Cardiovascular Benefit of Empagliflozin Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial
Silvio E Inzucchi, Kamlesh Khunti, David H Fitchett, Christoph Wanner, Michaela Mattheus, Jyothis T George, Anne Pernille Ofstad, Bernard Zinman, Silvio E Inzucchi, Kamlesh Khunti, David H Fitchett, Christoph Wanner, Michaela Mattheus, Jyothis T George, Anne Pernille Ofstad, Bernard Zinman
Abstract
Context: Control of multiple cardiovascular (CV) risk factors reduces CV events in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Objective: To investigate this association in a contemporary clinical trial population, including how CV risk factor control affects the CV benefits of empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.
Design: Post hoc analysis.
Setting: Randomized CV outcome trial (EMPA-REG OUTCOME).
Participants: Type 2 diabetes patients with established CV disease.
Intervention: Empagliflozin or placebo.
Main outcome measures: Risk of CV outcomes-including the treatment effect of empagliflozin-by achieving 7 goals for CV risk factor control at baseline: (1) glycated hemoglobin <7.5%, (2) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL or statin use, (3) systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, (4) pharmacological renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade, (5) normoalbuminuria, (6) aspirin use, (7) nonsmoking.
Results: In the placebo group, the hazard ratio (HR) for CV death was 4.00 (95% CI, 2.26-7.11) and 2.48 (95% CI, 1.52-4.06) for patients achieving only 0-3 or 4-5 risk factor goals at baseline, respectively, compared with those achieving 6-7 goals. Participants achieving 0-3 or 4-5 goals also had increased risk for the composite outcome of hospitalization for heart failure or CV death (excluding fatal stroke) (HR 2.89 [1.82-4.57] and 1.90 [1.31-2.78], respectively) and 3-point major adverse CV events (HR 2.21 [1.53-3.19] and 1.42 [1.06-1.89]). Empagliflozin significantly reduced these outcomes across all risk factor control categories (P > 0.05 for treatment-by-subgroup interactions).
Conclusions: Cardiovascular risk in EMPA-REG OUTCOME was inversely associated with baseline CV risk factor control. Empagliflozin's cardioprotective effect was consistent regardless of multiple baseline risk factor control.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01131676.
Keywords: cardioprotective; cardiovascular disease; type 2 diabetes.
© Endocrine Society 2020.
Figures
References
- American Diabetes Association. 10. cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes – 2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S103–S123.
- Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, et al. . 2019 ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(2):255–323.
- Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Framingham study. JAMA. 1979;241(19):2035–2038.
- Haffner SM, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(4):229–234.
- Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, et al. . Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2215–2222.
- Raghavan S, Vassy JL, Ho YL, et al. . Diabetes mellitus-related all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a national cohort of adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(4):e011295.
- Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(5):383–393.
- Griffin SJ, Borch-Johnsen K, Davies MJ, et al. . Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9786):156–167.
- Ueki K, Sasako T, Okazaki Y, et al. ; J-DOIT3 Study Group Effect of an intensified multifactorial intervention on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in type 2 diabetes (J-DOIT3): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(12):951–964.
- Stratton IM, Cull CA, Adler AI, Matthews DR, Neil HA, Holman RR. Additive effects of glycaemia and blood pressure exposure on risk of complications in type 2 diabetes: a prospective observational study (UKPDS 75). Diabetologia. 2006;49(8):1761–1769.
- Cederholm J, Zethelius B, Nilsson PM, Eeg-Olofsson K, Eliasson B, Gudbjörnsdottir S; Swedish National Diabetes Register Effect of tight control of HbA1c and blood pressure on cardiovascular diseases in type 2 diabetes: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR). Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;86(1):74–81.
- Zoungas S, de Galan BE, Ninomiya T, et al. ; ADVANCE Collaborative Group Combined effects of routine blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: New results from the ADVANCE trial. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(11):2068–2074.
- Gudbjörnsdottir S, Eliasson B, Eeg-Olofsson K, Zethelius B, Cederholm J; National Diabetes Register (NDR) Additive effects of glycaemia and dyslipidaemia on risk of cardiovascular diseases in type 2 diabetes: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register. Diabetologia. 2011;54(10):2544–2551.
- Nichols GA, Joshua-Gotlib S, Parasuraman S. Independent contribution of A1C, systolic blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol control to risk of cardiovascular disease hospitalizations in type 2 diabetes: an observational cohort study. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(5):691–697.
- Bittner V, Bertolet M, Barraza Felix R, et al. ; Group BDS Comprehensive cardiovascular risk factor control improves survival: The BARI 2D trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(7):765–773.
- Hamada S, Gulliford MC. Multiple risk factor control, mortality and cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(5):e019950.
- Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzen S, et al. . Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(7):633–644.
