Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis?

Yiran Zhang, Rita Hedo, Anna Rivera, Rudolph Rull, Sabrina Richardson, Xin M Tu, Yiran Zhang, Rita Hedo, Anna Rivera, Rudolph Rull, Sabrina Richardson, Xin M Tu

Abstract

Power analysis is a key component for planning prospective studies such as clinical trials. However, some journals in biomedical and psychosocial sciences ask for power analysis for data already collected and analysed before accepting manuscripts for publication. In this report, post hoc power analysis for retrospective studies is examined and the informativeness of understanding the power for detecting significant effects of the results analysed, using the same data on which the power analysis is based, is scrutinised. Monte Carlo simulation is used to investigate the performance of posthoc power analysis.

Keywords: continuous outcome; monte carlo; post-hoc power; retrospective study; simulation.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histograms of post hoc power, along with true power, based on 1000 Monte Carlo sample sizes with the mean difference: (A) δ=0.5; (B) δ=1 and (C) δ=2 and a sample size n=50.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histograms of post hoc power, along with true power, based on 1000 Monte Carlo sample sizes with the mean difference: (A) δ=0.5, (B) δ=1 and (C) δ=2 and a sample size n=100.

References

    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed Mahwah, NJ: LEA, 1988.
    1. Heonig JM, Heisey DM. The abuse of power: the pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. The American Statistician 2001;55:19–24.
    1. Kraemer HC, Mintz J, Noda A, et al. . Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63:484–9. 10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.484
    1. Levine M, Ensom MHH. Post hoc power analysis: an idea whose time has passed? Pharmacotherapy 2001;21:405–9. 10.1592/phco.21.5.405.34503
    1. Korn EL. Projection from previous studies. Control Clin Trials 1990;11:67–9. 10.1016/0197-2456(90)90033-X
    1. Korn EL. Projecting power from a previous study: maximum likelihood estimation. Am Stat 1990;44:290–2.
    1. Kowalski J, Tu XM. Modern applied U statistics. New York: Wiley, 2007.
    1. Tu XM, Kowalski J, Zhang J, et al. . Power analyses for longitudinal trials and other clustered designs. Stat Med 2004;23:2799–815. 10.1002/sim.1869

Source: PubMed

3
購読する