MRS-based Metabolomics in Cancer Research

Tedros Bezabeh, Omkar B Ijare, Alexander E Nikulin, Rajmund L Somorjai, Ian Cp Smith, Tedros Bezabeh, Omkar B Ijare, Alexander E Nikulin, Rajmund L Somorjai, Ian Cp Smith

Abstract

Metabolomics is a relatively new technique that is gaining importance very rapidly. MRS-based metabolomics, in particular, is becoming a useful tool in the study of body fluids, tissue biopsies and whole organisms. Advances in analytical techniques and data analysis methods have opened a new opportunity for such technology to contribute in the field of diagnostics. In the MRS approach to the diagnosis of disease, it is important that the analysis utilizes all the essential information in the spectra, is robust, and is non-subjective. Although some of the data analytic methods widely used in chemical and biological sciences are sketched, a more extensive discussion is given of a 5-stage Statistical Classification Strategy. This proposes powerful feature selection methods, based on, for example, genetic algorithms and novel projection techniques. The applications of MRS-based metabolomics in breast cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, hepatobiliary cancers, gastric cancer, and brain cancer have been reviewed. While the majority of these applications relate to body fluids and tissue biopsies, some in vivo applications have also been included. It should be emphasized that the number of subjects studied must be sufficiently large to ensure a robust diagnostic classification. Before MRS-based metabolomics can become a widely used clinical tool, however, certain challenges need to be overcome. These include manufacturing user-friendly commercial instruments with all the essential features, and educating physicians and medical technologists in the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of metabolomics data.

Keywords: cancer; classification; diagnosis; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; metabolomics.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representation of the risks of reaching conclusions with a sparse data set. Increasing the number of subjects generally lowers the accuracy, but this is much closer to the true accuracy. The lower accuracy solution will also be more robust: challenging the resultant classifier with new specimens will yield accuracy similar to that found by a reliable classifier.
Figure 2
Figure 2
1H MR spectra (360 MHz, 37°C) of prostate tissue specimens. A, cancer (Gleason grade: 3 + 3). Chos, cholines; Crs. creatines; Lac. lactic acid; Tau, taurine; HOD, partially deuterated water. Although certain substances are assigned on figure, this does not imply that these are the only substances contributing to a particular resonance. B. BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean and ± one standard deviation about the mean of (A) the 412 1D 1H MR spectra (400 MHz, 300 K) for the normal samples and (B) of the 111 1D 1H MR spectra (400 MHz, 300 K) for the colorectal cancer samples.
Figure 4
Figure 4
1H MRS spectra (360 MHz) of bile from (a) control, (b) chronic pancreatitis and (c) pancreatic cancer patients showing the relative levels of D-Glucuronate. It can be seen that the levels of D-Glucuronate are highly elevated in the pancreatic cancer patient.

References

    1. Nikulin AE, Brière KM, Friesen L, Smith ICP, Somorjai RL. Genetic algorithm-guided optimal attribute selection: a novel preprocessor for classifying MR spectra; Proceedings of Society of Magnetic Resonance, Third Scientific Meeting; Nice, France. 1995, 19–25 August, #1940.
    1. Nikulin AE, Dolenko B, Bezabeh T, Somorjai RL. Near-optimal region selection for feature space reduction: novel preprocessing methods for classifying MR spectra. NMR Biomed. 1998;11:209–16.
    1. Sletten E, Kvalheim OM, Kruse S, Farstad M, Søreide O. Detection of malignant tumours—multivariate analysis of proton NMR spectra of serum. Euro J Cancer. 1990;26:615–8.
    1. Wold S. Discussion: PLS in chemical practice. Technometrics. 1993;35:136–9.
    1. Smith ICP, Somorjai RL. Deriving biomedical diagnostics from NMR spectroscopic data. Biophysical Reviews. 2011;3:47–52.
    1. Zhang AH, Sun H, Qiu S, Wang XJ. Metabolomics in noninvasive breast cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;424:3–7.
    1. Jobard E, Pontoizeau C, Blaise BJ, Bachelot T, Elena-Herrmann B, Trédan O. A serum nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomic signature of advanced metastatic human breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.09.011. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Tenori L, Oakman C, Claudino WM, et al. Exploration of serum metabolomic profiles and outcomes in women with metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study. Mol Oncol. 2012;6:437–44.