- Pagidipati NJ, Navar AM, Pieper KS, et al. ; TECOS Study Group Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: international insights from the TECOS trial (Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes With Sitagliptin). Circulation. 2017;136(13):1193–1203.
- Khunti K, Kosiborod M, Ray KK. Legacy benefits of blood glucose, blood pressure and lipid control in individuals with diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Time to overcome multifactorial therapeutic inertia? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(6):1337–1341.
- McMurray JJ, Gerstein HC, Holman RR, Pfeffer MA. Heart failure: a cardiovascular outcome in diabetes that can no longer be ignored. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(10):843–851.
- Juhaeri J, Gao S, Dai WS. Incidence rates of heart failure, stroke, and acute myocardial infarction among Type 2 diabetic patients using insulin glargine and other insulin. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(6):497–503.
- Dinesh Shah A, Langenberg C, et al. . Type 2 diabetes and incidence of a wide range of cardiovascular diseases: a cohort study in 1.9 million people. Lancet. 2015. (Suppl 1);385(Suppl 1):S86.
- Cavender MA, Steg PG, Smith SC Jr, et al. ; REACH Registry Investigators Impact of diabetes mellitus on hospitalization for heart failure, cardiovascular events, and death: outcomes at 4 years from the reduction of atherothrombosis for continued health (REACH) registry. Circulation. 2015;132(10):923–931.
- McAllister DA, Read SH, Kerssens J, et al. . Incidence of hospitalization for heart failure and case-fatality among 3.25 million people with and without diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2018;138(24):2774–2786.
- Mosca L, Barrett-Connor E, Wenger NK. Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: what a difference a decade makes. Circulation. 2011;124(19):2145–2154.
- Hyun KK, Redfern J, Patel A, et al. . Gender inequalities in cardiovascular risk factor assessment and management in primary healthcare. Heart. 2017;103(7):492–498.
- Johansson I, Dahlström U, Edner M, Näsman P, Rydén L, Norhammar A. Risk factors, treatment and prognosis in men and women with heart failure with and without diabetes. Heart. 2015;101(14):1139–1148.
- Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–2128.
- Zinman B, Inzucchi SE, Wanner C, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME® investigators Empagliflozin in women with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease - an analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME®. Diabetologia. 2018;61(7):1522–1527.
- Zinman B, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. . Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of a randomized, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trial of empagliflozin (EMPA-REG OUTCOME™). Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:102.
- Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(6):580–591.
- Gæde P, Oellgaard J, Carstensen B, et al. . Years of life gained by multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: 21 years follow-up on the Steno-2 randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2016;59(11):2298–2307.
- Oellgaard J, Gæde P, Rossing P, et al. . Reduced risk of heart failure with intensified multifactorial intervention in individuals with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria: 21 years of follow-up in the randomised Steno-2 study. Diabetologia. 2018;61(8):1724–1733.
- Gæde P, Oellgaard J, Kruuse C, Rossing P, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Beneficial impact of intensified multifactorial intervention on risk of stroke: outcome of 21 years of follow-up in the randomised Steno-2 Study. Diabetologia. 2019;62(9):1575–1580.
- Bajaj H, Zinman B. Diabetes: Steno-2 - a small study with a big heart. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12(12):692-694.
- Griffin SJ, Rutten GEHM, Khunti K, et al. . Long-term effects of intensive multifactorial therapy in individuals with screen-detected type 2 diabetes in primary care: 10-year follow-up of the ADDITION-Europe cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(12):925–937.
- Crasto W, Morrison AE, Gray LJ, et al. . The Microalbuminuria Education Medication and Optimisation (MEMO) study: 4 years follow-up of multifactorial intervention in high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2020;37(2):286–297.
- Rana JS, Liu JY, Moffet HH, Jaffe M, Karter AJ. Diabetes and prior coronary heart disease are not necessarily risk equivalent for future coronary heart disease events. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(4):387–393.
- Mondesir FL, Brown TM, Muntner P, et al. . Diabetes, diabetes severity, and coronary heart disease risk equivalence: REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS). Am Heart J. 2016;181:43–51.
- Hernandez AV, Usmani A, RaJAMAnickam A, Moheet A. Thiazolidinediones and risk of heart failure in patients with or at high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2011;11(2):115–128.
- Singh S, Loke YK, Furberg CD. Thiazolidinediones and heart failure: a teleo-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(8):2148–2153.
- Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. ; SAVOR-TIMI 53 Steering Committee and Investigators Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1317–1326.
- Zelniker TA, Wiviott SD, Raz I, et al. . SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet. 2019;393(10166):31–39.
- Ofstad AP, Johansen OE, Gullestad L, et al. . Neutral impact on systolic and diastolic cardiac function of 2 years of intensified multi-intervention in type 2 diabetes: the randomized controlled Asker and Bærum Cardiovascular Diabetes (ABCD) study. Am Heart J. 2014;168(3):280–288.e2.
