Systematic review of resilience-enhancing, universal, primary school-based mental health promotion programs

Amanda Fenwick-Smith, Emma E Dahlberg, Sandra C Thompson, Amanda Fenwick-Smith, Emma E Dahlberg, Sandra C Thompson

Abstract

Background: Wellbeing and resilience are essential in preventing and reducing the severity of mental health problems. Equipping children with coping skills and protective behavior can help them react positively to change and obstacles in life, allowing greater mental, social and academic success. This systematic review studies the implementation and evaluation of universal, resilience-focused mental health promotion programs based in primary schools.

Methods: A systematic review of literature used five primary databases: PsycINFO; Web of Science; PubMed; Medline; Embase and The Cochrane Library; and keywords related to (a) health education, health promotion, mental health, mental health promotion, social and emotional wellbeing; (b) school health service, student, schools, whole-school; (c) adolescent, child, school child, pre-adolescent; (d) emotional intelligence, coping behavior, emotional adjustment, resilienc*, problem solving, to identify relevant articles. Articles included featured programs that were universally implemented in a primary school setting and focused on teaching of skills, including coping skills, help-seeking behaviors, stress management, and mindfulness, and were aimed at the overall goal of increasing resilience among students.

Results: Of 3087 peer-reviewed articles initially identified, 475 articles were further evaluated with 11 reports on evaluations of 7 school-based mental health promotion programs meeting the inclusion criteria. Evaluation tools used in program evaluation are also reviewed, with successful trends in evaluations discussed. Encouraging results were seen when the program was delivered by teachers within the schools. Length of programing did not seem important to outcomes. Across all 7 programs, few long-term sustained effects were recorded following program completion.

Conclusions: This review provides evidence that mental health promotion programs that focus on resilience and coping skills have positive impacts on the students' ability to manage daily stressors.

Keywords: Child; Health promotion; Mental health; Primary school; Resilience; Universal intervention.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable as all literature is published.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of selection process for relevant literature

