Cediranib in addition to chemotherapy for women with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (ICON6): overall survival results of a phase III randomised trial

J A Ledermann, A C Embleton-Thirsk, T J Perren, G C Jayson, G J S Rustin, S B Kaye, H Hirte, A Oza, M Vaughan, M Friedlander, A González-Martín, E Deane, B Popoola, L Farrelly, A M Swart, R S Kaplan, M K B Parmar, ICON6 collaborators, J A Ledermann, A C Embleton-Thirsk, T J Perren, G C Jayson, G J S Rustin, S B Kaye, H Hirte, A Oza, M Vaughan, M Friedlander, A González-Martín, E Deane, B Popoola, L Farrelly, A M Swart, R S Kaplan, M K B Parmar, ICON6 collaborators

Abstract

Background: Cediranib, an oral anti-angiogenic VEGFR 1-3 inhibitor, was studied at a daily dose of 20 mg in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy and as maintenance in a randomised trial in patients with first relapse of 'platinum-sensitive' ovarian cancer and has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS).

Patients and methods: ICON6 (NCT00532194) was an international three-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Between December 2007 and December 2011, 456 women were randomised, using stratification, to receive either chemotherapy with placebo throughout (arm A, reference); chemotherapy with concurrent cediranib, followed by maintenance placebo (arm B, concurrent); or chemotherapy with concurrent cediranib, followed by maintenance cediranib (arm C, maintenance). Due to an enforced redesign of the trial in September 2011, the primary endpoint became PFS between arms A and C which we have previously published, and the overall survival (OS) was defined as a secondary endpoint, which is reported here.

Results: After a median follow-up of 25.6 months, strong evidence of an effect of concurrent plus maintenance cediranib on PFS was observed [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.72, P < 0.0001]. In this final update of the survival analysis, 90% of patients have died. There was a 7.4-month difference in median survival and an HR of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.67-1.11, P = 0.24) in favour of arm C. There was strong evidence of a departure from the assumption of non-proportionality using the Grambsch-Therneau test (P = 0.0031), making the HR difficult to interpret. Consequently, the restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used and the estimated difference over 6 years by the RMST was 4.8 months (95% CI: -0.09 to 9.74 months).

Conclusions: Although a statistically significant difference in time to progression was seen, the enforced curtailment in recruitment meant that the secondary analysis of OS was underpowered. The relative reduction in the risk of death of 14% risk of death was not conventionally statistically significant, but this improvement and the increase in the mean survival time in this analysis suggest that cediranib may have worthwhile activity in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer and that further research should be undertaken.

Keywords: clinical trial; oncology; ovarian; overall survival; phase III.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure ACE-T, HH, MV, ED, BP, LF, and AMS declare no conflicts of interest. JAL has attended AstraZeneca, GSK, Clovis Oncology, MSD, Eisai, Pfizer advisory boards and spoken at symposia with remuneration and has institutional grants from AstraZeneca and MSD. TJP reports grants, personal fees, non-financial support from Roche; personal fees from Novartis; personal fees from AstraZeneca, other fees paid to the institution from multiple other pharmaceutical companies and research organisations in connection with the costs of running a broad research portfolio, outside the submitted work. GCJ attended AstraZeneca advisory board and has received research funding for investigator-led trials. Also research grant from Roche. GJSR has attended advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Amgen and OXiGENE, in addition to data management costs from the MRC. SBK has attended an AstraZeneca advisory board. AO is Principal Investigator for investigator-initiated trials with AstraZeneca and has institutional grants from AstraZeneca outside the submitted work, and non compensated membership of steering committees with AstraZeneca and Clovis and a noncompensated advisory role with AstraZeneca and GSK. MF has attended advisory board meetings for AstraZeneca, Takeda, Novartis, MSD and Lilly and received personal fees. Travel support from AstraZeneca, research funding to institution for investigator-initiated trials. AG-M reports personal fees for advisory boards to Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Genmab, GSK-TESARO, Novartis, MSD, Oncoinvent, PharmaMar, Pfizer-Merck, Roche, SOTIO. RSK reports grants from Cancer Research UK and AstraZeneca, as well as drug supply from AstraZeneca. MKBP reports an educational grant from AstraZeneca.

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram. ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; GCIG, Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup; SAE, serious adverse events.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall survival. Kaplan–Meier plot of overall survival: (a) Arms A versus C and (b) arms A versus B versus C (number at risk every 6 months with the number of failure events in parentheses, after the time in which the number at risk was calculated). HR, hazard ratio; RMST, restricted mean survival time.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time from randomisation to first subsequent treatment. Kaplan–Meier plot of the time from randomisation to patients' first subsequent treatment in months.

