Nurse clinic versus home delivery of evidence-based community leg ulcer care: a randomized health services trial

Margaret B Harrison, Ian D Graham, Karen Lorimer, Elizabeth Vandenkerkhof, Maureen Buchanan, Phil S Wells, Tim Brandys, Tadeusz Pierscianowski, Margaret B Harrison, Ian D Graham, Karen Lorimer, Elizabeth Vandenkerkhof, Maureen Buchanan, Phil S Wells, Tim Brandys, Tadeusz Pierscianowski

Abstract

Background: International studies report that nurse clinics improve healing rates for the leg ulcer population. However, these studies did not necessarily deliver similar standards of care based on evidence in the treatment venues (home and clinic). A rigorous evaluation of home versus clinic care is required to determine healing rates with equivalent care and establish the acceptability of clinic-delivered care.

Methods: Health Services RCT was conducted where mobile individuals were allocated to either home or nurse clinic for leg ulcer management. In both arms, care was delivered by specially trained nurses, following an evidence protocol.

Primary outcome: 3-month healing rates.

Secondary outcomes: durability of healing (recurrence), time free of ulcers, HRQL, satisfaction, resource use. Data were collected at base-line, every 3 months until healing occurred, with 1 year follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Results: 126 participants, 65 randomized to receive care in their homes, 61 to nurse-run clinics. No differences found between groups at baseline on socio-demographic, HRQL or clinical characteristics. mean age 69 years, 68% females, 84% English-speaking, half with previous episode of ulceration, 60% ulcers at inclusion < 5 cm2 for < 6 months. No differences in 3-month healing rates: clinic 58.3% compared to home care at 56.7% (p = 0.5) or in secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that organization of care not the setting where care is delivered influences healing rates. Key factors are a system that supports delivery of evidence-based recommendations with care being provided by a trained nursing team resulting in equivalent healing rates, HRQL whether care is delivered in the home or in a community nurse-led clinic.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System: NCT00656383.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of population with leg ulcers and eligible pool for clinic vs home trial.

