Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy

Claire N Harrison, Jacqueline S Garcia, Tim C P Somervaille, James M Foran, Srdan Verstovsek, Catriona Jamieson, Ruben Mesa, Ellen K Ritchie, Srinivas K Tantravahi, Pankit Vachhani, Casey L O'Connell, Rami S Komrokji, Jason Harb, Jessica E Hutti, Leanne Holes, Abdullah A Masud, Silpa Nuthalapati, Jalaja Potluri, Naveen Pemmaraju, Claire N Harrison, Jacqueline S Garcia, Tim C P Somervaille, James M Foran, Srdan Verstovsek, Catriona Jamieson, Ruben Mesa, Ellen K Ritchie, Srinivas K Tantravahi, Pankit Vachhani, Casey L O'Connell, Rami S Komrokji, Jason Harb, Jessica E Hutti, Leanne Holes, Abdullah A Masud, Silpa Nuthalapati, Jalaja Potluri, Naveen Pemmaraju

Abstract

Purpose: Targeting the BCL-XL pathway has demonstrated the ability to overcome Janus kinase inhibitor resistance in preclinical models. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of adding BCL-XL/BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax to ruxolitinib therapy in patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response to ruxolitinib monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03222609).

Methods: Thirty-four adult patients with intermediate-/high-risk myelofibrosis who had progression or suboptimal response on stable ruxolitinib dose (≥ 10 mg twice daily) were administered navitoclax at 50 mg once daily starting dose, followed by escalation to a maximum of 300 mg once daily in once in weekly increments (if platelets were ≥ 75 × 109/L). The primary end point was ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR35) from baseline at week 24. Secondary end points included ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS50) from baseline at week 24, hemoglobin improvement, change in bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) grade, and safety.

Results: High molecular risk mutations were identified in 58% of patients, and 52% harbored ≥ 3 mutations. SVR35 was achieved by 26.5% of patients at week 24, and by 41%, at any time on study, with an estimated median duration of SVR35 of 13.8 months. TSS50 was achieved by 30% (6 of 20) of patients at week 24, and BMF improved by 1-2 grades in 33% (11 of 33) of evaluable patients. Anemia response was achieved by 64% (7 of 11), including one patient with baseline transfusion dependence. Median overall survival was not reached with a median follow-up of 21.6 months. The most common adverse event was reversible thrombocytopenia without clinically significant bleeding (88%).

Conclusion: The addition of navitoclax to ruxolitinib in patients with persistent or progressive myelofibrosis resulted in durable SVR35, improved TSS, hemoglobin response, and BMF. Further investigation is underway to qualify the potential for disease modification.

