Understanding How Virtual Reality Can Support Mindfulness Practice: Mixed Methods Study

Elizabeth Seabrook, Ryan Kelly, Fiona Foley, Stephen Theiler, Neil Thomas, Greg Wadley, Maja Nedeljkovic, Elizabeth Seabrook, Ryan Kelly, Fiona Foley, Stephen Theiler, Neil Thomas, Greg Wadley, Maja Nedeljkovic

Abstract

Background: Regular mindfulness practice has been demonstrated to be beneficial for mental health, but mindfulness can be challenging to adopt, with environmental and personal distractors often cited as challenges. Virtual reality (VR) may address these challenges by providing an immersive environment for practicing mindfulness and by supporting the user to orient attention to the present moment within a tailored virtual setting. However, there is currently a limited understanding of the ways in which VR can support or hinder mindfulness practice. Such an understanding is required to design effective VR apps while ensuring that VR-supported mindfulness is acceptable to end users.

Objective: This study aimed to explore how VR can support mindfulness practice and to understand user experience issues that may affect the acceptability and efficacy of VR mindfulness for users in the general population.

Methods: A sample of 37 participants from the general population trialed a VR mindfulness app in a controlled laboratory setting. The VR app presented users with an omnidirectional video of a peaceful forest environment with a guided mindfulness voiceover that was delivered by a male narrator. Scores on the State Mindfulness Scale, Simulator Sickness Questionnaire, and single-item measures of positive and negative emotion and arousal were measured pre- and post-VR for all participants. Qualitative feedback was collected through interviews with a subset of 19 participants. The interviews sought to understand the user experience of mindfulness practice in VR.

Results: State mindfulness (P<.001; Cohen d=1.80) and positive affect (P=.006; r=.45) significantly increased after using the VR mindfulness app. No notable changes in negative emotion, subjective arousal, or symptoms of simulator sickness were observed across the sample. Participants described the user experience as relaxing, calming, and peaceful. Participants suggested that the use of VR helped them to focus on the present moment by using visual and auditory elements of VR as attentional anchors. The sense of presence in the virtual environment (VE) was identified by participants as being helpful to practicing mindfulness. Interruptions to presence acted as distractors. Some uncomfortable experiences were discussed, primarily in relation to video fidelity and the weight of the VR headset, although these were infrequent and minor.

Conclusions: This study suggests that an appropriately designed VR app can support mindfulness practice by enhancing state mindfulness and inducing positive affect. VR may help address the challenges of practicing mindfulness by creating a sense of presence in a tailored VE; by allowing users to attend to visual and auditory anchors of their choice; and by reducing the scope of the content in users' mind-wandering. VR has the unique capability to combine guided mindfulness practice with tailored VEs that lend themselves to support individuals to focus attention on the present moment.

Keywords: acceptability; emotion; evaluation; mindfulness; pilot projects; virtual reality.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Elizabeth Mary Seabrook, Ryan Kelly, Fiona Foley, Stephen Theiler, Neil Thomas, Greg Wadley, Maja Nedeljkovic. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 18.03.2020.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Filming locations for the virtual reality mindfulness app. The image on the left shows the environment presented for the first half of the mindfulness practice. The image on the right shows the second environment as well as the camera used to capture the omnidirectional footage.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart illustrating participant recruitment to data analysis. VR: virtual reality.

