Total neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with high risk factors in Slovenia

Mojca Tuta, Nina Boc, Erik Brecelj, Mirko Omejc, Franc Anderluh, Ajra Secerov Ermenc, Ana Jeromen Peressutti, Irena Oblak, Bojan Krebs, Vaneja Velenik, Mojca Tuta, Nina Boc, Erik Brecelj, Mirko Omejc, Franc Anderluh, Ajra Secerov Ermenc, Ana Jeromen Peressutti, Irena Oblak, Bojan Krebs, Vaneja Velenik

Abstract

Background In the light of a high rate of distant recurrence and poor compliance of adjuvant chemotherapy in high risk rectal cancer patients the total neoadjuvant treatment was logical approach to gaining acceptance. We aimed to evaluate toxicity and efficiency of this treatment in patients with rectal cancer and high risk factors for local or distant recurrence. Patients and methods Patients with rectal cancer stage II and III and with at least one high risk factor: T4, presence of extramural vein invasion (EMVI), positive extramesorectal lymph nodes or mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement were treated with four cycles of induction CAPOX/FOLFOX, followed by capecitabine-based radiochemotherapy (CRT) and two consolidation cycles of CAPOX/FOLFOX before the operation. Surgery was scheduled 8-10 weeks after completition of CRT. Results From November 2016 to July 2018 66 patients were evaluable. All patients had stage III disease, 24 (36.4%) had T4 tumors, in 46 (69.7%) EMVI was present and in 47 (71.2%) MRF was involved. After induction chemotherapy, which was completed by 61 (92.4%) of patients, radiologic downstaging of T, N, stage, absence of EMVI or MRF involvement was observed in 42.4%, 62.1%, 36.4%, 69.7% and 68.2%, respectively. All patients completed radiation and 54 (81.8%) patients received both cycles of consolidation chemotherapy. Grade 3 adverse events of neoadjuvant treatment was observed in 4 (6%) patients. Five patients rejected surgery, 3 of them with radiologic complete clinical remissions. One patient did not have definitive surgery of primary tumor due to unexpected cardiac arrest few days after sigmoid colostomy formation. Among 60 operated patients pathological complete response rate was 23.3%, the rate of near complete response was 20% and in 96.7% radical resection was achieved. Pathological T, N and stage downstaging was 65%, 96.7% and 83.4%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 perioperative complications were anastomotic leakage in 3, pelvic abscess in 1 and paralytic ileus in 2 patients. The rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients irradiated with 3D conformal technique was 12.1% while with IMRT and VMAT it was 37% (p < 0.05). Hypofractionation with larger dose per fraction and simultaneous integrated boost used in the latest two was the only factor associated with pCR. ConclusionsTotal neoadjuvant treatment of high risk rectal cancer is well tolerated and highly effective with excellent tumor and node regression rate and with low toxicity rate. Longer follow up will show if this strategy will improve distant disease control and survival.

Keywords: capox; radiochemotherapy; rectal cancer; total neoadjuvant treatment.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patients’ progress through the treatment.

