Infliximab dose reduction sustains the clinical treatment effect in active HLAB27 positive ankylosing spondylitis: a two-year pilot study

Boel Mörck, Rille Pullerits, Mats Geijer, Tomas Bremell, Helena Forsblad-d'Elia, Boel Mörck, Rille Pullerits, Mats Geijer, Tomas Bremell, Helena Forsblad-d'Elia

Abstract

The rationale of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and to determine whether IFX dose reduction and interval extension sustains the treatment effect. Nineteen patients were included and treated with IFX 5 mg/kg every 6 weeks for 56 weeks. All patients concomitantly received MTX with median dose 7.5 mg/weekly. During the second year, the IFX dose was reduced to 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks. Eighteen patients completed the 1-year and 15 patients the 2-year trial. The ≥50% improvement at week 16 from baseline of BASDAI was achieved in 16/19 (84%) patients. Significant reductions in BASDAI, BASFI, and BASMI scores, decrease in ESR and CRP, and improvement in SF-36 were observed at weeks 16 and 56. The MRI-defined inflammatory changes in the sacroiliac joints disappeared in 10/15 patients (67%) already at 16 weeks. IFX treatment effect was sustained throughout the second year after IFX dose reduction and interval extension. We conclude that IFX treatment is effective in well-established active AS and a dose reduction sustains the treatment effect. These observations are of clinical importance and open the opportunity to reduce the drug costs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01850121.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patient inclusion and dropouts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in SPARCC scores over time. Box plots show the 25th and 75th percentiles. Horizontal solid lines within boxes indicate medians and vertical bars indicate the 5th and 95th percentiles.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in BASDAI, BASFI, and BASMI scores over time. Box plots show the 25th and 75th percentiles. Horizontal solid lines within boxes indicate medians and vertical bars indicate the 5th and 95th percentiles.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) A representative MRI study at inclusion (top row) with bilateral inflammatory changes (arrows). There is a 2 × 3 cm high signal intensity lesion on the sacral side of the left sacroiliac joint on the STIR images (coronal and axial) with corresponding low signal intensity on the coronal T1-weighted image. At the right sacroiliac joint, there are smaller and more subtle lesions on both sides of the joint. There are sclerotic changes along the left joint (arrowheads). At 16 weeks (bottom row), no oedematous lesions can be seen. (b) An MRI study showing bilateral sacroiliitis in an AS patient at inclusion and at 16 weeks. At inclusion, there are bilateral inflammatory changes on the MRI images (top row, arrows). At the right sacroiliac joint, there is a 1 × 1 cm high signal intensity lesion in the sacrum on the STIR images (coronal and axial) with corresponding low signal intensity on the coronal T1-weighted image. On the left, there are smaller and more subtle lesions on both sides of the joint. There are sclerotic changes along the right sacroiliac joint. At 16 weeks (bottom row), no oedematous lesions can be seen.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The patients' health related quality of life measured by SF-36. The graph shows the mean scores for the eight SF-36 domains for the normal population and the patients with AS at baseline, at 16 weeks, and at 56 weeks. A significant improvement in patients' health related quality of life was observed at weeks 16 and 56 as compared with baseline.

