Cardiovascular Benefit of Empagliflozin Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial

Silvio E Inzucchi, Kamlesh Khunti, David H Fitchett, Christoph Wanner, Michaela Mattheus, Jyothis T George, Anne Pernille Ofstad, Bernard Zinman, Silvio E Inzucchi, Kamlesh Khunti, David H Fitchett, Christoph Wanner, Michaela Mattheus, Jyothis T George, Anne Pernille Ofstad, Bernard Zinman

Abstract

Context: Control of multiple cardiovascular (CV) risk factors reduces CV events in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Objective: To investigate this association in a contemporary clinical trial population, including how CV risk factor control affects the CV benefits of empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.

Design: Post hoc analysis.

Setting: Randomized CV outcome trial (EMPA-REG OUTCOME).

Participants: Type 2 diabetes patients with established CV disease.

Intervention: Empagliflozin or placebo.

Main outcome measures: Risk of CV outcomes-including the treatment effect of empagliflozin-by achieving 7 goals for CV risk factor control at baseline: (1) glycated hemoglobin <7.5%, (2) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL or statin use, (3) systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, (4) pharmacological renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade, (5) normoalbuminuria, (6) aspirin use, (7) nonsmoking.

Results: In the placebo group, the hazard ratio (HR) for CV death was 4.00 (95% CI, 2.26-7.11) and 2.48 (95% CI, 1.52-4.06) for patients achieving only 0-3 or 4-5 risk factor goals at baseline, respectively, compared with those achieving 6-7 goals. Participants achieving 0-3 or 4-5 goals also had increased risk for the composite outcome of hospitalization for heart failure or CV death (excluding fatal stroke) (HR 2.89 [1.82-4.57] and 1.90 [1.31-2.78], respectively) and 3-point major adverse CV events (HR 2.21 [1.53-3.19] and 1.42 [1.06-1.89]). Empagliflozin significantly reduced these outcomes across all risk factor control categories (P > 0.05 for treatment-by-subgroup interactions).

Conclusions: Cardiovascular risk in EMPA-REG OUTCOME was inversely associated with baseline CV risk factor control. Empagliflozin's cardioprotective effect was consistent regardless of multiple baseline risk factor control.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01131676.

Keywords: cardioprotective; cardiovascular disease; type 2 diabetes.

© Endocrine Society 2020.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CV risk factor control at baseline in EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Data on attainment of CV risk factor goals at baseline were unavailable for 85 patients (66 empagliflozin and 19 placebo) (1.2%). *glycated hemoglobin

Figure 2.

Risk of CV outcomes in…

Figure 2.

Risk of CV outcomes in the placebo group by achievement of CV risk…

Figure 2.
Risk of CV outcomes in the placebo group by achievement of CV risk factor goals at baseline: HbA1c

Figure 3.

Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo…

Figure 3.

Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV outcomes across subgroups of achievement of…

Figure 3.
Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV outcomes across subgroups of achievement of CV risk factor goals at baseline: HbA1c P-value relates to test of homogeneity of treatment group differences among subgroups (test for treatment by subgroup interaction) without adjustment for multiple testing. †Excludes fatal stroke.

Figure 4.

Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo…

Figure 4.

Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV outcomes overall and adjusted for control…

Figure 4.
Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV outcomes overall and adjusted for control of HbA1c (†Excludes fatal stroke.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. American Diabetes Association. 10. cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes – 2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S103–S123. - PubMed
    1. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, et al. . 2019 ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(2):255–323. - PubMed
    1. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Framingham study. JAMA. 1979;241(19):2035–2038. - PubMed
    1. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(4):229–234. - PubMed
    1. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, et al. . Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2215–2222. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 70 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Risk of CV outcomes in the placebo group by achievement of CV risk factor goals at baseline: HbA1c

Figure 3.

Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo…

Figure 3.

Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV outcomes across subgroups of achievement of…

Figure 3.
Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV outcomes across subgroups of achievement of CV risk factor goals at baseline: HbA1c P-value relates to test of homogeneity of treatment group differences among subgroups (test for treatment by subgroup interaction) without adjustment for multiple testing. †Excludes fatal stroke.

Figure 4.

Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo…

Figure 4.

Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV outcomes overall and adjusted for control…

Figure 4.
Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV outcomes overall and adjusted for control of HbA1c (†Excludes fatal stroke.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV outcomes across subgroups of achievement of CV risk factor goals at baseline: HbA1c P-value relates to test of homogeneity of treatment group differences among subgroups (test for treatment by subgroup interaction) without adjustment for multiple testing. †Excludes fatal stroke.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on CV outcomes overall and adjusted for control of HbA1c (†Excludes fatal stroke.

References

    1. American Diabetes Association. 10. cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes – 2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S103–S123.
    1. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, et al. . 2019 ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(2):255–323.
    1. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Framingham study. JAMA. 1979;241(19):2035–2038.
    1. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(4):229–234.
    1. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, et al. . Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2215–2222.
    1. Raghavan S, Vassy JL, Ho YL, et al. . Diabetes mellitus-related all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a national cohort of adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(4):e011295.
    1. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(5):383–393.
    1. Griffin SJ, Borch-Johnsen K, Davies MJ, et al. . Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9786):156–167.
    1. Ueki K, Sasako T, Okazaki Y, et al. ; J-DOIT3 Study Group Effect of an intensified multifactorial intervention on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in type 2 diabetes (J-DOIT3): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(12):951–964.
    1. Stratton IM, Cull CA, Adler AI, Matthews DR, Neil HA, Holman RR. Additive effects of glycaemia and blood pressure exposure on risk of complications in type 2 diabetes: a prospective observational study (UKPDS 75). Diabetologia. 2006;49(8):1761–1769.
    1. Cederholm J, Zethelius B, Nilsson PM, Eeg-Olofsson K, Eliasson B, Gudbjörnsdottir S; Swedish National Diabetes Register Effect of tight control of HbA1c and blood pressure on cardiovascular diseases in type 2 diabetes: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR). Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;86(1):74–81.
    1. Zoungas S, de Galan BE, Ninomiya T, et al. ; ADVANCE Collaborative Group Combined effects of routine blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: New results from the ADVANCE trial. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(11):2068–2074.
    1. Gudbjörnsdottir S, Eliasson B, Eeg-Olofsson K, Zethelius B, Cederholm J; National Diabetes Register (NDR) Additive effects of glycaemia and dyslipidaemia on risk of cardiovascular diseases in type 2 diabetes: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register. Diabetologia. 2011;54(10):2544–2551.
    1. Nichols GA, Joshua-Gotlib S, Parasuraman S. Independent contribution of A1C, systolic blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol control to risk of cardiovascular disease hospitalizations in type 2 diabetes: an observational cohort study. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(5):691–697.
    1. Bittner V, Bertolet M, Barraza Felix R, et al. ; Group BDS Comprehensive cardiovascular risk factor control improves survival: The BARI 2D trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(7):765–773.
    1. Hamada S, Gulliford MC. Multiple risk factor control, mortality and cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(5):e019950.
    1. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzen S, et al. . Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(7):633–644.
    1. Pagidipati NJ, Navar AM, Pieper KS, et al. ; TECOS Study Group Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: international insights from the TECOS trial (Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes With Sitagliptin). Circulation. 2017;136(13):1193–1203.
    1. Khunti K, Kosiborod M, Ray KK. Legacy benefits of blood glucose, blood pressure and lipid control in individuals with diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Time to overcome multifactorial therapeutic inertia? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(6):1337–1341.
    1. McMurray JJ, Gerstein HC, Holman RR, Pfeffer MA. Heart failure: a cardiovascular outcome in diabetes that can no longer be ignored. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(10):843–851.
    1. Juhaeri J, Gao S, Dai WS. Incidence rates of heart failure, stroke, and acute myocardial infarction among Type 2 diabetic patients using insulin glargine and other insulin. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(6):497–503.
    1. Dinesh Shah A, Langenberg C, et al. . Type 2 diabetes and incidence of a wide range of cardiovascular diseases: a cohort study in 1.9 million people. Lancet. 2015. (Suppl 1);385(Suppl 1):S86.
