Prenatal drug exposure and maternal and infant feeding behaviour

L L LaGasse, D Messinger, B M Lester, R Seifer, E Z Tronick, C R Bauer, S Shankaran, H S Bada, L L Wright, V L Smeriglio, L P Finnegan, P L Maza, J Liu, L L LaGasse, D Messinger, B M Lester, R Seifer, E Z Tronick, C R Bauer, S Shankaran, H S Bada, L L Wright, V L Smeriglio, L P Finnegan, P L Maza, J Liu

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate feeding difficulties and maternal behaviour during a feeding session with 1 month old infants prenatally exposed to cocaine and/or opiates.

Methods: The study is part of the maternal lifestyle study, which recruited 11 811 subjects at four urban hospitals, then followed 1388 from 1 to 36 months of age. Exposure to cocaine and opiates was determined by maternal interview and meconium assay. At the 1 month clinic visit, biological mothers were videotaped while bottle feeding their infants. This sample included 364 exposed to cocaine, 45 exposed to opiates, 31 exposed to both drugs, and 588 matched comparison infants. Mothers were mostly black, high school educated, and on public assistance. Videotapes were coded without knowledge of exposure status for frequency, duration and quality of infant sucking, arousal, feeding problems, and maternal feeding activity and interaction.

Results: No cocaine effects were found on infant feeding measures, but cocaine-using mothers were less flexible (6.29 v 6.50), less engaged (5.77 v 6.22), and had shorter feeding sessions (638 v 683 seconds). Opiate exposed infants showed prolonged sucking bursts (29 v 20 seconds), fewer pauses (1.6 v 2.2 per minute), more feeding problems (0.55 v 0.38), and increased arousal (2.59 v 2.39). Their mothers showed increased activity (30 v 22), independent of their infants' feeding problems.

Conclusions: Previous concerns about feeding behaviour in cocaine exposed infants may reflect the quality of the feeding interaction rather than infant feeding problems related to prenatal exposure. However, opiate exposed infants and their mothers both contributed to increased arousal and heightened feeding behaviour.

References

    1. Early Hum Dev. 2000 Nov;60(1):13-24
    1. J Anal Toxicol. 1999 Oct;23(6):436-45
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;186(3):487-95
    1. Pediatrics. 1970 Aug;46(2):187-92
    1. Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1975 Jul;12(1-2):63-9
    1. J Pediatr. 1976 Apr;88(4 Pt 1):637-41
    1. N Engl J Med. 1977 Sep 8;297(10):528-30
    1. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980 Jan;168(1):26-33
    1. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1980 Apr;4(2):152-64
    1. Pediatrics. 1986 Feb;77(2):209-11
    1. Nurs Res. 1986 Nov-Dec;35(6):352-5
    1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
    1. J Pediatr. 1987 May;110(5):799-804
    1. J Pediatr. 1987 Oct;111(4):571-8
    1. J Pediatr. 1988 Jan;112(1):143-8
    1. Pediatrics. 1989 Aug;84(2):205-10
    1. Epidemiology. 1990 Jan;1(1):43-6
    1. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1991 Mar-Apr;13(2):229-33
    1. Physiol Behav. 1992 Mar;51(3):487-91
    1. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 1992 Dec;6(3):76-84
    1. Lancet. 1993 Aug 21;342(8869):479-81
    1. Pediatrics. 1994 Feb;93(2):241-6
    1. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1994 Apr;18(2):317-23
    1. J Pediatr. 1996 Oct;129(4):581-90
    1. Early Hum Dev. 1996 Sep 20;46(1-2):105-16
    1. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1996 Nov-Dec;18(6):617-25
    1. Science. 1998 Oct 23;282(5389):633-4
    1. Pediatr Res. 1999 Feb;45(2):247-54
    1. Clin Perinatol. 1999 Mar;26(1):39-54, vi
    1. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Aug;153(8):801-7
    1. Pediatrics. 2001 Feb;107(2):309-17

Source: PubMed

3
購読する