Rectal, central venous, gastric and bladder pressures versus esophageal pressure for the measurement of cough strength: a prospective clinical comparison

Lluís G Aguilera, Lluís Gallart, Juan C Álvarez, Jordi Vallès, Joaquim Gea, Lluís G Aguilera, Lluís Gallart, Juan C Álvarez, Jordi Vallès, Joaquim Gea

Abstract

Background: Cough pressure, an expression of expiratory muscle strength, is usually measured with esophageal or gastric balloons, but these invasive catheters can be uncomfortable for the patient or their placement impractical. Because pressure in the thorax and abdomen are expected to be similar during a cough, we hypothesized that measurement at other thoracic or abdominal locations might also be similar as well as useful in clinical scenarios. This study aimed to compare cough pressures measured at thoracic and abdominal sites that could serve as alternatives to esophageal pressures (Pes).

Methods: Nine patients scheduled for laparotomy were asked to cough as forcefully as possible from total lung capacity in supine position. Three cough maneuvers were performed while Pes (the gold standard) as well as gastric, central venous, bladder and rectal pressures (Pga, Pcv, Pbl, and Prec, respectively) were measured simultaneously. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the repeatability of the measurements in each patient at each site and evaluate agreement between alternative sites (Pga, Pcv, Pbl, and Prec) and Pes. Bland-Altman plots were used to compare Pes and the measurements at the other sites.

Results: Median (first quartile, third quartile) maximum pressures were as follows: Pes 112 (89,148), Pga 105 (92,156), Pcv 102 (91,149), Pbl 118 (93,157), and Prec 103 (88,150) cmH2O. The ICCs showed excellent within-site repeatability of the measurements (p < 0.001) and excellent agreement between alternative sites and Pes (p < 0.004). The Bland-Altman plots showed minimal differences between Pes, Pga, Pcv, and Prec. However, Pbl was higher than the other pressures in most patients, and the difference between Pes and Pbl was slightly larger.

Conclusions: Cough pressure can be measured in the esophagus, stomach, superior vena cava or rectum, since their values are similar. It can also be measured in the bladder, although the value will be slightly higher. These results potentially facilitate the assessment of dynamic expiratory muscle strength with fewer invasive catheter placements in most hospitalized patients, thus providing an option that will be particularly useful in those undergoing thoracic or abdominal surgery.

Trial registration: NCT02957045 registered at November 7, 2016. Retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Abdominal muscles [A02.633.567.050]; Cough [C23.888.852.293]; Laparotomy [E04.406]; Respiratory muscles [A02.633.567.900].

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by our institutional review board (the clinical research ethics committee of Parc de Salut Mar–CEIC-Parc de Salut Mar), reference number 031554. It was also approved by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS), reference number 040073.

All patients signed an informed consent form before being enrolled in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Waveforms at all five measurement sites. Congruent waveforms recorded for four patients at all five measurement sites. Pcv = central venous pressure; PES = esophageal pressure; Pga = gastric pressure; PBL = bladder pressure; Prec = rectal pressure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bland–Altman plots of differences between the maximum (optimal) Pes and the pressure measurements at the alternative sites. Circles indicate the difference between PES and the alternative measured pressures. The central line indicates the average difference between the compared measurements. The upper and lower (dotted) lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. Values are expressed in cmH2O. Pcv = central venous pressure; PES = esophageal pressure; Pga = gastric pressure; PBL = bladder pressure; Prec = rectal pressure

References

    1. Laghi F, Tobin MJ. Disorders of the respiratory muscles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168:10–48. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2206020.
    1. Warner DO. Preventing postoperative pulmonary complications: the role of the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1467–1472. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00037.
    1. Colucci DB, Fiore JF, Jr, Paisani DM, Risso TT, Colucci M, Chiavegato LD, Faresin SM. Cough impairment and risk of postoperative pulmonary complications after open upper abdominal surgery. Respir Care. 2015;60:673–678. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03600.
    1. Man WD, Kyroussis D, Fleming TA, Chetta A, Harraf F, Mustfa N, Rafferty GF, Polkey MI, Moxham J. Cough gastric pressure and maximum expiratory mouth pressure in humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168:714–717. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200303-334BC.
    1. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory S ATS/ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:518–624. doi: 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518.
    1. Gallart L, Gea J, Aguar MC, Broquetas JM, Puig MM. Effects of interpleural bupivacaine on respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:48–55. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199507000-00006.
    1. Smith JA, Aliverti A, Quaranta M, McGuinness K, Kelsall A, Earis J, Calverley PM. Chest wall dynamics during voluntary and induced cough in healthy volunteers. J Physiol. 2012;590:563–574. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.213157.
    1. Chieveley-Williams S, Dinner L, Puddicombe A, Field D, Lovell AT, Goldstone JC. Central venous and bladder pressure reflect transdiaphragmatic pressure during pressure support ventilation. Chest. 2002;121:533–538. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.2.533.
    1. Collee GG, Lomax DM, Ferguson C, Hanson GC. Bedside measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) via an indwelling naso-gastric tube: clinical validation of the technique. Intensive Care Med. 1993;19:478–480. doi: 10.1007/BF01711092.
    1. Shafik A, El-Sharkawy A, Sharaf WM. Direct measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in various conditions. Eur J Surg. 1997;163:883–887.
    1. Roca J, Sanchis J, Agusti-Vidal A, Segarra F, Navajas D, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Casan P, Sans S. Spirometric reference values from a Mediterranean population. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1986;22:217–224.
    1. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1123–1133. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra011883.
    1. Pittman JA, Ping JS, Mark JB. Arterial and central venous pressure monitoring. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2004;42:13–30. doi: 10.1097/00004311-200404210-00004.
    1. Malbrain ML. Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:357–371. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2107-2.
    1. Iberti TJ, Lieber CE, Benjamin E. Determination of intra-abdominal pressure using a transurethral bladder catheter: clinical validation of the technique. Anesthesiology. 1989;70:47–50. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198901000-00011.
    1. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6:284–290. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307–310. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8.
    1. Enright PL, Beck KC, Sherrill DL. Repeatability of spirometry in 18,000 adult patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:235–238. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200204-347OC.
    1. Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. American Thoracic Society. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:1202–18. 10.1164/ajrccm/144.5.1202.
    1. Lee KK, Ward K, Rafferty GF, Moxham J, Birring SS. The intensity of voluntary, induced, and spontaneous cough. Chest. 2015;148:1259–1267. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0138.
    1. Byrd RB, Burns JR. Cough dynamics in the post-thoracotomy state. Chest. 1975;67:654–657. doi: 10.1378/chest.67.6.654.
    1. Arora NS, Gal TJ. Cough dynamics during progressive expiratory muscle weakness in healthy curarized subjects. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1981;51:494–498.
    1. Rochester DF. Tests of respiratory muscle function. Clin Chest Med. 1988;9:249–261.
    1. Man WD, Moxham J, Polkey MI. Magnetic stimulation for the measurement of respiratory and skeletal muscle function. Eur Respir J. 2004;24:846–860. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00029004.
    1. Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Valles J, Castillo J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Briones Z, Sanchis J. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1338–1350. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する