Circulating platelet-derived extracellular vesicles are decreased after remote ischemic preconditioning in patients with coronary disease: A randomized controlled trial

Caroline J Reddel, Gabrielle J Pennings, Jerrett K Lau, Vivien M Chen, Leonard Kritharides, Caroline J Reddel, Gabrielle J Pennings, Jerrett K Lau, Vivien M Chen, Leonard Kritharides

Abstract

Background: Brief nonharmful ischemia, remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been proposed to confer benefit to patients with coronary artery disease via unknown mechanisms.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the effect of RIPC on circulating levels of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and global coagulation and fibrinolytic factors in patients with coronary disease.

Patients/methods: Blood samples were taken from 60 patients presenting for coronary angiography enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial before and after RIPC (3 × 5 min administration of 200 mmHg sphygmomanometer on the arm, n = 31) or sham (n = 29) treatment. Most patients (n = 48) had significant coronary artery disease and all were taking at least one antiplatelet agent.

Results: Remote ischemic preconditioning significantly decreased circulating levels of EVs expressing platelet markers CD41 and CD61 detected by flow cytometry in plasma, whereas no such effect was found on EVs expressing phosphatidylserine, CD62P, CD45, CD11b, CD144, CD31+ /CD41- , or CD235a. RIPC had no effect on the overall hemostatic potential assay or circulating antigen levels of tissue plasminogen activator, urokinase, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, or plasminogen. Sham treatment had no effect on any studied parameter. Statin use inhibited the effect of RIPC on CD61+ EVs, diabetes modified the effect of RIPC on CD45+ and CD11b+ EVs, and hypertension modified the effect of RIPC on CD235a+ EVs.

Conclusions: Remote ischemic preconditioning decreased circulating levels of platelet-derived EVs in patients with coronary disease taking conventional antiplatelet therapy. This may reflect increased EV clearance/uptake or change in production. Clinical variables may alter the effectiveness of RIPC.

Keywords: blood coagulation; coronary artery disease; extracellular vesicles; fibrinolysis; ischemic preconditioning.

© 2021 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

References

REFERENCES

    1. Lau JK, Pennings GJ, Yong A, Kritharides L. Cardiac remote ischaemic preconditioning: mechanistic and clinical considerations. Heart Lung Circ. 2017;26(6):545-553.
    1. Zhao W, Meng R, Ma C, et al. Safety and efficacy of remote ischemic preconditioning in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis before carotid artery stenting: a proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2017;135(14):1325-1335.
    1. Hausenloy DJ, Kharbanda RK, Møller UK, et al. Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI): a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10207):1415-1424.
    1. Wolf P. The nature and significance of platelet products in human plasma. Br J Haematol. 1967;13(3):269-288.
    1. Minghua W, Zhijian G, Chahua H, et al. Plasma exosomes induced by remote ischaemic preconditioning attenuate myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury by transferring miR-24. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(3):320.
    1. Davidson SM, Riquelme JA, Zheng Y, Vicencio JM, Lavandero S, Yellon DM. Endothelial cells release cardioprotective exosomes that may contribute to ischaemic preconditioning. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15885.
    1. Shan LY, Li JZ, Zu LY, et al. Platelet-derived microparticles are implicated in remote ischemia conditioning in a rat model of cerebral infarction. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2013;19(12):917-925.
    1. Ma F, Liu H, Shen Y, Zhang Y, Pan S. Platelet-derived microvesicles are involved in cardio-protective effects of remote preconditioning. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(9):10832-10839.
    1. Liu M, Wang YL, Shang M, et al. Flow cytometric analysis of circulating microvesicles derived from myocardial Ischemic preconditioning and cardioprotection of Ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi. 2015;31(6):524-531.
    1. Giricz Z, Varga ZV, Baranyai T, et al. Cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning of the rat heart is mediated by extracellular vesicles. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;68:75-78.
    1. Frey UH, Klaassen M, Ochsenfarth C, et al. Remote ischaemic preconditioning increases serum extracellular vesicle concentrations with altered micro-RNA signature in CABG patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63(4):483-492.
    1. Li J, Rohailla S, Gelber N, et al. MicroRNA-144 is a circulating effector of remote ischemic preconditioning. Basic Res Cardiol. 2014;109(5):423.
    1. Jeanneteau J, Hibert P, Martinez MC, et al. Microparticle release in remote ischemic conditioning mechanism. Am J Physiol Heart Circ. 2012;303(7):H871-H877.
    1. Meng R, Ding Y, Asmaro K, et al. Ischemic conditioning is safe and effective for octo- and nonagenarians in stroke prevention and treatment. Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12(3):667-677.
    1. Mayor F, Bilgin-Freiert A, Connolly M, et al. Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on the coagulation profile of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a case-control study. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(5):808-815.
    1. Pryds K, Kristiansen J, Neergaard-Petersen S, et al. Effect of long-term remote ischaemic conditioning on platelet function and fibrinolysis in patients with chronic ischaemic heart failure. Thromb Res. 2017;153:40-46.
    1. Kristiansen J, Grove EL, Rise N, et al. Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on coagulation and fibrinolysis. Thromb Res. 2016;141:129-135.
    1. Reddel CJ, Allen JD, Ehteda A, et al. Increased thrombin generation in a mouse model of cancer cachexia is partially interleukin-6 dependent. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15(3):477-486.
    1. Reddel CJ, Pennings GJ, Curnow JL, Chen VM, Kritharides L. Procoagulant effects of low-level platelet activation and its inhibition by colchicine. Thromb Haemost. 2018;118(4):723-733.
    1. Reddel CJ, Curnow JL, Voitl J, et al. Detection of hypofibrinolysis in stable coronary artery disease using the overall haemostatic potential assay. Thromb Res. 2013;131(5):457-462.
    1. Lau JK, Pennings GJ, Reddel CJ, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning inhibits platelet alphaIIb beta3 activation in coronary artery disease patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomized trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(5):1221-1232.
    1. Lau JK, Roy P, Javadzadegan A, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning acutely improves coronary microcirculatory function. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(19):e009058.
    1. Boulanger CM, Loyer X, Rautou PE, Amabile N. Extracellular vesicles in coronary artery disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14(5):259-272.
    1. Cho YJ, Nam K, Yoo SJ, et al. Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on platelet activation and reactivity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized controlled trial. Platelets. 2020, Dec 13 (Online ahead of print). 1-9.
    1. Lanza GA, Stazi A, Villano A, et al. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on platelet activation induced by coronary procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117(3):359-365.
    1. Stazi A, Scalone G, Laurito M, et al. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on platelet activation and reactivity induced by ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2014;129(1):11-17.
    1. Xu X, Zhou Y, Luo S, et al. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning in the elderly patients with coronary artery disease with diabetes mellitus undergoing elective drug-eluting stent implantation. Angiology. 2014;65(8):660-666.
    1. Lacroix R, Plawinski L, Robert S, et al. Leukocyte- and endothelial-derived microparticles: a circulating source for fibrinolysis. Haematologica. 2012;97(12):1864-1872.
    1. Pasalic L, Williams R, Siupa A, Campbell H, Henderson MJ, Chen VMY. Enumeration of extracellular vesicles by a new improved flow cytometric method is comparable to fluorescence mode nanoparticle tracking analysis. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2016;12(4):977-986.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する