The role of spontaneous effort during mechanical ventilation: normal lung versus injured lung

Takeshi Yoshida, Akinori Uchiyama, Yuji Fujino, Takeshi Yoshida, Akinori Uchiyama, Yuji Fujino

Abstract

The role of preserving spontaneous effort during mechanical ventilation and its interaction with mechanical ventilation have been actively investigated for several decades. Inspiratory muscle activities can lower the pleural components surrounding the lung, leading to an increase in transpulmonary pressure when spontaneous breathing effort is preserved during mechanical ventilation. Thus, increased transpulmonary pressure provides various benefits for gas exchange, ventilation pattern, and lung aeration. However, it is important to note that these beneficial effects of preserved spontaneous effort have been demonstrated only when spontaneous effort is modest and lung injury is less severe. Recent studies have revealed the 'dark side' of spontaneous effort during mechanical ventilation, especially in severe lung injury. The 'dark side' refers to uncontrollable transpulmonary pressure due to combined high inspiratory pressure with excessive spontaneous effort and the injurious lung inflation pattern of Pendelluft (i.e., the translocation of air from nondependent lung regions to dependent lung regions). Thus, during the early stages of severe ARDS, the strict control of transpulmonary pressure and prevention of Pendelluft should be achieved with the short-term use of muscle paralysis. When there is preserved spontaneous effort in ARDS, spontaneous effort should be maintained at a modest level, as the transpulmonary pressure and the effect size of Pendelluft depend on the intensity of the spontaneous effort.

Keywords: ARDS; Lung injury; Muscle paralysis; Pendelluft; Pleural pressure; Spontaneous breathing; Transpulmonary pressure.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transpulmonary pressure difference: muscle paralysis vs. spontaneous breathing. Diaphragmatic contraction can elevate transpulmonary pressure with the same airway pressure applied in muscle paralysis, by altering the pleural components surrounding the lung.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Transition phase from spontaneous breathing to muscle paralysis in a rabbit. A lung-injured animal was ventilated with assisted pressure control mode. We recorded continuously waveforms of transpulmonary pressure, airway pressure, flow, and esophageal pressure without any change in ventilatory settings, after injection of neuromuscular blocking agent. When spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation is diminished, the negative swing in esophageal pressure is decreasing. As a result, inspiratory transpulmonary pressure decreases. Note that inspiratory transpulmonary pressure linearly correlates with the intensity of spontaneous breathing effort.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Fluid-like behavior presented in normal lung vs. solid-like behavior presented in injured lung. (A) The normal lung is traditionally considered to be a continuous elastic system—exhibiting fluid-like behavior—such that distending pressure applied to a local region of the pleura (the negative swing in pleural pressure generated by diaphragmatic contraction is −10 cm H2O) becomes generalized over the whole lung (pleural) surface (the negative swings in pleural pressure at any regions are the same −10 cm H2O). (B) In injured lung, the negative swing in pleural pressure generated by diaphragmatic contraction is not uniformly transmitted, but rather concentrated in the dependent lung regions, thus a huge difference in negative pleural pressure between nondependent and dependent lung regions was generated at the early phase of inspiration, causing Pendelluft. Adapted with permission of the Wolters Kluwer Health (Ref. [36]).
Figure 4
Figure 4
EIT waveforms in experimental lung injury—spontaneous versus mechanical breaths. Note that the early inflation in the dependent region (Zones 3 and 4) was accompanied by concomitant deflation of nondependent region (Zones 1 and 2), indicating movement of air from nondependent to dependent lung (i.e. Pendelluft). Note that under the same tidal volume, spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation unsuspectedly increased dependent lung inflation (Zones 3 and 4) due to Pendelluft. Adapted with permission of the American Thoracic Society Copyright © 2014 American Thoracic Society (Ref. [12]).
Figure 5
Figure 5
CT images in experimental lung injury—muscle paralysis vs. spontaneous breathing. Both dynamic CT images of the same anatomical, sagittal level at end-expiration are shown to compare the end-expiratory lung volume and the shape of the diaphragm. CT images are colored according to their Hounsfield units densities. The black lines indicate the diaphragm at end-expiration. These dynamic CT images were continuously taken after injection of neuromuscular blocking agent, without any change in ventilatory settings. Spontaneous breathing effort restored the end-expiratory lung volume due to diaphragmatic muscle tone. Once diaphragm was paralyzed, diaphragm shifted to cranial direction, resulting in large collapse in dorsal lung regions. Note that this happened because inadequate (low) PEEP was applied.