Conflict of interest statement

Claire N. HarrisonHonoraria: Celgene, Novartis, CTI BioPharma Corp, Roche/Genentech, Geron, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, BMSi, Constellation PharmaceuticalsConsulting or Advisory Role: Promedior, Celgene, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Galectin Therapeutics, Sierra OncologySpeakers' Bureau: Novartis, CTI BioPharma Corp, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Celgene, Janssen OncologyResearch Funding: Novartis (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Constellation Pharmaceuticals (Inst) Jacqueline S. GarciaConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Takeda, Astellas PharmaResearch Funding: AbbVie (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), Lilly (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Prelude Therapeutics (Inst) Tim C.P. SomervailleHonoraria: Novartis, Celgene/Bristol Myers SquibbConsulting or Advisory Role: NovartisResearch Funding: Imago Biosciences, Cellcentric James M. ForanConsulting or Advisory Role: SERVIER, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Stemline Therapeutics, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Certara Inc, Novartis, Pfizer, Revolution Medicines, Revolution MedicinesResearch Funding: AbbVie (Inst), Actinium Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Aprea Therapeutics (Inst), Aptose Biosciences (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), H3 Biomedicine (Inst), Kura Oncology (Inst), Sellas Life Sciences (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Trillium Therapeutics (Inst), Xencor (Inst) Srdan VerstovsekConsulting or Advisory Role: Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Sierra Oncology, Incyte, Novartis, CelgeneResearch Funding: Incyte (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Protagonist Therapeutics (Inst), Sierra Oncology (Inst), PharmaEssentia (Inst), Telios (Inst), Constellation Pharmaceuticals (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Geron (Inst), Galecto Biotech (Inst), Kartos Therapeutics (Inst) Catriona JamiesonStock and Other Ownership Interests: Aspera Biomedicines, IncPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent Royalties—Methods for Manipulating Phagocytosis Mediated by CD47, Patent #US20090191202A1 Ruben MesaHonoraria: Novartis, shire, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Sierra Oncology, AbbVie, Geron, BMSConsulting or Advisory Role: Baxalta, Galena Biopharma, Incyte, NovartisResearch Funding: Incyte (Inst), Genentech (Inst), CTI (Inst), Promedior (Inst), NS Pharma (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), PharmaEssentia (Inst), Celgene (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Imago Pharma (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis, Incyte, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, PharmaEssentia Ellen K. RitchieConsulting or Advisory Role: Incyte, Celgene, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol Myers SquibbSpeakers' Bureau: Celgene, IncyteResearch Funding: Astellas Pharma (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer Srinivas K. TantravahiHonoraria: Novartis, Karyopharm TherapeuticsConsulting or Advisory Role: Karyopharm Therapeutics, NovartisResearch Funding: Karyopharm Therapeutics Pankit VachhaniConsulting or Advisory Role: Blueprint Medicines, Incyte, AbbVie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, CTI BioPharma Corp, Novartis, Amgen, PfizerSpeakers' Bureau: IncyteResearch Funding: Seattle Genetics (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Astex Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Blueprint Medicines (Inst), Kartos Therapeutics (Inst), Gilead/Forty Seven (Inst), Constellation Pharmaceuticals (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), CTI BioPharma Corp (Inst), Takeda (Inst) Casey L. O'ConnellResearch Funding: Astex Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Genentech (Inst) Rami S. KomrokjiStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVieConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, Geron, Acceleron PharmaSpeakers' Bureau: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, AgiosTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Agios Jason HarbEmployment: AbbVieStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Jessica E. HuttiEmployment: AbbVieStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Leanne HolesEmployment: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene/JunoStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Abdullah A. MasudEmployment: AbbVieStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Silpa NuthalapatiEmployment: AbbVieStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Jalaja PotluriEmployment: AbbVieStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Naveen PemmarajuEmployment: MD Anderson Cancer CenterLeadership: ASH, ASCO.Honoraria: Incyte, Novartis, LFB Biotechnologies, Stemline Therapeutics, Celgene, AbbVie, MustangBio, Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Blueprint Medicines, DAVA Pharmaceuticals, Springer, Aptitude Health, Neopharm, CareDXConsulting or Advisory Role: Blueprint Medicines, Pacylex, Immunogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clearview Healthcare Partners, Astellas Pharma US Inc, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc, Triptych Health Partners, CTI BioPharma CorpResearch Funding: Novartis, Stemline Therapeutics, Samus Therapeutics, AbbVie, Cellectis, Affymetrix/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Plexxikon, MustangBioTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Stemline Therapeutics, Celgene, AbbVie, DAVA Oncology, MustangBio(OPTIONAL) Uncompensated Relationships: Dan's House of Hope(OPTIONAL) Uncompensated Relationships: Oncology TimesNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Percentage change from baseline in (A) spleen volume and (B) TSS at week 24 and (C) BMF improvement from baseline at any time on study. aPatients with nonmissing percent change from baseline at week 24. BMF, bone marrow fibrosis; SV, spleen volume; SVR35, spleen volume reduction of ≥ 35%; TSS, total symptom score; TSS50, ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier curve of OS in all patients (N = 34). NE, not estimable; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Mean platelet count over time. Platelet nadir was defined as 9 cells/L as indicated by the dashed line. SD, standard deviation; Wk, week.