References

    1. Bishop SR, Lau M, Shapiro S, Carlson L, Anderson ND, Carmody J, Segal ZV, Abbey S, Speca M, Velting D, Devins G. Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clin Psychol. 2004 Sep;11(3):230–41. doi: 10.1093/clipsy/bph077.
    1. Kabat-Zinn J. Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain, and Illness. New York: Delta Trade Paperbacks; 1990.
    1. Anderson T, Farb NA. Personalising practice using preferences for meditation anchor modality. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2521. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02521. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02521.
    1. Blanck P, Perleth S, Heidenreich T, Kröger P, Ditzen B, Bents H, Mander J. Effects of mindfulness exercises as stand-alone intervention on symptoms of anxiety and depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2018 Mar;102:25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.12.002.
    1. Cavanagh K, Strauss C, Forder L, Jones F. Can mindfulness and acceptance be learnt by self-help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mindfulness and acceptance-based self-help interventions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Mar;34(2):118–29. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.001.
    1. Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Mar;30(2):217–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004.
    1. Lutz A, Slagter HA, Dunne JD, Davidson RJ. Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Apr;12(4):163–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.005.
    1. Lymeus F, Lundgren T, Hartig T. Attentional effort of beginning mindfulness training is offset with practice directed toward images of natural scenery. Environ Behav. 2017;49(5):536–59. doi: 10.1177/0013916516657390.
    1. Lindsay EK, Creswell JD. Mechanisms of mindfulness training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT) Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Feb;51:48–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.011.
    1. Anderson T, Suresh M, Farb NA. Meditation benefits and drawbacks: empirical codebook and implications for teaching. J Cogn Enhanc. 2019;3(2):207–20. doi: 10.1007/s41465-018-00119-y.
    1. Little D. UCLIC - UCL Interaction Centre. University College London; 2016. [2020-01-14]. Supporting or Inhibiting Motivations to Meditate? A Semi-Structured Interview Study of the User Experience of Mobile Mindfulness Apps .
    1. Navarro-Haro MV, López-Del-Hoyo Y, Campos D, Linehan MM, Hoffman HG, García-Palacios A, Modrego-Alarcón M, Borao L, García-Campayo J. Meditation experts try Virtual Reality Mindfulness: a pilot study evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of Virtual Reality to facilitate mindfulness practice in people attending a Mindfulness conference. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187777.
    1. Sevilla-Llewellyn-Jones J, Santesteban-Echarri O, Pryor I, McGorry P, Alvarez-Jimenez M. Web-based mindfulness interventions for mental health treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Sep 25;5(3):e10278. doi: 10.2196/10278.
    1. Turner T, Hingle M. Evaluation of a mindfulness-based mobile app aimed at promoting awareness of weight-related behaviors in adolescents: a pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Apr 26;6(4):e67. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6695.
    1. Wahbeh H, Oken BS. Internet mindfulness meditation intervention for the general public: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Aug 8;3(3):e37. doi: 10.2196/mental.5900.
    1. Roquet CD, Sas C. Evaluating Mindfulness Meditation Apps. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; CHI EA'18; April 21 - 26, 2018; Montreal, Canada. New York: ACM; 2018. Apr, pp. 1–6.
    1. Collins E, Cox A, Wilcock C, Sethu-Jones G. Digital games and mindfulness apps: comparison of effects on post work recovery. JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Jul 18;6(7):e12853. doi: 10.2196/12853.
    1. Toivonen KI, Zernicke K, Carlson LE. Web-based mindfulness interventions for people with physical health conditions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 31;19(8):e303. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7487.
    1. Kvillemo P, Brandberg Y, Bränström R. Feasibility and outcomes of an internet-based mindfulness training program: a pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Jul 22;3(3):e33. doi: 10.2196/mental.5457.
    1. Baer R, Crane C, Miller E, Kuyken W. Doing no harm in mindfulness-based programs: conceptual issues and empirical findings. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Jul;71:101–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.001.
    1. Banerjee M, Cavanagh K, Strauss C. A qualitative study with healthcare staff exploring the facilitators and barriers to engaging in a self-help mindfulness-based intervention. Mindfulness. 2017;8(6):1653–64. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0740-z.
    1. Damen KH, van der Spek ED. Virtual Reality as e-Mental Health to Support Starting with Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy. In: Clua E, Roque L, Lugmayr A, Tuomi P, editors. Entertainment Computing – ICEC 2018. Cham: Springer; 2018. pp. 241–7.
    1. Bruggeman KJ, Wurster SW. The Hiatus System: Virtual Healing Spaces: Low Dose Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction Virtual Reality Application. Proceedings of the 2018 Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference; SIGGRAPH'18; August 12 - 16, 2018; British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. New York, USA: ACM Press; 2018. pp. 1–2.
    1. Chandrasiri A, Collett J, Fassbender E, de Foe A. A virtual reality approach to mindfulness skills training. Virtual Real. 2019 Feb 18;24:143–9. doi: 10.1007/s10055-019-00380-2.
