The mediating/moderating role of cultural context factors on self-care practices among those living with diabetes in rural Appalachia

Brittany L Smalls, Adebola Adegboyega, Ellen Combs, Matthew Rutledge, Philip M Westgate, Md Tofial Azam, Felipe De La Barra, Lovoria B Williams, Nancy E Schoenberg, Brittany L Smalls, Adebola Adegboyega, Ellen Combs, Matthew Rutledge, Philip M Westgate, Md Tofial Azam, Felipe De La Barra, Lovoria B Williams, Nancy E Schoenberg

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to examine whether cultural factors, such as religiosity and social support, mediate/moderate the relationship between personal/psychosocial factors and T2DM self-care in a rural Appalachian community.

Methods: Regression models were utilized to assess for mediation and moderation. Multilevel linear mixed effects models and GEE-type logistic regression models were fit for continuous (social support, self-care) and binary (religiosity) outcomes, respectively.

Results: The results indicated that cultural context factors (religiosity and social support) can mediate/moderate the relationship between psychosocial factors and T2DM self-care. Specifically, after adjusting for demographic variables, the findings suggested that social support may moderate the effect of depressive symptoms and stress on self-care. Religiosity may moderate the effect of distress on self-care, and empowerment was a predictor of self-care but was not mediated/moderated by the assessed cultural context factors. When considering health status, religiosity was a moderately significant predictor of self-care and may mediate the relationship between perceived health status and T2DM self-care.

Conclusions: This study represents the first known research to examine cultural assets and diabetes self-care practices among a community-based sample of Appalachian adults. We echo calls to increase the evidence on social support and religiosity and other contextual factors among this highly affected population.

Trial registration: US National Library of Science identifier NCT03474731. Registered March 23, 2018, www.clinicaltrials.gov .

Keywords: Religiosity; Rural Appalachia; Self-care; Social support.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual Model for Analysis Adapted from Biopsychosocial Model