References

    1. Harrison CN, Schaap N, Mesa RA: Management of myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib failure. Ann Hematol 99:1177-1191, 2020
    1. Vannucchi A, Barbui T, Cervantes F, et al. : Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 26:v85-v99, 2015
    1. de Freitas RM, da Costa Maranduba CM: Myeloproliferative neoplasms and the JAK/STAT signaling pathway: An overview. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 37:348-353, 2015
    1. Pikman Y, Lee BH, Mercher T, et al. : MPLW515L is a novel somatic activating mutation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. PLoS Med 3:e270, 2006
    1. James C, Ugo V, Le Couédic J-P, et al. : A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature 434:1144-1148, 2005
    1. Wernig G, Mercher T, Okabe R, et al. : Expression of Jak2V617F causes a polycythemia vera-like disease with associated myelofibrosis in a murine bone marrow transplant model. Blood 107:4274-4281, 2006
    1. Klampfl T, Gisslinger H, Harutyunyan AS, et al. : Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. New Engl J Med 369:2379-2390, 2013
    1. Tognon R, Gasparotto EP, Neves RP, et al. : Deregulation of apoptosis-related genes is associated with PRV1 overexpression and JAK2 V617F allele burden in Essential Thrombocythemia and Myelofibrosis. J Hematol Oncol 5:1-11, 2012
    1. Guo J, Roberts L, Chen Z, et al. : JAK2 V617F drives Mcl-1 expression and sensitizes hematologic cell lines to dual inhibition of JAK2 and Bcl-xL. PLoS One 10:e0114363, 2015
    1. Winter PS, Sarosiek KA, Lin KH, et al. : RAS signaling promotes resistance to JAK inhibitors by suppressing BAD-mediated apoptosis. Sci Signal 7:ra122, 2014
    1. Benites BD, Lima CSC, Lorand-Metze I, et al. : Primary myelofibrosis: Risk stratification by IPSS identifies patients with poor clinical outcome. Clinics 68:339-343, 2013
    1. Gerds A, Gotlib J, Bose P, et al. : NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Version 1.2020: Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, 2020
    1. Deisseroth A, Kaminskas E, Grillo J, et al. : US Food and Drug Administration approval: Ruxolitinib for the treatment of patients with intermediate and high-risk myelofibrosis. Clin Cancer Res 18:3212-3217, 2012
    1. Jamieson C, Hasserjian R, Gotlib J, et al. : Effect of treatment with a JAK2-selective inhibitor, fedratinib, on bone marrow fibrosis in patients with myelofibrosis. J Transl Med 13:294, 2015
    1. Bose P, Verstovsek S: JAK inhibition for the treatment of myelofibrosis: Limitations and Future perspectives. Hemasphere 4:e424, 2020
    1. Palandri F, Breccia M, Bonifacio M, et al. : Life after ruxolitinib: Reasons for discontinuation, impact of disease phase, and outcomes in 218 patients with myelofibrosis. Cancer 126:1243-1252, 2020
    1. Patel KP, Newberry KJ, Luthra R, et al. : Correlation of mutation profile and response in patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib. Blood 126:790-797, 2015
    1. Spiegel JY, McNamara C, Kennedy JA, et al. : Impact of genomic alterations on outcomes in myelofibrosis patients undergoing JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy. Blood Adv 1:1729-1738, 2017
    1. Pettit K, Gerds AT, Yacoub A, et al. : A Phase 2a Study of the LSD1 Inhibitor Img-7289 (Bomedemstat) for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis, Washington, DC, American Society of Hematology, 2019
    1. Pardanani A, Tefferi A: How I treat myelofibrosis after failure of JAK inhibitors. Blood 132:492-500, 2018
    1. Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Platzbecker U, et al. : Momelotinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY 2): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 5:e73-e81, 2018
    1. Mascarenhas J, Hoffman R, Talpaz M, et al. : Pacritinib vs best available therapy, including ruxolitinib, in patients with myelofibrosis: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 4:652-659, 2018
    1. Tse C, Shoemaker AR, Adickes J, et al. : ABT-263: A potent and orally bioavailable Bcl-2 family inhibitor. Cancer Res 68:3421-3428, 2008
