Risk factors for workplace sexual harassment and violence among a national cohort of women in Iceland: a cross-sectional study

Svava Dogg Jonsdottir, Arna Hauksdottir, Thor Aspelund, Johanna Jakobsdottir, Harpa Runarsdottir, Berglind Gudmundsdottir, Gunnar Tomasson, Unnur Anna Valdimarsdottir, Thorhildur Halldorsdottir, Edda Bjork Thordardottir, Svava Dogg Jonsdottir, Arna Hauksdottir, Thor Aspelund, Johanna Jakobsdottir, Harpa Runarsdottir, Berglind Gudmundsdottir, Gunnar Tomasson, Unnur Anna Valdimarsdottir, Thorhildur Halldorsdottir, Edda Bjork Thordardottir

Abstract

Background: Sexual harassment and violence in the workplace are a serious public health concern for women worldwide with substantial costs due to sick leave and personnel turnover. Yet little is known about the prevalence of sexual harassment and violence at a population level, especially across work sectors. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of workplace sexual harassment and violence by demographic factors and work sectors among Icelandic women.

Methods: For this cross-sectional study we analysed nationally representative, de-identified individual-level data from women who had responded to an online survey item about self-labelled current and lifetime workplace sexual harassment or violence as part of the Stress and Gene Analysis (SAGA) study, a cross-sectional nationally representative study done from March 1, 2018, to July 1, 2019. Eligible participants were women who resided in Iceland, were aged between 18 and 69 years, spoke Icelandic, and had a registered address from the Icelandic Population Register or a telephone number from the online 1819 service. We used binomial and Poisson regression analysis to study the cross-sectional association between workplace sexual harassment and violence and demographic factors (eg, age, sexual orientation, and education) and factors relating to the workplace (eg, work schedule), across works sectors.

Findings: Of 113 814 eligible women, 104 197 were invited to complete the online survey, of whom 30 403 women responded and were included in the SAGA cohort. 15 799 women answered the item about exposure to workplace sexual harassment or violence. 11 286 [71·4%] of 15 799 women answered the question about sexual orientation that were included in the survey from June, 2018. 5291 (33·5%) of 15 799 of participants reported having experienced workplace sexual harassment or violence during their lifetime, and 1178 (7·5%) in their current workplace. Such exposure in the current workplace was most common among women who were young (age 18-24 years: prevalence ratio [PR] 3·89 [95% CI 2·66-5·71]; age 25-34 years: 3·66 [2·53-5·31]), single (1·27 [1·12-1·43]), and worked shifts (2·32 [2·02-2·67]), with the highest prevalence rates observed among women in work sectors of public figures (15·67 [9·34-25·12]), tourism (15·01 [11·01-20·13]), and the legal system and security (13·56 [7·00-24·66]). Lifetime exposure to workplace sexual harassment or violence was more common among women who belonged to sexual minorities than among heterosexual women (PR 1·35 [1·24-1·46]).

Interpretation: Lifetime exposure to workplace sexual harassment or violence seems common among women in a Nordic welfare state. These findings provide nuanced targets for prevention and for public policies aimed at promoting women's safety in the work environment.

Funding: Icelandic Gender Equality Fund, European Research Council, and Icelandic Centre for Research.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study profile
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence of sexual harassment and violence in the current workplace by work sector Prevalence rates and 95% CIs adjusted for age, work schedule, and income.

