Safety and feasibility of percutaneous retrograde coronary sinus delivery of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation in patients with chronic refractory angina

Jorge Tuma, Roberto Fernández-Viña, Antonio Carrasco, Jorge Castillo, Carlos Cruz, Alvaro Carrillo, Jose Ercilla, Carlos Yarleque, Jaime Cunza, Timothy D Henry, Amit N Patel, Jorge Tuma, Roberto Fernández-Viña, Antonio Carrasco, Jorge Castillo, Carlos Cruz, Alvaro Carrillo, Jose Ercilla, Carlos Yarleque, Jaime Cunza, Timothy D Henry, Amit N Patel

Abstract

Background: Chronic refractory angina is a challenging clinical problem with limited treatment options. The results of early cardiovascular stem cell trials using ABMMC have been promising but have utilized intracoronary or intramyocardial delivery. The goal of the study was to evaluate the safety and early efficacy of autologous bone marrow derived mononuclear cells (ABMMC) delivered via percutaneous retrograde coronary sinus perfusion (PRCSP) to treat chronic refractory angina (CRA).

Methods: From May 2005 to October 2006, 14 patients, age 68 +/- 20 years old, with CRA and ischemic stress-induced myocardial segments assessed by SPECT received a median 8.19*10(8) ± 4.3*10(8) mononuclear and 1.65*10(7) ± 1.42*10(7) CD34(+) cells by PRCSP.

Results: ABMMC delivery was successful in all patients with no arrhythmias, elevated cardiac enzymes or complications related to the delivery. All but one patient improved by at least one Canadian Cardiovascular Society class at 2 year follow-up compared to baseline (p < 0.001). The median baseline area of ischemic myocardium by SPECT of 38.2% was reduced to 26.5% at one year and 23.5% at two years (p = 0.001). The median rest left ventricular ejection fraction by SPECT at baseline was 31.2% and improved to 35.5% at 2 year follow up (p = 0.019).

Conclusions: PRCSP should be considered as an alternative method of delivery for cell therapy with the ability to safely deliver large number of cells regardless of coronary anatomy, valvular disease or myocardial dysfunction. The clinical improvement in angina, myocardial perfusion and function in this phase 1 study is encouraging and needs to be confirmed in randomized placebo controlled trials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A: Unselected transplantation of BMC into the coronary veins, B: Selected transplantation of BMC into the lateral veins.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clinical outcomes of angina class.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Exercise Capacity.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A: Perfusion imaging in a patient at 2 year follow up, B: Perfusion imaging in another patient at 2 year follow up.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Functional evaluation of myocardium.

References

    1. Jolicoeur EM. et al.Clinical and research issues regarding chronic advanced coronary artery disease part II: Trial design, outcomes, and regulatory issues. American heart journal. 2008;155(3):435–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.12.005.
    1. Mannheimer C. et al.The problem of chronic refractory angina; report from the ESC Joint Study Group on the Treatment of Refractory Angina. European heart journal. 2002;23(5):355–70. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2706.
    1. Strauer BE. et al.Repair of infarcted myocardium by autologous intracoronary mononuclear bone marrow cell transplantation in humans. Circulation. 2002;106(15):1913–8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000034046.87607.1C.
    1. Wollert KC. et al.Intracoronary autologous bone-marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: the BOOST randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9429):141–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16626-9.
    1. Schachinger V. et al.Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarction: final one-year results of the TOPCARE-AMI Trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2004;44(8):1690–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.014.
    1. Chen SL. et al.Effect on left ventricular function of intracoronary transplantation of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The American journal of cardiology. 2004;94(1):92–5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.03.034.
    1. Schachinger V. et al.Intracoronary bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in acute myocardial infarction. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;355(12):1210–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060186.
    1. Janssens S. et al.Autologous bone marrow-derived stem-cell transfer in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;367(9505):113–21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67861-0.
    1. Lipinski MJ. et al.Impact of intracoronary cell therapy on left ventricular function in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007;50(18):1761–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.041.
    1. Tse HF. et al.Angiogenesis in ischaemic myocardium by intramyocardial autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell implantation. Lancet. 2003;361(9351):47–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12111-3.
    1. Fuchs S. et al.Catheter-based autologous bone marrow myocardial injection in no-option patients with advanced coronary artery disease: a feasibility study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2003;41(10):1721–4. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00328-0.
    1. Perin EC. et al.Transendocardial, autologous bone marrow cell transplantation for severe, chronic ischemic heart failure. Circulation. 2003;107(18):2294–302. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000070596.30552.8B.
    1. Briguori C. et al.Direct intramyocardial percutaneous delivery of autologous bone marrow in patients with refractory myocardial angina. American heart journal. 2006;151(3):674–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.033.
    1. Losordo DW. et al.Intramyocardial, autologous CD34+ cell therapy for refractory angina. Circulation research. 2011;109(4):428–36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.245993.
    1. Giordano FJ. Retrograde coronary perfusion: a superior route to deliver therapeutics to the heart?*. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2003;42(6):1129–31. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00903-3.
    1. Boekstegers P. et al.Selective suction and pressure-regulated retroinfusion: an effective and safe approach to retrograde protection against myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing normal and high risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1998;31(7):1525–33. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00135-1.
    1. Pohl T. et al.Retroinfusion-supported stenting in high-risk patients for percutaneous intervention and bypass surgery: results of the prospective randomized myoprotect I study. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2004;62(3):323–30. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20060.
    1. Raake P. et al.Myocardial gene transfer by selective pressure-regulated retroinfusion of coronary veins: comparison with surgical and percutaneous intramyocardial gene delivery. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2004;44(5):1124–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.074.
    1. von Degenfeld G. et al.Selective pressure-regulated retroinfusion of fibroblast growth factor-2 into the coronary vein enhances regional myocardial blood flow and function in pigs with chronic myocardial ischemia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2003;42(6):1120–8. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00915-X.
    1. Hoshino K. et al.Three catheter-based strategies for cardiac delivery of therapeutic gelatin microspheres. Gene therapy. 2006;13(18):1320–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302793.
    1. Hou D. et al.Radiolabeled cell distribution after intramyocardial, intracoronary, and interstitial retrograde coronary venous delivery: implications for current clinical trials. Circulation. 2005;112(9 Suppl):I150–6.
    1. George JC. et al.Transvenous intramyocardial cellular delivery increases retention in comparison to intracoronary delivery in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction. Journal of interventional cardiology. 2008;21(5):424–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00390.x.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する