Patterns of GPS measured time outdoors after school and objective physical activity in English children: the PEACH project

Ashley R Cooper, Angie S Page, Benedict W Wheeler, Melvyn Hillsdon, Pippa Griew, Russell Jago, Ashley R Cooper, Angie S Page, Benedict W Wheeler, Melvyn Hillsdon, Pippa Griew, Russell Jago

Abstract

Background: Observational studies have shown a positive association between time outdoors and physical activity in children. Time outdoors may be a feasible intervention target to increase the physical activity of youth, but methods are required to accurately measure time spent outdoors in a range of locations and over a sustained period. The Global Positioning System (GPS) provides precise location data and can be used to identify when an individual is outdoors. The aim of this study was to investigate whether GPS data recorded outdoors were associated with objectively measured physical activity.

Methods: Participants were 1010 children (11.0 +/- 0.4 years) recruited from 23 urban primary schools in South West England, measured between September 2006 and July 2008. Physical activity was measured by accelerometry (Actigraph GT1M) and children wore a GPS receiver (Garmin Foretrex 201) after school on four weekdays to record time outdoors. Accelerometer and GPS data were recorded at 10 second epochs and were combined to describe patterns of physical activity when both a GPS and accelerometer record were present (outdoors) and when there was accelerometer data only (indoors). ANOVA was used to investigate gender and seasonal differences in the patterns of outdoor and indoor physical activity, and linear regression was used to examine the cross-sectional associations between GPS-measured time outdoors and physical activity.

Results: GPS-measured time outdoors was a significant independent predictor of children's physical activity after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Physical activity was more than 2.5 fold higher outdoors than indoors (1345.8 +/- 907.3 vs 508.9 +/- 282.9 counts per minute; F = 783.2, p < .001). Overall, children recorded 41.7 +/- 46.1 minutes outdoors between 3.30 pm and 8.30 pm, with more time spent outdoors in the summer months (p < .001). There was no gender difference in time spent outdoors. Physical activity outdoors was higher in the summer than the winter (p < .001), whilst there was no seasonal variation in physical activity indoors.

Conclusions: Duration of GPS recording is positively associated with objectively measured physical activity and is sensitive to seasonal differences. Minute by minute patterning of GPS and physical activity data is feasible and may be a useful tool to investigate environmental influences on children's physical activity and to identify opportunities for intervention.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean percentage of time spent outdoors between 3.30 pm and 8.30 pm by gender (upper panel) and season (lower panel).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Minute-by-minute physical activity levels indoors and outdoors between 3.30 pm and 8.30 pm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean percentage of time outdoors and accelerometer counts per minute (± 95% confidence interval) outdoors and indoors between 3.30 pm and 8.30 pm by month of data collection.

References

    1. Ekelund U, Sardinha LB, Anderssen SA, Harro M, Franks PW, Brage S, Cooper AR, Andersen LB, Riddoch C, Froberg K. Associations between objectively assessed physical activity and indicators of body fatness in 9- to 10-y-old European children: a population-based study from 4 distinct regions in Europe (the European Youth Heart Study) Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:584–590.
    1. Andersen LB, Harro M, Sardinha LB, Froberg K, Ekelund U, Brage S, Anderssen SA. Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross-sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study) Lancet. 2006;368:299–304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69075-2.
    1. Strong WB, Malins RM, Blimkie CRJ, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, Gutin B, Hergenroeder AC, Must A, Nixon PA, Pivarnik JM. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr. 2005;146:732–737. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.055.
    1. Davison KK, Lawson CT. Do attributes in the physical environment influence children's physical activity? A review of the literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3:19. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-19.
    1. Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:963–975. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200005000-00014.
    1. Ferreira I, Horst K Van der, Wendel-Vos W, Kremers S, Van Lenthe FJ, Brug J. Environmental correlates of physical activity in youth - a review and update. Obes Rev. 2006;8:129–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00264.x.
    1. Baranowski T, Thompson WO, DuRant RH, Baranowski J, Puhl J. Observations on physical activity in physical locations: age, gender, ethnicity and month effects. RQES. 1993;64:127–133.
    1. Cleland V, Crawford D, Baur LA, Hume C, Timperio A, Salmon J. A prospective examination of children's time spent outdoors, objectively measured physical activity and overweight. Int J Obes. 2008;32:1685–1693. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.171.
    1. Wen LM, Kite J, Merom D, Rissel C. Time spent playing outdoors after school and its relationship with independent mobility: a cross-sectional survey of children aged 10-12 years in Sydney, Australia. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:15. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-15.
    1. Bell JF, Wilson JS, Liu GC. Neighborhood Greenness and 2-Year Changes in Body Mass Index of Children and Youth. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:547–553. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.07.006.
    1. Veitch J, Bagley S, Ball K, Salmon J. Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents' perceptions of influences on childrens' active free-play. Health Place. 2006;12:383–393. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.02.009.
    1. Burdette HL, Whitaker RC, Daniels SR. Parental report of outdoor playtime as a measure of physical activity in preschool-aged children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:353–357. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.4.353.
    1. Duncan MJ, Mummery WK. GIS or GPS? A comparison of two methods for assessing route taken during active transport. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:51–53. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.042.
    1. Duncan MJ, Mummery WK, Dascombe BJ. Utility of global positioning system to measure active transport in urban areas. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1851–1857. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31811ff31e.
    1. Mackett R, Brown B, Gong Y, Kitazawa K, Paskins J. Children's independent movement in the local environment. Built Environment. 2007;33:454–468. doi: 10.2148/benv.33.4.454.
    1. Cooper AR, Page AS, Wheeler BW, Griew P, Davis L, Hillsdon M, Jago R. Mapping the walk to school using accelerometry combined with GPS. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.036.
    1. Jones AP, Coombes EG, Griffin SJ, van Slujis EM. Environmental supportiveness for physical activity in English schoolchildren: a study using Global Positioning Systems. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-42.
    1. Page AS, Cooper AR, Griew P, Davis L, Hillsdon M. Independent mobility in relation to weekday and weekend physical activity in children aged 10-11 years: The PEACH Project. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:2. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-2.
    1. Niggebruge A, Haynes R, Jones A, Lovett A, Harvey I. The index of multiple deprivation 2000 access domain: a useful indicator for public health. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:2743–2753. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.026.
    1. Rodriguez DA, Brown AL, Troped PJ. Portable global positioning units to complement accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:S572–581. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000185297.72328.ce.
    1. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1240–1243. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240.
    1. Petersen AC, Crockett L, Richards M, Boxer A. A self-report measure of pubertal status: reliability, validity and initial norms. J Youth Adolesc. 1988;17:117–133. doi: 10.1007/BF01537962.
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Lee SM, Morgan CF, Beighle A, Pangrazi RP. Children's Pedometer-Determined Physical Activity during the Segmented School Day. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1732–1738. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000230212.55119.98.
    1. Trost SG, Rosenkranz RR, Dzewaltowski D. Physical activity levels among children attending after-school programs. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:622–629. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318161eaa5.
    1. Cooper AR, Page AS, Foster LJ, Qahwaji D. Commuting to school. Are children who walk more physically active? Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:273–276. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00205-8.
    1. Page A, Cooper AR, Stamatakis E, Foster LJ, Crowne EC, Sabin M, Shield JPH. Physical activity patterns in nonobese and obese children assessed using minute-by-minute accelerometry. Int J Obes. 2005;29:1070–1076. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802993.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する