Structuring Communication Relationships for Interprofessional Teamwork (SCRIPT): a cluster randomized controlled trial

Merrick Zwarenstein, Scott Reeves, Ann Russell, Chris Kenaszchuk, Lesley Gotlib Conn, Karen-Lee Miller, Lorelei Lingard, Kevin E Thorpe, Merrick Zwarenstein, Scott Reeves, Ann Russell, Chris Kenaszchuk, Lesley Gotlib Conn, Karen-Lee Miller, Lorelei Lingard, Kevin E Thorpe

Abstract

Background: Despite a burgeoning interest in using interprofessional approaches to promote effective collaboration in health care, systematic reviews find scant evidence of benefit. This protocol describes the first cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to design and evaluate an intervention intended to improve interprofessional collaborative communication and patient-centred care.

Objectives: The objective is to evaluate the effects of a four-component, hospital-based staff communication protocol designed to promote collaborative communication between healthcare professionals and enhance patient-centred care.

Methods: The study is a multi-centre mixed-methods cluster randomized controlled trial involving twenty clinical teaching teams (CTTs) in general internal medicine (GIM) divisions of five Toronto tertiary-care hospitals. CTTs will be randomly assigned either to receive an intervention designed to improve interprofessional collaborative communication, or to continue usual communication practices. Non-participant naturalistic observation, shadowing, and semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted to explore existing patterns of interprofessional collaboration in the CTTs, and to support intervention development. Interviews and shadowing will continue during intervention delivery in order to document interactions between the intervention settings and adopters, and changes in interprofessional communication. The primary outcome is the rate of unplanned hospital readmission. Secondary outcomes are length of stay (LOS); adherence to evidence-based prescription drug therapy; patients' satisfaction with care; self-report surveys of CTT staff perceptions of interprofessional collaboration; and frequency of calls to paging devices. Outcomes will be compared on an intention-to-treat basis using adjustment methods appropriate for data from a cluster randomized design.

Discussion: Pre-intervention qualitative analysis revealed that a substantial amount of interprofessional interaction lacks key core elements of collaborative communication such as self-introduction, description of professional role, and solicitation of other professional perspectives. Incorporating these findings, a four-component intervention was designed with a goal of creating a culture of communication in which the fundamentals of collaboration become a routine part of interprofessional interactions during unstructured work periods on GIM wards.

Trial registration: Registered with National Institutes of Health as NCT00466297.

