Importance of coverage and endemicity on the return of infectious trachoma after a single mass antibiotic distribution

Takele Lakew, Wondu Alemayehu, Muluken Melese, Elizabeth Yi, Jenafir I House, Kevin C Hong, Zhaoxia Zhou, Kathryn J Ray, Travis C Porco, Bruce D Gaynor, Thomas M Lietman, Jeremy D Keenan, Takele Lakew, Wondu Alemayehu, Muluken Melese, Elizabeth Yi, Jenafir I House, Kevin C Hong, Zhaoxia Zhou, Kathryn J Ray, Travis C Porco, Bruce D Gaynor, Thomas M Lietman, Jeremy D Keenan

Abstract

Background: As part of the SAFE strategy, mass antibiotic treatments are useful in controlling the ocular strains of chlamydia that cause trachoma. The World Health Organization recommends treating at least 80% of individuals per community. However, the role of antibiotic coverage for trachoma control has been poorly characterized.

Methodology/principal findings: In a collection of cluster-randomized clinical trials, mass oral azithromycin was administered to 40 villages in Ethiopia. The village prevalence of ocular chlamydia was determined before treatment, and at two and six months post-treatment. The mean prevalence of ocular chlamydia was 48.9% (95% CI 42.8 to 55.0%) before mass treatments, decreased to 5.4% (95% CI 3.9 to 7.0%) at two months after treatments (p<0.0001), and returned to 7.9% (95% CI 5.4 to 10.4%) by six months after treatment (p = 0.03). Antibiotic coverage ranged from 73.9% to 100%, with a mean of 90.6%. In multivariate regression models, chlamydial prevalence two months after treatment was associated with baseline infection (p<0.0001) and antibiotic coverage (p = 0.007). However, by six months after treatment, chlamydial prevalence was associated only with baseline infection (p<0.0001), but not coverage (p = 0.31).

Conclusions/significance: In post-hoc analyses of a large clinical trial, the amount of endemic chlamydial infection was a strong predictor of chlamydial infection after mass antibiotic treatments. Antibiotic coverage was an important short-term predictor of chlamydial infection, but no longer predicted infection by six months after mass antibiotic treatments. A wider range of antibiotic coverage than found in this study might allow an assessment of a more subtle association.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Kernel density estimate showing the…
Figure 1. Kernel density estimate showing the distribution of antibiotic coverage.
Antibiotic coverage data was available for 38 of 40 villages. The density plot was computed using the Epanechnikov kernel function, Sheather-Jones plug-in bandwidth estimate, and upper boundary correction using the renormalization method.
Figure 2. Predicted chlamydial infection after a…
Figure 2. Predicted chlamydial infection after a single mass azithromycin treatment, with varying levels of antibiotic coverage.
Post-treatment chlamydial prevalence in 1–5 year old children was calculated for a hypothetical community treated with a single mass azithromycin treatment, in which 48.9% of 1–5 year old children were infected at baseline. Antibiotic coverage was significantly associated with post-treatment infection at two months (2A; R2 = 0.53, p = 0.007), but not at six months (2B; R2 = 0.35, p = 0.31). The upper and lower curves are the boundaries of the 95% confidence interval for the predicted mean.

