A prospective, international, bicentric study to evaluate PremiCron suture material for cardiac valve surgery - PREMIVALVE a cohort study

Magdalena Rufa, Adrian Ursulescu, Petra Baumann, Manel T Ferrer, Magdalena Rufa, Adrian Ursulescu, Petra Baumann, Manel T Ferrer

Abstract

The most common age-related heart valve diseases include aortic valve stenosis and mitral valve insufficiency. The suture material is not the focus of most studies. The aim of the study was to assess the performance of PremiCron suture material for cardiac valve reconstruction and/or replacement under clinical routine. Performance was evaluated using the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) combined with endocarditis.

Materials and methods: The study was designed as an international, prospective, bicentric, observational, single-arm study to evaluate the PremiCron suture material in cardiac valve surgery and compare the outcome with literature data regarding postoperative complications. The primary endpoint was a composite of MACCE acquired in the hospital, combined with endocarditis occurring up to 6 months postoperatively. The secondary parameters were intraoperative handling of the suture, incidence of MACCE and other relevant complications and quality of life up to 6 months after surgery. Patients were examined at discharge, 30 days, and 6 months postoperatively.

Results: A total of 198 patients were enrolled in two centers in Europe. The cumulative primary endpoint event rate was 5.0%, lower than the reference value of 8.2% from the literature. Comparison of the incidence of individual MACCE until discharge and endocarditis rate 6 months postoperatively also showed that our data were within the range of the published rates. Quality of life significantly increased from preoperatively to 6 months after surgery. Ease of handling of the suture material was rated as very good.

Conclusion: The PremiCron suture material is safe and very eligible for cardiac valve replacement and/or cardiac valve reconstruction in a broad patient population with a cardiac valve disorder treated under daily clinical practice.

Keywords: MACCE; endocarditis; nonabsorbable coated polyester suture; valve reconstruction; valve replacement.

Conflict of interest statement

P.B. is employed by Aesculap AG. M.R., A.U., and M.T. declare no conflict of interest.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disposition of patients over the study period.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intraoperative handling assessment of PremiCron suture for cardiac valve replacement/reconstruction.

References

    1. Caballero GC, Alcázar MC, Menéndez JL, et al. . Cirugía cardiovascular en Espana en el ano 2020. Cirugía Cardiovascular 2020;29:207–220.
    1. Flury MFM. Entwicklung chirurgischen Nahtmaterials als Voraussetzung und Folge operativer Tätigkeiten und wissenschaftlicher Forschung – Historische Wurzeln der verschiedenen Nahtmaterialeigenschaften. WürzburgEntwicklung chirurgischen Nahtmaterials als Voraussetzung und Folge operativer Tätigkeiten und wissenschaftlicher Forschung – Historische Wurzeln der verschiedenen Nahtmaterialeigenschaften. Würzburg. Medizinische Fakultät der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität zu Würzburg; 2002.
    1. Carter A, Skilbeck CJ. Sutures, ligatures and knots. Surgery 2014;32:117–120.
    1. Edlich RF, Dean GK, Wallis AG, et al. . Dahlstrom, Long III WB. Scientific basis for the selection of skin closure techniques. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 2010;29:363–372.
    1. Tajirian AL, Goldberg DJ. A review of sutures and other skin closure materials. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2010;12:296–302.
    1. Firestone DE, Lauder AJ. Chemistry and mechanics of commonly used sutures and needles. J Hand Surg 2010;35:486–488.
    1. Mathew G, Agha R. STROCSS Group. STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery. Int J Surg 2021;96:106165.
    1. Stoliński J, Plicner D, Grudzień G, et al. . A comparison of minimally invasive and standard aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;152:1030–1039.
    1. Phanindranath MMM, Muniandy RK, Ibrahim MY, et al. . Risk factors and pathogenesis in the development of prosthetic valve endocarditis. IOSR J Pharm 2014;4:58–64.
    1. Ghanta RK, Lapar DJ, Kern JA, et al. . Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: a real-world multi-institutional analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;149:1060–1065.
    1. Bowdish ME, Hui DS, Cleveland JD, et al. . A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:456–463.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する