Safety and immunogenicity of a Herpes Zoster subunit vaccine in Japanese population aged ≥50 years when administered subcutaneously vs. intramuscularly

Peter Vink, Masanari Shiramoto, Masayuki Ogawa, Masahiro Eda, Martine Douha, Thomas Heineman, Himal Lal, Peter Vink, Masanari Shiramoto, Masayuki Ogawa, Masahiro Eda, Martine Douha, Thomas Heineman, Himal Lal

Abstract

The impact of alternate routes of vaccine administration, subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM), on the safety and immunogenicity of herpes zoster subunit candidate vaccine (HZ/su) was assessed in Japanese adults aged ≥ 50 y. During this phase III open-label study, 60 subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive HZ/su through SC or IM routes in a 0, 2 month schedule. Vaccine response rates (VRRs) and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of varicella zoster virus glycoprotein E (gE)-specific antibodies were determined by ELISA. Solicited and unsolicited symptoms were recorded for 7 and 30 d after each vaccination and graded 1-3 in severity. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded throughout the study. At one month post-dose 2, VRRs were 100% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 88.1-100) in both groups; anti-gE antibody GMCs were 44126.1 mIU/ml (95% CI: 36326.1-53601.0) and 45521.5 mIU/ml (95% CI; 37549.5-55185.9) in the SC and IM groups, respectively. Injection site reactions (pain, swelling and redness) were common, and observed more frequently following SC administration. Grade 3 redness and swelling were more frequently observed after SC administration. Fatigue and headache were the most frequently reported general symptoms for both routes of administration. Ten and 7 unsolicited AEs were reported in the SC and IM group, respectively. Two unsolicited AEs (1 in SC; 1 in IM) were considered related to vaccination by the investigator. Three non-fatal SAEs considered unrelated to vaccination were reported during the study. Administration of the HZ/su vaccine candidate resulted in a substantial immune response that was comparable between SC and IM subjects, but local reactogenicity may be greater for SC.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01777321.

Keywords: HZ/su vaccine; adjuvant; adjuvanted vaccine; herpes zoster; immunogenicity; intramuscular; reactogenicity; subcutaneous.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Disposition of study participants. SC: Subcutaneous IM: Intramuscular.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Vaccine response rate and geometric mean concentrations of anti-gE antibody (ATP cohort for immunogenicity). Samples were collected at the indicated time points (for both subcutaneous (SC) versus intramuscular (IM) groups) and anti-gE antibody concentrations were determined by ELISA. Data are vaccine response rates (VRRs) and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and error bars indicate 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Overall occurrence of solicited injection site reactions and general symptoms during the 7-day vaccination follow-up period (Total vaccinated cohort).

