Community based trial of home blood pressure monitoring with nurse-led telephone support in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack recently discharged from hospital

Sally Kerry, Hugh Markus, Teck Khong, Reena Doshi, Rachel Conroy, Pippa Oakeshott, Sally Kerry, Hugh Markus, Teck Khong, Reena Doshi, Rachel Conroy, Pippa Oakeshott

Abstract

Background: High blood pressure in patients with stroke increases the risk of recurrence but management in the community is often inadequate. Home blood pressure monitoring may increase patients' involvement in their care, increase compliance, and reduce the need for patients to attend their General Practitioner if blood pressure is adequately controlled. However the value of home monitoring to improve blood pressure control is unclear. In particular its use has not been evaluated in stroke patients in whom neurological and cognitive ability may present unique challenges.

Design: Community based randomised trial with follow up after 12 months.

Participants: 360 patients admitted to three South London Stroke units with stroke or transient ischaemic attack within the past 9 months will be recruited from the wards or outpatients and randomly allocated into two groups. All patients will be visited by the specialist nurse at home at baseline when she will measure their blood pressure and administer a questionnaire. These procedures will be repeated at 12 months follow up by another researcher blind as to whether the patient is in intervention or control group.

Intervention: INTERVENTION patients will be given a validated home blood pressure monitor and support from the specialist nurse. Control patients will continue with usual care (blood pressure monitoring by their practice). Main outcome measures in both groups after 12 months: 1. Change in systolic blood pressure.2. Cost effectiveness: Incremental cost of the intervention to the National Health Service and incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gained.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov registration NCT00514800.

References

    1. Cappuccio F, Kerry SM, Forbes L, Donald A. Blood pressure control by home monitoring:a meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2004;329:145–8. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. Bakx JC, van der Wel MC, van Wel c. Self monitoring of high blood pressure. BMJ. 2005;331:466–467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7515.466.
    1. Fahey T. Educational and organisational interventions used to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review. BJGP. 2005;55:875–882.
    1. McManus RJ, Mant J, Roalfe A, Oakes RA, Bryan S, Pattison HM, Hobbs FD. Targets and self monitoring in hypertension: randomised controlled trial and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2005;331:493–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38558.393669.E0.
    1. Staessen JA, Den Hond E, Celis H, Fagard R, Keary L, Vandenhoven G, O'Brien ET. Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician's office: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:955–64. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.8.955.
    1. Fahey T, Schroeder K, Ebrahim S. Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. p. CD005182.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Hypertension: management of hypertension in adults in primary care (CG034) 2006.
    1. Celis H, Hond ED, Staessen JA. Self-measurement of blood pressure at home in the management of hypertension. Clinical Medicine and Research. 2005;3:19–26.
    1. Dean SC, Oakeshott P, Kerry SM, Cappuccio FP. Potential barriers to adequate blood pressure control in hypertensive patients in primary care. Family Practice.
    1. Cappuccio F, Oakeshott P, Strazzullo P, Kerry SM. Application of Framingham risk estimates to ethnic minorities in United Kingdom and implications for primary prevention of heart disease in general practice: cross sectional population based study. BMJ. 2002;325:1271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1271.
    1. Dennis M, O'Rourke S, Slattery J, Staniforth T, Warlow C. Evaluation of a stroke family care worker: results of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1997;314:1071–7.
    1. Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke? Stroke. 1997;28:1876–82.
    1. Krasucki C, Ryan P, Ertan T, Howard R, Lindesay J, Mann A. The FEAR: a rapid screening instrument for generalised anxiety in elderly primary care attenders. Int J Ger Psych. 14:60–68. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199901)14:1<60::AID-GPS893>;2-G.
    1. O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mallion JM, Mancia G, Mengden T, Myers M, Padfield P, Palatini P, Parati G, Pickering T, Redon J, Staessen J, Stergiou G, Verdecchia P, European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. ESH recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2003;21:821–48. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200305000-00001.
    1. Wonderling D, McDermott C, Buxton M, Kinmonth AL, Pyke S, Thompson S, Wood D. Costs and effectiveness of cardiovascular screening and intervention: the British Family Heart Study. BMJ. 1996;312:1269–73.
    1. NICE . Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. National Institute for Clinical Excellence London; 2004.
    1. Patel A, Knapp M, Evans A, Perez I, Kalra L. Training care givers of stroke patients:economic evaluation. BMJ. 2004;328:1102–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1102.
    1. Raftery JP, Guiquip LY, Murchie P, Campbell NC, Ritchie LD. Cost effectiveness of nurse led secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease in primary care: follow up of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2005;330:707–10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38342.665417.8F.
    1. BMA and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National Formulary. 2005.
    1. DH NHS Reference costs. Leeds : DH. 2004.
    1. Curtis L, Netten A. Unit costs of health and social care. University of Kent Social Research Unit. 2004.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する