References

    1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2020.
    1. Report AHRA. 2019. . Accessed 12 July 19.
    1. Schoenberg NE, Ciciurkaite G, Greenwood MK. Community to clinic navigation to improve diabetes outcomes. Prev Med Rep. 2017;5:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.11.015.
    1. Control CfD, Prevention . National diabetes statistics report: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States, 2014. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services 2014. 2014.
    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes–2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl 1):S14–80. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S014.
    1. Macavoy S, Lippman DT. Teaching culturally competent care: nursing students experience rural Appalachia. J Transcult Nurs. 2001;12(3):221–227. doi: 10.1177/104365960101200306.
    1. Elliott J, Ripley D. Considering contemporary Appalachia: implications for culturally competent counseling. Teach Superv Couns. 2021;3(1):3.
    1. Specht H. Social support, social networks, social exchange, and social work practice. Soc Serv Rev. 1986;60(2):218–240. doi: 10.1086/644362.
    1. Tang TS, Brown MB, Funnell MM, Anderson RM. Social support, quality of life, and self-care behaviors among African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2008;34(2):266–276. doi: 10.1177/0145721708315680.
    1. Ciechanowski P, Russo J, Katon WJ, Lin EHB, Ludman E, Heckbert S, von Korff M, Williams LH, Young BA. Relationship styles and mortality in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):539–544. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1298.
    1. Trief P, Sandberg JG, Ploutz-Snyder R, Brittain R, Cibula D, Scales K, Weinstock RS. Promoting couples collaboration in type 2 diabetes: the diabetes support project pilot data. Fam Syst Health. 2011;29(3):253–261. doi: 10.1037/a0024564.
    1. Strom JL, Egede LE. The impact of social support on outcomes in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Curr Diab Rep. 2012;12(6):769–781. doi: 10.1007/s11892-012-0317-0.
    1. Mohebi S, Parham M, Sharifirad G, Gharlipour Z, Mohammadbeigi A, Rajati F. Relationship between perceived social support and self-care behavior in type 2 diabetics: a cross-sectional study. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7(1):48. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_73_17.
    1. Rose V, Harris M. ‘Training’friends and family to provide positive social support in diabetes self-management: experience of ethnically diverse patients. Diabet Med. 2013;30(3):372–373. doi: 10.1111/dme.12015.
    1. Ramkisson S, Pillay BJ, Sibanda W. Social support and coping in adults with type 2 diabetes. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2017;9(1):1–8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1405.
    1. Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Gillette CD. Psychosocial barriers to diabetes self-management and quality of life. Diabetes Spectr. 2001;14(1):33–41. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.14.1.33.
    1. Shaw BA, Gallant MP, Riley-Jacome M, Spokane LS. Assessing sources of support for diabetes self-care in urban and rural underserved communities. J Community Health. 2006;31(5):393–412. doi: 10.1007/s10900-006-9018-4.
    1. Pew Research Center, Religion and Public life. 2020. .
    1. Schoenberg NE, Swanson M. Rural religious leaders’ perspectives on their communities’ health priorities and health. South Med J. 2017;110(7):447–451. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000671.
    1. Krause N, Hill PC, Emmons R, Pargament KI, Ironson G. Assessing the relationship between religious involvement and health behaviors. Health Educ Behav. 2017;44(2):278–284. doi: 10.1177/1090198116655314.
    1. Permana I. How Religosity and/or spirituality might influence self-Care in Diabetes Management: a structured review. Bangladesh J Med Sci. 2018;17(2):185–193. doi: 10.3329/bjms.v17i2.35869.
    1. Agriculture UDo . Rural-urban commuting codes. 2020.
    1. Commission AR . An analysis of disparities in health status and access to health care in the Appalachian region. 2007.
    1. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, Dudl RJ, Lees J, Mullan J, Jackson RA. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(3):626–631. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.626.
    1. Association AD . Our 60-second type 2 diabetes risk test. 2020.
    1. McGuire B, Morrison T, Hermanns N, et al. Short-form measures of diabetes-related emotional distress: the problem areas in diabetes scale (PAID)-5 and PAID-1. Diabetologia. 2010;53(1):66–69. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1559-5.
    1. Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Fitzgerald JT, Marrero DG. The diabetes empowerment scale: a measure of psychosocial self-efficacy. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(6):739–743. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.6.739.
    1. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ. 1993;306(6890):1437–1440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1437.
    1. Van Dam NT, Earleywine M. Validation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale—Revised (CESD-R): pragmatic depression assessment in the general population. Psychiatry Res. 2011;186(1):128–132. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.08.018.
    1. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. Perceived stress scale. Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists. 1994. p. 10.
    1. Hahn EA, DeVellis RF, Bode RK, et al. Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(7):1035–1044. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9654-0.
    1. Castel LD, Williams KA, Bosworth HB, Eisen SV, Hahn EA, Irwin DE, Kelly MAR, Morse J, Stover A, DeWalt DA, DeVellis RF. Content validity in the PROMIS social-health domain: a qualitative analysis of focus-group data. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(5):737–749. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9352-3.
    1. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(7):943–950. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943.
    1. Kauermann G, Carroll RJ. A note on the efficiency of sandwich covariance matrix estimation. J Am Stat Assoc. 2001;96(456):1387–1396. doi: 10.1198/016214501753382309.
    1. Newton-John TR, Ventura AD, Mosely K, Browne JL, Speight J. ‘Are you sure you’re going to have another one of those?’: A qualitative analysis of the social control and social support models in type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2017;22(14):1819–1829. doi: 10.1177/1359105316642005.
    1. Mayberry LS, Berg CA, Greevy RA, Nelson LA, Bergner EM, Wallston KA, Harper KJ, Elasy TA. Mixed-methods randomized evaluation of FAMS: a Mobile phone-delivered intervention to improve family/friend involvement in adults’ type 2 diabetes self-care. Ann Behav Med. 2020;55(2):165–178. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa041.
    1. Van Den Brink R, Schutter N, Hanssen D, et al. Prognostic significance of social network, social support and loneliness for course of major depressive disorder in adulthood and old age. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018;27(3):266–277. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000014.
    1. Choi SA, Hastings JF. Religion, spirituality, coping, and resilience among African Americans with diabetes. J Relig Spiritual Soc Work Soc Thought. 2019;38(1):93–114. doi: 10.1080/15426432.2018.1524735.
    1. Gonzalez-Zacarias AA, Mavarez-Martinez A, Arias-Morales CE, Stoicea N, Rogers B. Impact of demographic, socioeconomic, and psychological factors on glycemic self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Public Health. 2016;4:195. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00195.
    1. Koenig HG, Peteet J, Balboni M. Religion and spirituality in gerontology. Spirituality and religion within the culture of medicine: from evidence to practice. 2017. p. 109.
    1. Łuczyński W, Głowińska-Olszewska B, Bossowski A. Empowerment in the treatment of diabetes and obesity. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2016/5671492.
    1. Fitzgerald M, O'Tuathaigh C, Moran J. Investigation of the relationship between patient empowerment and glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional analysis. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):5(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008422.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する