Reliability and validity of a revised version of the General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire

N Kliemann, J Wardle, F Johnson, H Croker, N Kliemann, J Wardle, F Johnson, H Croker

Abstract

Background/objectives: The General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire (GNKQ) was developed in the 1990s and has been widely used. Since then advances in understanding of associations between diet and disease have led to changes in dietary recommendations. This study reports the validity and reliability of an updated version of the GNKQ, bringing it into line with current nutritional advice.

Methods/subjects: Following a review of current recommendations, the revised version of the GNKQ (GNKQ-R) was created, consisting of 88 items and four sections. Reliability and validity of the GNKQ-R were determined in four validation studies: (1) reliability was examined using an online sample (n=266), (2) construct validity was assessed with 96 Dietetics students and 89 english students using the 'known-groups' method, (3) associations between nutrition knowledge and socio-demographic characteristics were examined using the previously described samples and (4) sensitivity to change was tested by measuring GNKQ-R scores pre- and post-exposure to online nutrition information in written (n=65) and video (n=41) formats.

Results: The reliability was >0.7 in all sections. Dietetics students scored significantly higher than english students. As predicted, GNKQ-R scores were significantly higher among females vs males, people with a degree vs without, and people with very good vs poor or good health status. They were lower in those older than 50 years vs younger adults. GNKQ-R scores were significantly greater after the nutrition interventions in both written and video formats.