References

    1. Jayson G.C., Kohn E.C., Kitchener H.C., Ledermann J.A. Ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2014;384:1376–1388.
    1. Hicklin D.J., Ellis L.M. Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1011–1027.
    1. Perren T.J., Swart A.M., Pfisterer J. A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2484–2496.
    1. Aghajanian C., Blank S.V., Goff B.A. OCEANS: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2039–2045.
    1. Pujade-Lauraine E., Hilpert F., Weber B. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: the AURELIA open-label randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1302–1308.
    1. Burger R.A., Brady M.F., Bookman M.A. Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2473–2483.
    1. Coleman R.L., Brady M.F., Herzog T.J. Bevacizumab and paclitaxel–carboplatin chemotherapy and secondary cytoreduction in recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study GOG-0213): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:779–791.
    1. Wedge S.R., Kendrew J., Hennequin L., Valentine P. AZD2171: a highly potent, orally bioavailable, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65:4389–4400.
    1. Matulonis U.A., Berlin S., Ivy P. Cediranib, an oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor kinases, is an active drug in recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5601–5606.
    1. Hoff P.M., Hochhaus A., Pestalozzi B.C. Cediranib plus FOLFOX/CAPOX versus placebo plus FOLFOX/CAPOX in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized, double-blind, phase III study (HORIZON II) J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3596–3603.
    1. Valle J.W., Wasan H., Lopes A. Cediranib or placebo in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (ABC-03): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:967–978.
    1. Mulders P., Hawkins R., Nathan P. Cediranib monotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomised phase II study. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:527–537.
    1. Goss G.D., Arnold A., Shepherd F.A. Randomized, double-blind trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with either daily oral cediranib or placebo in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: NCIC clinical trials group BR24 study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:49–55.
    1. Batchelor T.T., Duda D.G., di Tomaso E. Phase II study of cediranib, an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2817–2823.
    1. Kummar S., Allen D., Monks A. Cediranib for metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2296–2302.
    1. Ledermann J.A., Embleton A.C., Raja F. Cediranib in patients with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (ICON6): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1066–1074.
    1. AstraZeneca AstraZeneca Announces Results of Recentin HORIZON II Phase III Trial in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. 2010. Published online May 28, 2010. Available at:
    1. AstraZeneca . AstraZeneca; Cambridge: 2011. Annual Report.
    1. Raja F.A., Griffin C.L., Qian W. Initial toxicity assessment of ICON6: a randomised trial of cediranib plus chemotherapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;105:884–889.
    1. Pfisterer J., Plante M., Vergote I. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin compared with carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: an intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4699–4707.
    1. Parmar M.K.B., Ledermann J.A., Colombo N. Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial. Lancet. 2003;361:2099–2106.
    1. Laurie S.A., Solomon B.J., Seymour L. Randomised, double-blind trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with daily oral cediranib or placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: NCIC clinical trials group study BR29. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:706–712.
    1. Batchelor T.T., Mulholland P., Neyns B. Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3212–3218.
    1. European Medicines Agency . European Medicines Agency; 2016. Withdrawal Assessment Report – Zemfirza. Available at:
    1. Grambsch P.M., Therneau T.M. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika. 1994;81:515–526.
    1. Royston P., Parmar M.K.B. The use of restricted mean survival time to estimate the treatment effect in randomized clinical trials when the proportional hazards assumption is in doubt. Stat Med. 2011;30:2409–2421.
    1. Royston P., Parmar M.K.B. Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:16.
    1. Royston P., Choodari-Oskooei B., Parmar M.K.B., Rogers J.K. Combined test versus logrank/Cox test in 50 randomised trials. Trials. 2019;20:172.
    1. Royston P. A combined test for a generalized treatment effect in clinical trials with a time-to-event outcome. Stata J. 2017;17:405–421.
    1. Embleton-Thirsk A., Deane E., Townsend S. Impact of retrospective data verification to prepare the ICON6 trial for use in a marketing authorization application. Clin Trials. 2019;16:502–511.
    1. AstraZeneca A.B. 2016. Withdrawal Letter: Zemfirza. Published online Sept 19. Available at:
    1. Aghajanian C., Goff B., Nycum L.R., Wang Y.V., Husain A., Blank S.V. Final overall survival and safety analysis of OCEANS, a phase 3 trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;139:10–16.
    1. Tewari K.S., Burger R.A., Enserro D. Final overall survival of a randomized trial of bevacizumab for primary treatment of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:2317–2328.
    1. Wagner U., Marth C., Largillier R. Final overall survival results of phase III GCIG CALYPSO trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin vs paclitaxel and carboplatin in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:588–591.
    1. Rose P.G., Java J.J., Salani R. Nomogram for predicting individual survival after recurrence of advanced-stage, high-grade ovarian carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:245–254.
    1. Matulonis U.A., Oza A.M., Ho T.W., Ledermann J.A. Intermediate clinical endpoints: a bridge between progression-free survival and overall survival in ovarian cancer trials: Intermediate Clinical Endpoints. Cancer. 2015;121:1737–1746.
    1. du Bois A., Floquet A., Kim J.-W. Incorporation of pazopanib in maintenance therapy of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3374–3382.
    1. du Bois A., Kristensen G., Ray-Coquard I. Standard first-line chemotherapy with or without nintedanib for advanced ovarian cancer (AGO-OVAR 12): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:78–89.
    1. Liu J.F., Barry W.T., Birrer M. Combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib alone for women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1207–1214.
    1. Kaplan A.R., Gueble S.E., Liu Y. Cediranib suppresses homology-directed DNA repair through down-regulation of BRCA1/2 and RAD51. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11:eaav4508.
    1. Liu J.F., Brady M.F., Matulonis U.A. A phase III study comparing single-agent olaparib or the combination of cediranib and olaparib to standard platinum-based chemotherapy in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:6003.
    1. Stark D.P., Cook A., Brown J.M. Quality of life with cediranib in relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON6 phase 3 randomized clinical trial: quality of life in the ICON6 Trial. Cancer. 2017;123:2752–2761.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する