References

    1. Kaufman J, Cook A, Arny L, Jones B, Pittinsky T. Problems defining resiliency: illustrations from the study of maltreated children. Dev Psychopathol. 1994;6(1):215–229. doi: 10.1017/S0954579400005964.
    1. Grotberg EH: The international resilience project findings from the research and the effectiveness of interventions [microform] / Edith H. Grotberg. [Washington D.C.]: distributed by ERIC clearinghouse; 1996.
    1. Greenberg M, Domitrovich C, Bumbarger B. The prevention of mental disorders in school-aged children: current state of the field. Prev Treat. 2001;4(1):1–62
    1. Hodgson R, Abbasi T, Clarkson J. Effective mental health promotion: a literature review. Health Educ J. 1996;55(1):55–74. doi: 10.1177/001789699605500106.
    1. Catalano RF, Berglund ML, Ryan JAM, Lonczak HS, Hawkins JD. Positive youth development in the United States: research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. ANNALS Am Acad Polit Soc Sci. 2004;591(1):98–124. doi: 10.1177/0002716203260102.
    1. Benson PL, Saito RN. The Scientific Foundations of Youth Development. In: Benson PL, Pittman KJ, editors. Trends in Youth Development: Visions, Realities and Challenges. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2001. pp. 135–154.
    1. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30(3):427–432. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.3.427.
    1. Catherine PB, LJ F. Editorial commentary: resilience in child development – interconnected pathways to wellbeing. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54(4):333–336. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12057.
    1. Karatsoreos IN, McEwen BS. Annual research review: the neurobiology and physiology of resilience and adaptation across the life course. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54(4):337–47.
    1. Bonanno GA, Diminich ED. Annual research review: positive adjustment to adversity – trajectories of minimal–impact resilience and emergent resilience. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54(4):378–401.
    1. Dante C. Annual research review: resilient functioning in maltreated children – past, present, and future perspectives. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54(4):402–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02608.x.
    1. Weare K, Nind M. Mental health promotion and problem prevention in schools: what does the evidence say? Health Promot Int. 2011;26(suppl 1):i29–i69. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar075.
    1. Adi Y, Killoran A, Janmohamed K, Stewart-Brown S. Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Mental Wellbeing in Primary Schools: Universal Approaches Which Do not Focus on Violence or Bullying. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2007.
    1. Diekstra R. Social and motional education: an international analysis edn.: Fundacion Marcelino Botin. 2008. Effectiveness of school-based social and emotional education programmes worlwide - part one, a review of meta-analytic literature; pp. 255–284.
    1. Browne G, Gafni A, Roberts J, Byrne C, Majumdar B. Effective/efficient mental health programs for school-age children: a synthesis of reviews. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(7):1367–1384. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00332-0.
    1. Durlak JA, Weissberg RP, Dymnicki AB, Taylor RD, Schellinger KB. The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Dev. 2011;82(1):405–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.
    1. Murphy JM, Abel MR, Hoover S, Jellinek M, Fazel M. Scope, scale, and dose of the world's largest school-based mental health programs. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2017;25(5):218–228. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000149.
    1. Dray J, Bowman J, Campbell E, Freund M, Wolfenden L, Hodder RK, McElwaine K, Tremain D, Bartlem K, Bailey J, et al. Systematic review of universal resilience-focused interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health in the school setting. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(10):813–824. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.07.780.
    1. Wells J, Barlow J, Stewart-Brown S. A systematic review of universal approaches to mental health promotion in schools. Health Educ. 2003;103(4):197–220. doi: 10.1108/09654280310485546.
    1. Durlak JA, Wells AM. Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: a meta-analytic review. Am J Community Psychol. 1997;25(2):115–152. doi: 10.1023/A:1024654026646.
    1. Zoritch B, Roberts I, Oakley A. The health and welfare effects of day-care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Soc Sci Med (1982) 1998;47(3):317–327. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00037-9.
    1. Gillham JE, Reivich KJ, Freres DR, Chaplin TM, Shatté AJ, Samuels B, Elkon AGL, Litzinger S, Lascher M, Gallop R, et al. School-based prevention of depressive symptoms: a randomized controlled study of the effectiveness and specificity of the Penn resiliency program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75(1):9–19. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.1.9.
    1. Vuijk P, van Lier PA, Crijnen AA, Huizink AC. Testing sex-specific pathways from peer victimization to anxiety and depression in early adolescents through a randomized intervention trial. J Affect Disord. 2007;100(1–3):221–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.11.003.
