The treatment zone decentration and corneal refractive profile changes in children undergoing orthokeratology treatment

Weiping Lin, Tianpu Gu, Hua Bi, Bei Du, Bin Zhang, Ruihua Wei, Weiping Lin, Tianpu Gu, Hua Bi, Bei Du, Bin Zhang, Ruihua Wei

Abstract

Background: To confirm the association between treatment-zone (TZ) decentration and axial length growth (ALG) in children who underwent orthokeratology; and to explore the association between TZ decentration and relative corneal refractive power (RCRP) profile, which was known to be significantly associated with ALG retardation.

Methods: Four hundred myopic children of age 12 years participated in the study, with 200 wearing orthokeratology lenses and the other 200 wearing single-vision spectacle as the controls. Cycloplegic refraction was performed at baseline. Axial length was measured at baseline and 12 months after initial lens wear, and ALG was defined as the difference. In the ortho-k group, TZ decentration and the RCRP map were calculated from the topography map obtained at the 12-month visit. RCRP were summed within various chord radii from the cornea center, and the association to TZ decentration, spherical equivalent (SE), ALG were analyzed with linear regressions.

Results: Compared to the controls, children wearing orthokeratology lenses had significantly smaller ALG over 1 year (0.1 ± 0.15 mm vs. 0.32 ± 0.17 mm, p < 0.001). ALG was significantly and negatively associated with summed RCRP within the central cornea of 2 mm in radius. The mean TZ decentration was 0.62 ± 0.25 mm, and the mean direction was 214.26 ± 7.39 degrees. ALG was negatively associated with the TZ decentration magnitude (p < 0.01), but not the direction (p = 0.905). TZ decentration caused an asymmetrical distribution of the RCRP with the nasal side plus power shifting towards the corneal center. For chord radius ranging 1-2 mm, the association between TZ decentration and the summed RCRP were significant, and the proportion of variance accountable increased with chord radius. For chord radius beyond 1.5 mm, the association between baseline spherical equivalent (SE) and summed RCRP was significant. The portion of variance accountable by SE increased and peaked in 2.5 mm chord radius.

Conclusions: A larger TZ decentration was associated with a larger summed RCRP in the central cornea. It may be one of the possible reasons why TZ decentration is beneficial to retarding myopia progression.

Keywords: Corneal refractive power; Myopia control; Orthokeratology; Treatment zone decentration.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Methods to determine treatment zone decentration. A topographic map before and after orthokeratology treatment. B Method to determine TZ decentration during the 12-month follow-up visit. The red cross indicates the geometric center, the black circle represents the fitted treatment zone, and the black cross indicates the center of the treatment zone
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Methods to determine RCRP. A) Axial map at baseline, (B) axial map in 12 months after treatment, (C) The RCRP map
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Histogram showing axial length growth of children in the ortho-k (blue line) and spectacle groups (gray line). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Histogram showing the distribution of RCRP, TZ decentration, and SE, the triangle representing the mean values. A) RCRP. B) TZ decentration. C) SE
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The association between ALG and RCRP, TZ decentration, and SE. A Correlation between ALG and RCRP. B Correlation between TZ decentration and RCRP. C Correlation between SE and RCRP
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
RCRP map and RCRP profiles on four major meridians. A RCRP map of a subject with a small TZ decentration. B RCRP profiles along four meridians of this subject. Red line: horizontal. Dark line: vertical. Blue and green: oblique. C RCRP map of a subject with a large TZ decentration. D. RCRP profiles along four meridians of this subject
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
The association between TZ decentration and summed RCRP at different chord radii. A Correlation between TZ decentration and summed RCRP at radius 1.5 mm. B Simple linear regression showed that the percentage of the variance of Summed RCRP could be explained by TZ decentration at different chord radii. Solid symbols indicate statistical significance
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
The association between SE and summed RCRP at different chord radii. A Correlation between SE and summed RCRP at radius 3.5 mm. B Simple linear regression showed that the percentage of the variance of summed RCRP could be explained by SE (black block) at different chord radii

