Assessment of environmental correlates of physical activity: development of a European questionnaire

Heleen Spittaels, Charlie Foster, Jean-Michel Oppert, Harry Rutter, Pekka Oja, Michael Sjöström, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Heleen Spittaels, Charlie Foster, Jean-Michel Oppert, Harry Rutter, Pekka Oja, Michael Sjöström, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

Abstract

Background: Research on the influence of the physical environment on physical activity is rapidly expanding and different measures of environmental perceptions have been developed, mostly in the US and Australia. The purpose of this paper is to (i) provide a literature review of measures of environmental perceptions recently used in European studies and (ii) develop a questionnaire for population monitoring purposes in the European countries.

Methods: This study was done within the framework of the EU-funded project 'Instruments for Assessing Levels of Physical Activity and Fitness (ALPHA)', which aims to propose standardised instruments for physical activity and fitness monitoring across Europe. Quantitative studies published from 1990 up to November 2007 were systematically searched in Pubmed, Web of Science, TRIS and Geobase. In addition a survey was conducted among members of the European network for the promotion of Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA Europe) and European members of the International Physical Activity and Environment Network (IPEN) to identify published or ongoing studies. Studies were included if they were conducted among European general adult population (18+y) and used a questionnaire to assess perceptions of the physical environment. A consensus meeting with an international expert group was organised to discuss the development of a European environmental questionnaire.

Results: The literature search resulted in 23 European studies, 15 published and 8 unpublished. In these studies, 13 different environmental questionnaires were used. Most of these studies used adapted versions of questionnaires that were developed outside Europe and that focused only on the walkability construct: The Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS), the abbreviated version of the NEWS (ANEWS) and the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study (NQLS) questionnaire have been most commonly used. Based on the results of the literature review and the output of the meeting with international experts, a European environmental questionnaire with 49 items was developed.

Conclusion: There is need for a greater degree of standardization in instruments/methods used to assess environmental correlates of physical activity, taking into account the European-specific situation. A first step in this process is taken by the development of a European environmental questionnaire.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study selection process. HEPA-Europe: European Network for the Promotion of Health-Enhancing Physical Activity; IPEN: the International Physical Activity and Environment Network; TRIS: Transportation Research Information Services

