Resilience Programs for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tatiana Matheus Pinto, Paulo Guirro Laurence, Cristiane Rufino Macedo, Elizeu Coutinho Macedo, Tatiana Matheus Pinto, Paulo Guirro Laurence, Cristiane Rufino Macedo, Elizeu Coutinho Macedo

Abstract

Resilience may be defined as the ability to recover and adapt to adverse situations. Given that resilience involves cognitive and behavioral aspects, it could be promoted based on strategies that favor them, especially during childhood and adolescence. As a result, several resilience-focused programs have been developed and studied. This systematic review of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) aimed to assess resilience-focused programs for children (<12 years old) and adolescents (12-22 years old) compared to active (treatment as usual, other program modalities, and educational curriculum at school) or inactive (waiting list, no treatment) control groups. We performed a systematic review of meta-analyses of RCTs. The following databases were searched: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO. Two authors independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the studies' risk of bias. Meta-analyses of random effects were conducted to calculate the standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of program effectiveness. Of the 17 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria, 13 provided sufficient data to assess the effectiveness of the programs after their implementation. Meta-analyses indicated overall effectiveness of the programs in promoting resilience (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI [0.15, 0.81], p = 0.0077). The subgroup analysis indicated effectiveness only among adolescents' resilience (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI [0.08, 0.88], p = 0.02). The follow-up analysis also indicated evidence of continuation of results within a period of up to 6 months up (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI [-0.44, 0.69], p = 0.02). These results indicated the effectiveness of promoting resilience, especially in adolescents, and its continuation in follow-up analyses. These findings are promising in the field of resilience programs; however, further studies are necessary to analyze the different possible characteristics of programs and their results. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020179874], [CRD42020179874].

Keywords: adolescents; children; program; resilience; systematic review.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Pinto, Laurence, Macedo and Macedo.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study flow diagram.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Studies published per year.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Risk of bias for all studies.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Risk of bias for each study.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Publication risk funnel plot.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Overall and subgroup effects of programs on resilience.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Follow-up effects of program on resilience.