References

    1. WHO and Pan American Health Organization Understanding and addressing violence against women: intimate partner violence. 2012.
    1. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Press release—EEOC launches new training program on respectful workplaces: trainings focus on harassment prevention and creating respectful workplaces for all. Oct 4, 2017.
    1. Latcheva R. Sexual harassment in the European Union: a pervasive but still hidden form of gender-based violence. J Interpers Violence. 2017;32:1821–1852.
    1. McLaughlin H, Uggen C, Blackstone A. The economic and career effects of sexual harassment on working women. Gend Soc. 2017;31:333–358.
    1. Gale S, Mordukhovich I, Newlan S, McNeely E. The impact of workplace harassment on health in a working cohort. Front Psychol. 2019;10
    1. Hutagalung F, Ishak Z. Sexual harassment: a predictor to job satisfaction and work stress among women employees. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;65:723–730.
    1. Jahnke SA, Haddock CK, Jitnarin N, Kaipust CM, Hollerbach BS, Poston WSC. The prevalence and health impacts of frequent work discrimination and harassment among women firefighters in the US Fire Service. BioMed Res Int. 2019;2019
    1. Rugulies R, Sørensen K, Aldrich PT, et al. Onset of workplace sexual harassment and subsequent depressive symptoms and incident depressive disorder in the Danish workforce. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:21–29.
    1. Magnusson Hanson LL, Nyberg A, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Bondestam F, Madsen IEH. Work related sexual harassment and risk of suicide and suicide attempts: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2020;370
    1. McDonald P, Charlesworth S. Academic evidence on the causes, manifestations and responses to workplace sexual harassment. Initial Submission to the Australian Human Rights Commission's National Inquiry into Sexual Harassment in Australian Workplaces. January 2019.
    1. Das A. Sexual harassment at work in the United States. Arch Sex Behav. 2009;38:909–921.
    1. Fasting K, Brackenridge C, Knorre N. Performance level and sexual harassment prevalence among female athletes in the Czech Republic. Women Sport Phys Act J. 2010;19:26–32.
    1. UC San Diego Center on Gender Equity and Health Stop Street Harassment Measuring #MeToo: a national study on sexual harassment and assault. April 2019.
    1. Durana A, Lenhart A, Miller R, Schulte B, Weingarten E. Sexual harassment: a severe and pervasive problem. September 2018.
    1. Adler M, Vincent-Höper S, Vaupel C, Gregersen S, Schablon A, Nienhaus A. Sexual harassment by patients, clients, and residents: investigating its prevalence, frequency and associations with impaired well-being among social and healthcare workers in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18
    1. North L. Damaging and daunting: Female journalists' experiences of sexual harassment in the newsroom. Fem Media Stud. 2016;16:495–510.
    1. Science and Technology Australia Sexual harassment in the workplace. Feb 28, 2019.
    1. Wood L, Hoefer S, Kammer-Kerwick M, Parra-Cardona JR, Busch-Armendariz N, Hicks S. Sexual harassment at institutions of higher education: prevalence, risk, and extent. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36:4520–4544.
    1. Rosenthal MN, Smidt AM, Freyd JJ. Still second class: sexual harassment of graduate students. Psychol Women Q. 2016;40:364–377.
    1. McClain T, Kammer-Kerwick M, Wood L, Temple JR, Busch-Armendariz N. Sexual harassment among medical students: prevalence, prediction, and correlated outcomes. Workplace Health Saf. 2021;69:257–267.
    1. Sivertsen B, Nielsen MB, Madsen IEH, Knapstad M, Lønning KJ, Hysing M. Sexual harassment and assault among university students in Norway: a cross-sectional prevalence study. BMJ Open. 2019;9
    1. Kearl H. The facts behind the #MeToo movement: a national study on sexual harassment and abuse. February 2018.
    1. Gebicki C, Meagher A, Flax G. Everyone's business: fourth national survey on sexual harassment in Australian workplaces. Sept 12, 2018.
    1. FRA - European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights Violence against women: an EU-wide survey—main results. Report. 2014.
    1. Daníelsdóttir HB, Aspelund T, Thordardottir EB, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and resilience among adult women: a population-based study. Elife. 2022;11
    1. Magley VJ, Hulin CL, Fitzgerald LF, DeNardo M. Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment. J Appl Psychol. 1999;84:390–402.
    1. US Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational employment and wage statistics. May 2018.
    1. Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:702–706.
    1. Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:21.
    1. Statistics Iceland Mannfjöldin eftir póstnúmerum, kyni og aldri 1998-2022 (The population by postal code, sex and age 1998-2022) 2018.
    1. Statistics Iceland Mannfjöldi eftir menntunarstöðu samkvæmt stigum í ISCED 2011 menntunarflokkuninni 2003-2020 (Population by educational status according to levels in the ISCED 2011 educational classification 2003-2020) 2017.
    1. Statistics Iceland (2017) Dreifing heildartekna eftir kyni og aldri 1990-2021 (Distribution of total income by gender and age 1990-2021) [Table] 2017.
    1. Snorradóttir Á, Jónsdóttir GA, Gústafsdóttir G, Tryggvadóttir GB, Snæfríðar- og Gunnarsdóttir H, Valdimarsdóttir M. Use of power in the workplace: research on the prevalence and nature of bullying and harassment in the Icelandic labor market. January 2020. [in Icelandic].
    1. Hillstrom LC. ABC-CLIO; Santa Barbara, CA: 2018. The #MeToo Movement.
    1. World Economic Forum Global gender gap report 2021. Insight report. March 2021.
    1. Trades Union Congress Sexual harassment of LGBT people in the workplace. Report. May 17, 2019.
    1. Lee J, Oh M. Combat workplace sexual harassment by third parties? Reframing institutional measures and cultural transformation in South Korea. Violence Against Women. 2021;27:2835–2852.
    1. Steinþórsdóttir FS, Pétursdóttir GM. Preserving masculine dominance in the police force with gendered bullying and sexual harassment. Policing (Oxf) 2018;12:165–176.
    1. Dobbin F, Kalev A. The promise and peril of sexual harassment programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:12255–12260.
    1. Ellsberg M, Arango DJ, Morton M, et al. Prevention of violence against women and girls: what does the evidence say? Lancet. 2015;385:1555–1566.
    1. Anderson LA, Whiston SC. Sexual assault education programs: a meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychol Women Q. 2005;29:374–388.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する