References

    1. Sjöström M, Oja P, Hägströmer M, Smith BJ, Bauman A. Health-enhancing physical activity across European Union countries: the Eurobarometer study. J Public Health. 2006;14:291–300. doi: 10.1007/s10389-006-0031-y.
    1. Sallis JF, Bauman A, Pratt M. Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:379–397. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00076-2.
    1. Centers for Disease control and Prevention Impact of the built environment on health. 2008.
    1. Kerry J, Rosenberg D, Forman H. Introduction to the Active Living Research Reference List for January–December 2006. 2008.
    1. Bauman A. The physical environment and physical activity: moving from ecological associations to intervention evidence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:535–536. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.032342.
    1. Foster C, Hillsdon M, Jones A, Grundy C, Wilkinson P, White M, et al. Objective Measures of the Environment and Physical Activity – Results of the Environment and Physical Activity Study in English adults. Journal of physical activity & health. 2009.
    1. Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E. Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity: a review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:188–199. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00426-3.
    1. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1793–1812. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00150-2.
    1. Emery J, Crump C, Bors P. Reliability and validity of two instruments designed to assess the walking and bicycling suitability of sidewalks and roads. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2003;18:38–46.
    1. Kirtland KA, Porter DE, Addy CL, Neet MJ, Williams JE, Sharpe PA, et al. Environmental measures of physical activity supports: perception versus reality. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24:323–331. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00021-7.
    1. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1552–1558. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552.
    1. Meusel D, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Hägströmer M, Bergman P, Sjöström M. Assessing Levels of Physical Activity in the European Population – the ALPHA project. Selección. 2007;16:9–12.
    1. Wendel-Vos W, Droomers M, Kremers S, Brug J, Van Lenthe F. Potential environmental determinants of physical activity in adults: A systematic review. Obesity Reviews. 2007;8:425–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00370.x.
    1. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–1395. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
    1. De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sallis JF, Saelens BE. Environmental correlates of physical activity in a sample of Belgian adults. Am J Health Promot. 2003;18:83–92.
    1. Rutten A, Abel T, Kannas L, von LT, Luschen G, Diaz JA, et al. Self reported physical activity, public health, and perceived environment: results from a comparative European study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:139–146. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.139.
    1. Stahl T, Rutten A, Nutbeam D, Kannas L. The importance of policy orientation and environment on physical activity participation – a comparative analysis between Eastern Germany, Western Germany and Finland. Health Promot Int. 2002;17:235–246. doi: 10.1093/heapro/17.3.235.
    1. Titze S, Stronegger W, Owen N. Prospective study of individual, social, and environmental predictors of physical activity: women's leisure running. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2005;6:363–376. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.06.001.
    1. Foster C, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M. Environmental perceptions and walking in English adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:924–928. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.014068.
    1. De Bourdeaudhuij I, Teixeira PJ, Cardon G, Deforche B. Environmental and psychosocial correlates of physical activity in Portuguese and Belgian adults. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8:886–895. doi: 10.1079/PHN2004673.
    1. Alexander A, Bergman P, Hägströmer M, Sjöström M. IPAQ environmental module; reliability testing. J Public Health. 2006;14:76–80. doi: 10.1007/s10389-005-0016-2.
    1. Daskapan A, Tuzun EH, Eker L. Perceived barriers to physical activity in university students. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2006;5:615–620.
    1. Poortinga W. Perceptions of the environment, physical activity, and obesity. Social Science & Medicine. 2006;63:2835–2846. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.018.
    1. Dawson J, Hillsdon M, Boller I, Foster C. Perceived barriers to walking in the neighborhood environment: a survey of middle-aged and older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2007;15:318–335.
    1. Dawson J, Hillsdon M, Boller I, Foster C. Perceived barriers to walking in the neighbourhood environment and change in physical activity levels over 12 months. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41:562–568. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.033340.
    1. Harrison RA, Gemmell I, Heller RF. The population effect of crime and neighbourhood on physical activity: an analysis of 15 461 adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:34–39. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.048389.
    1. Mota J, Lacerda A, Santos MP, Ribeiro JC, Carvalho J. Perceived neighborhood environments and physical activity in an elderly sample. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2007;104:438–444. doi: 10.2466/PMS.104.2.438-444.
    1. Titze S, Stronegger WJ, Janschitz S, Oja P. Environmental, social, and personal correlates of cycling for transportation in a student population. Journal of physical activity & health. 2007;4:66–79.
    1. de Geus B, De BI, Jannes C, Meeusen R. Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with cycling for transport among a working population. Health Educ Res. 2008;23:697–708. doi: 10.1093/her/cym055.
    1. Mygind O. The significance of the neighbourhood for physical activity. SDU; 2007.
    1. Ogilvie D. PhD Thesis, MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2007. Shifting towards healthier transport? From systematic review to primary research.
    1. Wright A, Lowry R, Baker G, Frizsimons C. Do environmental perceptions and self-reported and objective physical activity (PA) levels vary by social deprivation and gender? Baseline results from an intervention trial. ISBNPA meeting, Norway, June 2007. 2008.
    1. Brownson RC, Chang JJ, Eyler AA, Ainsworth BE, Kirtland KA, Saelens BE, et al. Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: a comparison of the reliability of 3 questionnaires. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:473–483. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.94.3.473.
    1. Leslie E, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Owen N, Bauman A, Coffee N, et al. Residents' perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: a pilot study. Health & Place. 2005;11:227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.05.005.
    1. Cerin E, Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: validity and development of a short form. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1682–1691. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000227639.83607.4d.
    1. Foster C, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M. Environmental perceptions and walking in English adults. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2004;58:924–928. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.014068.
    1. Badland H, Schofield G. Transport, urban design, and physical activity: an evidence-based update. Transportation research Part D – Transport and environment. 2005;10:177–196. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2004.12.001.
    1. Hagstromer M, Oja P, Sjostrom M. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9:755–762. doi: 10.1079/PHN2005898.
    1. European Commission Health and food Eurobarometer 64.3. 2006.
    1. Abu-Omar K, Rutten A. Relation of leisure time, occupational, domestic, and commuting physical activity to health indicators in Europe. Prev Med. 2008;47:319–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.012.
    1. Vaz dA, Graca P, Afonso C, D'Amicis A, Lappalainen R, Damkjaer S. Physical activity levels and body weight in a nationally representative sample in the European Union. Public Health Nutr. 1999;2:105–113.
    1. Pucher J, Dijkstra L. Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from The Netherlands and Germany. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1509–1516. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1509.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する