    1. Cavender MA, Steg PG, Smith SC Jr, et al. ; REACH Registry Investigators Impact of diabetes mellitus on hospitalization for heart failure, cardiovascular events, and death: outcomes at 4 years from the reduction of atherothrombosis for continued health (REACH) registry. Circulation. 2015;132(10):923–931.
    1. McAllister DA, Read SH, Kerssens J, et al. . Incidence of hospitalization for heart failure and case-fatality among 3.25 million people with and without diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2018;138(24):2774–2786.
    1. Mosca L, Barrett-Connor E, Wenger NK. Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: what a difference a decade makes. Circulation. 2011;124(19):2145–2154.
    1. Hyun KK, Redfern J, Patel A, et al. . Gender inequalities in cardiovascular risk factor assessment and management in primary healthcare. Heart. 2017;103(7):492–498.
    1. Johansson I, Dahlström U, Edner M, Näsman P, Rydén L, Norhammar A. Risk factors, treatment and prognosis in men and women with heart failure with and without diabetes. Heart. 2015;101(14):1139–1148.
    1. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–2128.
    1. Zinman B, Inzucchi SE, Wanner C, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME® investigators Empagliflozin in women with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease - an analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME®. Diabetologia. 2018;61(7):1522–1527.
    1. Zinman B, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. . Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of a randomized, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trial of empagliflozin (EMPA-REG OUTCOME™). Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:102.
    1. Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(6):580–591.
    1. Gæde P, Oellgaard J, Carstensen B, et al. . Years of life gained by multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: 21 years follow-up on the Steno-2 randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2016;59(11):2298–2307.
    1. Oellgaard J, Gæde P, Rossing P, et al. . Reduced risk of heart failure with intensified multifactorial intervention in individuals with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria: 21 years of follow-up in the randomised Steno-2 study. Diabetologia. 2018;61(8):1724–1733.
    1. Gæde P, Oellgaard J, Kruuse C, Rossing P, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Beneficial impact of intensified multifactorial intervention on risk of stroke: outcome of 21 years of follow-up in the randomised Steno-2 Study. Diabetologia. 2019;62(9):1575–1580.
    1. Bajaj H, Zinman B. Diabetes: Steno-2 - a small study with a big heart. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12(12):692-694.
    1. Griffin SJ, Rutten GEHM, Khunti K, et al. . Long-term effects of intensive multifactorial therapy in individuals with screen-detected type 2 diabetes in primary care: 10-year follow-up of the ADDITION-Europe cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(12):925–937.
    1. Crasto W, Morrison AE, Gray LJ, et al. . The Microalbuminuria Education Medication and Optimisation (MEMO) study: 4 years follow-up of multifactorial intervention in high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2020;37(2):286–297.
    1. Rana JS, Liu JY, Moffet HH, Jaffe M, Karter AJ. Diabetes and prior coronary heart disease are not necessarily risk equivalent for future coronary heart disease events. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(4):387–393.
    1. Mondesir FL, Brown TM, Muntner P, et al. . Diabetes, diabetes severity, and coronary heart disease risk equivalence: REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS). Am Heart J. 2016;181:43–51.
    1. Hernandez AV, Usmani A, RaJAMAnickam A, Moheet A. Thiazolidinediones and risk of heart failure in patients with or at high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2011;11(2):115–128.
    1. Singh S, Loke YK, Furberg CD. Thiazolidinediones and heart failure: a teleo-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(8):2148–2153.
    1. Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. ; SAVOR-TIMI 53 Steering Committee and Investigators Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1317–1326.
    1. Zelniker TA, Wiviott SD, Raz I, et al. . SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet. 2019;393(10166):31–39.
    1. Ofstad AP, Johansen OE, Gullestad L, et al. . Neutral impact on systolic and diastolic cardiac function of 2 years of intensified multi-intervention in type 2 diabetes: the randomized controlled Asker and Bærum Cardiovascular Diabetes (ABCD) study. Am Heart J. 2014;168(3):280–288.e2.
    1. Castagno D, Baird-Gunning J, Jhund PS, et al. . Intensive glycemic control has no impact on the risk of heart failure in type 2 diabetic patients: evidence from a 37,229 patient meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2011;162(5):938–948.e2.
    1. Lee MMY, Sattar N, McMurray JJV, Packard CJ. Statins in the prevention and treatment of heart failure: a review of the evidence. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019;21(10):41.
    1. Verma S, Mazer CD, Fitchett D, et al. . Empagliflozin reduces cardiovascular events, mortality and renal events in participants with type 2 diabetes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: subanalysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME(R) randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2018;61(18):1712–1723.
