A large-scale genome-wide gene expression analysis in peripheral blood identifies very few differentially expressed genes related to antidepressant treatment and response in patients with major depressive disorder

Anne Krogh Nøhr, Morten Lindow, Annika Forsingdal, Samuel Demharter, Troels Nielsen, Raimund Buller, Ida Moltke, Morana Vitezic, Anders Albrechtsen, Anne Krogh Nøhr, Morten Lindow, Annika Forsingdal, Samuel Demharter, Troels Nielsen, Raimund Buller, Ida Moltke, Morana Vitezic, Anders Albrechtsen

Abstract

A better understanding of the biological factors underlying antidepressant treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) is needed. We perform gene expression analyses and explore sources of variability in peripheral blood related to antidepressant treatment and treatment response in patients suffering from recurrent MDD at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. The study includes 281 patients, which were randomized to 8 weeks of treatment with vortioxetine (N = 184) or placebo (N = 97). To our knowledge, this is the largest dataset including both gene expression in blood and placebo-controlled treatment response measured by a clinical scale in a randomized clinical trial. We identified three novel genes whose RNA expression levels at baseline and week 8 are significantly (FDR < 0.05) associated with treatment response after 8 weeks of treatment. Among these genes were SOCS3 (FDR = 0.0039) and PROK2 (FDR = 0.0028), which have previously both been linked to depression. Downregulation of these genes was associated with poorer treatment response. We did not identify any genes that were differentially expressed between placebo and vortioxetine groups at week 8 or between baseline and week 8 of treatment. Nor did we replicate any genes identified in previous peripheral blood gene expression studies examining treatment response. Analysis of genome-wide expression variability showed that type of treatment and treatment response explains very little of the variance, a median of <0.0001% and 0.05% in gene expression across all genes, respectively. Given the relatively large size of the study, the limited findings suggest that peripheral blood gene expression might not be the best approach to explore the biological factors underlying antidepressant treatment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01422213.

Figures

Fig. 1. Examination of genes correlated to…
Fig. 1. Examination of genes correlated to treatment response.
Plots of log2-transformed TMM-normalized gene expression as a function of percentage improvement in MADRAS total score at week 8 from baseline for PROK2 (A) and SOCS3 (B). Percentage improvement is plotted to account for the MADRS score at baseline, since change in MADRS score depends on the MADRS score at baseline. Boxplots of log2-transformed TMM-normalized gene expression difference between responders and non-responders for each timepoint (baseline and week 8) and each treatment type (placebo and vortioxetine) for PROK2 (C) and SOCS3 (D). PBL = samples from placebo-treated patients at baseline; PW8 = samples from placebo-treated patients at week 8; TBL = samples from vortioxetine-treated patients at baseline; TW8 = samples from vortioxetine-treated patients at week 8. Response is defined as >50% decrease in the MADRS total score from baseline. E Bar plot of variance partitioned on the covariates in the experimental design for the nine genes, with an FDR < 0.05, related to treatment response.
Fig. 2. Examination of the distribution of…
Fig. 2. Examination of the distribution of variance across all genes.
A Violin plot of the distribution of variance across all genes for the covariates in the experimental design. Inside the violin plots are boxplots. B Bar plot of variance partitioned on the covariates in the experimental design for the genes highlighted in plot A. The variance of the covariates for each gene sum to 1. C Violin plot of the distribution of variance across all genes for the covariates in the experimental design and explorative variables.