References

    1. Tahhan N, Du Toit R, Papas E, et al. Comparison of reverse-geometry lens designs for overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80(12):796–804. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200312000-00009.
    1. Lee YC, Wang JH, Chiu CJ. Effect of orthokeratology on myopia progression: twelve-year results of a retrospective cohort study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0639-4.
    1. VanderVeen DK, Kraker RT, Pineles SL, et al. Use of orthokeratology for the prevention of myopic progression in children: a report by the American Academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(4):623–636. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.026.
    1. Cho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of myopia in orthokeratology (ROMIO) study: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(11):7077–7085. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10565.
    1. Huang J, Wen D, Wang Q, et al. Efficacy comparison of 16 interventions for myopia control in children: a network Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(4):697–708. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.010.
    1. Chen R, Chen Y, Lipson M, et al. The effect of treatment zone Decentration on myopic progression during or-thokeratology. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45(5):645–651. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1673438.
    1. Wang A, Yang C. Influence of overnight orthokeratology Lens treatment zone Decentration on myopia progression. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:2596953.
    1. Lin W, Li N, Gu T, et al. The treatment zone size and its decentration influence axial elongation in children with orthokeratology treatment. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021;21(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02123-x.
    1. Wang J, Yang D, Bi H, et al. A new method to analyze the relative corneal refractive power and its association to myopic progression control with orthokeratology. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018;7(6):17. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.6.17.
    1. Wang D, Wen D, Zhang B, et al. The association between Fourier parameters and clinical parameters in myopic children undergoing orthokeratology. Curr Eye Res. 2021;46(11):1637–1645. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1917619.
    1. Hiraoka T, Mihashi T, Okamoto C, et al. Influence of induced decentered orthokeratology lens on ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations and contrast sensitivity function. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(11):1918–1926. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.06.018.
    1. Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, et al. Influence of ocular wavefront aberrations on axial length elongation in myopic children treated with overnight orthokeratology. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(1):93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.042.
    1. Yang X, Bi H, Li L, et al. The effect of relative corneal refractive power shift distribution on axial length growth in myopic children undergoing orthokeratology treatment. Curr Eye Res. 2021;46(5):657–665. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1820528.
    1. Hu Y, Wen C, Li Z, et al. Areal summed corneal power shift is an important determinant for axial length elongation in myopic children treated with overnight orthokeratology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(11):1571–1575. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312933.
    1. Zhong Y, Chen Z, Xue F, et al. Central and peripheral corneal power change in myopic orthokeratology and its relationship with 2-year axial length change. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(8):4514–4519. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-13935.
    1. Paune J, Fonts S, Rodriguez L, et al. The role of Back optic zone diameter in myopia control with orthokeratology lenses. J Clin Med. 2021;10(2):336. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020336.
    1. Carracedo G, Espinosa-Vidal TM, Martinez-Alberquilla I, et al. The topographical effect of optical zone diameter in orthokeratology contact lenses in high Myopes. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:1082472. doi: 10.1155/2019/1082472.
    1. Huang Y, Li X, Ding C, et al. Comparison of peripheral refraction and higher-order aberrations between orthokeratology and multifocal soft contact lens designed with highly addition. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022.
    1. Zhang Z, Chen Z, Chen Z, et al. Change in corneal power distribution in orthokeratology: a predictor for the change in axial length. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022;11(2):18. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.2.18.
    1. Liu G, Chen Z, Xue F, et al. Effects of myopic orthokeratology on visual performance and optical quality. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(5):316–321. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000372.
    1. Maseedupally VK, Gifford P, Lum E, et al. Treatment zone Decentration during orthokeratology on eyes with corneal Toricity. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(9):1101–1111. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000896.
    1. Yang X, Zhong X, Gong X, et al. Topographical evaluation of the decentration of orthokeratology lenses. Yan Ke Xue Bao. 2005;21(3):132–135.
    1. Chen Z, Xue F, Zhou J, et al. Prediction of orthokeratology Lens Decentration with corneal elevation. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94(9):903–907. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001109.
    1. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott LT. Corneal reshaping and myopia progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(9):1181–1185. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.151365.
    1. Kang P, Swarbrick H. Time course of the effects of orthokeratology on peripheral refraction and corneal topography. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;33(3):277–282. doi: 10.1111/opo.12027.
    1. Queiros A, Amorim-de-Sousa A, Lopes-Ferreira D, et al. Relative peripheral refraction across 4 meridians after orthokeratology and LASIK surgery. Eye Vis (Lond) 2018;5:12. doi: 10.1186/s40662-018-0106-1.
    1. Lau JK, Vincent SJ, Cheung SW, et al. Higher-order aberrations and axial elongation in myopic children treated with orthokeratology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(2):22. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.2.22.
    1. Vincent SJ, Cho P, Chan KY, et al. CLEAR - orthokeratology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44(2):240–269. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.02.003.
    1. Lau JK, Vincent SJ, Cheung SW, et al. The influence of orthokeratology compression factor on ocular higher-order aberrations. Clin Exp Optom. 2020;103(1):123–128. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12933.
    1. Chen J, Huang W, Zhu R, et al. Influence of overnight orthokeratology lens fitting decentration on corneal topography reshaping. Eye Vis (Lond) 2018;5:5. doi: 10.1186/s40662-018-0100-7.
    1. Tsai YY, Lin JM. Ablation centration after active eye-tracker-assisted photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(1):28–34. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00328-4.
    1. Lu F, Simpson T, Sorbara L, et al. The relationship between the treatment zone diameter and visual, optical and subjective performance in corneal refractive therapy lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27(6):568–578. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00520.x.
    1. Wilson SE, Lin DT, Klyce SD, et al. Rigid contact lens decentration: a risk factor for corneal warpage. CLAO J. 1990;16(3):177–182.
    1. Jiang F, Huang X, Xia H, et al. The spatial distribution of relative corneal refractive power shift and axial growth in myopic children: orthokeratology versus multifocal contact Lens. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:686932. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.686932.
    1. Wang D, Wen D, Zhang B, et al. The association between Fourier parameters and clinical parameters in myopic children undergoing Orthokeratolog. Cur Eye Res. 2021;(3):1–9.
    1. Queiros A, Lopes-Ferreira D, Yeoh B, et al. Refractive, biometric and corneal topographic parameter changes during 12 months of orthokeratology. Clin Exp Optom. 2020;103(4):454–462. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12976.
    1. Li Z, Cui D, Long W, et al. Predictive role of paracentral corneal Toricity using elevation data for treatment zone Decentration during orthokeratology. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43(9):1083–1089. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1481516.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する