Diffusion tensor imaging in spinal cord injury

Ravindra B Kamble, Neelam K Venkataramana, Arun L Naik, Shailesh V Rao, Ravindra B Kamble, Neelam K Venkataramana, Arun L Naik, Shailesh V Rao

Abstract

Background and purpose: To assess the feasibility of spinal tractography in patients of spinal cord injury vs a control group and to compare fractional anisotropy (FA) values between the groups.

Materials and methods: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was performed in the spinal cord of 29 patients (18 patients and 11 controls). DTI was done in the cervical region if the cord injury was at the dorsal or lumbar region and in the conus region if cord injury was in the cervical or dorsal region. FA was calculated for the patients and the controls and the values were compared.

Results: The mean FA value was 0.550±0.09 in the control group and 0.367±0.14 in the patients; this difference was statistically significant (P=0.001).

Conclusion: Spinal tractography is a feasible technique to assess the extent of spinal cord injury by FA, which is reduced in patients of spinal cord injury, suggesting possible Wallerian degeneration. In future, this technique may become a useful tool for assessing cord injury patients after stem cell therapy, with improvement in FA values indicating axonal regeneration.

Keywords: Fractional anisotropy; MRI; spinal cord injury; tensor imaging.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1 (A-E)
Figure 1 (A-E)
This patient sustained a road traffic accident with cervical cord injury. He had 0/5 power in both lower limbs and 4/5 power in both upper limbs. T2W sagittal MRI (A) shows cervical cord injury with a normal appearing lower cord. The line drawn at D11 shows the level of axial images. Figure B shows placement of the ROI with a colored map of the FA (C) and a colored ADC map (D). Figure E shows a colored fiber tractography image. The FA values at three ROIs were 0.275±0.0471, 0.315±0.0593, and 0.393±0.0687 which are significantly lower than the control group, suggesting possibly descending Wallerian degeneration in the lower cord.

References

    1. Lin VW, Cardenas DD, Cutter NC, Frost FS, Hammond MC. New York: Demos Medical Publishing; 2002. Spinal Cord Medicine: Principles and Practice.
    1. Becerra JL, Puckett WR, Hiester ED, Quencer RM, Marcillo AE, Donovan Post MJ, et al. MR-pathologic comparisons of Wallerian degeneration in spinal cord injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16:125–33.
    1. Hesseltine SM, Law M, Babba J, Rada M, Lopeza S, Gea Y, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in multiple sclerosis: Assessment of regional differences in the axial plane within normal-appearing cervical spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1189–93.
    1. Arfanakis K, Haughton VM, Carew JD, Rogers BP, Dempsey RJ, Meyerand ME. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:794–802.
    1. Inglese M, Makani S, Johnson G, Cohen BA, Silver JA, Gonen O, et al. Diffuse axonal injury in mild traumatic brain injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:298–303.
    1. Tsuchiya K, Fujikawa A, Honya K, Nitatori T, Suzuki Y. Diffusion tensor tractography of the lower spinal cord. Neuroradiology. 2008;50:221–5.
    1. Vargas MI, Delavelle J, Jlassi H, Rilliet B, Viallon M, Becker CD, et al. Clinical applications of diffusion tensor tractography of the spinal cord. Neuroradiology. 2008;50:25–9.
    1. Chang Y, Jung TD, Yoo DS, Hyun JK. Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography of patients with cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:2033–40.
    1. Kim JH, Loy DN, Wang Q, Budde MD, Schmidt RE, Trinkaus K, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging at 3 hours after traumatic spinal cord injury predicts long-term locomotor recovery. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:587–98.
    1. Mohamed FB, Hunter LN, Barakat N, Liu CS, Sair H, Samdani AF, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the pediatric spinal cord at 1.5T: Preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:339–45.
    1. Buss A, Pech K, Merkler D, Kakulas BA, Martin D, Schoenen J, et al. Sequential loss of myelin proteins during Wallerian degeneration in the human spinal cord. Brain. 2005;128:356–64.
    1. Ellingson BM, Kurpad SN, Schmit BD. Ex vivo diffusion tensor imaging and quantitative tractography of the rat spinal cord during long-term recovery from moderate spinal contusion. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:1068–79.
    1. Mathai KI, Sasivadanan, Sudumbraker S, Sahoo PK. Stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury A plea for rationality. Indian J Neurotrauma. 2008;5:7–10.
    1. Pal R, Venkataramana NK, Jan M, Bansal A, Balaraju S, Jaan M, et al. Ex vivo-expanded autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in human spinal cord injury/paraplegia: A pilot clinical study. Cytotherapy. 2009;11:897–911.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する