Effectiveness and Tolerability of Micafungin in Chinese Patients with Invasive Fungal Infections: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study

Xiaoyun Zheng, Xiaobo Huang, Jianmin Luo, Juan Li, Wei Li, Qifa Liu, Ting Niu, Xiaodong Wang, Jianfeng Zhou, Xi Zhang, Jianda Hu, Kaiyan Liu, Xiaoyun Zheng, Xiaobo Huang, Jianmin Luo, Juan Li, Wei Li, Qifa Liu, Ting Niu, Xiaodong Wang, Jianfeng Zhou, Xi Zhang, Jianda Hu, Kaiyan Liu

Abstract

Introduction: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a significant health problem in immunocompromised patients, resulting in substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Micafungin is a broad-spectrum echinocandin with activity against Candida and Aspergillus spp. This was a multicenter, non-comparative, retrospective observational study that evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of intravenously administered micafungin for treating IFIs caused by Candida and Aspergillus spp.

Methods: Adult patients in China who had received at least one dose of intravenously administered micafungin were eligible. Retrospective data (May 2008-April 2015) were extracted from patients' medical files and recorded using electronic data capture. The primary endpoint was overall success rate (patients with complete or partial response). Subgroup analyses determined effectiveness according to diagnostic certainty, fungal species, type of IFI, duration of micafungin treatment, and daily dose of micafungin. Tolerability, including the incidence of adverse events (AEs), was also assessed.

Results: Overall, 2555 patients who received at least one dose of micafungin were identified. The mean duration of treatment and mean daily dose were 10.2 days and 133.0 mg, respectively. The overall success rate was 60.8%; this was significantly higher in patients who received treatment for at least 1 week (range 67.9-71.6% [mean 69.2%]) compared with less than 1 week (47.8%; P < 0.0001), and those who received 50-100 mg (65.7%) compared with other daily doses (range 42.9-60.1% [mean 59.0%]; P = 0.0011). Success rates in Candida- and Aspergillus-infected patients were similar (61.9% and 56.8%, respectively). AEs and adverse drug reactions were observed in 36.2% and 4.5% of patients, respectively. The majority of AEs were mild, while discontinuation due to AEs was low (2.3%).

Conclusion: Micafungin is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of patients with IFIs in China, as demonstrated in Candida- and Aspergillus-infected adults. Subgroup analyses highlighted the potential benefits of treating IFIs with micafungin for a minimum of 1 week.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02678598.

Funding: Astellas Pharma Inc.

Keywords: Aspergillus; Candida; Invasive fungal infections; Micafungin; Real-world data; Retrospective study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition. FAS full analysis set, IFI invasive fungal infection, PPS per-protocol set, SAS safety analysis set
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall success rates (proportion of patients with complete or partial response) at the end of treatment according to diagnostic certainty (a); the organism causing the infection (b); type of disease (c); treatment duration (d); and the daily dose (e) in the FAS. P values indicate significant differences between treatment groups (providing there is also a clear difference in the proportion of patients with a complete or partial response); error bars represent asymptotic 95% confidence intervals. FAS full analysis set

References

    1. de la Torre P, Reboli AC. Micafungin: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy. Core Evid. 2014;9:27–39.
    1. Drgona L, Khachatryan A, Stephens J, et al. Clinical and economic burden of invasive fungal diseases in Europe: focus on pre-emptive and empirical treatment of Aspergillus and Candida species. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:7–21. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1944-3.
    1. Cornely OA. Aspergillus to Zygomycetes: causes, risk factors, prevention, and treatment of invasive fungal infections. Infection. 2008;36:296–313. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-7357-z.
    1. Kriengkauykiat J, Ito JI, Dadwal SS. Epidemiology and treatment approaches in management of invasive fungal infections. Clin Epidemiol. 2011;3:175–191.
    1. Liao Y, Chen M, Hartmann T, Yang RY, Liao WQ. Epidemiology of opportunistic invasive fungal infections in China: review of literature. Chin Med J (Engl) 2013;126:361–368.
    1. Messer SA, Diekema DJ, Boyken L, Tendolkar S, Hollis RJ, Pfaller MA. Activities of micafungin against 315 invasive clinical isolates of fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:324–326. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.2.324-326.2006.
    1. Pfaller MA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ, et al. In vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin: a head-to-head comparison using the CLSI M38-A2 broth microdilution method. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:3323–3325. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01155-09.
    1. Hanadate T, Wakasugi M, Sogabe K, et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of micafungin in Japanese patients with deep mycosis: a post-marketing survey report. J Infect Chemother. 2011;17:622–632. doi: 10.1007/s10156-011-0219-0.
    1. Huang X, Chen H, Han M, et al. Multicenter, randomized, open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of micafungin versus itraconazole for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2012;18:1509–1516. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.03.014.
    1. Shang W, Feng G, Sun R, et al. Comparison of micafungin and voriconazole in the treatment of invasive fungal infections in kidney transplant recipients. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012;37:652–656. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01362.x.
    1. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1813–1821. doi: 10.1086/588660.
    1. Ma XJ, Li GP, Zhou J, Wang A, Li TS. A retrospective study of amphotericin B treatment for invasive fungal infection. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2007;46:718–720.
    1. Jia L, Huang M, Liu WL, et al. Clinical analysis of amphotericin B in the treatment of invasive fungal infections in 121 patients with hematologic diseases. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2008;29:619–622.
    1. Shen Y, Huang XJ, Wang JX, et al. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole as invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in China: a multicenter, randomized, open-label study. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;51:738–745. doi: 10.5414/CP201880.
    1. Yan T, Li SL, Wang DX. Comparison between micafungin and caspofungin for the empirical treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections in surgical intensive care patients. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016;96:2301–2306.
    1. Cornely OA, Bassetti M, Calandra T, et al. ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:19–37. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12039.
    1. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:409–417. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ1194.
    1. Electronic Medicines Compendium. EU summary of product characteristics for micafungin. 2018. . Accessed June 2018.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Prescribing information for micafungin. 2018. . Accessed June 2018.
    1. Chen GL, Chen Y, Zhu CQ, Yang CD, Ye S. Invasive fungal infection in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;31:1087–1091. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-1980-x.
    1. Enoch DA, Idris SF, Aliyu SH, Micallef C, Sule O, Karas JA. Micafungin for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. J Infect. 2014;68:507–526. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.01.007.
    1. . Trial record for NCT01686607: Short and long-term safety of micafungin and other parenteral antifungal agents (MYCOS). 2018. . Accessed 26 April 2018.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する