    1. Duarte IF, Gil AM. Metabolic Signatures of cancer unveiled by MR spectroscopy of human biofluids. Prog NMR Spectroscopy. 2012;62:51–74.
    1. Mountford CE, Somorjai RL, Malycha P, et al. Diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer by magnetic resonance spectroscopy of fine-needle aspirates analysed using a statistical classification strategy. Br J Surg. 2001;88(9):1234–40.
    1. Lean C, Doran S, Somorjai RL, et al. Determination of grade and receptor status from the primary breast lesion by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004;3(6):551–6.
    1. Li M, Song Y, Cho N, et al. An HR-MAS MR metabolomics study on breast tissues obtained with core needle biopsy. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25563.
    1. Giskeødegård GF, Grinde MT, Sitter B, et al. Multivariate modeling and prediction of breast cancer prognostic factors using MR metabolomics. J Proteome Res. 2010;9(2):972–9.
    1. Bathen TF, Geurts B, Sitter B, et al. Feasibility of MR metabolomics for immediate analysis of resection margins during breast cancer surgery. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61578.
    1. Bathen TF, Sitter B, Sjoeback TE, Tessem M, Gribbestad IS. Magnetic resonance metabolomics of intact tissue: a biotechnological tool in cancer diagnosis and treatment evaluation. Cancer Res. 2010;70:OF1–OF5.
    1. Bolan PJ. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the breast: current status. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013;21:625–39.
    1. Begley JK, Redpath TW, Bolan PJ, Gilbert FJ. In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast cancer: a review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:207.
    1. Bathen TF, Heldahl MG, Sitter B, Vettukattil R, Bofin A, Lundgren S, Gribbestad IS. In vivo MRS of locally advanced breast cancer: characteristics related to negative or positive choline detection and early monitoring of treatment response. MAGMA. 2011;24:347–57.
    1. Sharma U, Baek HM, Su MY, Jagannathan NR. In vivo 1H MRS in the assessment of the therapeutic response of breast cancer patients. NMR Biomed. 2011;24:700–11.
    1. Sardanelli F, Fausto A, Di Leo G, de Nijs R, Vorbuchner M, Podo F. In vivo proton MR spectroscopy of the breast using the total choline peak integral as a marker of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1608–17.
    1. Hahn P, Smith ICP, Leboldus L, Littman C, Somorjai RL, Bezabeh T. The classification of benign and malignant human prostate tissue by multivariate analysis of 1H magnetic resonance spectra. Cancer Res. 1997;15:3398–401.
    1. Swindle P, McCredie S, Russell P, et al. Pathologic characterization of human prostate tissue with proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2003;228:144–51.
    1. Swindle P, Ramadan S, Stanwell P, McCredie S, Russell P, Mountford C. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the central, transition and peripheral zones of the prostate: assignments and correlation with histopathology. MAGMA. 2008;21:423–34.
    1. Menard C, Smith ICP, Somorjai RL, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the malignant prostate gland after radiotherapy: a histopathologic study of diagnostic validity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:317–23.
    1. Cheng LL, Wu C, Smith MR, Gonzalez RG. Non-destructive quantitation of spermine in human prostate tissue samples using HRMAS 1H NMR spectroscopy at 9.4 T. FEBS Lett. 2001;494:112–6.
    1. Wu CL, Taylor JL, He W, et al. Proton high-resolution magic angle spinning NMR analysis of fresh and previously frozen tissue of human prostate. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:1307–11.
    1. Decelle EA, Cheng LL. High-resolution magic angle spinning 1H MRS in prostate cancer. NMR Biomed. 2013 doi: 10.1002/nbm.2994. (Epub ahead of print)
    1. Stenman K, Stattin P, Stenlund H, Riklund K, Gröbner G, Bergh A. 1H HRMAS NMR Derived Bio-markers Related to Tumor Grade, Tumor Cell Fraction, and Cell Proliferation in Prostate Tissue Samples. Biomark Insights. 2011;6:39–47.
    1. Kline EE, Treat EG, Davis MS, Smith AY, Sillerud LO. Citrate concentrations in human seminal fluid and expressed prostatic fluid determined via 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy outperform prostate specific antigen in prostate cancer detection. J Urol. 2006;176:2274–9.
