Tolerability, Safety, and Effectiveness of Oxycodone DETERx in Elderly Patients ≥65 Years of Age with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ernest A Kopecky, Ben Vaughn, Scott Lagasse, Melinda O'Connor, Ernest A Kopecky, Ben Vaughn, Scott Lagasse, Melinda O'Connor

Abstract

Trial design: This was a phase III, randomized withdrawal, double-blind, placebo-controlled, enriched enrollment, parallel-group, multicenter study intended to demonstrate the safety, tolerability, and analgesic efficacy of oxycodone DETERx® (Xtampza™ ER) compared with matching placebo.

Methods: This post hoc analysis was performed using data from a subpopulation of enrolled patients who were ≥65 years of age. The study enrolled male and female patients with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain for a minimum of 6 months prior to screening who required around-the-clock opioid therapy. To be eligible for enrollment, patients were required to have an average 24-h pain intensity score of ≥5 and ≤9 on an 11-point (0-10) Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale at the screening visit. The study enrolled both opioid-experienced and opioid-naïve patients. The study consisted of an open-label titration phase followed by a 12-week double-blind maintenance phase. The dose range was 40-160 mg oxycodone hydrochloride equivalent per day. This post hoc analysis evaluated the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of oxycodone DETERx among patients ≥65 years of age. The effectiveness of oxycodone DETERx was evaluated based on average pain intensity scores, Patient Global Impression of Change, responder analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The safety and tolerability of oxycodone DETERx were also evaluated. Patients were randomized to either oxycodone DETERx or placebo using a blocked randomization scheme in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization was stratified by previous opioid use (naïve or experienced). The study drug was coded in a manner that maintained the blinding. Study personnel and patients remained blinded to the assigned treatments throughout the study.

Results: For this post-hoc analysis, the intent-to-treat and randomized safety populations included 52 patients ≥65 years old, 26 each in the oxycodone DETERx and placebo groups, who participated in the study during the titration phase and were randomized to the double-blind maintenance phase. Clinically important pain reduction from screening was achieved with oxycodone DETERx, with the median pain intensity score decreasing from 7.50 at screening to 2.69 at Week 12. A clinically meaningful treatment difference of -0.9 in pain score between oxycodone DETERx and placebo was observed. All 18 elderly patients who completed the study reported improvement in pain, with 62% showing ≥30% improvement and 54% showing ≥50% improvement in pain intensity compared with patients on placebo (p = 0.0128 and p = 0.0501, respectively). Patients on oxycodone DETERx remained in the study longer than those on placebo. Of the 26 patients ≥65 years old randomized to continue oxycodone DETERx during the double-blind maintenance phase, 18 (69%) completed the study; only two patients (8%) in the oxycodone DETERx group discontinued due to adverse events. The safety and tolerability profiles showed no new or unexpected safety concerns. The adverse event profiles were similar between the titration and double-blind maintenance phases.

Conclusions: Oxycodone DETERx was efficacious and generally well tolerated in patients ≥65 years old.

Trial registration: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01685684).

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

Authors Melinda O’Connor and Scott Lagasse are salaried (including stock) employees of Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc., the company that funded the study and the writing of this manuscript. At the time this manuscript was written, author Ernest A. Kopecky was a salaried (including stock) employee of Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. Ben Vaughn is a salaried employee of Rho, Inc., a contract research organization that performed the statistical analyses for the manuscript. Mr. Vaughn has no personal financial ties to Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. and no ownership in any form in Rho, Inc.

Funding

The study was funded by Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Ethical approval and informed consent

The study was conducted according to Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. The clinical protocol for the parent study was reviewed and approved by an institutional review board (Quorum Review IRB, Seattle, WA, USA). All patients provided written consent to participate in the parent study before study-related procedures or assessments were conducted.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Weekly pain intensity (measured using an 11-point (0–10) numerical rating scale) scores for patients taking oxycodone DETERx by age (intent-to-treat population)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Responder analysis for pain intensity percent reduction at Week 12 in patients ≥65 years old (intent-to-treat population)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Time to exit from the study using the Kaplan–Meier method—patients ≥65 years of age

