Implementation of a full-scale prehospital telemedicine system: evaluation of the process and systemic effects in a pre-post intervention study

Sebastian Bergrath, Jörg Christian Brokmann, Stefan Beckers, Marc Felzen, Michael Czaplik, Rolf Rossaint, Sebastian Bergrath, Jörg Christian Brokmann, Stefan Beckers, Marc Felzen, Michael Czaplik, Rolf Rossaint

Abstract

Objectives: To review the implementation strategy from a research project towards routine care of a comprehensive mobile physician-staffed prehospital telemedicine system. The objective is to evaluate the implementation process and systemic influences on emergency medical service (EMS) resource utilisation.

Design: Retrospective pre-post implementation study.

Setting: Two interdisciplinary projects and the EMS of a German urban region.

Interventions: Implementation of a full-scale prehospital telemedicine system.

Endpoints: Descriptive evaluation of the implementation strategy. Primary endpoint: ground-based and helicopter-based physician staffed emergency missions before and after implementation.

Results: The first research project revealed positive effects on guideline adherence and patient safety in two simulation studies, with feasibility demonstrated in a clinical study. After technical optimisation, safety and positive effects were demonstrated in a multicentre trial. Routine care in the city of Aachen, Germany was conducted stepwise from April 2014 to March 2015, including modified dispatch criteria. Systemic parameters of all EMS assignments between pre-implementation (April 2013 to March 2014) and post implementation (April 2015 to March 2016): on-scene EMS physician operations decreased from 7882/25 187 missions (31.3%) to 6360/26 462 (24.0%), p<0.0001. The need for neighbouring physician-staffed units dropped from 234/25 187 (0.93%) to 119/26 462 (0.45%), p<0.0001, and the need for helicopter EMS from 198/25 187 (0.79%) to 100/26 462 (0.38%), p<0.0001. In the post implementation period 2347 telemedical interventions were conducted, with 26 462 emergency missions (8.87%).

Conclusion: A stepwise implementation strategy allowed transfer from the project phase to routine care. We detected a reduced need for conventional on-scene physician care by ground-based and helicopter-based EMS, but cannot exclude unrecognised confounders, including modified dispatch criteria and possible learning effects. This creates the potential for increased availability of EMS physicians for life-threatening emergencies by shifting physician interventions from conventional to telemedical care.

Trial registration number: NCT04127565.

