Barriers and enablers to adoption of intrauterine device as a contraceptive method: A multi-stakeholder perspective

Namita Mishra, Meely Panda, Souvik Pyne, Nallala Srinivas, Sandipana Pati, Sanghamitra Pati, Namita Mishra, Meely Panda, Souvik Pyne, Nallala Srinivas, Sandipana Pati, Sanghamitra Pati

Abstract

Background: Promoting family planning practices aid considerably in attaining Millennium Development Goals by various mechanisms. Despite concerted health system efforts, adoption of especially reversible contraceptive methods such as intrauterine devices (IUDs) has remained negatively skewed in India, which is the pioneer country to implement Family Planning programme way back in 1952. Although few studies in India have looked into the reasons for its nonacceptance, literature from Odisha was scant and hence the study was undertaken.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study using qualitative methods was done in the Mahanga Tehsil of Cuttack district. In-depth interviews were conducted with women of reproductive age (WRA) and focused group discussions (FGDs) among health workers and health professionals were held separately. Data analysis was done using thematic framework approach supported by Atlas Ti software.

Results: There were 31 in-depth interviews with WRA, two FGDs with health workers, and one FGD with health professionals. Availability of IUD services was low and wherever available, being located far away affected its physical accessibility. Most women were reluctant to ask health workers about services owing to their shyness while many women felt using IUDs breached their autonomy and privacy. The existence of fear and misconceptions regarding its use rooting from lack of knowledge and poor service quality also impeded its adoption by women.

Conclusion: There is a pressing need to enhance the demand of IUDs by dispelling the myths among women through effective information, education, and communication and also to improve the availability of IUDs.

Keywords: Contraceptive; health; intrauterine device; qualitative research; women.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. New Delhi: Policy Unit, NIHFW; 2014. National Institute Health and Family Welfare. Population and Development: A Discourse on Family Planning in Odisha.
    1. Kols A. Reducing unmet need for family planning: Evidence-based strategies and approaches. Outlook. 2008;25:1.
    1. Ringheim K, Gribble J, Foreman M. Integrating family planning and maternal and child health care: Saving lives, money, and time. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2007;33:6–12.
    1. Abrejo FG, Shaikh BT, Saleem S. ICPD to MDGs: Missing links and common grounds. Reprod Health. 2008;5:4.
    1. Visaria L, Jejeebhoy S, Merrick T. From family planning to reproductive health: Challenges facing India. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 1999;1:S44–9.
    1. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2007.
    1. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2010. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). District Level Household and family Survey (DLHS-3), 2007-08.
    1. Ambadekar NN, Rathod KZ, Zodpey SP. Study of cu T utilization status and some of the factors associated with discontinuation of cu T in rural part of yavatmal district. Indian J Community Med. 2011;36:54–6.
    1. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Family Welfare Statistics in India 2015. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 2016
    1. National Health Mission. Health Statistics. Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Odisha. [Last cited on 2016 Sep 13]. Available from: .
    1. Carpenter CJ. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Commun. 2010;25:661–9.
    1. Downing-Matibag TM, Geisinger B. Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: A health belief model perspective. Qual Health Res. 2009;19:1196–209.
    1. Khan ME, Kar SS, Desai VK, Patel P, Itare BP, Barge S. Increasing the Accessibility, Acceptability and Use of the IUD in Gujarat, India. Frontiers Final Report; May. 2008
    1. Rati MS, Jawadagi MS, Pujari MJ. A study to assess the factors affecting acceptance of intrauterine device (IUD) among rural women of Hirebagewadi, Belgaum. IOSR J Nurs Health Sci. 2014;3:37–52.
    1. Murarkar SK, Soundale SG, Lakade RN. Study of contraceptive practices and reasons for not accepting contraceptives in rural India: Chanai village as a case study. Indian J Sci Technol. 2011;4:915–6.
    1. Gadre SS, Ahirwar R. Level of acceptance of IUCD insertion in Indian women-a cross-sectional mixed research from central India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4:1079–85.
    1. Yadav K, Singh B, Goswami K. Agreement and concordance regarding reproductive intentions and contraception between husbands and wives in rural Ballabgarh, India. Indian J Community Med. 2010;35:19–23.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する