    1. Cikajlo I, Staba UC, Vrhovac S, Larkin F, Roddy M. A cloud-based virtual reality app for a novel telemindfulness service: rationale, design and feasibility evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Jun 5;6(6):e108. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6849.
    1. Steuer J. Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J Commun. 1992;42(4):73–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x.
    1. Diemer J, Alpers GW, Peperkorn HM, Shiban Y, Mühlberger A. The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: a review of research in virtual reality. Front Psychol. 2015;6:26. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026.
    1. Slater M. Measuring presence: a response to The Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire. Presence. 1999;8(5):560–5. doi: 10.1162/105474699566477.
    1. Witmer BG, Singer MJ. Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence. 1998;7(3):225–40. doi: 10.1162/105474698565686.
    1. Slater M. University College London. 2003. [2020-03-04]. A note on presence terminology .
    1. Slater M. Grand challenges in virtual environments. Front Robot AI. 2014;1:1. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2014.00003.
    1. Flores A, Linehan MM, Todd SR, Hoffman HG. The use of virtual reality to facilitate mindfulness skills training in dialectical behavioral therapy for spinal cord injury: a case study. Front Psychol. 2018;9:531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00531.
    1. Navarro-Haro MV, Modrego-Alarcón M, Hoffman HG, López-Montoyo A, Navarro-Gil M, Montero-Marin J, García-Palacios A, Borao L, García-Campayo J. Evaluation of a mindfulness-based intervention with and without virtual reality dialectical behavior therapy mindfulness skills training for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in primary care: a pilot study. Front Psychol. 2019;10:55. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00055. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00055.
    1. Gomez J, Hoffman HG, Bistricky SL, Gonzalez M, Rosenberg L, Sampaio M, Garcia-Palacios A, Navarro-Haro MV, Alhalabi W, Rosenberg M, Meyer WJ, Linehan MM. The use of virtual reality facilitates dialectical behavior 'therapy observing sounds and visuals' mindfulness skills training exercises for a Latino patient with severe burns: a case study. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1611. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01611. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01611.
    1. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1993;3(3):203–20. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3.
    1. Davis S, Nesbitt K, Nalivaiko E. A Systematic Review of Cybersickness. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment; IE'14; December 2 - 3, 2014; NSW, Newcastle, Australia. ACM Press; 2014. pp. 1–9.
    1. Gu J, Strauss C, Crane C, Barnhofer T, Karl A, Cavanagh K, Kuyken W. Examining the factor structure of the 39-item and 15-item versions of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire before and after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for people with recurrent depression. Psychol Assess. 2016 Jul;28(7):791–802. doi: 10.1037/pas0000263.
    1. Baer RA, Carmody J, Hunsinger M. Weekly change in mindfulness and perceived stress in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. J Clin Psychol. 2012 Jul;68(7):755–65. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21865.
    1. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335–43. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u.
    1. Tanay G, Bernstein A. State Mindfulness Scale (SMS): development and initial validation. Psychol Assess. 2013 Dec;25(4):1286–99. doi: 10.1037/a0034044.
    1. Russell JA. A circumplex model of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39(6):1161–78. doi: 10.1037/h0077714.
    1. Pot-Kolder R, Veling W, Counotte J, van der Gaag M. Anxiety partially mediates cybersickness symptoms in immersive virtual reality environments. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Mar;21(3):187–93. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0082.
    1. Witmer BG, Jerome CJ, Singer MJ. The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence. 2005;14(3):298–312. doi: 10.1162/105474605323384654.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Second Edition. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):237–46. doi: 10.1177/1098214005283748.
    1. Garland EL, Farb NA, Goldin P, Fredrickson BL. Mindfulness broadens awareness and builds eudaimonic meaning: a process model of mindful positive emotion regulation. Psychol Inq. 2015 Oct 1;26(4):293–314. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2015.1064294.
    1. Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali LM, Knight TM, Pullin AS. A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 4;10:456. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-456.
    1. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 1991;11(3):201–30. doi: 10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80184-7.
    1. Valtchanov D, Barton KR, Ellard C. Restorative effects of virtual nature settings. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010 Oct;13(5):503–12. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0308.
    1. Peters D, Calvo RA, Ryan RM. Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Front Psychol. 2018;9:797. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797.
    1. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68–78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68.
    1. Kaplan S. Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environ Behav. 2001;33(4):480–506. doi: 10.1177/00139160121973106.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する