References

    1. Stock MC, Downs JB, Frolicher DA. Airway pressure release ventilation. Crit Care Med. 1987;15:462–6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198705000-00002.
    1. Putensen C, Zech S, Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Stüber F, Von Spiegel T, et al. Long-term effects of spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support in patients with acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:43–9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.1.2001078.
    1. Marini JJ. Spontaneously regulated vs. controlled ventilation of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011;17:24–9. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328342726e.
    1. Putensen C, Muders T, Varelmann D, Wrigge H. The impact of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12:13–8. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000198994.37319.60.
    1. Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Neumann P, Defosse J, Magnusson A, Putensen C, et al. Spontaneous breathing improves lung aeration in oleic acid-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:376–84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00019.
    1. Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Neumann P, Muders T, Magnusson A, Putensen C, et al. Spontaneous breathing with airway pressure release ventilation favors ventilation in dependent lung regions and counters cyclic alveolar collapse in oleic-acid-induced lung injury: a randomized controlled computed tomography trial. Crit Care. 2005;9:R780–9. doi: 10.1186/cc3908.
    1. Yoshida T, Rinka H, Kaji A, Yoshimoto A, Arimoto H, Miyaichi T, et al. The impact of spontaneous ventilation on distribution of lung aeration in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: airway pressure release ventilation versus pressure support ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1892–900. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bbd918.
    1. Sassoon CS, Zhu E, Caiozzo VJ. Assist-control mechanical ventilation attenuates ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:626–32. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200401-042OC.
    1. Jung B, Constantin JM, Rossel N, Le Goff C, Sebbane M, Coisel Y, et al. Adaptive support ventilation prevents ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction in piglet: an in vivo and in vitro study. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:1435–43. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d7b036.
    1. Yoshida T, Uchiyama A, Matsuura N, Mashimo T, Fujino Y. Spontaneous breathing during lung-protective ventilation in an experimental acute lung injury model: high transpulmonary pressure associated with strong spontaneous breathing effort may worsen lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1578–85. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182451c40.
    1. Yoshida T, Uchiyama A, Matsuura N, Mashimo T, Fujino Y. The comparison of spontaneous breathing and muscle paralysis in two different severities of experimental lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:536–45. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182711972.
    1. Yoshida T, Torsani V, Gomes S, Santiago RRDS, Beraldo M, Cost EL, et al. Spontaneous effort causes occult pendelluft during mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:1420–7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201303-0539OC.
    1. Gainnier M, Roch A, Forel JM, Thirion X, Arnal JM, Donati S, et al. Effect of neuromuscular blocking agents on gas exchange in patients presenting with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:113–9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104114.72614.BC.
    1. Forel JM, Roch A, Marin V, Michelet P, Demory D, Blache JL, et al. Neuromuscular blocking agents decrease inflammatory response in patients presenting with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2749–57. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000239435.87433.0D.
    1. Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, et al. ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1107–16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372.
    1. Steingrub JS, Lagu T, Rothberg MB, Nathanson BH, Raghunathan K, Lindenauer PK. Treatment with neuromuscular blocking agents and the risk of in-hospital mortality among mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:90–6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829eb7c9.
    1. Eikermann M, Vidal Melo MF. Therapeutic range of spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:536–9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000126.
