The 5P program, personalized and participatory primary prevention pathway: Rational and design of a clinical trial in general practice

Florian Legrand, Jean-Marc Eychene, Julien Audiffren, Armelle Klein, Christophe Labourdette, Alice Nicolaï, Frédéric Sandron, Pierre-Paul Vidal, Florian Legrand, Jean-Marc Eychene, Julien Audiffren, Armelle Klein, Christophe Labourdette, Alice Nicolaï, Frédéric Sandron, Pierre-Paul Vidal

Abstract

The aging of the population is leading to an increase in the number of people with loss of autonomy, placing a strain on the health care system. Its prevention at early stages such as the frailty stage would allow an improvement in the quality of life of seniors while limiting health care expenses. The "Atout Age" prevention program set up by the health public authorities of Reunion Island for retired people and the new frailty assessment tools based on mathematical machine learning algorithms could improve the ambulatory care of senior citizens. At present, referral care remains hospital with comprehensive geriatric assessment and there is a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of a prevention pathway for loss of autonomy in primary care. For these reasons, the 5P program "Personalized and Participative Primary Prevention Pathway" has been started in order to obtain scientific evidence. In this article, we present the objectives, design and first results, used in the 5P program up to the implementation of a clinical trial in general practice. The program is articulated in 3 phases. A first phase to evaluate the acceptability of innovative screening tools for frailty. A second pilot phase evaluates the feasibility of a large-scale ambulatory clinical trial in general practice. The last phase described in this article, is a multisite, pseudo-randomized, controlled clinical trial measuring the impact of the "Atout Age" workshops on the physical performance and the quality of life of seniors compared with their usual ambulatory follow-up.

Keywords: Clinical trial; Comprehensive geriatric assessment; Disability; Frail elderly; General practice; Machine learning; Physical exercise.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

© 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
« Smart Check® » system.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Design of phase 3 scaling UP of the 5P program.