References

    1. Brandt J, Bollow M, Häberle J, et al. Studying patients with inflammatory back pain and arthritis of the lower limbs clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging: many, but not all patients with sacroiliitis have spondyloarthropathy. Rheumatology. 1999;38(9):831–836.
    1. Braun J, Bollow M, Remlinger G, et al. Prevalence of spondylarthropathies in HLA-B27 positive and negative blood donors. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1998;41(1):58–67.
    1. Boonen A. A review of work-participation, cost-of-illness and cost-effectiveness studies in ankylosing spondylitis. Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology. 2006;2(10):546–553.
    1. Zochling J, van der Heijde D, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2006;65(4):442–452.
    1. van der Heijde D, Dijkmans B, Geusens P, et al. Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ASSERT) Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2005;52(2):582–591.
    1. Baraliakos X, Listing J, Fritz C, et al. Persistent clinical efficacy and safety of infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis after 8 years-early clinical response predicts long-term outcome. Rheumatology. 2011;50(9):1690–1699.ker194
    1. Saougou I, Markatseli TE, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA. Maintained clinical response of infliximab treatment in ankylosing spondylitis: a 6-year long-term study. Joint Bone Spine. 2010;77(4):325–329.
    1. Heldmann F, Brandt J, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, et al. The European ankylosing spondylitis infliximab cohort (EASIC): a European multicentre study of long term outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with infliximab. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2011;29(4):672–680.
    1. Tenga G, Goëb V, Lequerré T, et al. A 3 mg/kg starting dose of infliximab in active spondyloarthritis resistant to conventional treatments is efficient, safe and lowers costs. Joint Bone Spine. 2011;78(1):50–55.
    1. Maksymowych WP, Jhangri GS, Lambert RG, et al. Infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: a prospective observational inception cohort analysis of efficacy and safety. Journal of Rheumatology. 2002;29(5):959–965.
    1. Rejón E, Giménez MD, Mayordomo L, Rodríguez S, González MP, Marenco JL. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of multiple intravenous infusions of infliximab in refractory ankylosing spondylitis patients with axial involvement. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology. 2004;33(5):323–326.
    1. Sidiropoulos P, Kritikos HD, Siakka P, et al. Low dose of infliximab is inadequate in most patients with spondylarthropathies. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2005;23(4):513–516.
    1. Keeling S, Oswald A, Mallon C, Russell AS, Maksymowych WP. Prospective observational analysis of the efficacy and safety of low-dose (3 mg/kg) infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: 4-year followup. Journal of Rheumatology. 2006;33(3):558–561.
    1. Jois RN, Leeder J, Gibb A, et al. Low-dose infliximab treatment for ankylosing spondylitis—clinically- and cost-effective. Rheumatology. 2006;45(12):1566–1569.
    1. Inman RD, Maksymowych WP. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of low dose infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis. Journal of Rheumatology. 2010;37(6):1203–1210.
    1. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1984;27(4):361–368.
    1. Maksymowych WP, Inman RD, Salonen D, et al. Spondyloarthritis research consortium of Canada magnetic resonance imaging index for assessment of sacroiliac joint inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Care and Research. 2005;53(5):703–709.
    1. Prevoo MLL, van ’T Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LBA, van Riel PLCM. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1995;38(1):44–48.
    1. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1993;36(6):729–740.
    1. Pedersen SJ, Sørensen IJ, Hermann KA, et al. Responsiveness of the ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) and clinical and MRI measures of disease activity in a 1-year follow-up study of patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor α inhibitors. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2010;69(6):1065–1071.
    1. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index. Journal of Rheumatology. 1994;21(12):2286–2291.
    1. Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC, Kennedy LG, Garrett SL, Calin A. Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The bath AS metrology index. Journal of Rheumatology. 1994;21(9):1694–1698.
    1. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, O’Hea J, Mallorie P, Jenkinson T. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index. Journal of Rheumatology. 1994;21(12):2281–2285.
    1. Jones SD, Steiner A, Garrett SL, Calin A. The bath ankylosing spondylitis patient global score (BAS-G) The British Journal of Rheumatology. 1996;35(1):66–71.
    1. Persson L, Karlsson J, Bengtsson C, Steen B, Sullivan M. The Swedish SF-36 health survey II. Evaluation of clinical validity: results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenborg. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51(11):1095–1103.
    1. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Jr., Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care. 1994;32(1):40–66.
    1. Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.
    1. Sullivan MK, Taft C, Ware J. SF-36 Health Survey: Swedish Manual and Interpretation Guide. 2nd edition 2002.
    1. de Vries HS, van Oijen MGH, Driessen RJB, et al. Appropriate infliximab infusion dosage and monitoring: results of a panel meeting of rheumatologists, dermatologists and gastroenterologists. The British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2011;71(1):7–19.
    1. Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, et al. Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. The Lancet. 2002;359(9313):1187–1193.
    1. Chen J, Liu C, Lin J. Methotrexate for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2006;(4)CD004524
    1. Pérez-Guijo VC, Cravo AR, Castro MDC, Font P, Muñoz-Gomariz E, Collantes-Estevez E. Increased efficacy of infliximab associated with methotrexate in ankylosing spondylitis. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74(3):254–258.
    1. Mulleman D, Lauféron F, Wendling D, et al. Infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: alone or in combination with methotrexate? A pharmacokinetic comparative study. Arthritis Research and Therapy. 2011;13(3, article R82)
    1. Breban M, Ravaud P, Claudepierre P, et al. Maintenance of infliximab treatment in ankylosing spondylitis: results of a one-year randomized controlled trial comparing systematic versus on-demand treatment. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2008;58(1):88–97.
    1. Sampaio-Barros PD, Costallat LTL, Bertolo MB, Neto JFM, Samara AM. Methotrexate in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology. 2000;29(3):160–162.
    1. Valesini G, Iannuccelli C, Marocchi E, Pascoli L, Scalzi V, Di Franco M. Biological and clinical effects of anti-TNFα treatment. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2007;7(1):35–41.
    1. Smolen JS, Emery P. Infliximab: 12 years of experience. Arthritis Research and Therapy. 2011;13(1, article S2)
    1. Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: an open, observational, extension study of a three-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2003;48(8):2224–2233.
    1. Braun J, Deodhar A, Dijkmans B, et al. Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis over a two-year period. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2008;59(9):1270–1278.
    1. Landewé RBM, Hermann KA, van der Heijde DMFM, et al. Scoring sacroiliac joints by magnetic resonance imaging. A multiple-reader reliability experiment. Journal of Rheumatology. 2005;32(10):2050–2055.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する