References

    1. Adibsereshki N., Hatamizadeh N., Sajedi F., Kazemnejad A. (2019). The effectiveness of a resilience intervention program on emotional intelligence of adolescent students with hearing loss. Children 6:48.
    1. American Psychological Association (APA) (2020). Building Your Resilience. Available online at: (accessed July 14, 2021).
    1. Anticich S., Barrett P., Silverman W., Lacherez P., Gillies R. (2013). The prevention of childhood anxiety and promotion of resilience among preschool-aged children: a universal school-based trial. Adv. Sch. Ment. Health Promot. 6 93–121.
    1. Balduzzi S., Rücker G., Schwarzer G. (2019). How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evid. Based Ment. Health. 22 153–160. 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117
    1. Castro-Olivo S. (2014). Promoting social-emotional learning in adolescent Latino ELLs: a study of the culturally adapted Strong Teens program. Sch. Psychol. Q. 29 567–577. 10.1037/spq0000055
    1. Chen Y., Shen W., Gao K., Lam C., Chang W., Deng H. (2014). Effectiveness of RCT of a CBT intervention for youths who lost parents in the Sichuan, China, earthquake. Psychiatr. Serv. 65 259–262. 10.1176/appi.ps.201200470
    1. Chisholm K., Patterson P., Torgerson C., Turner E., Jenkinson D., Birchwood M. (2016). Impact of contact on adolescents’ mental health literacy and stigma: the SchoolSpace cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2016:e009435.
    1. Chmitorz A., Kunzler A., Helmreich I., Tüscher O., Kalisch R., Kubiak T., et al. (2018). Intervention studies to foster resilience: a systematic review and proposal for a resilience framework in future intervention studies. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 59 78–100. 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.002
    1. DelGiudice M. (2018). “Middle childhood: an evolutionary-developmental synthesis,” in Handbook of Life Course Health Development, eds Halfon N., Forrest C., Lerner R., Faustman E. (Cham: Springer; ), 95–108. 10.1007/978-3-319-47143-3_5
    1. Dray J., Bowman J., Campbell E., Freund M., Wolfenden L., Hodder R. K., et al. (2017). Systematic review of universal resilience-focused interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health in the school setting. J. Am. Acad. Child. Psy. 56 813–824. 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.07.780
    1. Druker K., Mazzucchelli T., Beilby J. (2019). An evaluation of an integrated fluency and resilience program for early developmental stuttering disorders. J. Commun. Disord. 78 69–83. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.02.002
    1. Fenwick-Smith A., Dahlberg E. E., Thompson S. C. (2018). Systematic review of resilience-enhancing, universal, primary school-based mental health promotion programs. BMC Psychol. 6:30. 10.1186/s40359-018-0242-3
    1. Goossens L. (2006). “Adolescent development: putting Europe on the map,” in Handbook of Adolescent Development, eds Jackson S., Goossens L. (New York, NY: Psychology Press; ), 1–10. 10.4324/9780203969861-1
    1. Harrer M., Cuijpers P., Furukawa T. A., Ebert D. D. (2019). Doing Meta-Analysis in R: A Hands-on Guide. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
    1. Hatamizadeh N., Adibsereshki N., Kazemnejad A., Sajedi F. (2020). Randomized trial of a resilience intervention on resilience, behavioral strengths and difficulties of mainstreamed adolescent students with hearing loss. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 128:109722. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109722
    1. Helmreich I., Kunzler A., Chmitorz A., König J., Binder H., Wessa M., et al. (2017). Psychological interventions for resilience enhancement in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2:CD012527.
    1. Higgins J., Green S. (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0). Available online at: (accessed June 15, 2020).
    1. Higgins J. P., Thompson S. G., Deeks J. J., Altman D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 327 557–560. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
    1. Hodder R., Freund M., Wolfenden L., Bowman J., Nepal S., Dray J., et al. (2017). Systematic review of universal school-based ‘resilience’ interventions targeting adolescent tobacco, alcohol or illicit substance use: a meta-analysis. Prev. Med. 100 248–268. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.04.003
    1. Hoffman J. (2019). Basic Biostatistics for Medical and Biomedical Practitioners. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    1. Hood K., Iturralde E., Rausch J., Weissberg-Benchell J. (2018). Preventing diabetes distress in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: results 1 year after participation in the STePS program. Diab. Care 41 1623–1630. 10.2337/dc17-2556
    1. Hyun M.-S., Nam K., Kim M.-A. (2010). Randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioral therapy for at-risk Korean male adolescents. Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs. 24 202–211.
    1. Johnstone K., Middleton T., Kemps E. (2020). A pilot investigation of universal school-based prevention programs for anxiety and depression symptomology in children: a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Psychol. 76 1193–1216. 10.1002/jclp.22926
    1. Joyce S., Shand F., Tighe J., Laurent S. J., Bryant R. A., Harvey S. B. (2018). Road to resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis of resilience training programmes and interventions. BMJ Open 8:e017858.
    1. Laird K. T., Krause B., Funes C., Lavretsky H. (2019). Psychobiological factors of resilience and depression in late life. Transl. Psychiatry 9:88. 10.1038/s41398-019-0424-7
    1. Lee P., Stewart D. (2013). Does a socio-ecological school model promote resilience in primary schools? J. Sch. Health. 83 795–804.
    1. Leppin A. L., Bora P. R., Tilburt J. C., Gionfriddo M. R., Zeballos-Palacios C., Dulohery M. M., et al. (2014). The efficacy of resiliency training programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. PLoS One 9:e111420. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111420
    1. Leventhal K., Gillham J., DeMaria L., Andrew G., Peabody J., Leventhal S. (2015). Building psychosocial assets and wellbeing among adolescent girls: a randomized controlled trial. J. Adolesc. 45 284–295. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.09.011
    1. Li X., Harrison S., Fairchild A., Chi P., Zhao J., Zhao G. (2017). A randomized controlled trial of a resilience-based intervention on psychosocial well-being of children affected by HIV/AIDS: effects at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Soc. Sci. Med. 190 256–264. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.007
    1. Masten A. S. (2018). Resilience theory and research on children and families: past, present, and promise. J. Fam. Theory Rev. 10 12–31.
    1. Masten A. S., Barnes A. J. (2018). Resilience in children: developmental perspectives. Children 5:98.
    1. McGuinness L. A., Higgins J. P. T. (2020). Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res. Syn. Meth. 12 55–61. 10.1002/jrsm.1411
    1. Page M. J., McKenzie J. E., Bossuyt P. M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T. C., Mulrow C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71.
    1. Prince-Embury S. (2006). Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescent: Profiles of Personal Strengths. San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson, Psychological Corporation.
    1. R Core Team (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    1. Sander L., Rausch L., Baumeister H. (2016). Effectiveness of internet-based interventions for the prevention of mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Ment. Health 3 1–20. 10.1016/j.invent.2018.09.001
    1. Tan L., Martin G. (2015). Taming the adolescent mind: a randomised controlled trial examining clinical efficacy of an adolescent mindfulness-based group programme. Child Adolesc. Ment. Health 20 49–55. 10.1111/camh.12057
    1. Vanhove A. J., Herian M. N., Perez A. L. U., Harms P. D., Lester P. B. (2015). Can resilience be developed at work? A meta-analytic review of resilience-building programme effectiveness. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 89 278–307.
    1. Volanen S.-M., Lassander M., Hankonen N., Santalahti P., Hintsanen M., Simonsen N., et al. (2019). Healthy learning mind-effectiveness of a mindfulness program on mental health compared to a relaxation program and teaching as usual in schools: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. J. Affect. Disord. 260 660–669. 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.087
    1. Westgate M. J. (2019a). revtools: an R package to support paper screening for evidence synthesis. Res. Synth. Methods 10 606–614. 10.1002/jrsm.1374
    1. Westgate M. J. (2019b). Revtools: Tools to Support Evidence Synthesis. R Package [Computer Software Manual]. (R package version 0.4.1). Available online at: (accessed July 15, 2021).
    1. Yeun Y. R., Woo H. Y. (2018). The effects of an interpersonal relationship improvement program on self-esteem, interpersonal orientation, and ego-resilience on Korean adolescents. Biomed. Res. 29 3701–3703.
    1. Zhang P., Mo L., Torres J., Huang X. (2019). Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on psychological adjustment in Chinese pediatric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a randomized trial. Medinice 98:e16319. 10.1097/MD.0000000000016319

Source: PubMed

3
購読する