Cumulative Disadvantage and Disparities in Depression and Pain Among Veterans With Osteoarthritis: The Role of Perceived Discrimination

Juliette McClendon, Utibe R Essien, Ada Youk, Said A Ibrahim, Ernest Vina, C Kent Kwoh, Leslie R M Hausmann, Juliette McClendon, Utibe R Essien, Ada Youk, Said A Ibrahim, Ernest Vina, C Kent Kwoh, Leslie R M Hausmann

Abstract

Objective: Perceived discrimination is associated with chronic pain and depression and contributes to racial health disparities. In a cohort of older adult veterans with osteoarthritis (OA), our objective was to examine how membership in multiple socially disadvantaged groups (cumulative disadvantage) was associated with perceived discrimination, pain, and depression. We also tested whether perceived discrimination mediated the association of cumulative disadvantage with depression and pain.

Methods: We analyzed baseline data from 270 African American veterans and 247 White veterans enrolled in a randomized controlled trial testing a psychological intervention for chronic pain at 2 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. Participants were age ≥50 years and self-reported symptomatic knee OA. Measures included the Everyday Discrimination Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain subscale, and demographic variables. Cumulative disadvantage was defined as the number of socially disadvantaged groups to which each participant belonged (i.e., self-reported female sex, African American race, annual income of <$20,000, and/or unemployed due to disability). We used linear regression models and Sobel's test of mediation to examine hypotheses.

Results: The mean ± SD number of social disadvantages was 1.3 ± 1.0. Cumulative disadvantage was significantly associated with higher perceived discrimination, pain, and depression (P < 0.001 for all). Perceived discrimination significantly mediated the association between cumulative disadvantage and depression symptoms (Z = 3.75, P < 0.001) as well as pain severity (Z = 2.24, P = 0.025).

Conclusion: Perceived discrimination is an important psychosocial stressor that contributes to worsening OA-related mental and physical health outcomes, with greater effects among those from multiple socially disadvantaged groups.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02223858.

© 2020, American College of Rheumatology. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Perceived discrimination mediating the association between cumulative disadvantage and depression symptoms. Sobel Z = 3.75 (p

Figure 2.

Perceived discrimination mediating the association…

Figure 2.

Perceived discrimination mediating the association between cumulative disadvantage and pain severity. Sobel Z…

Figure 2.
Perceived discrimination mediating the association between cumulative disadvantage and pain severity. Sobel Z =2.24 (p = 0.025). Proportion of total effect mediated = 0.090 (9%). Model adjusted for age, body mass index, and site of recruitment. Total effect = c; Direct effect = c’. *p<.05.>
Similar articles
Cited by
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Related information
Full text links [x]
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Perceived discrimination mediating the association between cumulative disadvantage and pain severity. Sobel Z =2.24 (p = 0.025). Proportion of total effect mediated = 0.090 (9%). Model adjusted for age, body mass index, and site of recruitment. Total effect = c; Direct effect = c’. *p<.05.>

Source: PubMed

3
購読する