    1. Waibel M, Solomon VS, Knight DA, et al. : Combined targeting of JAK2 and Bcl-2/Bcl-xL to cure mutant JAK2-driven malignancies and overcome acquired resistance to JAK2 inhibitors. Cell Rep 5:1047-1059, 2013
    1. Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. : A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: A study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood 115:1703-1708, 2010
    1. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. : Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649-656, 1982
    1. Branch SK: Guidelines from the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). J Pharm Biomed Anal 38:798-805, 2005
    1. Mesa RA, Schwager S, Radia D, et al. : The Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF): An evidence-based brief inventory to measure quality of life and symptomatic response to treatment in myelofibrosis. Leuk Res 33:1199-1203, 2009
    1. Mesa RA, Kantarjian H, Tefferi A, et al. : Evaluating the serial use of the myelofibrosis symptom assessment form for measuring symptomatic improvement: Performance in 87 myelofibrosis patients on a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor (INCB018424) clinical trial. Cancer 117:4869-4877, 2011
    1. Tefferi A, Cervantes F, Mesa R, et al. : Revised response criteria for myelofibrosis: International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consensus report. Blood 122:1395-1398, 2013
    1. Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM, Facchetti F, et al. : European consensus on grading bone marrow fibrosis and assessment of cellularity. Haematologica 90:1128-1132, 2005
    1. National Cancer Institute : Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 3.
    1. Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdle, NJ, Erlbaum. Conner BE: The Box in the Barn. Columbus, Highlights for Children Inc, 1988
    1. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. : A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. New Engl J Med 366:799-807, 2012
    1. Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian J-J, et al. : Long-term findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study of ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Leukemia 30:1701-1707, 2016
    1. Dueck AC, Cleeland CS, Dantzer R, et al. : Cytokine Profile Changes in 309 Myelofibrosis Patients: Comparison of JAK1/JAK2 Inhibitor Therapy vs. Placebo-Correlative Analysis From the COMFORT-I Trial, Washington, DC, American Society of Hematology, 2013
    1. Pardanani A, Tefferi A, Jamieson C, et al. : A phase 2 randomized dose-ranging study of the JAK2-selective inhibitor fedratinib (SAR302503) in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood Cancer J 5:e335, 2015
    1. Pemmaraju N, Garcia JS, Potluri J, et al. : The addition of navitoclax to ruxolitinib demonstrates efficacy within different high-risk populations in patients with relapsed/refractory myelofibrosis. Blood, 136:49-50, 2020
    1. Kuykendall AT, Shah S, Talati C, et al. : Between a rux and a hard place: Evaluating salvage treatment and outcomes in myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib discontinuation. Ann Hematol 97:435-441, 2018
    1. Newberry KJ, Patel K, Masarova L, et al. : Clonal evolution and outcomes in myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib discontinuation. Blood, 130:1125-1131, 2017
    1. Yang J, Pradhan R, Rosen L, et al. : Effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of navitoclax (ABT‐263), a dual inhibitor of Bcl‐2 and Bcl‐XL, in patients with cancer. J Clin Pharm Ther 39:680-684, 2014
    1. Incyte Corporation : Ruxolitinib Prescribing Information. 2020.
    1. Food and Drug Administration WU : Ruxolitinib (Jakafi), Application Number: 202192Orig1s000, Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Review(s). 2011.
    1. Xiong H, Pradhan RS, Nada A, et al. : Studying navitoclax, a targeted anticancer drug, in healthy volunteers—Ethical considerations and risk/benefit assessments and management. Anticancer Res 34:3739-3746, 2014
    1. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. : Efficacy, safety, and survival with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis: Results of a median 3-year follow-up of COMFORT-I. Haematologica 100:479, 2015

Source: PubMed

3
購読する