Rotator cuff repair using a bioresorbable nanofiber interposition scaffold: a biomechanical and histologic analysis in sheep

Anthony Romeo, Jeremiah Easley, Dan Regan, Eileen Hackett, James Johnson, Jed Johnson, Christian Puttlitz, Kirk McGilvray, Anthony Romeo, Jeremiah Easley, Dan Regan, Eileen Hackett, James Johnson, Jed Johnson, Christian Puttlitz, Kirk McGilvray

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical, structural, and histologic quality of rotator cuff repairs augmented with an interposition electrospun nanofiber scaffold composed of polyglycolic acid (PGA) and poly-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone (PLCL) in an acute sheep model.

Methods: Forty acute infraspinatus tendon detachment and repair procedures were performed in a sheep infraspinatus model using a double-row transosseous-equivalent anchor technique either with an interposition nanofiber scaffold composed of polyglycolic acid-poly-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone or with no scaffold. Animals were euthanized at the 6-week (20 samples) and 12-week (20 samples) postoperative time points to assess the biomechanical and histologic properties of the repairs and to compare differences within each group.

Results: Within the scaffold-treated group, there was a significant increase in ultimate failure force (in newtons) from 6 to 12 weeks (P < .01), a significant increase in ultimate failure load from 6 to 12 weeks (P < .01), and a significant increase in ultimate failure stress (in megapascals) from 6 to 12 weeks (P < .01). At 6 weeks, the tendon-bone attachment was most consistent with an "indirect" type of insertion, whereas at 12 weeks, a visible difference in the progression and re-formation of the enthesis was observed. Compared with controls, animals in the scaffold-treated group displayed an insertion of the fibrous tendon with the humeral footprint that was beginning to be organized in a manner similar to the "native" direct/fibrocartilaginous insertion of the ovine infraspinatus tendon. In the majority of these animals treated with the scaffold, prominent perforating collagen fibers, similar to Sharpey fibers, were present and extending through a region of calcified fibrocartilage and attaching to the humeral footprint. No surgical complications occurred in any of the 40 sheep, including delayed wound healing or infection.

Conclusions: In a sheep acute rotator cuff repair model, securing a nanofiber scaffold between the tendon and the bone using a double-row transosseous-equivalent anchor fixation technique resulted in greater failure strength. Additionally, at the enthesis, Sharpey fiber-like attachments (ie, collagen fibers extending from the tendon into the calcified fibrocartilage of the humerus) were observed, which were not seen in the control group.

Keywords: Rotator cuff repair (RCR); acute model; nanofiber; ovine model; scaffold; tendon.

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative images demonstrating modified double-row technique in which the sharply transected infraspinatus tendon (left) was immediately reattached using a total of 4 suture anchors (right) in an acute transection and reattachment ovine model. This sequence of images also shows the placement of the scaffold at the enthesis (fourth panel) prior to tendon reattachment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative scanning electron microscope images demonstrating architecture of nanofiber scaffold used in study. The scaffold is a nonwoven, biphasic, microporous nanofiber matrix composed of biodegradable polymer fibers consisting of polyglycolic acid and poly-L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ultimate failure load (top left), construct stiffness (top right), ultimate failure stress (bottom left), and construct elastic modulus (bottom right). There was a significant increase in ultimate failure load (in newtons) from 6 to 12 weeks (A, P < .01). Additionally, there was a statistically significant increase in only the nanofiber treatment group between 6 and 12 weeks (B, P < .01). There were no significant differences in construct stiffness (in newtons per millimeter), allowing for the effects of time (P = .41), treatment (P = .16), or the interaction between treatment and time (P = .36). There was a significant increase in ultimate failure stress (in megapascals) from 6 to 12 weeks (A, P < .01). There was no significant difference in construct elastic modulus (in megapascals), allowing for the effects of time (P = .91), treatment (P = .18), or the interaction between treatment and time (P = .89).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Histopathologic assessment of treatment groups. Like symbols indicate statistically significant differences between groups. The given scores are based on an adaptation of the parameters of the Movin and Bonar scoring systems for specific assessment of tendon histologic characteristics.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Representative hematoxylin-eosin–stained images (magnification ×1.25) highlighting fibrocartilaginous zone of attachment at tendon-bone interface in both treatment groups at both time points. The enthesis footprint is indicated (), in addition to the tendon (*) and residual scaffold (#) at the 6-week time point.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Re-formation of Sharpey-like fibers. A representative image demonstrates the formation of Sharpey-like fibers along a fibrocartilaginous zone of attachment at the tendon-bone interface (). When present, these fibers were characterized as broad, distinctive bundles of dense collagen that originated from the tendon fibrous connective tissue, extended through fibrocartilage or hyaline-like cartilage, and attached to the underlying humeral bone along the tendon-bone interface region of interest (nanofiber treatment, 12 weeks, magnification ×10).

