Characterisation of the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and drospirenone in extended-cycle regimens: population pharmacokinetic analysis from a randomised Phase III study

Stefanie Reif, Nelleke Snelder, Hartmut Blode, Stefanie Reif, Nelleke Snelder, Hartmut Blode

Abstract

Objectives: The primary objective of this analysis was to characterise the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of ethinylestradiol (EE) and drospirenone (DRSP) in a randomised Phase III study that investigated the contraceptive efficacy and safety of three different regimens of EE 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg.

Methods: Non-linear mixed-effects modelling was used to develop population PK models for EE and DRSP. EE and DRSP serum concentrations were determined in blood samples obtained from approximately 1100 healthy young women on two occasions during the first cycle (Week 3) and after 6 months (Week 27) of EE 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg use. EE 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg was administered as a flexible extended regimen [24-120 days' active hormonal intake followed by 4 days with no tablet intake (tablet-free interval)], a conventional 28-day cyclic regimen (24 days' active hormonal intake followed by 4 days of placebo tablets) or a fixed extended regimen (120 days' uninterrupted active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day tablet-free interval) over 1 year.

Results: The population PK of EE and DRSP in this population were successfully described using the developed population models. All three regimens led to similar steady-state drug exposure during long-term treatment. Only minor changes (≤ 8%) in the steady-state PK of EE and DRSP were observed between Week 3 and Week 27 of an extended regimen. Body weight (BW) and age had a small, statistically significant impact on the PK of EE and DRSP (BW only) in a covariate analysis, however, these changes were not considered to be clinically relevant.

Conclusions: Extending the established 24/4-day regimen of EE 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg does not change the known steady-state PK of EE and DRSP, suggesting that the clinical efficacy is also similar. This is in line with the published clinical results from this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Observed ethinylestradiol (EE) and drospirenone (DRSP) serum concentrations and (B) final models of EE and DRSP for population predicted (lines) and observed (circles) concentrations in young healthy women on different EE 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg regimens. In A, black circles: flexible extended regimen with management of intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding (flexibleMIB; 24–120/4); dark grey triangles: fixed extended regimen (120/4); light grey quadrangles: conventional regimen (24/4). In B, Week 3, Days 15–21 of the first cycle with daily administration of EE 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg. Week 27: Days 15–21 of the seventh cycle in a 24/4 regimen, or Days 59–65 of the second cycle in a fixed extended regimen (120/4), or Week 27 in a flexible extended regimen (24–120/4). Database: 4218 EE and 4042 DRSP serum concentrations from 1109 and 1096 subjects. At both visits, two samples were taken from each subject 45–120 minutes apart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Final models for ethinylestradiol (EE) and drospirenone (DRSP): visual predictive checks. Scatter = observed values; continuous line = predicted median; dashed line = predicted lower and upper limit of 90% of the predictions. Visit 3 = Week 3; Visit 5 = Week 27.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Impact of the covariates body weight (BW) and age on ethinylestradiol (EE) exposure (A) and covariate BW on drospirenone (DRSP) exposure (B) in comparison with the overall distribution of individual EE or DRSP area under drug concentration time curves from 0–24 hours at steady state (AUC0–24 h, ss) in the study population. The AUC range between the 5th and 95th percentiles is shown as bars across the whole study population. The vertical line indicates the AUC value of a typical subject of median age (24 years) and weight (62 kg). Numbers in parentheses of the bars labelled with the covariate name indicate the deviation of the AUC value from the typical subject's value for the subjects at the 5th and 95th percentiles of the covariate distribution.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Final models for ethinylestradiol (EE) and drospirenone (DRSP): distribution of the individual EE and DRSP exposure at steady state (AUC0–24 h, ss) by regimen. Group 1 = flexible extended regimen with management of intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding (24–120/4); Group 2 = fixed extended regimen (120/4); Group 3 = conventional regimen (24/4). Black line with dot = median; box = range between 25th and 75th percentile; whiskers = 5th and 95th percentile.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Minimum and maximum drospirenone concentrations to be expected with the conventional regimen (24/4) and an extended flexible 72/4-day regimen (simulated data).