References

    1. Andersson E, Hansson C, Swanbeck G. Leg and foot ulcer prevalence and investigation of the peripheral arterial and venous circulation in a randomised elderly population. An epidemiological survey and clinical investigation. Acta Derm Venereol. 1993;73:57–61.
    1. Baker SR, Stacey MC, Jopp-McKay AG, Hoskin SE, Thomspon PJ. Epidemiology of chronic venous ulcers. British Journal of Surgery. 1991;78:864–7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780729.
    1. Callam MJ, Harper DR, Dale JJ, Ruckley CV. Chronic ulcer of the leg: clinical history. British Medical Journal. 1987;294:1389–91.
    1. Cornwall JV, Dore CJ, Lewis JD. Leg ulcers: epidemiology and aetiology. British Journal of Surgery. 1986;73:693–6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800730905.
    1. Graham ID, Harrison MD, Nelson EA, Lorimer K, Fisher A. A systematic review of prevalence studies of lower limb ulceration. Advance Skin Wound Care. 2003;16:305–16. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200311000-00013.
    1. Franks P, McCullagh L, Moffatt CJ. Assessing quality of life with chronic venous leg ulceration using the MEdical Outcomes Short Form-36 questionnaire. Ostomy Wound Management. 2003;49:26–37.
    1. Jull A, Walker A, Hackett M, et al. Leg Ulceration and perceived health: A population base case-control study. Age Aging. 2004;33:236–41. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh087.
    1. Korn P, Patel S, Heller J, et al. Why insurers should reimburse patients for compression stocking in patients with chronic venous stasis. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2002;35:950–7. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.121984.
    1. Laing W. Chronic venous diseases of the leg. London UK, Office of Health Economics; 1992. Ref Type: Generic.
    1. Walters SJ, Morell CJ, Dixon S. Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with venous leg ulcers. Quality of Life Research. 1999;8:327–36. doi: 10.1023/A:1008992006845.
    1. Castineira F, Fisher H, Coleman D, Grace PA, Burke P. The Limerick Leg ulcer project: Early results. Irish Journal of Medical Science. 1999;168:17–20. doi: 10.1007/BF02939574.
    1. Lambourne L, Moffat C. Clinical audit and effective changes in leg ulcer service. Journal of Wound Care. 1996;5:348–52.
    1. Moffat CJ, Franks PJ, Oldroyd MI, et al. Community clinics for leg ulcers and impact on healing. British Medical Journal. 1992;305:1389–92.
    1. Morrell CJ, Walters SJ, Dixon S, et al. Cost effectiveness of community leg ulcer clinics: Randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal. 1998;316:1487–91.
    1. Scriven JM, Hartshorne T, Bell PRF, Naylor AR, London NJM. Single-visit venous ulcer assessment clinic: The first year. British Journal of Surgery. 1997;84:334–6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800840319.
    1. Simon DA, Freak L, Kinsella A, et al. Community leg ulcer clinics: A comparative study in two health authorities. British Medical Journal. 1996;312:1648–51.
    1. Stevens J, Franks P, Harrington M. A community/hosptial leg ulcer service. Journal of Wound Care. 1997;6:62–8.
    1. Moffatt CJ, Oldroyd MI. A pioneering service to the community: The Riverside Community Leg Ulcer Project. Prof Nurse. 1994;9:486–490 passim.
    1. Hampton S, Lindsay E. Empowering patients to take control of leg ulcer treatment through individualised management. Journal of Wound Care. 2005;14:238–40.
    1. Harrison MB, Graham ID, Lorimer K, Friedberg E, Pierscianowski T, Brandys T. Leg-ulcer care in the community, before and after implementation of an evidence-based service. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2005;172:1447–52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041441.
    1. Graham ID, Harrison MD, Brouwers M. Evaluating and adapting practice guidelines for local use: A conceptual framework. In: Pickering S, Thompson J, editor. Clinical Governance in Practice. London: Harcourt Publishers; 2003.
    1. Graham ID, Lorimer K, Harrison MB, Pierscianowski T. Evaluating the quality of international clinical practice guidelines for leg ulcers: Preparing for a Canadian adaptation. Canadian Association of Enterostomal Therapy Journal. 2000;19:15–31.
    1. Graham ID, Harrison MB. Evaluation and adaptation of clinical practice guidelines. Evidence Based Nursing. 2005;8:68–72. doi: 10.1136/ebn.8.3.68.
    1. Cluzeau FA, Littlejohns P, Grimshaw JM, Feder G, Moran SE. Development and application of a generic methodologyto assess the quality of clinical guidelines. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 1999;11:21–8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.1.21.
    1. The AGREE Research Trust website. WWW. 2007.
    1. Graham ID, Harrison MB, Shafey M, Keast D. Involving family physicians in evidence-based planning for community leg ulcer care: The results of two surveys. Canadian Family Physician. 2001.
    1. Graham ID, Harrison MB, Moffat C, Franks P. Leg ulcer care: Nursing attitudes and knowledge. Canadian Nurse. 2001;97:19–24.
    1. Graham ID, Harrison MB, Lorimer K, et al. Adapting National and International leg ulcer practice guidelines for local use: The Ontario Leg Ulcer Community Care Protocol. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2005;18:307–18. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200507000-00011.
    1. Gilliss CL, Kulkin IL. Monitoring nursing interventions and data collection in a randomized clinical trial. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1991;13:416–22. doi: 10.1177/019394599101300312.
    1. Kirchhoff KT, Dille CA. Issues in intervention research: Maintaining integrity. Applied Nursing Research. 1994;7:32–8. doi: 10.1016/0897-1897(94)90018-3.
    1. Rabeneck L, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RJ. Problems in the conduct and analysis of randomized clinical trials. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1992;152:507–12. doi: 10.1001/archinte.152.3.507.
    1. Edwards H, Courtney M, Finlayson K, et al. Chronic venous leg ulcers: effect of a community nursing intervention on pain and healing. Nurs Stand. 2005;19:47–54.
    1. RCN Institute. Clinical Practice Guidelines . The management of patients with venous leg ulcers. Recommendations for assessment, compression therapy, cleansing, debridgement, dressing, contact sensitivity, training/education and quality assurance. York, UK: Centre for Evidence Based Nursing, University of York; 1998.
    1. SIGN Quick Reference Guide Chronic Leg Ulcer Guideline: The care of patients with chronic leg ulcer. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. 1998. p. qrg26.
    1. Ahroni JH, Boyko EJ, Pecoraro RE. Reliability of computerized wound surface area determinations. Wounds: A compendium of clinical research and practice. 1992;4:133–7.
    1. Etris MB, Pribble J, LaBrecque J. Evaluation of two wound measurement methods in a multicenter, controlled study. Ostomy Wound Management. 1994;315:576–80.
    1. Liskay AM, Mion LC, Davis BR. Comparison of two devices for wound measurement. Dermatology Nursing. 1993;5:437–40.
    1. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1:277–99. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5.
    1. Melzack R. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30:191–7. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8.
    1. Melzack R, Katz J. The McGill pain questionnaire: Appraisal and current status. In: Turk DC, Melzack R, editor. Handbook of Pain Assessment. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1992. pp. 152–68.
    1. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey – construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–3. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
    1. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, et al. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? Journal of Public Health Medicine. 1997;19:179–96.
    1. Nemeth KA, Graham ID, Harrison MB. The measurement of leg ulcer pain: Identification and appraisal of pain assessment tools. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2003;16:260–7. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200309000-00017.
    1. Nemeth KA, Harrison MB, Graham ID, Burke S. Pain in pure and mixed aetiology venous leg ulcers: a three-phase point prevalence study. Journal of Wound Care. 2003;12:336–40.
    1. Walters SJ, Morrell CJ, Dixon S. Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with venous leg ulcers. Qual Life Res. 1999;8:327–336. doi: 10.1023/A:1008992006845.
    1. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, et al. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? Journal of Public Health Medicine. 1997;19:179–96.
    1. Hopman WM, Towheed T, Anastassiades T, et al. Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2000;163:265–71.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する