    1. Serkova NJ, Gamito EJ, Jones RH, et al. The metabolites citrate, myo-inositol, and spermine are potential age-independent markers of prostate cancer in human expressed prostatic secretions. Prostate. 2008;68:620–28.
    1. Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB. Advances in MR spectroscopy of the prostate. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2008;16:697–710.
    1. Kobus T, Wright AJ, Scheenen TW, Heerschap A. Mapping of prostate cancer by 1H MRSI. NMR Biomed. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2008.07.005. (Epub ahead of print)
    1. Zakian KL, Shukla-Dave A, Ackerstaff E, Hricak H, Koutcher JA. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of prostate cancer: biomarkers for tumor characterization. Cancer Biomark. 2008;4:263–76.
    1. Jagannathan NR. Prostate MR: current status, challenges and future directions. NMR Biomed. 2013 Aug 30; doi: 10.1002/nbm.3011.
    1. Jiménez B, Mirnezami R, Kinross J, et al. 1H HR-MAS NMR spectroscopy of tumor-induced localmetabolic “field-effects” enables colorectal cancer staging and prognostication. J Proteome Res. 2013;12:959–68.
    1. Bertini I, Cacciatore S, Jensen BV, et al. Metabolomic NMR fingerprinting to identify and predict survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2012;72:356–64.
    1. Bro R, Nielsen HJ, Savorani F, et al. Data fusion in metabolomic cancer diagnostics. Metabolomics. 2013;9:3–8.
    1. Chan EC, Koh PK, Mal M, et al. Metabolic Profiling of Human Colorectal Cancer Using High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (HR-MAS NMR) Spectroscopy and Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) JProteome Res. 2009;8:352–61.
    1. Lean CL, Newland RC, Ende DA, Bokey EL, Smith ICP, Mountford CE. Assessment of human colorectal biopsies by 1H MRS: correlation with histopathology. Magn Reson Med. 1993;30:525–533.
    1. Moreno A, Arús C. Quantitative and qualitative characterization of 1H NMR spectra of colon tumors, normal mucosa and their perchloric acid extracts: decreased levels of myo-inositol in tumours can be detected in intact biopsies. NMR Biomed. 1996;9:33–45.
    1. Moreno A, Rey M, Montane JM, Alonso J, Arús C. 1H NMR spectroscopy of colon tumors and normal mucosal biopsies; elevated taurine levels and reduced polyethyleneglycol absorption in tumors may have diagnostic significance. NMR Biomed. 1993;6:111–8.
    1. Merchant TE, Kasimos JN, de Graaf PW, Minsky BD, Gierke LW, Glonek T. Phospholipid profiles of human colon cancer using 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;6:121–6.
    1. Kasimos JN, Merchant TE, Gierke LW, Glonek T. 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy of human colon cancer. Cancer Res. 1990;50:527–32.
    1. Merchant TE, Diamantis PM, Lauwers G, et al. Characterization of malignant colon tumors with 31P nuclear magnetic resonance phospholipid and phosphatic metabolite profiles. Cancer. 1995;76:1715–23.
    1. Merchant TE, Characiejus D, Kasimos JN, Den Otter W, Gierke LW, Glonek T. Phosphodiesters in saponified extracts of human breast and colon tumors using 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 1992;26:132–40.
    1. Hakomori S, Nudelman E, Levery SB, Kannagi R. Novel fucolipids accumulating in human adenocarcinoma. I. Glycolipids with di- or trifucosylated type 2 chain. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:4672–80.
    1. Lean CL, Mackinnon WB, Mountford CE. Fucose in 1H COSY spectra of plasma membrane fragments shed from human malignant colorectal cells. Magn Reson Med. 1991;20:306–11.
    1. Monleón D, Morales JM, Barrasa A, López JA, Vázquez C, Celda B. Metabolite profiling of fecal water extracts from human colorectal cancer. NMR Biomed. 2009;22:342–8.
    1. Bezabeh T, Somorjai RL, Dolenko B, et al. Detecting colorectal cancer by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of fecal extracts. NMR Biomed. 2009;22:593–600.
    1. Bezabeh T, Smith ICP, Krupnik E, et al. Diagnostic potential for cancer via 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of colon tissue. Anticancer Res. 1996;16(3B):1553–8.