    1. Hamid O, Shannon J, Martin J. Actions of the respiratory muscles. In: Troyer AD, editor. Physiologic basis of respiratory disease. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: BC Decker Inc; 2005. p. 263.
    1. Kim MJ, Druz WS, Danon J, Machnach W, Sharp JT. Mechanics of the canine diaphragm. J Appl Physiol. 1976;41:369–82.
    1. Marshall R. Relationships between stimulus and work of breathing at different lung volumes. J Appl Physiol. 1962;17:917–21.
    1. Sant’Ambrogio G, Saibene F. Contractile properties of the diaphragm in some mammals. Respir Physiol. 1970;10:349–57. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(70)90054-X.
    1. Pengelly LD, Alderson AM, Milic-Emili J. Mechanics of the diaphragm. J Appl Physiol. 1971;30:797–805.
    1. De Troyer A, Wilson TA. Effect of acute inflation on the mechanics of the inspiratory muscles. J Appl Physiol. 2009;107:315–23. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91472.2008.
    1. Evans CL, Hill AV. The relation of length to tension development and heat production on contraction in muscle. J Physiol. 1914;49:10–6. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1914.sp001684.
    1. Boriek AM, Black B, Hubmayr R, Wilson TA. Length and curvature of the dog diaphragm. J Appl Physiol. 2006;101:794–8. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00865.2004.
    1. Talmor DS, Fessler HE. Are esophageal pressure measurements important in clinical decision-making in mechanically ventilated patients? Respir Care. 2010;55:162–72.
    1. Talmor D, Sarge T, O’Donnell CR, Ritz R, Malhotra A, Lisbon A, et al. Esophageal and transpulmonary pressures in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1389–94. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215515.49001.A2.
    1. Keenan JC, Formenti P, Marini JJ. Lung recruitment in acute respiratory distress syndrome: what is the best strategy? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20:63–8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000054.
    1. Hoppin FG, Jr, Green ID, Mead J. Distribution of pleural surface pressure in dogs. J Appl Physiol. 1969;27:863–73.
    1. Krueger JJ, Bain T, Patterson JL., Jr Elevation gradient of intrathoracic pressure. J Appl Physiol. 1961;16:465–8.
    1. D’Angelo E, Sant’Ambrogio G, Agostoni E. Effect of diaphragm activity or paralysis on distribution of pleural pressure. J Appl Physiol. 1974;37:311–5.
    1. D’Angelo E, Agostoni E. Continuous recording of pleural surface pressure at various sites. J Appl Physiol. 1973;19:356–68.
    1. Minh VD, Friedman PJ, Kurihara N, Moser KM. Ipsilateral transpulmonary pressures during unilateral electrophrenic respiration. J Appl Physiol. 1974;37:505–9.
    1. Minh VD, Kurihara N, Friedman PJ, Moser KM. Reversal of the pleural pressure gradient during electrophrenic stimulation. J Appl Physiol. 1974;37:496–504.
    1. Zidulka A, Nadler S, Anthonisen NR. Pleural pressure with lobar obstruction in dogs. Respir Physiol. 1976;26:239–48. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(76)90102-X.
    1. Hraiech S, Yoshida T, Papazian L. Balancing neuromuscular blockade versus preserved muscle activity. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21:26–33. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000175.
    1. Hedenstierna G, Edmark L. The effects of anesthesia and muscle paralysis on the respiratory system. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1327–35. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2761-7.
    1. Hering R, Peters D, Zinserling J, Wrigge H, von Spiegel T, Putensen C. Effects of spontaneous breathing during airway pressure release ventilation on renal perfusion and function in patients with acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1426–33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1442-z.
    1. Rose L, Hawkins M. Airway pressure release ventilation and biphasic positive airway pressure: a systematic review of definitional criteria. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1766–73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1216-3.
    1. Hering R, Zinserling J, Wrigge H, Varelmann D, Berg A, Kreyer S, et al. Effects of spontaneous breathing during airway pressure release ventilation on respiratory work and muscle blood flow in experimental lung injury. Chest. 2005;128:2991–8.
    1. Saddy F, Moraes L, Santos CL, Oliveira GP, Cruz FF, Morales MM, et al. Biphasic positive airway pressure minimizes biological impact on lung tissue in mild acute lung injury independent of etiology. Crit Care. 2013;17:R228. doi: 10.1186/cc13051.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する