References

    1. Andrist LC, Arias RD, Nucatola D, et al. Women's and providers’ attitudes toward menstrual suppression with extended use of oral contraceptives. Contraception 2004;70:359–363
    1. den Tonkelaar I, Oddens BJ. Preferred frequency and characteristics of menstrual bleeding in relation to reproductive status, oral contraceptive use, and hormone replacement therapy use. Contraception 1999;59:357–362
    1. Edelman A, Lew R, Cwiak C, et al. Acceptability of contraceptive-induced amenorrhea in a racially diverse group of US women. Contraception 2007;75:450–453
    1. Kuhl H, Birkhauser M, Mueck A, et al. Long-cycle treatment in oral contraception [in German]. Ther Umsch 2009;66:101–108
    1. Wiegratz I, Hommel HH, Zimmermann T, et al. Attitude of German women and gynecologists towards long-cycle treatment with oral contraceptives. Contraception 2004;69:37–42
    1. Klipping C, Duijkers I, Fortier M, et al. Contraceptive efficacy and tolerability of ethinylestradiol 20 µg/drospirenone 3 mg in a flexible extended regimen: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2012;38:73–83
    1. Klipping C, Duijkers I, Fortier M, et al. Long-term tolerability of ethinylestradiol 20 µg/drospirenone 3 mg in a flexible extended regimen: results from a randomised, controlled, multicentre study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2012;38:84–93
    1. Kroll R, Reape KZ, Margolis M. The efficacy and safety of a low-dose, 91-day, extended-regimen oral contraceptive with continuous ethinyl estradiol. Contraception 2010;81:41–48
    1. Wiegratz I, Stahlberg S, Manthey T, et al. Effect of extended-cycle regimen with an oral contraceptive containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and 2 mg dienogest on bleeding patterns, safety, acceptance and contraceptive efficacy. Contraception 2011;84:133–143
    1. Wright KP, Johnson JV. Evaluation of extended and continuous use oral contraceptives. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2008;4:905–911
    1. Edelman AB, Gallo MF, Jensen JT, et al. Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined oral contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3::CD004695.
    1. Blode H, Kowal K, Roth K, et al. Pharmacokinetics of drospirenone and ethinylestradiol in Caucasian and Japanese women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2012;17:284–297
    1. Blode H, Wuttke W, Loock W, et al. A 1-year pharmacokinetic investigation of a novel oral contraceptive containing drospirenone in healthy female volunteers. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2000;5:256–264
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Guidance for Industry: Population Pharmacokinetics. February 1999. [accessed 4 January 2013].
    1. Beal S, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann A, et al. NONMEM User's Guides (1989–2009). Ellicott City, MD: Icon Development Solutions, 2009
    1. Jonsson EN, Karlsson MO. Automated covariate model building within NONMEM. Pharm Res 1998;15:1463–1468
    1. Wählby U, Jonsson EN, Karlsson MO. Comparison of stepwise covariate model building strategies in population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis. AAPS PharmSci 2002;4:E27.
    1. DiLiberti CE, O'Leary CM, Hendy CH, et al. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of an extended-regimen oral contraceptive with continuous estrogen. Contraception 2011;83:55–61
    1. Jensen JT, Garie SG, Trummer D, et al. Bleeding profile of a flexible extended regimen of ethinylestradiol/drospirenone in US women: an open-label, three-arm, active-controlled, multicenter study. Contraception 2012;86:110–118
    1. Goldzieher JW, Dozier TS, de la Pena A. Plasma levels and pharmacokinetics of ethynyl estrogens in various populations. I. Ethynylestradiol. Contraception 1980;21:1–16
    1. Fotherby K, Akpoviroro J, Abdel-Rahman HA, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ethynyloestradiol in women for different populations. Contraception 1981;23:487–496
    1. Goldzieher JW, Stanczyk FZ. Oral contraceptives and individual variability of circulating levels of ethinyl estradiol and progestins. Contraception 2008;78:4–9
    1. Brody SA, Turkes A, Goldzieher JW. Pharmacokinetics of three bioequivalent norethindrone/mestranol-50 micrograms and three norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol-35 micrograms OC formulations: are “low-dose” pills really lower? Contraception 1989;40:269–284
    1. Kuhnz W, Blode H, Zimmermann H. Pharmacokinetics of exogenous natural and synthetic estrogens and antiestrogens. In: Oettel M, Schillinger E (eds), Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology: Estrogens and Antiestrogens II Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1999;. 261–322.
    1. Davis AR, Westhoff CL, Stanczyk FZ. Carbamazepine coadministration with an oral contraceptive: effects on steroid pharmacokinetics, ovulation, and bleeding. Epilepsia 2011;52:243–247
    1. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc ALESSE® 28 Tablets (levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol tablets) prescribing information 2008: [accessed 4 January 2013].
    1. Endrikat J, Blode H, Gerlinger C, et al. A pharmacokinetic study with a low-dose oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol plus 100 microg levonorgestrel. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2002;7:79–90

Source: PubMed

3
購読する