References

    1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs . United Nations; New York: 2019. World Population Prospects 2019 Volume II: Demographic Profiles. 2019.
    1. Merceron Sebastien, La population réunionnaise à l’horizon 2050 - autant de seniors que de jeunes, Rapport Insee (2017). (accessed June 29, 2020).
    1. Fried T.R., Bradley E.H., Williams C.S., Tinetti M.E. Functional disability and health care expenditures for older persons. Arch. Intern. Med. 2001;161:2602–2607. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.21.2602.
    1. Pierre A.J. Rapport Aquillo: comité «Avancée en âge» Anticiper pour une autonomie préservée: un enjeu de société. Doc. Fr. 2013:132.
    1. Collège des Généralistes Enseignants de l'Océan Indien (CGEOI), Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale Océan Indien (DUMG-OI), Agence Régionale de Santé Océan Indien (ARS), Enquête gramoune care, In Extenso. 2015.
    1. Ministère des Solidarités et de la Santé, Le dispositif Paerpa. 2020.
    1. Colvez A., Castex A., Carriere I. Recovery from disability in an older population. Results of long-term follow-up in Upper-Normandy (France) Rev. Epidemiol. Sante Publique. 2003;51:565–573.
    1. Cambois E., Blachier A., Robine J.-M. Aging and health in France: an unexpected expansion of disability in mid-adulthood over recent years. Eur. J. Publ. Health. 2013;23:575–581. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks136.
    1. Clegg A., Young J., Iliffe S., Rikkert M.O., Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381:752–762. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9.
    1. Fried L.P., Tangen C.M., Walston J., Newman A.B., Hirsch C., Gottdiener J., Seeman T., Tracy R., Kop W.J., Burke G., McBurnie M.A. Frailty in older adults evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. Ser. A. 2001;56:M146–M157. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146.
    1. Fried L.P., Ferrucci L., Darer J., Williamson J.D., Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J. Gerontol. Ser. A. 2004;59:M255–M263. doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.3.M255.
    1. Walston J., Hadley E.C., Ferrucci L., Guralnik J.M., Newman A.B., Studenski S.A., Ershler W.B., Harris T., Fried L.P. Research agenda for frailty in older adults: toward a better understanding of physiology and etiology: summary from the American geriatrics society/national institute on aging research conference on frailty in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2006;54:991–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00745.x.
    1. Sirven N., Rapp T. 2016. Dépenses de santé, vieillissement et fragilité: le cas français; p. 32.
    1. Börsch-Supan A., Jürgens H., Lipps O.SHARE. Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Mannheim Institute for the Economics of Aging; 2003.
    1. Gill T.M., Gahbauer E.A., Allore H.G., Han L. Transitions between frailty states among community-living older persons. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006;166:418–423. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.4.418.
    1. Stuck A.E., Siu A.L., Wieland G.D., Rubenstein L.Z., Adams J. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet. 1993;342:1032–1036. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-V.
    1. Le Bihan C. Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1; 2014. Évaluation Gériatrique Standardisée Au Cabinet De Médecine Générale: Présentation D’un Outil Simplifié De Dépistage Des Grands Syndromes Gériatriques, La Grille Gérontoquick. These d’exercice.
    1. Gaboreau Y. Université Joseph Fourier; 2009. Intérêt et réalisation du dépistage de syndromes gériatriques par le médecin généraliste: études de la dénutrition, de la chute et de la démence chez le sujet âgé de 75 ans en Savoie et en Isère. (Thèse d’exercice)
    1. LOI n° 2009-879 du 21 juillet 2009 portant réforme de l’hôpital et relative aux patients, à la santé et aux territoires - Article 36. 2009.
    1. Audiffren J., Bargiotas I., Vayatis N., Vidal P.-P., Ricard D. A non linear scoring approach for evaluating balance: classification of elderly as fallers and non-fallers. PloS One. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167456.
    1. Beam A.L., Kohane I.S. Big data and machine learning in health care. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2018;319:1317–1318. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18391.
    1. Cesari M., Demougeot L., Boccalon H., Guyonnet S., Vellas B., Andrieu S. The Multidomain Intervention to preveNt disability in ElDers (MINDED) project: rationale and study design of a pilot study. Contemp. Clin. Trials. 2014;38:145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.04.006.
    1. Autorité de Santé Haute. 2013. Comment repérer la fragilité en soins ambulatoires?
    1. Arborio A.-M., Fournier P. L’observation directe, Armand Colin. 2015.
    1. Legrand F., Eychene J.-M., Audiffren J., Klein A., Labourdette C., Nicolaï A., Sandron F., Vidal P.-P. Description of participants in the “atout age mobility” prevention workshops at the university hospital center of La reunion: a prospective study. J. Nutr. Health Aging. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1604-8.
    1. Klein A., Sandron F. Réception et mise en pratique des messages de prévention bien vieillir chez les personnes âgées de plus de 60 ans à la Réunion. NPG Neurol. - Psychiatr. - Gériatrie. 2019;19:39–43. doi: 10.1016/j.npg.2018.07.006.
    1. Klein A. Technologies de la santé et de l’autonomie et vécus du vieillissement. Gerontol. Soc. 2019;41/n° 160:33–45.
    1. Sandron F. Vieillissement et gérontechnologies à La Réunion, Université de La Réunion, Saint-Denis. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement; 2017. p. 122.
    1. Klein A. Editions L'Harmattan; 2018. Vieillissement, innovation et territoire: le cas de l’île de La Réunion.
    1. Coutton V. Évaluer la dépendance à l’aide de groupes iso-ressources (GIR):une tentative en France avec la grille aggir. Gerontol. Soc. 2001;24:111–129. doi: 10.3917/gs.099.0111.
    1. Vidal P.-P., Vienne‐Jumeau A., Moreau A., Vidal C., Wang D., Audiffren J., Bargiotas I., Barrois R., Buffat S., Dubost C., Ghidaglia J.-M., Labourdette C., Mantilla J., Oudre L., Quijoux F., Robert M., Yelnik A.P., Ricard D., Vayatis N. An opinion paper on the maintenance of robustness: towards a multimodal and intergenerational approach using digital twins. AGING Med. 2020;3:188–194. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12115.
    1. Sass C., Moulin J.-J., Guéguen R., Abric L., Dauphinot V., Dupré C., Giordanella J.P., Girard F., Guenot C., Labbe É. Le score Epices: un score individuel de précarité. Construction du score et mesure des relations avec des données de santé, dans une population de 197 389 personnes. Bull. Épidémiologique Hebd. 2006;14:93–96.
    1. Instrument Ware J., Jr., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med. Care. 1992;30:473–483.
    1. Snaith R.P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Health Qual. Life Outcome. 2003;1:29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-29.
    1. Moran P., Leese M., Lee T., Walters P., Thornicroft G., Mann A. Standardised assessment of personality – abbreviated scale (SAPAS): preliminary validation of a brief screen for personality disorder. Br. J. Psychiatry. 2003;183:228–232. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.3.228.
    1. Fuhrer R., Rouillon F. La version française de l’échelle CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale). Description et traduction de l’échelle d’autoévaluation. Psychiatr. Psychobiol. 1989;4:163–166.
    1. Fried L.P., Borhani N.O., Enright P., Furberg C.D., Gardin J.M., Kronmal R.A., Kuller L.H., Manolio T.A., Mittelmark M.B., Newman A., O'Leary D.H., Psaty B., Rautaharju P., Tracy R.P., Weiler P.G. The cardiovascular health study: design and rationale. Ann. Epidemiol. 1991;1:263–276. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-W.
    1. Guralnik J.M., Simonsick E.M., Ferrucci L., Glynn R.J., Berkman L.F., Blazer D.G., Scherr P.A., Wallace R.B. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J. Gerontol. 1994;49:M85–M94.
    1. Sirven N. Institut de recherche et documentation en économie de la santé; 2014. Mesurer la Fragilité Des Personnes Âgées En Population Générale: Une Comparaison Entre ESPS et SHARE; p. 20.
    1. Agence nationale d’accréditation et d’évaluation en santé (ANAES) Guide méthodologique: comment évaluer a priori un programme de dépistage? 2004.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する