References

    1. Global Industry Analysts, Inc. Report; 2011. . Accessed 6 June 2017.
    1. Newsroom Archive. 2010 census shows 65 and older population growing faster than total U.S. population. . Accessed 6 June 2017.
    1. Katz N, Kopecky EA, OʼConnor M, et al. A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety, tolerability, and efficacy study of Xtampza ER in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain. Pain. 2015;156(12):2458–2467. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000315.
    1. Maxwell JC. The prescription drug epidemic in the United States: a perfect storm. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011;30(3):264–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00291.x.
    1. Pergolizzi JV, Jr, Taylor R, Jr, Nalamachu S, et al. Challenges of treating patients with chronic pain with dysphagia (CPD): physician and patient perspectives. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(2):191–202. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.854197.
    1. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Guidance for industry: size, shape, and other physical attributes of generic tablets and capsules. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; 2015.
    1. Argoff CE, Kopecky EA. Patients with chronic pain and dysphagia (CPD): unmet medical needs and pharmacologic treatment options. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(12):2543–2559. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.967388.
    1. Coluzzi PH, Fairbairn BS. The management of pain in terminally ill cancer patients with difficulty swallowing. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 1999;16(6):731–737. doi: 10.1177/104990919901600611.
    1. Zorba Paster R. Chronic pain management issues in the primary care setting and the utility of long-acting opioids. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010;11(11):1823–1833. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2010.491510.
    1. Gudin JA. Assessment of extended-release opioid analgesics for the treatment of chronic pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2013;27(1):49–61. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2012.757575.
    1. Raffa RB, Burmeister JJ, Yuvasheva E, et al. QTc interval prolongation by d-propoxyphene: what about other analgesics? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012;13(10):1397–1409. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2012.682150.
    1. Kopecky EA, Fleming AB, Noonan PK, et al. Impact of physical manipulation on in vitro and in vivo release profiles of oxycodone DETERx®: an extended-release, abuse-deterrent formulation. J Opioid Manag. 2014;10(4):233–246. doi: 10.5055/jom.2014.0211.
    1. Kopecky E, Fleming A, Findlen K, et al. Oxycodone DETERx, an extended-release, abuse-deterrent formulation for management of patients with chronic pain and chronic pain with dysphagia. J Pain. 2014;15(4):S90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.01.370.
    1. Fleming AB, Carlson DR, Varanasi RK, et al. Evaluation of an extended-release, abuse-deterrent, microsphere-in-capsule analgesic for the management of patients with chronic pain with dysphagia (CPD) Pain Pract. 2015;16(3):334–344. doi: 10.1111/papr.12280.
    1. Katz N. Enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trial designs of analgesics: focus on methodology. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(9):797–807. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b12dec.
    1. Ferrell B, Ferrell BA. Pain in the elderly: a report of the Task Force on Pain in the Elderly of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Seattle: IASP Press; 1996.
    1. Chodosh J, Solomon DH, Roth CP, et al. The quality of medical care provided to vulnerable older patients with chronic pain. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(5):756–761. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52214.x.
    1. McClean WJ, Higginbotham NH. Prevalence of pain among nursing home residents in rural New South Wales. Med J Aust. 2002;177(1):17–20.
    1. Won AB, Lapane KL, Vallow S, et al. Persistent nonmalignant pain and analgesic prescribing patterns in elderly nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(6):867–874. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52251.x.
    1. AGS Panel on Persistent Pain in Older Persons The management of persistent pain in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(S6):205–224. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.50.6s.1.x.
    1. Juurlink DN, Herrmann N, Szalai JP, et al. Medical illness and the risk of suicide in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(11):1179–1184. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.11.1179.
    1. Jakobsson U, Rahm Hallberg I, Westergren A. Pain management in elderly persons who require assistance with activities of daily living: a comparison of those living at home with those in special accommodations. Eur J Pain. 2004;8(4):335–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.10.007.
    1. Bosley BN, Weiner DK, Rudy TE, et al. Is chronic nonmalignant pain associated with decreased appetite in older adults? Preliminary evidence. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(2):247–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52063.x.
    1. Ferrell B, Argoff CE, Epplin J, et al. Pharmacological management of persistent pain in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(8):1331–46. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02376.x.
    1. Avouac J, Gossec L, Dougados M. Efficacy and safety of opioids for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2007;15(8):957–965. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.02.006.
    1. Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(7):478–491. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006.
    1. Eisenberg E, McNicol ED, Carr DB. Efficacy and safety of opioid agonists in the treatment of neuropathic pain of nonmalignant origin. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293(24):3043–3052. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.24.3043.
    1. Moulin DE, Clark AJ, Gilron I, et al. Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain—consensus statement and guidelines from the Canadian Pain Society. Pain Res Manag. 2007;12(1):13–21. doi: 10.1155/2007/730785.
    1. Nicholson B, Passik SD. Management of chronic noncancer pain in the primary care setting. South Med J. 2007;100(10):1028–1036. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3180f626ff.
    1. Trescot AM, Helm S, Hansen H, et al. Opioids in the management of chronic non-cancer pain: an update of American Society of the Interventional Pain Physicians’ (ASIPP) Guidelines. Pain Physician. 2008;11(2 Suppl):S5–S62.
    1. Singh G, Wu O, Langhorne P, et al. Risk of acute myocardial infarction with nonselective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R153. doi: 10.1186/ar2047.
    1. Benyamin R, Trescot AM, Datta S, Buenaventura R, Adlaka R, Sehgal N, et al. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician. 2008;11(2 Suppl):S105–S120.
    1. Rao A, Cohen HJ. Symptom management in the elderly cancer patient: fatigue, pain, and depression. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2004;2004(32):150–157. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh031.
    1. Cleary JF, Carbone PP. Palliative medicine in the elderly. Cancer. 1997;80(7):1335–1347. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971001)80:7<1335::AID-CNCR21>;2-7.
    1. Gloth FM., 3rd Pain management in older adults: prevention and treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(2):188–199. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49041.x.
    1. Viganó A, Bruera E, Suarez-Almazor ME. Age, pain intensity, and opioid dose in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer. 1998;83(6):1244–1250. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980915)83:6<1244::AID-CNCR26>;2-4.
    1. Auret K, Schug SA. Underutilisation of opioids in elderly patients with chronic pain. Drugs Aging. 2005;22(8):641–654. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200522080-00002.
    1. OxyContin [package insert] Purdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, CT, 2007. . Accessed 6 June 2017.
    1. Opana ER [package insert] Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Chadds Ford, PA. 2012. . Accessed 6 June 2017.
    1. Hysingla ER [package insert] Purdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, CT. 2014. . Accessed 6 June 2017.
    1. Embeda [medication guide] Pfizer Inc., New York, NY. 2014. . Accessed 6 June 2017.
    1. Troxyca ER [medication guide] Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY. 2016. . Accessed 6 June 2017.
    1. SAS Software, Version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows. Copyright © 2014 SAS Institute Inc.
    1. Zohydro ER [medical review] Zogenix Inc., Emeryville, CA. 2013. . Accessed 6 June 2017.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する