References

    1. Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EK, Putter H, Wiggers T. The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246:693–701. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000257358.56863.ce.
    1. Gollins S, Sebag-Montefiore D. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for locally advanced rectal cancer. Clin Oncol. 2016;28:146–51. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.11.003.
    1. De Felice F, Benevento I, Magnante AL, Musio D, Bulzonetti N, Caiazzo R. Clinical benefit of adding oxaliplatin to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:1–6. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3323-4.
    1. Chau I, Brown G, Cunningham D, Tait D, Wotherspoon A, Norman AR. Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin followed by synchronous chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision in magnetic resonance imaging-defined poor-risk rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:668–74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.4875.
    1. Fernández-Martos C, Pericay C, Aparicio J, Salud A, Safont MJ, Massuti B. Phase II, randomized study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) compared with induction CAPOX followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in magnetic resonance imaging-defined. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:859–65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8541.
    1. Cercek A, Roxburgh CSD, Strombom P, Smith JJ, Temple LKF, Nash GM. Adoption of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:e180071. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0071.
    1. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Arain MA, Chen YJ, Ciombor KK. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology rectal cancer Version 1.2019. 2019. [cited 2019 Apr 25]. Available at.
    1. Bujko K, Bujko M. Point: Short-course radiation therapy is preferable in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2011;21:220–7. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.02.008.
    1. Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, Brown G, Rödel C, Cervantes A. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 4):iv263. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy161.
    1. But-Hadzic J, Anderluh F, Brecelj E, Edhemovic I, Secerov-Ermenc A, Hudej R. Acute toxicity and tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation therapy with shortening of the overall treatment time using intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost: a Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:1003–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.031.
    1. Cancer Institute N. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE). 2009. [cited 2019 Apr 25]
    1. Edge SB, Compton CC. The american joint committee on cancer: The 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4.
    1. Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A. Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12:19–23. PMID: 9112145.
    1. IBM Corp. Released. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk: IBM Corp; 2018. 2018.
    1. Golo D, But-Hadzic J, Anderluh F, Brecelj E, Edhemovic I, Jeromen A. Induction chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in preoperative treatment of rectal cancer - Long-term results of phase II OIGIT-01 Trial. Radiol Oncol. 2018;52:267–74. doi: 10.2478/raon-2018-0028.
    1. Wang X, Yu Y, Meng W, Jiang D, Deng X, Wu B. Total neoadjuvant treatment (CAPOX plus radiotherapy) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with high risk factors: A phase 2 trial. Radiother Oncol. 2018;129:300–5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.027.
    1. Dewdney A, Cunningham D, Tabernero J, Capdevila J, Glimelius B, Cervantes A. Multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial comparing neoadjuvant oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and preoperative radiotherapy with or without cetuximab followed by total mesorectal excision in patients with high-risk rectal cancer (EXPERT-C) J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1620–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.6036.
    1. But-Hadzic J, Velenik V. Preoperative intensity-modulated chemoradiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost in rectal cancer: 2-year follow-up results of phase II study. Radiol Oncol. 2018;52:23–9. doi: 10.1515/raon-2018-0007.
    1. Kalady MF, De Campos-Lobato LF, Stocchi L, Geisler DP, Dietz D, Lavery IC. Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;250:582–8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b91e63.
    1. Francois BY, Nemoz CJ, Baulieux J, Vignal J, Grandjean J, Partensky C. Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: the Lyon R90-01 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2396–402. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2396.
    1. Goodman KA. Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. Cancer Radiother. 2018;22:459–65. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.01.004.
    1. George TJ, Allegra CJ, Yothers G. Neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score: a new surrogate endpoint in rectal cancer clinical trials. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2015;11:275–80. doi: 10.1007/s11888-015-0285-2.
    1. Yothers G, George TJ, Allegra CJ, Bosset J-F, Bujko K, Collette L. Predictive validity of NeoAdjuvant Rectal (NAR) Score and pathologic complete response (ypCR) for overall survival (OS) as surrogate endpoints in rectal cancer clinical trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(15 Suppl):3533. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.3533.
    1. Sclafani F, Peckitt C, Cunningham D, Tait D, Giralt J, Glimelius B. Short- and long-term quality of life and bowel function in patients with MRI-defined, high-risk, locally advanced rectal cancer treated with an intensified neoadjuvant strategy in the randomized phase 2 EXPERT-C Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2015;93:303–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.03.038.
    1. Schou J V., Larsen FO, Rasch L, Linnemann D, Langhoff J, Høgdall E. Induction chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin followed by chemoradiotherapy before total mesorectal excision in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2627–33. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds056.
    1. Zaborowski A, Stakelum A, Winter DC. Systematic review of outcomes after total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. BJS. 2019;106:979–87. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11171.
    1. Bosset JF, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Stojanovic-Rundic S, Bensadoun RJ. Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: Long-term results of the EORTC 22921 randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:184–90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70599-0.
    1. Herrle F, Sandra-Petrescu F, Weiss C, Post S, Runkel N, Kienle P. Quality of life and timing of stoma closure in patients with rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection with diverting stoma: A multicenter longitudinal observational study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:281–90. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000545.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する