but no significant reduction in women younger than 50 (19.53 (17.24 to 22.29) v 21.03 (18.97 to 23.44); 0.93 (0.79 to 1.09); P=0.37). A 5% reduction in all cause mortality was seen in the screening arm versus the control arm, but it was not statistically significant (rate ratio 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.10); P=0.49).

Conclusions: These results indicate that clinical breast examination conducted every two years by primary health workers significantly downstaged breast cancer at diagnosis and led to a non-significant 15% reduction in breast cancer mortality overall (but a significant reduction of nearly 30%in mortality in women aged ≥50). No significant reduction in mortality was seen in women younger than 50 years. Clinical breast examination should be considered for breast cancer screening in low and middle income countries.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India CTRI/2010/091/001205; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00632047.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from the US National Institutes of Health, Tata Memorial Centre, Sir Dorabji Tata Trusts, M K Tata Trusts, Department of Atomic Energy Clinical Trial Centre (Government of India), and the Women’s Cancer Initiative, India for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Trial flow diagram
Fig 2
Fig 2
Cumulative breast cancer mortality during 20 years of study

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. CI5 plus-cancer incidence in five continents time trends. 2018.
    1. Torre LA, Islami F, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global cancer in women: burden and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26:444-57. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0858
    1. Mumbai Cancer Registry . Annual reports 1992-2016: cancer incidence and mortality in Mumbai Municipal Corporation area. Mumbai. Indian Cancer Society, 2016.
    1. Dhillon PK, Mathur P, Nandakumar A, India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Cancer Collaborators . The burden of cancers and their variations across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:1289-306. 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30447-9
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424. 10.3322/caac.21492.
    1. Harford JB. Breast-cancer early detection in low-income and middle-income countries: do what you can versus one size fits all. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:306-12. 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70273-4
    1. Mittra I. Breast cancer screening in developing countries. Prev Med 2011;53:121-2. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.06.010
    1. Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM, et al. . Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1445-57. 10.1093/jnci/94.19.1445
    1. Hackshaw AK, Paul EA. Breast self-examination and death from breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2003;88:1047-53. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600847
    1. Harvey BJ, Miller AB, Baines CJ, Corey PN. Effect of breast self-examination techniques on the risk of death from breast cancer. CMAJ 1997;157:1205-12.
    1. Black E, Richmond R. Improving early detection of breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: why mammography may not be the way forward. Global Health 2019;15:3. 10.1186/s12992-018-0446-6
    1. Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, Johns L, Waller M, Bobrow L, Trial Management Group . Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years’ follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368:2053-60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69834-6
    1. Moss SM, Wale C, Smith R, Evans A, Cuckle H, Duffy SW. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality in the UK Age trial at 17 years’ follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:1123-32. 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00128-X
    1. Shapiro S. Periodic screening for breast cancer: the HIP Randomized Controlled Trial. Health Insurance Plan. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997;22:27-30. 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.27
    1. Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. CMAJ 1992;147:1477-88.
    1. Breslow L, Thomas LB, Upton AC. (chairmen): Final reports of the National Cancer Institute ad hoc working groups on Mammography in Screening for Breast Cancer and summary report of their joint findings and recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977;59:467-541.
    1. Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, Sun P, To T, Narod SA. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial. BMJ 2014;348:g366. 10.1136/bmj.g366
    1. Mittra I. Breast screening: the case for physical examination without mammography. Lancet 1994;343:342-4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91170-3
    1. Mittra I, Baum M, Thornton H, Houghton J. Is clinical breast examination an acceptable alternative to mammographic screening? BMJ 2000;321:1071-3. 10.1136/bmj.321.7268.1071
    1. Mittra I, Mishra GA, Singh S, et al. . A cluster randomized, controlled trial of breast and cervix cancer screening in Mumbai, India: methodology and interim results after three rounds of screening. Int J Cancer 2010;126:976-84.
    1. Dinshaw K, Mishra G, Shastri S, et al. . Determinants of compliance in a cluster randomised controlled trial on screening of breast and cervix cancer in Mumbai, India. 1. Compliance to screening. Oncology 2007;73:145-53. 10.1159/000126497
    1. Dinshaw K, Mishra G, Shastri S, et al. . Determinants of compliance in a cluster randomised controlled trial on screening of breast and cervix cancer in mumbai, India. 2. Compliance to referral and treatment. Oncology 2007;73:154-61. 10.1159/000126498
    1. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. Death registration details.
    1. Indian Cancer Society. Registry research and education.
    1. Kohler U, Kreuter F. Stata: data analysis and statistical software. Data analysis using Stata. 3rd ed. Stata Press, 2012.
    1. Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Thara S, et al. . Clinical breast examination: preliminary results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in India. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:1476-80. 10.1093/jnci/djr304
    1. Pisani P, Parkin DM, Ngelangel C, et al. . Outcome of screening by clinical examination of the breast in a trial in the Philippines. Int J Cancer 2006;118:149-54. 10.1002/ijc.21343
    1. Shastri SS, Mittra I, Mishra GA, et al. . Effect of VIA screening by primary health workers: randomized controlled study in Mumbai, India. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106:dju009. 10.1093/jnci/dju009
    1. Elwood JM, Cox B, Richardson AK. The effectiveness of breast cancer screening by mammography in younger women. Online J Curr Clin Trials 1993;Doc No 32:23,227 , 195.
    1. Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002;359:909-19. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08020-0
    1. Retsky M, Demicheli R, Hrushesky W. Breast cancer screening: controversies and future directions. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003;15:1-8. 10.1097/00001703-200302000-00001
    1. Horeweg N, van Klaveren RJ, Groen HJ, et al. . Blinded and uniform cause of death verification in a lung cancer CT screening trial. Lung Cancer 2012;77:522-5. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.04.018
    1. Marcus PM, Gareen IF, Miller AB, et al. . The National Lung Screening Trial’s endpoint verification process: determining the cause of death. Contemp Clin Trials 2011;32:834-40. 10.1016/j.cct.2011.07.003

Source: PubMed

3
購読する