References

    1. Solomon AW, Zondervan M, Kuper H, Buchan JC, Mabey DCW, et al. World Health Organization; 2006. Trachoma control: a guide for programme managers.
    1. Bailey RL, Arullendran P, Whittle HC, Mabey DC. Randomised controlled trial of single-dose azithromycin in treatment of trachoma. Lancet. 1993;342:453–456.
    1. Dawson CR, Schachter J, Sallam S, Sheta A, Rubinstein RA, et al. A comparison of oral azithromycin with topical oxytetracycline/polymyxin for the treatment of trachoma in children. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:363–368.
    1. Schachter J, West SK, Mabey D, Dawson CR, Bobo L, et al. Azithromycin in control of trachoma. Lancet. 1999;354:630–635.
    1. West SK, Munoz B, Mkocha H, Holland MJ, Aguirre A, et al. Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis after mass treatment of a trachoma hyperendemic community in Tanzania: a longitudinal study. Lancet. 2005;366:1296–1300.
    1. Chidambaram JD, Alemayehu W, Melese M, Lakew T, Yi E, et al. Effect of a single mass antibiotic distribution on the prevalence of infectious trachoma. JAMA. 2006;295:1142–1146.
    1. Melese M, Chidambaram JD, Alemayehu W, Lee DC, Yi EH, et al. Feasibility of eliminating ocular Chlamydia trachomatis with repeat mass antibiotic treatments. JAMA. 2004;292:721–725.
    1. Lietman T, Porco T, Dawson C, Blower S. Global elimination of trachoma: how frequently should we administer mass chemotherapy? Nat Med. 1999;5:572–576.
    1. Ray KJ, Porco TC, Hong KC, Lee DC, Alemayehu W, et al. A rationale for continuing mass antibiotic distributions for trachoma. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:91.
    1. Solomon AW, Harding-Esch E, Alexander ND, Aguirre A, Holland MJ, et al. Two doses of azithromycin to eliminate trachoma in a Tanzanian community. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1870–1871.
    1. Gill DA, Lakew T, Alemayehu W, Melese M, Zhou Z, et al. Complete elimination is a difficult goal for trachoma programs in severely affected communities. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:564–566.
    1. West S, Munoz B, Mkocha H, Gaydos C, Quinn T. Trachoma and ocular Chlamydia trachomatis were not eliminated three years after two rounds of mass treatment in a trachoma hyperendemic village. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1492–1497.
    1. Melese M, Alemayehu W, Lakew T, Yi E, House J, et al. Comparison of annual and biannual mass antibiotic administration for elimination of infectious trachoma. JAMA. 2008;299:778–784.
    1. Lakew T, House J, Hong KC, Yi E, Alemayehu W, et al. Reduction and return of infectious trachoma in severely affected communities in ethiopia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e376.
    1. Peeling RW, Toye B, Jessamine P, Gemmill I. Pooling of urine specimens for PCR testing: a cost saving strategy for Chlamydia trachomatis control programmes. Sex Transm Infect. 1998;74:66–70.
    1. Diamant J, Benis R, Schachter J, Moncada J, Pang F, et al. Pooling of Chlamydia laboratory tests to determine the prevalence of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2001;8:109–117.
    1. Morre SA, van Dijk R, Meijer CJ, van den Brule AJ, Kjaer SK, et al. Pooling cervical swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR: sensitivity, dilution, inhibition, and cost-saving aspects. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:2375–2376.
    1. Davidson R, MacKinnon JG. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. Estimation and inference in econometrics. pp. 552–556.
    1. Anderson RM, May RM. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. Infectious diseases of humans : dynamics and control. pp. 87–121.
    1. Ali M, Emch M, Yunus M, Sack D, Lopez AL, et al. Vaccine Protection of Bangladeshi infants and young children against cholera: implications for vaccine deployment and person-to-person transmission. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:33–37.
    1. Lynch M, West S, Munoz B, Frick KD, Mkocha HA. Azithromycin treatment coverage in Tanzanian children using community volunteers. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2003;10:167–175.
    1. Lietman T, Porco T, Dawson C, Blower S. Global elimination of trachoma: how frequently should we administer mass chemotherapy? Nat Med. 1999;5:572–576.
    1. Solomon AW, Foster A, Mabey DCW. Single Dose Azithromycin for Trachoma: Author Reply. New Engl J Med. 2005;352:414–415.
    1. Solomon AW, Holland MJ, Alexander ND, Massae PA, Aguirre A, et al. Mass treatment with single-dose azithromycin for trachoma. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1962–1971.
    1. Emerson PM, Burton M, Solomon AW, Bailey R, Mabey D. The SAFE strategy for trachoma control: Using operational research for policy, planning and implementation. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84:613–619.
    1. Shah NAHJ, Lakew T, Alemayehu W, Halfpenny C, Hong KC, Porco TC, Whitcher JP, Lietman TM, Gaynor BD. (in press)Travel and implications for the elimination of trachoma in Ethiopia. Ophthalmic Epidemiol
    1. Zhang J, Lietman T, Olinger L, Miao Y, Stephens RS. Genetic diversity of Chlamydia trachomatis and the prevalence of trachoma. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23:217–220.
    1. House J, Gaynor B, Taylor H, Lietman TM. The real challenge: can we discover why trachoma is disappearing before it's gone? Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2007;47:63–76.
    1. Burton MJ, Holland MJ, Makalo P, Aryee EA, Alexander ND, et al. Re-emergence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection after mass antibiotic treatment of a trachoma-endemic Gambian community: a longitudinal study. Lancet. 2005;365:1321–1328.
    1. Gaynor BD, Miao Y, Cevallos V, Jha H, Chaudary JS, et al. Eliminating trachoma in areas with limited disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:596–598.
    1. West SK, Munoz B, Mkocha H, Gaydos C, Quinn T. Trachoma and ocular Chlamydia trachomatis were not eliminated three years after two rounds of mass treatment in a trachoma hyperendemic village. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1492–1497.
    1. Ngondi J, Onsarigo A, Matthews F, Reacher M, Brayne C, et al. Effect of 3 years of SAFE (surgery, antibiotics, facial cleanliness, and environmental change) strategy for trachoma control in southern Sudan: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2006;368:589–595.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する