References

    1. Agabalyan N Tendinopathy—from basic science to treatment. Int J Exp Pathol 2013;94:A1. 10.1111/iep.12034
    1. Agudelo-Garcia PA, De Jesus JK, Williams SP, Nowicki MO, Chiocca EA, Liyanarachchi S, et al. Glioma cell migration on three-dimensional nanofiber scaffolds is regulated by substrate topography and abolished by inhibition of STAT3 signaling. Neoplasia 2011;13:831–40. 10.1593/neo.11612
    1. Brown BN, Sicari BM, Badylak SF. Rethinking regenerative medicine: a macrophage-centered approach. Front Immunol 2014;5:510. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00510
    1. Cao H, McHugh K, Chew SY, Anderson JM. The topographical effect of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds on the in vivo and in vitro foreign body reaction. J Biomed Mater ResA 2010;93:1151–9. 10.1002/jbm.a.32609
    1. Carr A, Cooper C, Campbell MK, Rees J, Moser J, Beard DJ, et al. Effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (UKUFF): a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:107–15. 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0424.R1
    1. Cathy A, Mayton HA. Introductory techniques for processing mineralized bone and implants. Columbia, MD: National Society for Histotechnology; 2021.
    1. Easley J, Johnson J, Regan D, Hackett E, Romeo AA, Schlegel T, et al. Partial infraspinatus tendon transection as a means for the development of a translational ovine chronic rotator cuff disease model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2020;33:212–9. 10.1055/s-0040-1701650
    1. Easley J, Puttlitz C, Hackett E, Broomfield C, Nakamura L, Hawes M, et al. A prospective study comparing tendon-to-bone interface healing using an interposition bioresorbable scaffold with a vented anchor for primary rotator cuff repair in sheep. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020;29:157–66. 10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.024
    1. Erickson BJ, Shishani Y, Bishop ME, Patel M, Jones S, Romeo AA, et al. Subscapularis repair during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a stem-based double-row repair: sonographic and clinical outcomes. Orthop J Sports Med 2020;8:2325967120906806. 10.1177/2325967120906806
    1. Fenwick SA, Hazleman BL, Riley GP. The vasculature and its role in the damaged and healing tendon. Arthritis Res 2002;4:252–60. 10.1186/ar416
    1. Fotticchia A, Musson D, Lenardi C, Demirci E, Liu Y. Anisotropic cytocompatible electrospun scaffold for tendon tissue engineering elicits limited inflammatory response in vitro. J Biomater Appl 2018;33:127–39. 10.1177/0885328218779846
    1. Fu W, Liu Z, Feng B, Hu R, He X, Wang H, et al. Electrospun gelatin/PCL and collagen/PLCL scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering. Int J Nanomedicine 2014;9:2335–44. 10.2147/IJN.S61375
    1. Hakimi O, Mouthuy PA, Zargar N, Lostis E, Morrey M, Carr A. A layered electrospun and woven surgical scaffold to enhance endogenous tendon repair. Acta Biomater 2015;26:124–35. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.007
    1. Harryman DT II, Mack LA, Wang KY, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA III. Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:982–9.
    1. Hee CK, Dines JS, Dines DM, Roden CM, Wisner-Lynch LA, Turner AS, et al. Augmentation of a rotator cuff suture repair using rhPDGF-BB and a type I bovine collagen matrix in an ovine model. Am J Sports Med 2011;39:1630–9. 10.1177/0363546511404942
    1. Hopkins C, Fu SC, Chua E, Hu X, Rolf C, Mattila VM, et al. Critical review on the socio-economic impact of tendinopathy. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol 2016;4:9–20. 10.1016/j.asmart.2016.01.002