References

    1. Gershon AA, Gershon MD, Breuer J, Levin MJ, Oaklander AL, Griffiths PD. Advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis and epidemiology of herpes zoster. J Clin Virol 2010; 4 8(Suppl 1):S2-7; PMID:20510263;
    1. Eshleman E, Shahzad A, Cohrs RJ. Varicella zoster virus latency. Future Virol 2011; 6:341-55; PMID:21695042;
    1. Pickering G, Leplege A. Herpes zoster pain, postherpetic neuralgia, and quality of life in the elderly. Pain Pract 2011; 11:397-402; PMID:21199312;
    1. Harpaz R, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Seward JF. Prevention of herpes zoster: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2008; 57:1-30; quiz CE2-4
    1. McElhaney JE. Prevention of infectious diseases in older adults through immunization: the challenge of the senescent immune response. Expert Rev Vaccines 2009; 8:593-606; PMID:19397416;
    1. Sampathkumar P, Drage LA, Martin DP. Herpes zoster (shingles) and postherpetic neuralgia. Mayo Clin Proc 2009; 84:274-80; PMID:19252116;
    1. Toyama N, Shiraki K. Epidemiology of herpes zoster and its relationship to varicella in Japan: A 10-year survey of 48,388 herpes zoster cases in Miyazaki prefecture. J Med Virol 2009; 81:2053-8; PMID:19856466;
    1. Yawn BP, Gilden D. The global epidemiology of herpes zoster. Neurology 2013; 81:928-30; PMID:23999562;
    1. Chapman RS, Cross KW, Fleming DM. The incidence of shingles and its implications for vaccination policy. Vaccine 2003; 21:2541-7; PMID:12744889;
    1. Gonzalez Chiappe S, Sarazin M, Turbelin C, Lasserre A, Pelat C, Bonmarin I, Chosidow O, Blanchon T, Hanslik T. Herpes zoster: Burden of disease in France. Vaccine 2010; 28:7933-8; PMID:20946861;
    1. Pinchinat S, Cebrián-Cuenca AM, Bricout H, Johnson RW. Similar Herpes Zoster incidence across Europe: results from a systematic literature review. BMC Infect Dis 2013; 13:170; PMID:23574765;
    1. Clark TG, Cassidy-Hanley D. Recombinant subunit vaccines: potentials and constraints. Dev Biol (Basel) 2005; 121:153-63; PMID:15962478
    1. Garcon N, Van Mechelen M. Recent clinical experience with vaccines using MPL- and QS-21-containing adjuvant systems. Expert Rev Vaccines 2011; 10:471-86; PMID:21506645;
    1. Lal H, Cunningham AL, Godeaux O, Chlibek R, Diez-Domingo J, Hwang SJ, Levin MJ, McElhaney JE, Poder A, Puig-Barberà J, et al.. Efficacy of an adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:2087-96; PMID:25916341;
    1. Lal H, Zahaf T, Heineman TC. Safety and immunogenicity of an AS01-adjuvanted varicella zoster virus subunit candidate vaccine (HZ/su): a phase-I, open-label study in Japanese adults. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2013; 9:1425-9; PMID:23584252;
    1. Leroux-Roels I, Leroux-Roels G, Clement F, Vandepapeliere P, Vassilev V, Ledent E, Heineman TC. A phase 1/2 clinical trial evaluating safety and immunogenicity of a varicella zoster glycoprotein e subunit vaccine candidate in young and older adults. J Infect Dis 2012; 206:1280-90; PMID:22872734;
    1. Chlibek R, Bayas JM, Collins H, de la Pinta ML, Ledent E, Mold JF, Heineman TC. Safety and immunogenicity of an AS01-adjuvanted varicella-zoster virus subunit candidate vaccine against herpes zoster in adults ≥50 years of age. J Infect Dis 2013; 208:1953-61; PMID:23904292;
    1. Chlibek R, Smetana J, Pauksens K, Rombo L, Van den Hoek JA, Richardus JH, Plassmann G, Ledent E, Heineman TC. Safety and immunogenicity of three different formulations of an adjuvanted varicella-zoster virus subunit candidate vaccine in older adults: a phase II, randomized, controlled study. Vaccine 2014; 32:1745-53; PMID:24508036;
    1. Saitoh A, Okabe N. Current issues with the immunization program in Japan: can we fill the “vaccine gap”? Vaccine 2012; 30:4752-6; PMID:22521841;
    1. Zuckerman JN. The importance of injecting vaccines into muscle. Different patients need different needle sizes. BMJ 2000; 321:1237-8;
    1. Ajana F, Sana C, Caulin E. [Are there differences in immunogenicity and safety of vaccines according to the injection method?]. Med Mal Infect 2008; 38:648-57; PMID:18986787;
    1. Cook IF, Barr I, Hartel G, Pond D, Hampson AW. Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of an inactivated influenza vaccine administered by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection in elderly adults. Vaccine 2006; 24(13):2395-402; PMID:16406171;
    1. de Lalla F, Rinaldi E, Santoro D, Pravettoni G. Immune response to hepatitis B vaccine given at different injection sites and by different routes: a controlled randomized study. Eur J Epidemiol 1988; 4(2):256-8; PMID:2969825;
    1. Diez-Domingo J, Weinke T, Garcia de Lomas J, Meyer CU, Bertrand I, Eymin C, Thomas S, Sadorge C. Comparison of intramuscular and subcutaneous administration of a herpes zoster live-attenuated vaccine in adults aged ≥50 years: a randomised non-inferiority clinical trial. Vaccine 2015; 33:789-95; PMID:25555381;
    1. Ruben FL, Froeschle JE, Meschievitz C, Chen K, George J, Reeves-Hoché MK, Pietrobon P, Bybel M, Livingood WC, Woodhouse L. Choosing a route of administration for quadrivalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine: intramuscular versus subcutaneous. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32(1):170-2; PMID:11118395;
    1. Mark A, Carlsson RM, Granstöm M. Subcutaneous versus intramuscular injection for booster DT vaccination of adolescents. Vaccine 1999; 17(15–16):2067-72; PMID:10217608
    1. Rothstein EP, Kamiya H, Nii R, Matsuda T, Bernstein HH, Long SS, Hosbach PH, Meschievitz CK. Comparison of diphtheria-tetanus-two component acellular pertussis vaccines in United States and Japanese infants at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. Pediatrics 1996; 97(2):236-42; PMID:8584384

Source: PubMed

3
購読する