Oral surgical procedures under local anaesthesia in day surgery

Abdulkadir Burak Çankaya, Çağrı Akçay, Neşe Kahraman, Banu Gürkan Köseoğlu, Abdulkadir Burak Çankaya, Çağrı Akçay, Neşe Kahraman, Banu Gürkan Köseoğlu

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to analyze gender-stratified data of patients who underwent day surgery in a hospital based on the type of treatment, type of local anaesthesia, and local anaesthesia complications. By learning all these parameters, it is our main goal to find answers to questions such as what we can do in hospital conditions, what we can win, and what operations we can treat.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed to assess hospital records of 10,750 dental patients who received oral surgery under local anaesthesia at the Istanbul University Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery from August 2013 through June 2016.

Results: Patients mostly received surgery for wisdom teeth, dental implants, or odontogenic cysts or tumours. Men aged 31-40 years (23.66%) and women aged 21-30 years (30.73%) were the largest groups undergoing operations. Surgery for an impacted tooth was the most common ambulatory procedure, accounting for 54.2% of operations. The second most common ambulatory procedure was dental implant surgery (10.2%), followed by root (7.4%), odontogenic cyst (7.2%), and impacted canine surgeries (6.4%). The most common age group receiving surgery was 21-30 years old (3304 patients, 60.75%). Twice as many women as men underwent surgery.

Conclusions: Day case surgery is an expanding area of health care and a valuable method of treating patients in many aspects of oral surgical practice. Different medical and dental specialties can benefit from this ambulatory approach to treatment, which also reduces treatment costs.

Keywords: Day case surgery; Gender; Local anaesthesia; Type of treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval and consent to participate was taken from Istanbul University, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

The committee’s reference number: 40685465/804.01–569/013.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Daniel A, Haas BD. An update on local anesthetics in dentistry. J Can Dent Assoc. 2002:546–51.
    1. Leco Berrocal MI, Martínez González JM. Social demand in ambulatory Oral surgery. Experience in the master of Oral surgery. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008:39–42.
    1. Pérez-García S, Chaparro-Avendaño AV, Delgado-Molina E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Day case oral surgery in pediatric patients during the year 2000 in the University of Barcelona Dental Clinic (Spain). Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005:221–30.
    1. Syed KB, Zaheer K. Prevalence of impacted molar teeth among Saudi population in the Asir Region, Saudi Arabia—A retrospective study over 3 years. J Int Oral Health. 2013:43–7.
    1. Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H. The distribution of individual tooth impaction in general dental patients of northern India. Community Dent Health. 2010;27:184–186.
    1. Barbosa Mario, Carmona Inmaculada Tomás, Amaral Barbas, Limeres Jacobo, Álvarez Maximiliano, Cerqueira Conceição, Diz Pedro. General anesthesia increases the risk of bacteremia following dental extractions. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2010;110(6):706–712. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.011.

Source: PubMed

スポンサーと協力者

医学的状態

薬物療法

3
購読する