    1. Huntington L, Coles-Black J, Richardson M, Sobol T, Caldow J, Chuen J, et al. The use of suture-tape and suture-wire in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparative biomechanics study. Injury 2018;49:2047–52. 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.004
    1. Inui A, Kokubu T, Mifune Y, Sakata R, Nishimoto H, Nishida K, et al. Regeneration of rotator cuff tear using electrospun poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds in a rabbit model. Arthroscopy 2012;28:1790–9. 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.05.887
    1. Kendal A, Snelling S, Dakin S, Stace E, Mouthuy PA, Carr A. Resorbable electrospun polydioxanone fibres modify the behaviour of cells from both healthy and diseased human tendons. Eur Cell Mater 2017;33:169–82. 10.22203/eCM.v033a13
    1. Kennedy KM, Bhaw-Luximon A, Jhurry D. Cell-matrix mechanical interaction in electrospun polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering: implications for scaffold design and performance. Acta Biomater 2017;50:41–55. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.034
    1. Lampe KJ, Namba RM, Silverman TR, Bjugstad KB, Mahoney MJ. Impact of lactic acid on cell proliferation and free radical-induced cell death in monolayer cultures of neural precursor cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009;103:1214–23. 10.1002/bit.22352
    1. Lewis CW, Schlegel TF, Hawkins RJ, James SP, Turner AS. The effect of immobilization on rotator cuff healing using modified Mason-Allen stitches: a biomechanical study in sheep. Biomed Sci Instrum 2001;37:263–8.
    1. Lewis CW, Schlegel TF, Hawkins RJ, James SP, Turner AS. Comparison of tunnel suture and suture anchor methods as a function of time in a sheep model. Biomed Sci Instrum 1999;35:403–8.
    1. Lin ST, Musson DS, Amirapu S, Cornish J, Bhattacharyya D. Development of organic solvent-free micro-/nano-porous polymer scaffolds for musculoskeletal regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 2017;105:1393–404. 10.1002/jbm.a.36023
    1. Lorbach O, Bachelier F, Vees J, Kohn D, Pape D. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair. Am J Sports Med 2008;36:1504–10. 10.1177/0363546508314424
    1. Luan T, Liu X, Easley JT, Ravishankar B, Puttlitz C, Feeley BT. Muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration after an acute rotator cuff repair in a sheep model. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2015;5:106–12. 10.11138/mltj/2015.5.2.106
    1. Matsen FA III. CORR Insights(R): does distal clavicle resection decrease pain or improve shoulder function in patients with acro-mioclavicular joint arthritis and rotator cuff tears? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018;476:2415–7. 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000441
    1. McElvany MD, McGoldrick E, Gee AO, Neradilek MB, Matsen FA III. Rotator cuff repair: published evidence on factors associated with repair integrity and clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med 2015;43:491–500. 10.1177/0363546514529644
    1. McGilvray KC, Easley J, Seim HB, Regan D, Berven SH, Hsu WK, et al. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model. Spine J 2018;18:1250–60. 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018
    1. Miller BS, Downie BK, Kohen RB, Kijek T, Lesniak B, Jacobson JA, et al. When do rotator cuff repairs fail? Serial ultrasound examination after arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 2011;39:2064–70. 10.1177/0363546511413372
    1. Orr SB, Chainani A, Hippensteel KJ, Kishan A, Gilchrist C, Garrigues NW, et al. Aligned multilayered electrospun scaffolds for rotator cuff tendon tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2015;24:117–26. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.010