    1. Fitchett D, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators Cardiovascular mortality reduction with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(3):364–367.
    1. Verma S, Mazer CD, Al-Omran M, et al. . Cardiovascular outcomes and safety of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral artery disease: a subanalysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME. Circulation. 2018;137:405–407.
    1. Fitchett D, Zinman B, Wanner C, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial investigators Heart failure outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk: results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(19):1526–1534.
    1. Wanner C, Lachin JM, Inzucchi SE, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators Empagliflozin and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, established cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease. Circulation. 2018;137(2):119–129.
    1. Verma S, Wanner C, Zwiener I, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators Influence of microvascular disease on cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(21):2780–2782.
    1. Fitchett D, Inzucchi SE, Cannon CP, et al. . Empagliflozin reduced mortality and hospitalization for heart failure across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Circulation. 2019;139(11):1384–1395.
    1. Fitchett D, Butler J, van de Borne P, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial investigators Effects of empagliflozin on risk for cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization across the spectrum of heart failure risk in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(5):363–370.
    1. Monteiro P, Bergenstal RM, Toural E, et al. . Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in older patients in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial. Age Ageing. 2019;48(6):859–866.
    1. Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod M, Fitchett D, et al. . Improvement in cardiovascular outcomes with empagliflozin is independent of glycemic control. Circulation. 2018;138(17):1904–1907.
    1. Fitchett D, Inzucchi SE, Wanner C, et al. . Relationship between hypoglycaemia, cardiovascular outcomes, and empagliflozin treatment in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(2):209–217.
    1. Heise T, Jordan J, Wanner C, et al. . Acute pharmacodynamic effects of empagliflozin with and without diuretic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2016;38(10):2248–2264 e5.
    1. Heise T, Jordan J, Wanner C, et al. . Pharmacodynamic effects of single and multiple doses of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Ther. 2016;38(10):2265–2276.
    1. Schou M, Gullestad L, Fitchett D, et al. . Empagliflozin exerts short- and long-term effects on plasma volume in patients with type 2 diabetes: insight from EMPA-REG OUTCOME. Circulation. 2017;136(suppl 1):A15997 (abstr).
    1. Inzucchi SE, Zinman B, Fitchett D, et al. . How does empagliflozin reduce cardiovascular mortality? Insights from a mediation analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(2):356–363.
    1. Chilton RJ, Gullestad L, Fitchett D, et al. . Empagliflozin reduces markers of arterial stiffness, vascular resistance and cardiac workload in EMPA-REG OUTCOME. Circulation. 2016;134(suppl 1):A13520.
    1. Bell RM, Yellon DM. SGLT2 inhibitors: hypotheses on the mechanism of cardiovascular protection. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(6):435–437.
    1. Verma S, McMurray JJV. SGLT2 inhibitors and mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit: a state-of-the-art review. Diabetologia. 2018;61(10):2108–2117.
    1. Coleman RL, Gray AM, Broedl UC, et al. . Can the cardiovascular risk reductions observed with empagliflozin in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial be explained by concomitant changes seen in conventional cardiovascular risk factor levels? Diabetes Obes Metab 2020;22(7):1151–1156.
    1. McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, et al. ; DAPA-HF Trial Committees and Investigators Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):1995–2008.
    1. Fan W, Song Y, Inzucchi SE, et al. . Composite cardiovascular risk factor target achievement and its predictors in US adults with diabetes: the Diabetes Collaborative Registry. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(5):1121–1127.
    1. Gomes MB, Charbonnel B, Cid-Ruzafa J, et al. . Glycaemic, lipid and blood pressure control according to guidelines in patients initiating second-line glucose-lowering therapy: results from the global DISCOVER study. Diabetologia. 2017;60(suppl 1):S140–S140.
    1. Khunti K, Ceriello A, Cos X, De Block C. Achievement of guideline targets for blood pressure, lipid, and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;137:137–148.
    1. Saposnik G, Goodman SG, Leiter LA, et al. . Applying the evidence: do patients with stroke, coronary artery disease, or both achieve similar treatment goals? Stroke. 2009;40(4):1417–1424.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する