    1. Dadds MR, Roth JH. Prevention of anxiety disorders: results of a universal trial with young children. J Child Fam Stud. 2008;17(3):320–335. doi: 10.1007/s10826-007-9144-3.
    1. Sawyer MG, Pfeiffer S, Spence SH, Bond L, Graetz B, Kay D, Patton G, Sheffield J. School-based prevention of depression: a randomised controlled study of the beyondblue schools research initiative. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010;51(2):199–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02136.x.
    1. Iizuka CA, Barrett PM, Gillies R, Cook CR, Marinovic W. A combined intervention targeting both Teachers' and Students' social-emotional skills: preliminary evaluation of Students' outcomes. Aust J Guid Couns. 2014;24(2):152–166. doi: 10.1017/jgc.2014.12.
    1. Rooney R, Hassan S, Kane R, Roberts CM, Nesa M. Reducing depression in 9-10 year old children in low SES schools: a longitudinal universal randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2013;51(12):845–854. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.09.005.
    1. Pluye P. Robert E, Cargo M, Bartlett G, O'Cathain A, Griffiths F, Boardman F, Gagnon MP, Rousseau MC. Proposal: A mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. Montreal, Canada: McGill University; 2011.
    1. National Collaborating Center for Methods and Tools . Appraising Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Studies included in Mixed Studies Reviews: The MMAT. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University; 2015.
    1. Sibinga EMS, Webb L, Ghazarian SR, Ellen JM: School-based mindfulness instruction: an RCT. Pediatrics 2016, 137 (1) (no pagination)(e20152532).
    1. Clarke AM, Sixsmith J, Barry MM. Evaluating the implementation of an emotional wellbeing programme for primary school children using participatory approaches. Health Educ J. 2015;74(5):578–593. doi: 10.1177/0017896914553133.
    1. Mishara BL, Ystgaard M. Effectiveness of a mental health promotion program to improve coping skills in young children: Zippy's friends. Early Child Res Q. 2006;21(1):110–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.01.002.
    1. Clarke AM, Bunting B, Barry MM. Evaluating the implementation of a school-based emotional well-being programme: a cluster randomized controlled trial of Zippy’s friends for children in disadvantaged primary schools. Health Educ Res. 2014;29(5):786–798. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu047.
    1. Dufour S, Denoncourt J, Mishara BL. Improving Children's adaptation: new evidence regarding the effectiveness of Zippy's friends, a school mental health promotion program. Adv School Ment Health Promot. 2011;4(3):18–28. doi: 10.1080/1754730X.2011.9715633.
    1. Holen S, Waaktaar T, Lervåg A, Ystgaard M. The effectiveness of a universal school-based programme on coping and mental health: a randomised, controlled study of Zippy’s friends. Educ Psychol. 2012;32(5):657–677. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2012.686152.
    1. Malti T, Schwartz SE, Liu CH, Noam GG. Program evaluation: relationships as key to student development. New Dir Youth Dev. 2008;2008(120):151–177. doi: 10.1002/yd.290.
    1. Nielsen L, Meilstrup C, Nelausen MK, Koushede V, Holstein BE. Promotion of social and emotional competence. Health Educ. 2015;115(3/4):339–356. doi: 10.1108/HE-03-2014-0039.
    1. Yamamoto T, Matsumoto Y, Bernard ME. Effects of the cognitive-behavioral you can do it! Education program on the resilience of Japanese elementary school students: a preliminary investigation. Int J Educ Res. 2017;86:50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.006.
    1. Kraag G, Van Breukelen GJP, Kok G, Hosman C. Learn young, learn fair', a stress management program for fifth and sixth graders: longitudinal results from an experimental study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009;50(9):1185–1195. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02088.x.
    1. Caldarella P, Christensen L, Kramer TJ, Kronmiller K. Promoting social and emotional learning in second grade students: a study of the strong start curriculum. Early Childhood Educ J. 2009;37(1):51–56. doi: 10.1007/s10643-009-0321-4.
    1. Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3–4):327–350. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.
    1. Moore, TG. Rethinking universal and targeted services. CCCH Working Paper 2. August 2008. Parkville, Victoria: Centre for Community Child Health.
    1. Darbyshire P, MacDougall C, Schiller W. Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: more insight or just more? Qual Res. 2005;5(4):417–436. doi: 10.1177/1468794105056921.
    1. Pridmore P, Bendelow G. Images of health: exploring beliefs of children using the 'draw-and-write' technique. Health Educ J. 1995;54(4):473–488. doi: 10.1177/001789699505400410.
    1. Barter C, Renold E. 'I wanna tell you a story': exploring the application of vignettes in qualitative research with children and young people. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2000;3(4):307–323. doi: 10.1080/13645570050178594.
    1. Lengua LJ, Stormshak EA. Gender, Gender Roles, and Personality: gender differences in the prediction of coping and psychological symptoms. Sex Roles. 2000;43(11):787–820. doi: 10.1023/A:1011096604861.
    1. Wasonga T, Christman DE, Kilmer L. Ethnicity, Gender and Age: predicting resilience and academic achievement among urban high school students. Am Second Educ. 2003;32(1):62–74.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する