    1. Brière KM, Kuesel AC, Bird RP, Smith ICP. 1H MR visible lipids in colon tissue from normal and carcinogen-treated rats. NMR Biomed. 1995;8:33–40.
    1. Krupnik E, Brière KM, Bird RP, Littman C, Smith ICP. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy evidence that aberrant crypt foci are preneoplastic lesions in the colon. Anticancer Res. 1999;19(3A):1699–1703.
    1. Bradshaw-Pierce EL, Pitts TM, Kulikowski G, et al. Utilization of quantitative in vivo pharmacology approaches to assess combination effects of everolimus and irinotecan in mouse xenograft models of colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58089.
    1. Ijare OB, Smith ICP, Mohajeri S, Bezabeh T. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of bile in the diagnosis of hepatopancreaticobiliary diseases: past, presence and future. In: Khetrapal CL, Kumar A, Ramanathan KV, editors. Future directions of NMR. Vol. 1. New Delhi: Springer (India); 2011. pp. 45–53.
    1. Khan SA, Cox IJ, Hamilton G, Thomas HC, Taylor-Robinson SD. In vivo and in vitro nuclear Future Directions of NMR magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a tool for investigating hepatobiliary disease: a review of 1H and 31P MRS applications. Liver Int. 2005;25:273–81.
    1. Soper R, Himmelreich U, Painter D, et al. Pathology of hepatocellular carcinoma and its precursors using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and a statistical classification strategy. Pathology. 2002;34:417–22.
    1. Nishijima T, Nishina M, Fujiwara K. Measurement of lactate levels in serum and bile using proton nuclear magnetic resonance in patients with hepatobiliary diseases: it’s utility in detection of malignancies. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1997;27:13–17.
    1. Yang Y, Li C, Nie X, et al. Metabonomic studies of human hepatocellular carcinoma using high-resolution magic-angle spinning 1H NMR spectroscopy in conjunction with multivariate data analysis. J Proteome Res. 2007;6:2605–14.
    1. Wang J, Zhang S, Li Z, et al. 1H-NMR-based metabolomics of tumor tissue for the metabolic characterization of rat hepatocellular carcinoma formation and metastasis. Tumour Biol. 2011;32:223–31.
    1. Nagana Gowda GA, Shanaiah N, Cooper A, Maluccio M, Raftery D. Visualization of bile homeostasis using 1H-NMR Spectroscopy as a route for assessing liver cancer. Lipids. 2009;44:27–35.
    1. Nahon P, Amathieu R, Triba MN, et al. Identification of serum proton NMR metabolomic fingerprints associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:6714–22.
    1. Albiin N, Smith ICP, Arnelo U, et al. Detection of cholangiocarcinoma with magnetic resonance spectroscopy of bile in patients with and without primary sclerosing cholangitis. Acta Radiol. 2008;49:855–62.
    1. Wen H, Yoo SS, Kang J, et al. A new NMR-based metabolomics approach for the diagnosis of biliary tract cancer. J Hepatol. 2010;52:228–33.
    1. Khan SA, Cox IJ, Thillainayagam AV, Bansi DS, Thomas HC, Taylor-Robinson SD. Proton and phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of human bile in hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;17:733–38.
    1. Sharif AW, Williams HRT, Lampejo T, et al. Metabolic profiling of bile in cholangiocarcinoma using in vitro magnetic resonance spectroscopy. HPB. 2010;12:396–402.
    1. Beger RD, Schnackenberg LK, Holland RD, Li D, Dragan Y. Metabonomic models of human pancreatic cancer using 1D proton NMR spectra of lipids in plasma. Metabolomics. 2006;2:125–134.
    1. Davis VW, Schiller DE, Eurich D, Bathe OF, Sawyer MB. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with a distinct urinary metabolomic signature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Zhang L, Jin H, Guo X, et al. Distinguishing pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis and healthy individuals by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabonomic profiles. Clin Biochem. 2012;45:1064–9.
    1. Tesiram YA, Lerner M, Stewart C, Njoku C, Brackett DJ. Utility of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for pancreatic cancer studies. Pancreas. 2012;41:474–80.
    1. Kaplan O, Kushnir T, Askenazy N, Knubovets T, Navon G. Role of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in cancer diagnosis and treatment: 31P, 23Na, and 1H MRS studies of three models of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 1997;57:1452–9.
