School-based programs to reduce sexual risk behaviors: a review of effectiveness

D Kirby, L Short, J Collins, D Rugg, L Kolbe, M Howard, B Miller, F Sonenstein, L S Zabin, D Kirby, L Short, J Collins, D Rugg, L Kolbe, M Howard, B Miller, F Sonenstein, L S Zabin

Abstract

This review was undertaken in recognition of the mounting public health and social problems associated with adolescent sexual behavior and the importance of basing school-affiliated programs designed to reduce sexual risk-taking behavior on sound research. The authors were commissioned by the Division of Adolescent and School Health within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Service, to review carefully the research on these programs and to assess their impact on behavior. The authors identified 23 studies of school-based programs that were published in professional journals and measured program impact on behavior. They then summarized the results of those studies, identifying the distinguishing characteristics of effective programs, and citing important research questions to be addressed in the future. Not all sex and AIDS education programs had significant effects on adolescent sexual risk-taking behavior, but specific programs did delay the initiation of intercourse, reduce the frequency of intercourse, reduce the number of sexual partners, or increase the use of condoms or other contraceptives. These effective programs have the potential to reduce exposure to unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease, including HIV infection. These programs should be replicated widely in U.S. schools. Additional research is needed to improve the effectiveness of programs and to clarify the most important characteristics of effective programs.

References

    1. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1993 Aug 13;42(3):1-11
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1990 Nov-Dec;22(6):252-5
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1986 Jul-Aug;18(4):162-70
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1993 Jan-Feb;25(1):12-6
    1. Nature. 1988 Jun 9;333(6173):514-9
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1980 Jan-Feb;12(1):6-7,11-4
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1991 Nov-Dec;23(6):253-63
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1982 May-Jun;14(3):117-26
    1. Public Health Rep. 1993 Nov-Dec;108(6):680-94
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Nov 15;134(10):1159-66
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1989 Mar-Apr;21(2):65-72
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1986 May-Jun;18(3):119-26
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1992 May-Jun;24(3):100-6
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1990 Nov-Dec;22(6):261-71
    1. J Sch Health. 1983 May;53(5):294-302
    1. SIECUS Rep. 1990 Jan;18(2):1-9
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1989 Mar-Apr;21(2):85-8
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1991 Jan-Feb;23(1):6-16
    1. J Sch Health. 1992 Sep;62(7):310-8
    1. Adolesc Med. 1992 Jun;3(2):181-194
    1. JAMA. 1987 Jun 26;257(24):3382-6
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1990 Jan-Feb;22(1):21-6
    1. JAMA. 1993 Aug 11;270(6):725-30
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1988 Jul-Aug;20(4):182-7
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1986 Jul-Aug;18(4):151-62
    1. Am J Public Health. 1985 Nov;75(11):1331-2

Source: PubMed

3
購読する