    1. Over 460,000 rotator cuff surgeries per year reported in the United States. Kings Crossing, BC, Canada: iData Research; 2018.
    1. Peach MS, Ramos DM, James R, Morozowich NL, Mazzocca AD, Doty SB, et al. Engineered stem cell niche matrices for rotator cuff tendon regenerative engineering. PLoS One 2017;12:e0174789. 10.1371/journal.pone.0174789
    1. Rashid M, Dudhia J, Dakin SG, Snelling SJB, De Godoy R, Mouthuy PA, et al. Histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation of cellular response to a woven and electrospun polydioxanone (PDO) and polycaprolactone (PCL) patch for tendon repair. Sci Rep 2020;10:4754. 10.1038/s41598-020-61725-5
    1. Reifenrath J, Wellmann M, Kempfert M, Angrisani N, Welke B, Gniesmer S, et al. TGF-beta3 loaded electrospun polycaprolacton fibre scaffolds for rotator cuff tear repair: an in vivo study in rats. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:1046. 10.3390/ijms21031046
    1. Riley G Tendinopathy—from basic science to treatment. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2008;4:82–9. 10.1038/ncprheum0700
    1. Rodeo SA, Potter HG, Kawamura S, Turner AS, Kim HJ, Atkinson BL. Biologic augmentation of rotator cuff tendon-healing with use of a mixture of osteoinductive growth factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:2485–97. 10.2106/JBJS.C.01627
    1. Santoni BG, McGilvray KC, Lyons AS, Bansal M, Turner AS, Macgillivray JD, et al. Biomechanical analysis of an ovine rotator cuff repair via porous patch augmentation in a chronic rupture model. Am J Sports Med 2010;38:679–86. 10.1177/0363546510366866
    1. Schar MO, Rodeo SA, Zumstein MA. Biologics in rotator cuff surgery. Shoulder Elbow 2014;6:239–44. 10.1177/1758573214536536
    1. Schlegel TF, Hawkins RJ, Lewis CW, Motta T, Turner AS. The effects of augmentation with Swine small intestine submucosa on tendon healing under tension: histologic and mechanical evaluations in sheep. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:275–80. 10.1177/0363546505279912
    1. Schlegel TF, Hawkins RJ, Lewis CW, Turner AS. An in vivo comparison of the modified Mason-Allen suture technique versus an inclined horizontal mattress suture technique with regard to tendon-to-bone healing: a biomechanical and histologic study in sheep. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16:115–21. 10.1016/j.jse.2006.05.002
    1. Seeherman HJ, Archambault JM, Rodeo SA, Turner AS, Zekas L, D’Augusta D, et al. rhBMP-12 accelerates healing of rotator cuff repairs in a sheep model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:2206–19. 10.2106/JBJS.G.00742
    1. Slabaugh MA, Nho SJ, Grumet RC, Wilson JB, Seroyer ST, Frank RM, et al. Does the literature confirm superior clinical results in radiographically healed rotator cuffs after rotator cuff repair? Arthroscopy 2010;26:393–403. 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.07.023
    1. Stace ET, Nagra NS, Tiberwel S, Khan W, Carr AJ. The use of electrospun scaffolds in musculoskeletal tissue engineering: a focus on tendon and the rotator cuff. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2018;13:619–31. 10.2174/1574888X13666180129105707
    1. Sun Y, Han F, Zhang P, Zhi Y, Yang J, Yao X, et al. A synthetic bridging patch of modified co-electrospun dual nano-scaffolds for massive rotator cuff tear. J Mater Chem B 2016;4:7259–69. 10.1039/c6tb01674j
    1. Teunis T, Lubberts B, Reilly BT, Ring D. A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1913–21. 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.001