References

    1. World Health Organisation . Continuing Education of Health Personnel. Copenhagen; 1976.
    1. World Health Organisation . Learning Together to Work Together. Geneva; 1988.
    1. Romanow R. Building on Values: The Future of Healthcare in Canada (Final Report 1–356) Ottawa: Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada; 2002.
    1. First Minister's Accord . Building A Safer System A National Integrated Strategy for Improving Patient Safety in Canadian Health Care. Ottawa: Secretariat; 2003.
    1. Barr H, Koppel I, Reeves S, Hammick M, Freeth D. Effective Interprofessional Education: Assumption, Argument and Evidence. London: Blackwell; 2005.
    1. Zwarenstein M, Reeves S, Barr H, Hammick M, Koppel I, Atkins J. Interprofessional Education: Effects on Professional Practice and Health Care Outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001. p. CD002213.
    1. Oandasan I, D'Amour D, Zwarenstein M, Barker K, Purden M, Beaulieu M, Reeves S, Nasmith L, Bosco C, Ginsburg L, Tregunno D. Interdisciplinary Education for Collaborative Patient-Centred Practice. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2004.
    1. Zwarenstein M, Reeves S. Knowledge translation and interprofessional collaboration: where the rubber of evidence based care hits the road of teamwork. J Contin Edu Health Prof. 2006;26:46–54. doi: 10.1002/chp.50.
    1. Reeves S, Russell A, Zwarenstein M, Kenaszchuk C, Conn LG, Doran D, Sinclair L, Lingard L, Oandasan I, Thorpe K, Austin Z, Beales J, Hindmarsh W, Whiteside C, Hodges B, Nasmith L, Silver I, Miller KL, Vogwill V, Strauss S. Structuring communication relationships for interprofessional teamwork (SCRIPT): a Canadian initiative aimed at improving patient-centred care. J Interprof Care. 2007;21:111–114. doi: 10.1080/13561820600991595.
    1. Russell L, Nyhof-Young J, Abosh B, Robinson S. An exploratory analysis of an interprofessional learning environment in two hospital clinical teaching units. J Interprof Care. 2006;20:29–39. doi: 10.1080/13561820500476473.
    1. Medical Research Council . A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health. London; 2002. accessed May 6, 2007.
    1. Spradley J. Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston; 1980.
    1. Bernard HR. In: Research Methods in Anthropology. 3. Walnut Creek, editor. CA: AltaMira Press; 2002.
    1. Knoblauch H. Focused ethnography. Forum: Qual Soc Res. 2005;6
    1. McDonald S. Studying actions in context: a qualitative shadowing method for organization research. Qual Res. 2005;5:455–473. doi: 10.1177/1468794105056923.
    1. Kuzel AJ. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: Crabtree B, Miller W, editor. Doing Qualitative Research. 2. London: Sage Publications; 1999. pp. 33–45.
    1. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000.
    1. Logan J, Graham ID. Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. Science Communication. 1998;20:227–246. doi: 10.1177/1075547098020002004.
    1. Pettigrew AM. Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Org Sci. 1990;1:267–292.
    1. van Walraven C, Mamdani M, Fang J, Austin PC. Continuity of care and patient outcomes after hospital discharge. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:624–631. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30082.x.
    1. Adams A, Bond S, Arber S. Development and validation of scales to measure organisational features of acute hospital wards. Intl J Nurs Stud. 1995;32:612–627. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(95)00041-1.
    1. Chaboyer W, Patterson E. Australian hospital generalist and critical care nurses' perception of doctor-nurse collaboration. Nurs Health Sci. 2001;3:73–79. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2018.2001.00075.x.
    1. Chaboyer W, Najman S, Dunn P. Factors influencing job valuation: a comparative study of critical care and non-critical care nurses. Intl J Nurs Stud. 2001;38:53–61.
    1. Day SJ, Altman DG. Blinding in clinical trials and other studies. BMJ. 2000;321:504. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7259.504.
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Altman DG. The landscape and lexicon of blinding in randomized trials. Ann Int Med. 2002;136:254–259.
    1. Fick DM, Cooper JW, Wade WE, Waller JL, Maclean JR, Beers MH. Updating the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2716–2724. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.22.2716.
    1. Hintze J. NCSS, PASS, and GESS Kaysville, Utah: NCSS. 2006.
    1. . From the site's list of Frequently Asked Questions, 'Q32: How do I randomize a list of people's names?'.
    1. Reed JF., III Adjusted chi-square statistics: Application to clustered binary data in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:201–203. doi: 10.1370/afm.41.
    1. Donner A, Klar N. Methods for comparing event rates in intervention studies when the unit of allocation is a cluster. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:279–289.
    1. Donner A, Klar N. Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials. London: Arnold; 2000.
    1. Wears RL. Advanced statistics: statistical methods for analyzing cluster and cluster randomized data. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:330–341. doi: 10.1197/aemj.9.4.330.
    1. Patel R, Reilly K, Old A, Nagen G, Child S. Appropriate use of pagers in a New Zealand tertiary hospital. N Z Med J. 2006;119:U1912.
    1. Volpp KGM, Grande D. Residents' suggestions for reducing errors in teaching hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:851–855. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb021667.
    1. Katz MH, Schroeder SA. The sounds of the hospital. Paging patterns in three hospitals. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1585–1589.
    1. Blum NJ, Lieu TA. Interrupted care. The effects of paging on pediatric resident activities. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1992;146:806–808.
    1. Coiera E, Tombs V. Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: an observational study. BMJ. 1998;316:673–676.
    1. Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 2. London: Routledge; 1995.
    1. Allen D. The nursing-medical boundary: a negotiated order? Sociol Health Illness. 1997;19:498–520.
    1. Reeves S, Lewin S. Interprofessional collaboration in the hospital: strategies and meanings. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004;9:218–225. doi: 10.1258/1355819042250140.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する