    1. Fang F, He X, Deng H, et al. Discrimination of metabolic profiles of pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis by high-resolution magic angle spinning 1H nuclear magnetic resonance and principal components analysis. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:1678–82.
    1. Cho SG, Lee DH, Lee KY, et al. Differentiation of chronic focal pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma by in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005;29:163–9.
    1. Bala L, Tripathi P, Bhatt G, et al. 1H and 31P NMR studies indicate reduced bile constituents in patients with biliary obstruction and infection. NMR Biomed. 2009;22:220–228.
    1. Bezabeh T, Ijare OB, Albiin N, Arnelo U, Lindberg B, Smith ICP. Detection and quantification of D-glucuronic acid in human bile using 1H NMR spectroscopy: relevance to the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. MAGMA. 2009;22:267–75.
    1. Wang J, Ma C, Liao Z, Tian B, Lu JP. Study on chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer using MRS and pancreatic juice samples. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:2126–30.
    1. Bezabeh T, Ijare OB, Albiin N, et al. 1H MRS of pancreatic juice: an MRS-based diagnostic approach for the detection of pancreatic cancer. Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med. 2011;19:869.
    1. Nagana Gowda GA, Ijare OB, Shanaiah N, Bezabeh T. Combining nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and mass spectrometry in biomarker discovery. Biomark Med. 2009;3:307–22.
    1. Srivastava M, Sharma A, Kapoor VK, Nagana Gowda GA. Stones from cancerous and benign gallbladders are different: A proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Hepatol Res. 2008;38:997–1005.
    1. Jayalakshmi K, Sonkar K, Behari A, Kapoor VK, Sinha N. Lipid profiling of cancerous and benign gallbladder tissues by 1H NMR spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 2011;24:335–42.
    1. Mun CW, Cho JY, Shin WJ, et al. Ex vivo proton MR spectroscopy (1H-MRS) for evaluation of human gastric carcinoma. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22:861–70.
    1. Calabrese C, Pisi A, Di Febo G, et al. Biochemical alterations from normal mucosa to gastric cancer by ex vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:1386–95.
    1. Somorjai RL, Dolenko B, Nikulin AK, et al. Classification of 1H MR spectra of human brain neoplasms: the influence of preprocessing and computerized consensus diagnosis on classification accuracy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;6:437–44.
    1. Erb G, Elbayed K, Piotto M, et al. Toward improved grading of malignancy in oligodendrogliomas using metabolomics. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59:959–65.
    1. Srivastava NK, Pradhan S, Gowda GA, Kumar R. In vitro, high-resolution 1H and 31P NMR based analysis of the lipid components in the tissue, serum, and CSF of the patients with primary brain tumors: one possible diagnostic view. NMR Biomed. 2010;23:113–22.
    1. Tate AR, Griffiths JR, Martínez-Pérez I, et al. Towards a method for automated classification of 1H MRS spectra from brain tumours. NMR Biomed. 1998;11:177–91.
    1. Preul MC, Caramanos Z, Collins DL, et al. Accurate, noninvasive diagnosis of human brain tumors by using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Nat Med. 1996;2:323–5.
    1. Preul MC, Caramanos Z, Leblanc R, Villemure JG, Arnold DL. Using pattern analysis of in vivo proton MRSI data to improve the diagnosis and surgical management of patients with brain tumors. NMR Biomed. 1998;11:192–200.
    1. Majós C, Julià-Sapé M, Alonso J, et al. Brain tumor classification by proton MR spectroscopy: comparison of diagnostic accuracy at short and long TE. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:1696–704.
    1. Pérez-Ruiz A, Julià-Sapé M, Mercadal G, Olier I, Majós C, Arús C. The INTERPRET Decision-Support System version 3.0 for evaluation of Magnetic resonance spectroscopy data from human brain tumours and other abnormal brain masses. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:581.
    1. Somorjai RL, Dolenko B, Baumgartner R. Class prediction and discovery using gene microarray and proteomics mass spectroscopy data: curses, caveats, cautions. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1484–91.
    1. Jain AK, Chandrasekaran B. In: Dimensionality and sample size considerations in pattern recognition practice. Krishnaiah PR, Kanal LN, editors. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: North Holland Publ Co; 1982. pp. 835–85.