- Castagno D, Baird-Gunning J, Jhund PS, et al. . Intensive glycemic control has no impact on the risk of heart failure in type 2 diabetic patients: evidence from a 37,229 patient meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2011;162(5):938–948.e2.
- Lee MMY, Sattar N, McMurray JJV, Packard CJ. Statins in the prevention and treatment of heart failure: a review of the evidence. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019;21(10):41.
- Verma S, Mazer CD, Fitchett D, et al. . Empagliflozin reduces cardiovascular events, mortality and renal events in participants with type 2 diabetes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: subanalysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME(R) randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2018;61(18):1712–1723.
- Fitchett D, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators Cardiovascular mortality reduction with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(3):364–367.
- Verma S, Mazer CD, Al-Omran M, et al. . Cardiovascular outcomes and safety of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral artery disease: a subanalysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME. Circulation. 2018;137:405–407.
- Fitchett D, Zinman B, Wanner C, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial investigators Heart failure outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk: results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(19):1526–1534.
- Wanner C, Lachin JM, Inzucchi SE, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators Empagliflozin and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, established cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease. Circulation. 2018;137(2):119–129.
- Verma S, Wanner C, Zwiener I, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators Influence of microvascular disease on cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(21):2780–2782.
- Fitchett D, Inzucchi SE, Cannon CP, et al. . Empagliflozin reduced mortality and hospitalization for heart failure across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Circulation. 2019;139(11):1384–1395.
- Fitchett D, Butler J, van de Borne P, et al. ; EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial investigators Effects of empagliflozin on risk for cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization across the spectrum of heart failure risk in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(5):363–370.
- Monteiro P, Bergenstal RM, Toural E, et al. . Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in older patients in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial. Age Ageing. 2019;48(6):859–866.
- Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod M, Fitchett D, et al. . Improvement in cardiovascular outcomes with empagliflozin is independent of glycemic control. Circulation. 2018;138(17):1904–1907.
- Fitchett D, Inzucchi SE, Wanner C, et al. . Relationship between hypoglycaemia, cardiovascular outcomes, and empagliflozin treatment in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME® trial. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(2):209–217.
- Heise T, Jordan J, Wanner C, et al. . Acute pharmacodynamic effects of empagliflozin with and without diuretic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2016;38(10):2248–2264 e5.
- Heise T, Jordan J, Wanner C, et al. . Pharmacodynamic effects of single and multiple doses of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Ther. 2016;38(10):2265–2276.
- Schou M, Gullestad L, Fitchett D, et al. . Empagliflozin exerts short- and long-term effects on plasma volume in patients with type 2 diabetes: insight from EMPA-REG OUTCOME. Circulation. 2017;136(suppl 1):A15997 (abstr).
- Inzucchi SE, Zinman B, Fitchett D, et al. . How does empagliflozin reduce cardiovascular mortality? Insights from a mediation analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(2):356–363.
- Chilton RJ, Gullestad L, Fitchett D, et al. . Empagliflozin reduces markers of arterial stiffness, vascular resistance and cardiac workload in EMPA-REG OUTCOME. Circulation. 2016;134(suppl 1):A13520.
- Bell RM, Yellon DM. SGLT2 inhibitors: hypotheses on the mechanism of cardiovascular protection. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(6):435–437.
- Verma S, McMurray JJV. SGLT2 inhibitors and mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit: a state-of-the-art review. Diabetologia. 2018;61(10):2108–2117.
- Coleman RL, Gray AM, Broedl UC, et al. . Can the cardiovascular risk reductions observed with empagliflozin in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial be explained by concomitant changes seen in conventional cardiovascular risk factor levels? Diabetes Obes Metab 2020;22(7):1151–1156.
- McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, et al. ; DAPA-HF Trial Committees and Investigators Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):1995–2008.
- Fan W, Song Y, Inzucchi SE, et al. . Composite cardiovascular risk factor target achievement and its predictors in US adults with diabetes: the Diabetes Collaborative Registry. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(5):1121–1127.
- Gomes MB, Charbonnel B, Cid-Ruzafa J, et al. . Glycaemic, lipid and blood pressure control according to guidelines in patients initiating second-line glucose-lowering therapy: results from the global DISCOVER study. Diabetologia. 2017;60(suppl 1):S140–S140.
- Khunti K, Ceriello A, Cos X, De Block C. Achievement of guideline targets for blood pressure, lipid, and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;137:137–148.
- Saposnik G, Goodman SG, Leiter LA, et al. . Applying the evidence: do patients with stroke, coronary artery disease, or both achieve similar treatment goals? Stroke. 2009;40(4):1417–1424.
Source: PubMed