    1. Thangarajah T, Pendegrass CJ, Shahbazi S, Lambert S, Alexander S, Blunn GW. Augmentation of rotator cuff repair with soft tissue scaffolds. Orthop J Sports Med 2015;3:2325967115587495. 10.1177/2325967115587495
    1. Townsend JM, Hukill ME, Fung KM, Ohst DG, Johnson JK, Weatherly RA, et al. Biodegradable electrospun patch containing cell adhesion or antimicrobial compounds for trachea repair in vivo. Biomed Mater 2020;15:025003. 10.1088/1748-605X/ab5e1b
    1. Turner AS. Experiences with sheep as an animal model for shoulder surgery: strengths and shortcomings. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16:S158–63. 10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.002
    1. Van Kampen C, Arnoczky S, Parks P, Hackett E, Ruehlman D, Turner A, et al. Tissue-engineered augmentation of a rotator cuff tendon using a reconstituted collagen scaffold: a histological evaluation in sheep. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2013;3:229–35. 10.1002/jor.23642
    1. Willbold E, Wellmann M, Welke B, Angrisani N, Gniesmer S, Kampmann A, et al. Possibilities and limitations of electrospun chitosan-coated polycaprolactone grafts for rotator cuff tear repair. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2020;14:186–97. 10.1002/term.2985
    1. Wong CC, Yeh YY, Yang TL, Tsuang YH, Chen CH. Augmentation of tendon graft-bone tunnel interface healing by use of bioactive platelet-rich fibrin scaffolds. Am J Sports Med 2020;48:1379–88. 10.1177/0363546520908849
    1. Wong WK, Li MY, Yung PS, Leong HT. The effect of psychological factors on pain, function and quality of life in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2020;47:102173. 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102173
    1. Xu Y, Murrell GA. The basic science of tendinopathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:1528–38. 10.1007/s11999-008-0286-4
    1. Xu Y, Wu J, Wang H, Li H, Di N, Song L, et al. Fabrication of electrospun poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone)/collagen nanoyarn network as a novel, three-dimensional, macroporous, aligned scaffold for tendon tissue engineering. Tissue Eng C Methods 2013;19:925–36. 10.1089/ten.TEC.2012.0328
    1. Yang C, Deng G, Chen W, Ye X, Mo X. A novel electrospun-aligned nanoyarn-reinforced nanofibrous scaffold for tendon tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2014;122:270–6. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.06.061
    1. Yeung E, Inoue T, Matsushita H, Opfermann J, Mass P, Aslan S, et al. In vivo implantation of 3-dimensional printed customized branched tissue engineered vascular graft in a porcine model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020;159:1971–81.e1. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.138
    1. Zhang K, Fu Q, Yoo J, Chen X, Chandra P, Mo X, et al.. 3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: an in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment. Acta Biomater 2017;50:154–64. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.008
    1. Zhang X, Bogdanowicz D, Erisken C, Lee NM, Lu HH. Biomimetic scaffold design for functional and integrative tendon repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012;21:266–77. 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.016
    1. Zhao S, Xie X, Pan G, Shen P, Zhao J, Cui W. Healing improvement after rotator cuff repair using gelatin-grafted poly(L-lactide) electrospun fibrous membranes. J Surg Res 2015;193:33–42. 10.1016/j.jss.2014.08.019
    1. Zhao S, Zhao J, Dong S, Huangfu X, Li B, Yang H, et al. Biological augmentation of rotator cuff repair using bFGF-loaded electrospun poly(lactide-co-glycolide) fibrous membranes. Int J Nanomedicine 2014;9:2373–85. 10.2147/IJN.S59536

Source: PubMed

3
購読する