Keywords: accident & emergency medicine; change management; organisational development; telemedicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors report no specific funding in relation to this research. JCB, MC and RR are shareholders in Docs in Clouds GmbH (Aachen, Germany), a telemedical and consulting service. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Luiz T, van Lengen RH, Wickenkamp A, et al. . Operational availability of ground-based emergency medical services in Rheinland-Palatinate: state-wide web-based system for collation, display and analysis. Anaesthesist 2011;60:421–6. 10.1007/s00101-010-1826-3
    1. Bader K, Bernhard M, Gries A. Development of ground-based physician-staffed emergency missions in the city of Leipzig from 2003 to 2013. Anaesthesist 2018;67:177–87. 10.1007/s00101-017-0393-2
    1. Kraef C, van der Meirschen M, Free C. Digital telemedicine interventions for patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020;10:e036904. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036904
    1. Antonenko K, Paciaroni M, Sokolova L. Digital health in stroke medicine: what are the opportunities for stroke patients? Curr Opin Neurol (Published Online First: 4 December 2020).
    1. Müller-Barna P, Hubert ND, Bergner C, et al. . TeleVertigo: diagnosing stroke in acute dizziness: a Telemedicine-Supported approach. Stroke 2019;50:3293–8. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026505
    1. Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of telehealth. N Engl J Med 2016;375:154–61. 10.1056/NEJMra1601705
    1. Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, et al. . Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2018;24:4–12. 10.1177/1357633X16674087
    1. Sanchez-Ross M, Oghlakian G, Maher J, et al. . The STAT-MI (ST-segment analysis using wireless technology in acute myocardial infarction) trial improves outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:222–7. 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.11.007
    1. Rasmussen MB, Frost L, Stengaard C, et al. . Diagnostic performance and system delay using telemedicine for prehospital diagnosis in triaging and treatment of STEMI. Heart 2014;100:711–5. 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304576
    1. Papai G, Csato G, Racz I, et al. . The transtelephonic electrocardiogram-based triage is an independent predictor of decreased hospital mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Telemed Telecare 2020;26:18814335:221–2. 10.1177/1357633X18814335
    1. Yperzeele L, Van Hooff R-J, De Smedt A, et al. . Feasibility of AmbulanCe-Based telemedicine (fact) study: safety, feasibility and reliability of third generation in-ambulance telemedicine. PLoS One 2014;9:e110043. 10.1371/journal.pone.0110043
    1. Winburn AS, Brixey JJ, Langabeer J, et al. . A systematic review of prehospital telehealth utilization. J Telemed Telecare 2018;24:473–81. 10.1177/1357633X17713140
    1. Ebinger M, Winter B, Wendt M, et al. . Effect of the use of ambulance-based thrombolysis on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014;311:1622–31. 10.1001/jama.2014.2850
    1. Bergrath S, Reich A, Rossaint R, et al. . Feasibility of prehospital teleconsultation in acute stroke--a pilot study in clinical routine. PLoS One 2012;7:e36796. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036796
    1. Bowry R, Parker S, Rajan SS, et al. . Benefits of stroke treatment using a mobile stroke unit compared with standard management: the BEST-MSU study Run-In phase. Stroke 2015;46:3370–4. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011093
    1. LaMonte MP, Xiao Y, Hu PF, et al. . Shortening time to stroke treatment using ambulance telemedicine: TeleBAT. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;13:148–54. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.03.004
    1. Lindskou TA, Mikkelsen S, Christensen EF, et al. . The Danish prehospital emergency healthcare system and research possibilities. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2019;27:100. 10.1186/s13049-019-0676-5
    1. Mikkelsen S, Lassen AT. The Danish prehospital system. Eur J Emerg Med 2020;27:394–5. 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000774
    1. Skorning M, Bergrath S, Rörtgen D, et al. . E-health in emergency medicine - the research project Med-on-@ix. Anaesthesist 2009;58:285–92. 10.1007/s00101-008-1502-z
    1. Brokmann JC, Rossaint R, Bergrath S, et al. . [Potential and effectiveness of a telemedical rescue assistance system. Prospective observational study on implementation in emergency medicine]. Anaesthesist 2015;64:438–45. 10.1007/s00101-015-0039-1
    1. Skorning M, Bergrath S, Rörtgen D, et al. . Teleconsultation in pre-hospital emergency medical services: real-time telemedical support in a prospective controlled simulation study. Resuscitation 2012;83:626–32. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.10.029
    1. Rörtgen D, Bergrath S, Rossaint R, et al. . Comparison of physician staffed emergency teams with paramedic teams assisted by telemedicine--a randomized, controlled simulation study. Resuscitation 2013;84:85–92. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.06.012
    1. Bergrath S, Czaplik M, Rossaint R, et al. . Implementation phase of a multicentre prehospital telemedicine system to support paramedics: feasibility and possible limitations. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013;21:54. 10.1186/1757-7241-21-54
    1. Brokmann JC, Conrad C, Rossaint R, et al. . Treatment of acute coronary syndrome by Telemedically supported Paramedics compared with Physician-Based treatment: a prospective, interventional, multicenter trial. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e314. 10.2196/jmir.6358
    1. Bergrath S, Rörtgen D, Rossaint R, et al. . Technical and organisational feasibility of a multifunctional telemedicine system in an emergency medical service - an observational study. J Telemed Telecare 2011;17:371–7. 10.1258/jtt.2011.110203
    1. Brokmann JC, Rossaint R, Hirsch F, et al. . Analgesia by telemedically supported paramedics compared with physician-administered analgesia: a prospective, interventional, multicentre trial. Eur J Pain 2016;20:1176–84. 10.1002/ejp.843
    1. Felzen M, Brokmann JC, Beckers SK, et al. . Improved technical performance of a multifunctional prehospital telemedicine system between the research phase and the routine use phase - an observational study. J Telemed Telecare 2017;23:402–9. 10.1177/1357633X16644115
    1. Schneiders M-T, Schilberg D, Isenhardt I. Telenotarzt auf dem Prüfstand. evaluation des Projektes Med-on-aix AUS Sicht Der Rettungsassistenten. Notfall Rettungsmed 2012;15:410–5.
    1. Czaplik M, Bergrath S, Rossaint R, et al. . Employment of telemedicine in emergency medicine. Clinical requirement analysis, system development and first test results. Methods Inf Med 2014;53:99–107. 10.3414/ME13-01-0022
    1. Marsh-Feiley G, Eadie L, Wilson P. Paramedic and physician perspectives on the potential use of remotely supported prehospital ultrasound. Rural Remote Health 2018;18:4574. 10.22605/RRH4574
    1. Bergrath S, Müller M, Rossaint R, et al. . Guideline adherence in acute coronary syndromes between telemedically supported paramedics and conventional on-scene physician care: a longitudinal pre-post intervention cohort study. Health Informatics J 2019;25:1528–37. 10.1177/1460458218775157
    1. Lenssen N, Krockauer A, Beckers SK, et al. . Quality of analgesia in physician-operated telemedical prehospital emergency care is comparable to physician-based prehospital care - a retrospective longitudinal study. Sci Rep 2017;7:1536. 10.1038/s41598-017-01437-5
    1. Brokmann JC, Rossaint R, Müller M, et al. . Blood pressure management and guideline adherence in hypertensive emergencies and urgencies: a comparison between telemedically supported and conventional out-of-hospital care. J Clin Hypertens 2017;19:704–12. 10.1111/jch.13026
    1. Floyd T, Mårtensson S, Bailey J, et al. . The mower (middle of the week everyone gets a re-chart) pilot study: reducing in-hospital charting error with a multi-intervention. BMC Health Serv Res 2019;19:397. 10.1186/s12913-019-4230-y
    1. Porter A, Dale J, Foster T, et al. . Implementation and use of computerised clinical decision support (CCDS) in emergency pre-hospital care: a qualitative study of paramedic views and experience using strong Structuration theory. Implement Sci 2018;13:91. 10.1186/s13012-018-0786-x
    1. Stevanovic A, Beckers SK, Czaplik M, et al. . Telemedical support for prehospital emergency medical service (TEMS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017;18:43. 10.1186/s13063-017-1781-2
    1. Dami F, Darioli V, Pasquier M. Association between the NACA score and clinical outcomes. Am J Emerg Med 2020;38:1692–3. 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.01.021

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する