Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEEPsAKE 1 trial

Lars Erik Kristensen, Mauro Keiserman, Kim Papp, Leslie McCasland, Douglas White, Wenjing Lu, Zailong Wang, Ahmed M Soliman, Ann Eldred, Lisa Barcomb, Frank Behrens, Lars Erik Kristensen, Mauro Keiserman, Kim Papp, Leslie McCasland, Douglas White, Wenjing Lu, Zailong Wang, Ahmed M Soliman, Ann Eldred, Lisa Barcomb, Frank Behrens

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate risankizumab, a biological therapy that inhibits interleukin 23, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have responded inadequately or are intolerant to ≥1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD).

Methods: In the randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind KEEPsAKE 1 trial, 964 patients with active PsA were randomised (1:1) to receive risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 24. Here, we report the results from the 24-week double-blind period; the open-label period with all patients receiving risankizumab is ongoing.

Results: At week 24, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving risankizumab achieved the primary endpoint of ACR20 (57.3% vs placebo, 33.5%; p<0.001). Significant differences were also observed for risankizumab versus placebo for the first eight ranked secondary endpoints, including skin and nail psoriasis endpoints, minimal disease activity and resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis (p<0.001). Adverse events and serious adverse events were reported at similar rates in the risankizumab and placebo groups. Serious infections were reported for 1.0% and 1.2% of patients receiving risankizumab and placebo, respectively. There was one death in the risankizumab group (urosepsis deemed unrelated to the study drug).

Conclusions: Risankizumab treatment results in significantly greater improvement of signs and symptoms of PsA compared with placebo and is well tolerated in patients with active PsA who have responded inadequately or are intolerant to ≥1 csDMARD.

Trial registration number: NCT03675308.

Keywords: arthritis; biological therapy; psoriatic.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: LEK has received honoraria or fees for serving as a speaker or consultant from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. He has received investigator-initiated study grants from AbbVie, Biogen, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. MK has received honoraria or fees for serving on advisory boards, as a speaker or as a consultant, and has received grants as a principal investigator from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB. KP has received honoraria or fees for serving on advisory boards, as a speaker and as a consultant, as well as grants as principal investigator from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Bausch Health (Valeant), Baxalta, Baxter, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Coherus, Dermira, EMD Serono, Forward Pharma, Galderma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, LEO Pharma, Lilly, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Stiefel, Sun Pharma, Takeda and UCB. LM has received fees for serving on an advisory board from Lilly. DW has received honoraria or fees for serving on advisory boards, as a speaker and as a consultant, from AbbVie and Novartis. WL, ZW, AMS, AE and LB are full-time employees of AbbVie and may hold AbbVie stock or stock options. AMS is listed as an inventor on some AbbVie patents. FB has received research grants, honoraria or fees for serving as a consultant or speaker from AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Galapagos, Genzyme, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition. PBO, placebo; RZB, risankizumab.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ACR responses over time. (A) ACR20, (B) ACR50 and (C) ACR70 response rates for risankizumab 150 mg and placebo over the 24-week, double-blind treatment period. ACR20/50/70, ≥20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology score; PBO, placebo; RZB, risankizumab. ***P≤0.001 versus PBO. $Statistically significant under overall type I error control. **P≤0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PASI 90 response over time. Among patients with ≥3% body surface area affected by psoriasis at baseline. PASI 90, ≥90% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PBO, placebo; RZB, risankizumab. ***P≤0.001 versus PBO. $Statistically significant under overall type I error control.

References

    1. Orbai A-M, de Wit M, Mease P, et al. . International patient and physician consensus on a psoriatic arthritis core outcome set for clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:673–80. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210242
    1. Kristensen LE, Jørgensen TS, Christensen R, et al. . Societal costs and patients' experience of health inequities before and after diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis: a Danish cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1495–501. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210579
    1. Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, et al. . EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:700.1–12. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159
    1. Skyrizi (risankizumab-rzaa) . Prescribing information. North Chicago, IL: AbbVie, Inc, 2019.
    1. Östör A, Van den Bosch F, Papp K, et al. . Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEEPsAKE 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221048. [Epub ahead of print: 23 Nov 2021].
    1. Cassell SE, Bieber JD, Rich P, et al. . The modified nail psoriasis severity index: validation of an instrument to assess psoriatic nail involvement in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2007;34:123–9.
    1. Elewski BE, Okun MM, Papp K, et al. . Adalimumab for nail psoriasis: Efficacy and safety from the first 26 weeks of a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018;78:90–9. 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.029
    1. Hudgens S, Sundaram M, Williams DA. Evaluation of a novel clinician reported outcome in nail psoriasis. Value in Health 2016;19:A127. 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.519
    1. van der Heijde D, Sharp J, Wassenberg S, et al. . Psoriatic arthritis imaging: a review of scoring methods. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64 Suppl 2:ii61–4. 10.1136/ard.2004.030809
    1. Mease PJ, Woolley JM, Bitman B, et al. . Minimally important difference of health assessment questionnaire in psoriatic arthritis: relating thresholds of improvement in functional ability to patient-rated importance and satisfaction. J Rheumatol 2011;38:2461–5. 10.3899/jrheum.110546
    1. Ritchlin CT, Colbert RA, Gladman DD. Psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med 2017;376:957–70. 10.1056/NEJMra1505557
    1. de Jong EM, Seegers BA, Gulinck MK, et al. . Psoriasis of the nails associated with disability in a large number of patients: results of a recent interview with 1,728 patients. Dermatology 1996;193:300–3. 10.1159/000246274
    1. Sandobal C, Carbó E, Iribas J, et al. . Ultrasound nail imaging on patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis compared with rheumatoid arthritis and control subjects. J Clin Rheumatol 2014;20:21–4. 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000054
    1. Smolen JS, Schöls M, Braun J, et al. . Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international Task force. Ann Rheum Dis 2018;77:3–17. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211734
    1. Reich K, Gooderham M, Thaçi D, et al. . Risankizumab compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMvent): a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2019;394:576–86. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30952-3
    1. Gordon KB, Strober B, Lebwohl M, et al. . Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet 2018;392:650–61. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31713-6
    1. Yang K, Oak ASW, Elewski BE. Use of IL-23 inhibitors for the treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a comprehensive review. Am J Clin Dermatol 2021;22:173–92. 10.1007/s40257-020-00578-0
    1. Mease PJ, Rahman P, Gottlieb AB, et al. . Guselkumab in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis (DISCOVER-2): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2020;395:1126–36. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30263-4
    1. Deodhar A, Helliwell PS, Boehncke W-H, et al. . Guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who were biologic-naive or had previously received TNFα inhibitor treatment (DISCOVER-1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2020;395:1115–25. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30265-8

Source: PubMed

3
購読する