References

    1. Kessler RC, Bromet EJ. The epidemiology of depression across cultures. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114409.
    1. Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4.
    1. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV-TR. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
    1. Spijker J, Graaf R, Bijl RV, Beekman AT, Ormel J, Nolen WA. Functional disability and depression in the general population. Results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004;110:208–14. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00335.x.
    1. Üstün TB, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Chatterji S, Mathers C, Murray CJL. Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000. Br J Psychiatry. 2004. 10.1192/bjp.184.5.386.
    1. Cai N, Choi KW, Fried EI. Reviewing the genetics of heterogeneity in depression: operationalizations, manifestations, and etiologies. Hum Mol Genet. 2020. 10.1093/hmg/ddaa115.
    1. Gartlehner G, Hansen RA, Thieda P, DeVeaugh-Geiss AM, Gaynes BN, Krebs EE, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Second-Generation Antidepressants in the Pharmacologic Treatment of Adult Depression [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007. Report No.: 07-EHC007-EF. PMID: 20704050.
    1. Simon GE, Perlis RH. Personalized medicine for depression: can we match patients with treatments? Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:1445–55. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09111680.
    1. Tylee DS, Kawaguchi DM, Glatt SJ. On the outside, looking in: a review and evaluation of the comparability of blood and brain ‘-omes’. Am J Med Genet Part B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2013. 10.1002/ajmg.b.32150.
    1. Mamdani F, Berlim MT, Beaulieu MM, Turecki G. Pharmacogenomic predictors of citalopram treatment outcome in major depressive disorder. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2014. 10.3109/15622975.2013.766762.
    1. Mamdani F, Berlim MT, Beaulieu MM, Labbe A, Merette C, Turecki G. Gene expression biomarkers of response to citalopram treatment in major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2011;1:e13. 10.1038/tp.2011.12.
    1. Guilloux JP, Bassi S, Ding Y, Walsh C, Turecki G, Tseng G, et al. Testing the predictive value of peripheral gene expression for nonremission following citalopram treatment for major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015. 10.1038/npp.2014.226.
    1. Woo HI, Lim SW, Myung W, Kim DK, Lee SY. Differentially expressed genes related to major depressive disorder and antidepressant response: genome-wide gene expression analysis. Exp Mol Med. 2018. 10.1038/s12276-018-0123-0.
    1. Pettai K, Milani L, Tammiste A, Võsa U, Kolde R, Eller T, et al. Whole-genome expression analysis reveals genes associated with treatment response to escitalopram in major depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.06.007.
    1. Hodgson K, Tansey KE, Powell TR, Coppola G, Uher R, Zvezdana Dernovšek M, et al. Transcriptomics and the mechanisms of antidepressant efficacy. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.10.009.
    1. Cook IA, Congdon E, Krantz DE, Hunter AM, Coppola G, Hamilton SP, et al. Time course of changes in peripheral blood gene expression during medication treatment for major depressive disorder. Front Genet. 2019. 10.3389/fgene.2019.00870.
    1. Lecrubier Y, Sheehan DV, Weiller E, Amorim P, Bonora I, Sheehan KH, et al. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatry. 1997. 10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83296-8.
    1. Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data [Online]. 2010. Available online at: .
    1. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635.
    1. Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang TC, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2015. 10.1038/nbt.3122.
    1. Harrow J, Frankish A, Gonzalez JM, Tapanari E, Diekhans M, Kokocinski F, et al. GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for the ENCODE project. Genome Res. 2012. 10.1101/gr.135350.111.
    1. Hoffman GE, Roussos P. Dream: powerful differential expression analysis for repeated measures designs, Bioinformatics. 2020;btaa687. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa687.
    1. Li S, Labaj PP, Zumbo P, Sykacek P, Shi W, Shi L, et al. Detecting and correcting systematic variation in large-scale RNA sequencing data. Nat Biotechnol. 2014. 10.1038/nbt.3000.
    1. Stegle O, Parts L, Piipari M, Winn J, Durbin R. Using probabilistic estimation of expression residuals (PEER) to obtain increased power and interpretability of gene expression analyses. Nat Protoc. 2012. 10.1038/nprot.2011.457.
    1. Hoffman GE, Schadt EE. variancePartition: interpreting drivers of variation in complex gene expression studies. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. 10.1186/s12859-016-1323-z.
    1. Cheng MY, Bullock CM, Li C, Lee AG, Bermak JC, Belluzzi J, et al. Prokineticin 2 transmits the behavioural circadian rhythm of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Nature. 2002. 10.1038/417405a.
    1. McClung CA. Circadian genes, rhythms and the biology of mood disorders. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;114:222–32. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.02.003.
    1. Spijker S, Van Zanten JS, De Jong S, Penninx BWJH, Van Dyck R, Zitman FG, et al. Stimulated gene expression profiles as a blood marker of major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2010. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.03.017.
    1. Carow B, Rottenberg ME. SOCS3, a Major Regulator of Infection and Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2014;5:58. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00058.
    1. Haapakoski R, Mathieu J, Ebmeier KP, Alenius H, Kivimäki M. Cumulative meta-analysis of interleukins 6 and 1β, tumour necrosis factor α and C-reactive protein in patients with major depressive disorder. Brain Behav Immun. 2015. 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.06.001.
    1. Al-Samhari MM, Al-Rasheed NM, Al-Rejaie S, Al-Rasheed NM, Hasan IH, Mahmoud AM, et al. Possible involvement of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in N-acetylcysteine-mediated antidepressant-like effects. Exp Biol Med. 2016. 10.1177/1535370215619707.
    1. Binder EB. The role of FKBP5, a co-chaperone of the glucocorticoid receptor in the pathogenesis and therapy of affective and anxiety disorders. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34(Suppl 1):S186–95. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.05.021.
    1. Rao S, Yao Y, Ryan J, Li T, Wang D, Zheng C, et al. Common variants in FKBP5 gene and major depressive disorder (MDD) susceptibility: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016. 10.1038/srep32687.
    1. Szczepankiewicz A, Leszczyńska-Rodziewicz A, Pawlak J, Narozna B, Rajewska-Rager A, Wilkosc M, et al. FKBP5 polymorphism is associated with major depression but not with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2014. 10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.002.
    1. Ising M, Maccarrone G, Brückl T, Scheuer S, Hennings J, Holsboer F, et al. FKBP5 gene expression predicts antidepressant treatment outcome in depression. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. 10.3390/ijms20030485.
    1. Brooker SM, Gobeske KT, Chen J, Peng CY, Kessler JA. Hippocampal bone morphogenetic protein signaling mediates behavioral effects of antidepressant treatment. Mol Psychiatry. 2017. 10.1038/mp.2016.160.
    1. Pain O, Hodgson K, Trubetskoy V, Ripke S, Marshe VS, Adams MJ, et al. Antidepressant response in major depressive disorder: a genome-wide association study. MedRxiv. 2020. 10.1101/2020.12.11.20245035.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する