    1. Huber PJ. Projection Pursuit. Ann Stat. 1985;13:435–525.
    1. Somorjai RL, Alexander M, Baumgartner R, et al. A Data-Driven, Flexible Machine Learning Strategy for the Classification of Biomedical Data. In: Dubitzky W, Azuaje F, editors. Artificial Intelligence Methods and Tools for Systems Biology Computational Biology Series. Vol. 5. Springer; 2004. pp. 67–85.
    1. Somorjai RL, Demko A, Mandelzweig M, et al. Mapping high-dimensional data onto a relative distance plane—An exact method for visualizing and characterizing high-dimensional patterns. J Biomed Informatics. 2004;37:366–79.
    1. Dolenko B, Somorjai RL. Time well spent: preprocessing of MR spectra for greater classification accuracy; Proceedings of Society of Magnetic Resonance, Third Scientific Meeting; Nice, France. 1995, 19–25 August, # 1936.
    1. Somorjai RL, Dolenko B, Halliday W, et al. Accurate discrimination between low- and high-grade human brain astrocytomas: robust multivariate analysis of 1H MR spectra. J Med Biochem. 1999;3:17–24.
    1. Cover TM, van Campenhout JM. On the possible orderings in the measurement selection problem. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 1977;SMC-7:657–661.
    1. Eriksson L, Johansson E, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wold S. Multi- and Megavariate Data Analysis—Principles and Applications. Umetrics AB; Umea Sweden: 2001.
    1. Jackson JE. A User’s Guide to Principal Components. Wiley; New York: 1991.
    1. Sjöström M, Eriksson L, Hellberg S, Jonsson J, Skagerberg B, Wold S. PLS discriminant plots; Proceeding of PARC in Practice; Amsterdam. June 19–21, 1985; North-Holland: Elsevier Science publishers B. V.; 1986.
    1. Somorjai RL. Creating robust, reliable, clinically relevant classifiers from spectroscopic data. Biophys Rev. 2009;1:201–11.
    1. Holte RC. Very simple classification rules perform very well on most commonly used datasets. Machine Learning. 1993;11:63–91.
    1. Simon R, Radmacher MD, Dobbin K, McShane LM. Pitfalls in the use of DNA microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:14–18.
    1. Somorjai RL, Nikulin AE, Pizzi N, et al. Computerized consensus diagnosis: a classification strategy for the robust analysis of MR spectra l. Application to 1H spectra of thyroid neoplasms. Magn Reson Med. 1995;33:257–63.
    1. Lean CL, Somorjai RL, Smith ICP, Russell P, Mountford CE. Accurate diagnosis and prognosis of human cancers by proton MRS and a three stage classification strategy. Annu Rep NMR Spectrosc. 2002;48:71–111.
    1. Klein P, Somorjai RL. Nonlinear methods for discrimination and their application to classification of protein structures. J Theor Biol. 1988;130:461–8.
    1. Kohavi R, John GH. Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence. 1997;97:273–324.
    1. Witten IH, Frank E. Data mining practical machine learning tools and techniques. 2nd edition. Elsevier, Morgan Kaufmann Publications; Amsterdam: 2005.
    1. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman Hill; New York: 1993.
    1. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning. 2001;45:5–32.
    1. Ambroise C, McLachlan GJ. Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:6562–6.
    1. Somorjai RL, Dolenko B, Mandelzweig M. Direct classification of high-dimensional data in low-dimensional projected feature spaces—Comparison of several classification methodologies. J Biomed Inform. 2007;40:131–8.
    1. Somorjai RL, Dolenko B, Roberson W, Thiessen N. Class-proximity measures-dissimilarity-based classification and display of high-dimensional data. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44:775–88.
    1. Anderson TW, Bahadur RR. Classification into two multivariate normal distributions with different covariance matrices. Ann Math Statist. 1962;33:420–31.
    1. Cover TM, Thomas JA. Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley & Sons Inc; New York: 1991.
    1. Kullbach S, Leifler RA. On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Stat. 1951;22:79–86.
    1. Kuncheva LI. Combining Pattern Classifiers-Methods and Algorithms. Wiley-Interscience; New York: 2004.
    1. Zhilkin PA, Somorjai RL. Application of several methods of classification fusion to magnetic resonance spectra. Connection Science. 1996;8:427–42.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する