Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Linagliptin in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A 3-Year Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

Fumiko Yamamoto, Yuriko Unno, Tomoo Okamura, Rie Ikeda, Kaori Ochiai, Naoyuki Hayashi, Fumiko Yamamoto, Yuriko Unno, Tomoo Okamura, Rie Ikeda, Kaori Ochiai, Naoyuki Hayashi

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical trials of linagliptin in Japanese patients conducted to date have had limited observational periods; therefore, there is a need for additional longer-term real-world data. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term safety and effectiveness of linagliptin in routine clinical practice.

Methods: This was a prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance study conducted over 156 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who started linagliptin monotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The secondary endpoint was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to last available observation. Other effectiveness endpoints included the change in HbA1c and change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline to week 26 and over the course of the treatment period.

Results: Overall, 2235 and 2054 patients were included in the safety and effectiveness analysis sets, respectively. Patients were mostly male (58.4%), and the mean age was 66.7 years. The incidence of ADRs was 10.7% (n = 240). The most frequent ADRs according to MedDRA preferred terms were diabetes mellitus (n = 35 patients, 1.6%), constipation (n = 21, 0.9%), diabetes mellitus inadequate control (n = 13, 0.6%) and hypertension (n = 13, 0.6%). The mean change in HbA1c from baseline to last observation was - 0.67% [standard deviation (SD) 1.27%, 95% confidence interval - 0.72, - 0.61]. At week 26, HbA1c and FPG showed mean ± SD changes from baseline of - 0.73 ± 1.20% and - 21.02 ± 44.33 mg/dL, respectively, that were sustained until week 156.

Conclusions: In Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, linagliptin produced sustained reductions in HbA1c and had a safety profile consistent with the established safety profile of linagliptin.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01650259).

Keywords: DPP-4 inhibitor; Japanese; Linagliptin; Long-term; Post-marketing surveillance; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of patient inclusion. Asterisk refers to exclusion criteria: patients could be excluded for multiple reasons. eCRF Electronic case report form
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c; a) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG; b) over time in patients who received linagliptin 5 mg. Data are shown as the adjusted mean ± standard error. Mixed model for repeated measures analysis was performed. EOT End of treatment

References

    1. Charvat H, Goto A, Goto M, et al. Impact of population aging on trends in diabetes prevalence: a meta-regression analysis of 160,000 Japanese adults. J Diabetes Investig. 2015;6:533–542. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12333.
    1. Haneda M, Noda M, Origasa H, et al. Japanese clinical practice guideline for diabetes 2016. J Diabetes Investig. 2018;9:657–697. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12810.
    1. Deeks ED. Linagliptin: a review of its use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 2012;72:1793–1824. doi: 10.2165/11209570-000000000-00000.
    1. McKeage K. Linagliptin: an update of its use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 2014;74:1927–1946. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0308-3.
    1. Barnett AH, Patel S, Harper R, et al. Linagliptin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes patients for whom metformin is inappropriate: an 18-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial with a 34-week active-controlled extension. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14:1145–1154. doi: 10.1111/dom.12011.
    1. Del Prato S, Barnett AH, Huisman H, Neubacher D, Woerle HJ, Dugi KA. Effect of linagliptin monotherapy on glycaemic control and markers of beta-cell function in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13:258–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01350.x.
    1. Kawamori R, Inagaki N, Araki E, et al. Linagliptin monotherapy provides superior glycaemic control versus placebo or voglibose with comparable safety in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo and active comparator-controlled, double-blind study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14:348–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01545.x.
    1. Araki E, Kawamori R, Inagaki N, et al. Long-term safety of linagliptin monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:364–371. doi: 10.1111/dom.12039.
    1. Barnett AH, Huisman H, Jones R, von Eynatten M, Patel S, Woerle HJ. Linagliptin for patients aged 70 years or older with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with common antidiabetes treatments: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382:1413–1423. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61500-7.
    1. Unno Y, Ochiai K, Ikeda R, Hayashi N. Long-term safety and efficacy of linagliptin (Trazenta® Tablets 5 mg), a DPP-4 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus—interim report from special surveillance in patients who started linagliptin treatment as monotherapy. J New Rem Clin. 2018;67:667–688.
    1. Lehrke M, Marx N, Patel S, et al. Safety and tolerability of linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a comprehensive pooled analysis of 22 placebo-controlled studies. Clin Ther. 2014;36:1130–1146. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.008.
    1. Ning G, Bandgar T, Hehnke U, Lee J, Chan JCN. Efficacy and safety of linagliptin in 2681 Asian patients stratified by age, obesity, and renal function: a pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials. Adv Ther. 2017;34:2150–2162. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0595-7.
    1. World Health Organization . World Health Organization model list of essential medicines, 21st list (2019) Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する