Conclusions: The GNKQ-R is a valid measure of nutrition knowledge that is consistent, reliable and sensitive to change.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Parmenter K, Wardle J. Development of a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire for adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 1999; 53: 298–308.
    1. Alsaffar AA. Validation of a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire in a Turkish student sample. Public Health Nutr 2012; 15: 2074–2085.
    1. Hendrie GA, Cox DN, Coveney J. Validation of the general nutrition knowledge questionnaire in an Australian community sample. Nutr Diet 2008; 65: 72–77.
    1. Ferro-Lebres V, Moreira P, Ribeiro JC. Adaptation, update and validation of the general nutrition questionnaire in a Portuguese adolescent sample. Ecol Food Nutr 2014; 53: 528–542.
    1. Spendlove JK, Heaney SE, Gifford JA, Prvan T, Denyer GS, O'Connor HT. Evaluation of general nutrition knowledge in elite Australian athletes. Br J Nutr 2012; 107: 1871–1880.
    1. Parmenter K, Waller J, Wardle J. Demographic variation in nutrition knowledge in England. Health Educ Res 2000; 15: 163–174.
    1. Hendrie GA, Coveney J, Cox D. Exploring nutrition knowledge and the demographic variation in knowledge levels in an Australian community sample. Public Health Nutr 2008; 11: 1365–1371.
    1. Wardle J, Parmenter K, Waller J. Nutrition knowledge and food intake. Appetite 2000; 34: 269–275.
    1. Spronk I, Kullen C, Burdon C, O'Connor H. Relationship between nutrition knowledge and dietary intake. Br J Nutr 2014; 111: 1713–1726.
    1. O'Brien G, Davies M. Nutrition knowledge and body mass index. Health Educ Res 2007; 22: 571–575.
    1. Willett WC, Stampfer MJ. Current evidence on healthy eating. Ann Rev Public Health 2013; 34: 77–95.
    1. Nestle M. Eating made simple—how do you cope with a mountain of conflicting diet advice? Sci Am 2007; 297: 60–69.
    1. Parmenter K, Wardle J. Evaluation and design of nutrition knowledge measures. J Nutr Educ 2000; 32: 269–277.
    1. Spronk I, Heaney SE, Prvan T, O'Connor HT. Relationship between general nutrition knowledge and dietary quality in elite athletes. Int J Sport Nutr Exe 2015; 25: 243–251.
    1. WHO Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2004.
    1. WHO. Diet, Nutrition and Prevention Diseases. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2003.
    1. Public Health England. The Eatwell Guide: Helping you Eat A Healthy, Balanced Diet. 2016. Available from (accessed on March 2016).
    1. Department of Health. UK Chief Medical Officers' Alcohol Guidelines Review Summary of the Proposed New Guidelines. 2016. Available from (accessed September 2015).
    1. SACN The Nutritional Wellbeing of the British Population. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition: London, 2008.
    1. WCRF/AIRC Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
    1. WHO Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2014. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2014.
    1. WHO Reducing Salt in Populations. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2007.
    1. WHO Fruit and Vegetable Promotion Initiative. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2003.
    1. Mozaffarian D, Katan MB, Ascherio A, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Medical progress—trans fatty acids and cardiovascular disease. New Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1601–1613.
    1. Skerrett PJ, Willett WC. Essentials of healthy eating: a guide. J Midwifery Womens Health 2010; 55: 492–501.
    1. Albert CM, Hennekens CH, O'Donnell CJ, Ajani UA, Carey VJ, Willett WC et al. Fish consumption and risk of sudden cardiac death. JAMA 1998; 279: 23–28.
    1. Monteiro CA, Levy RB, Claro RM, de Castro IRR, Cannon G. Increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods and likely impact on human health: evidence from Brazil. Public Health Nutr 2011; 14: 5–13.
    1. Brasil. Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population. Ministry of Health of Brazil: Brasilia-DF, 2014.
    1. Australia. Eat for Health: Australian Dietary Guidelines—Providing the Scientific Evidence for Healthier Australian Diets. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia: Canberra, 2013.
    1. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Office for National Statistics. National Food Survey 2000. UK Data Archive: Colchester, Essex, 2004.
    1. Health Survey of England. Adult Anthropometric Measures, Overweight and Obesity, Ch. 10. HSE: London, 2012.
    1. David MC, Ware RS. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials supports the use of incentives for inducing response to electronic health surveys. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 1210–1221.
    1. Allison DB. Handbook of Assessment Methods for Eating Behaviors and Weight-Related Problems: Measures, Theory and Research. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1995.
    1. Hobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: development of a patient-based measure of outcome. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8: 1.
    1. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE: London, 2013; , p 908.
    1. Furnee CA, Groot W, van den Brink HM. The health effects of education: a meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health 2008; 18: 417–421.
    1. Subramanian SV, Huijts T, Avendano M. Self-reported health assessments in the 2002 World Health Survey: how do they correlate with education? Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 131–138.
    1. Sichert-Hellert W, Beghin L, De Henauw S, Grammatikaki E, Hallstrom L, Manios Y et al. Nutritional knowledge in European adolescents: results from the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) study. Public Health Nutr 2011; 14: 2083–2091.
    1. Clifford D, Anderson J, Auld G, Champ J. Good Grubbin': impact of a TV cooking show for college students living off campus. J Nutr Educ Behav 2009; 41: 194–200.
    1. Stark CM, Graham-Kiefer ML, Devine CM, Dollahite JS, Olson CM. Online course increases nutrition professionals' knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy in using an ecological approach to prevent childhood obesity. J Nutr Educ Behav 2011; 43: 316–322.
    1. Maiburg BHJ, Rethans JJE, Schuwirth LWT, Mathus-Vliegen LMH, van Ree JW. Controlled trial of effect of computer-based nutrition course on knowledge and practice of general practitioner trainees. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77: 1019s–1024s.
    1. Thompson DA, Joshi A, Hernandez RG, Bair-Merritt MH, Arora M, Luna R et al. Nutrition education via a touchscreen: a randomized controlled trial in latino immigrant parents of infants and toddlers. Acad Pediatr 2012; 12: 412–419.
    1. BNF. Healthy Eating. British Nutrition Foundation: London, 2010. Available from . (accessed on September 2015).
    1. Goodacre S. Uncontrolled before-after studies: discouraged by Cochrane and the EMJ. Emerg Med J 2015; 32: 507–508.
    1. Engstrom JL, Paterson SA, Doherty A, Trabulsi M, Speer KL. Accuracy of self-reported height and weight in women: an integrative review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health 2003; 48: 338–345.
    1. Pursey K, Burrows TL, Stanwell P, Collins CE. How accurate is web-based self-reported height. Weight, and body mass index in young adults?. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e4.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する