Observational Study in a Real-World Setting of Targeted Therapy in the Systemic Treatment of Progressive Unresectable or Metastatic Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (pNETs) in France: OPALINE Study

Denis Smith, Côme Lepage, Eric Vicaut, Sophie Dominguez, Romain Coriat, Olivier Dubreuil, Thierry Lecomte, Eric Baudin, Laurence Venat Bouvet, Emmanuelle Samalin, Alexandre Santos, Odile Borie, Ségolène Bisot-Locard, Bernard Goichot, Catherine Lombard-Bohas, Denis Smith, Côme Lepage, Eric Vicaut, Sophie Dominguez, Romain Coriat, Olivier Dubreuil, Thierry Lecomte, Eric Baudin, Laurence Venat Bouvet, Emmanuelle Samalin, Alexandre Santos, Odile Borie, Ségolène Bisot-Locard, Bernard Goichot, Catherine Lombard-Bohas

Abstract

Introduction: Approval of sunitinib and everolimus for the treatment of progressive, unresectable or metastatic well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) was obtained in France in 2011 and 2012, respectively. OPALINE was set up as an observational study to evaluate the efficacy of sunitinib and everolimus compared to usual pNET treatments of chemotherapies and somatostatin analogues that had been previously recommended by the health authorities.

Methods: The OPALINE study assessed the efficacy of everolimus and sunitinib in terms of survival, disease progression and tolerance. Patients (N = 144) were enrolled from May 2015 to September 2017, and their disease characteristics were analyzed from diagnosis to 2 years post-enrollment.

Results: At inclusion most patients had comorbidities, and about 95% presented metastases. Patients received on average 3.2 lines of treatment from diagnosis to inclusion and two lines throughout the 2-year follow-up. Seventy-nine patients (59.0%) received at least one targeted therapy (TT) during their care path. For these patients, the overall survival (OS) was approximatively 176.5 months (95% CI: 97.2-not evaluable), with a 2-year survival rate estimated at 93.6% (SD 2.6%). Similar survival rates were observed whether the TTs were prescribed sooner or later in the treatment path. The main reasons for discontinuation of TTs were disease progression (54 patients) and adverse events (26 patients). Most patients receiving TTs did not change their dose during the follow-up reflecting the good treatment tolerability over time. No new safety alert was reported for everolimus and sunitinib during this study.

Conclusion: Given their good tolerance and positive impact on estimated OS, the two TTs have an important role to play in the care path of patients with pNETs.

Gov national clinical trial number: NCT02264665.

Keywords: 2-Year morbi-mortality; Ambispective study; Everolimus; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; Sunitinib; pNET.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Physician population. Profile of the active physicians, per specialty, affiliation and medical structure. Physicians actively participating in the study were mainly gastroenterologists or oncologists, mainly affiliated to public institutions and more particularly practicing in hospital structures
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient population

References

    1. Delaunoit T, Neczyporenko F, Rubin J, Erlichman C, Hobday TJ. Medical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:475–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01643.x.
    1. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3063–3072. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4377.
    1. Yao JC, Phan AT, Jehl V, Shah G, Meric-Bernstam F. Everolimus in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: the clinical experience. Cancer Res. 2013;73:1449–1453. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3923.
    1. David M, Lepage C, Jouve JL, et al. Management and prognosis of pancreatic cancer over a 30-year period. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:215–218. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605150.
    1. Halfdanarson TR, Rabe KG, Rubin J, Petersen GM. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1727–1733. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn351.
    1. Bierley J, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. International union against cancer. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 8. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2017.
    1. Lepage C, Bouvier AM, Phelip JM, Hatem C, Vernet C, Faivre J. Incidence and management of malignant digestive endocrine tumours in a well defined French population. Gut. 2004;53:549–553. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.026401.
    1. Lepage C, Rachet B, Coleman MP. Survival from malignant digestive endocrine tumors in England and Wales: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:899–904. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.01.006.
    1. de Mestier L, Lepage C, Baudin E, et al. Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN): French Intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, GTE, RENATEN, TENPATH, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR) Dig Liver Dis. 2020;52:473–492. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.02.011.
    1. Raymond E, Dahan L, Raoul JL, et al. Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:501–513. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003825.
    1. Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T, et al. Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:514–523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009290.
    1. Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data, Springer: statistics for biology and health; 1997.
    1. Espinosa-Olarte P, La Salvia A, Riesco-Martinez M, et al. Chemotherapy in NEN: still has a role? Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2021;22:595–614. doi: 10.1007/s11154-021-09638-0.
    1. Berdelou A, Boige V, Arfi-Rouche J, et al. Not all patients with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour will benefit from all approved or recommended therapeutic options: a real-life retrospective study. Neuroendocrinology. 2017;105:26–34. doi: 10.1159/000446988.
    1. Pavel, M, Öberg K, Falconi M, et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2020;31:844–860.
    1. Raymond E, Kulke MH, Qin S, et al. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Neuroendocrinology. 2018;107:237–245. doi: 10.1159/000491999.
    1. Landau DA, Tausch E, Taylor-Weiner AN, et al. Mutations driving CLL and their evolution in progression and relapse. Nature. 2015;526:525–530. doi: 10.1038/nature15395.
    1. Megdanova-Chipeva VG, Lamarca A, Backen A, et al. Systemic treatment selection for patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) Cancers (Basel) 2020;12:1988. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071988.
    1. Khan S, Stamp E, Sammon C, Brabander T, de Herder W, Pavel M. Matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, everolimus and sunitinib in advanced, unresectable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: relative effectiveness of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2021;16:5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2021.06.002.
    1. Panzuto F, Rinzivillo M, Fazio N, et al. Real world study of Everolimus in advanced progressive neuroendocrine tumors. Oncologist. 2014;19:966–974. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0037.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する