Local Consolidative Therapy Vs. Maintenance Therapy or Observation for Patients With Oligometastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional, Phase II, Randomized Study

Daniel R Gomez, Chad Tang, Jianjun Zhang, George R Blumenschein Jr, Mike Hernandez, J Jack Lee, Rong Ye, David A Palma, Alexander V Louie, D Ross Camidge, Robert C Doebele, Ferdinandos Skoulidis, Laurie E Gaspar, James W Welsh, Don L Gibbons, Jose A Karam, Brian D Kavanagh, Anne S Tsao, Boris Sepesi, Stephen G Swisher, John V Heymach, Daniel R Gomez, Chad Tang, Jianjun Zhang, George R Blumenschein Jr, Mike Hernandez, J Jack Lee, Rong Ye, David A Palma, Alexander V Louie, D Ross Camidge, Robert C Doebele, Ferdinandos Skoulidis, Laurie E Gaspar, James W Welsh, Don L Gibbons, Jose A Karam, Brian D Kavanagh, Anne S Tsao, Boris Sepesi, Stephen G Swisher, John V Heymach

Abstract

Purpose: Our previously published findings reported that local consolidative therapy (LCT) with radiotherapy or surgery improved progression-free survival (PFS) and delayed new disease in patients with oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that did not progress after front-line systemic therapy. Herein, we present the longer-term overall survival (OS) results accompanied by additional secondary end points.

Patients and methods: This multicenter, randomized, phase II trial enrolled patients with stage IV NSCLC, three or fewer metastases, and no progression at 3 or more months after front-line systemic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to maintenance therapy or observation (MT/O) or to LCT to all active disease sites. The primary end point was PFS; secondary end points were OS, toxicity, and the appearance of new lesions. All analyses were two sided, and P values less than .10 were deemed significant.

Results: The Data Safety and Monitoring Board recommended early trial closure after 49 patients were randomly assigned because of a significant PFS benefit in the LCT arm. With an updated median follow-up time of 38.8 months (range, 28.3 to 61.4 months), the PFS benefit was durable (median, 14.2 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 23.1 months] with LCT v 4.4 months [95% CI, 2.2 to 8.3 months] with MT/O; P = .022). We also found an OS benefit in the LCT arm (median, 41.2 months [95% CI, 18.9 months to not reached] with LCT v 17.0 months [95% CI, 10.1 to 39.8 months] with MT/O; P = .017). No additional grade 3 or greater toxicities were observed. Survival after progression was longer in the LCT group (37.6 months with LCT v 9.4 months with MT/O; P = .034). Of the 20 patients who experienced progression in the MT/O arm, nine received LCT to all lesions after progression, and the median OS was 17 months (95% CI, 7.8 months to not reached).

Conclusion: In patients with oligometastatic NSCLC that did not progress after front-line systemic therapy, LCT prolonged PFS and OS relative to MT/O.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
(A) Progression-free survival (PFS) and (B) overall survival (OS) in patients given local consolidative therapy (LCT) or maintenance therapy or observation (MT/O) for oligometastatic non–small-cell lung cancer.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Overall survival (OS) after disease progression among patients originally assigned to local consolidative therapy (LCT) or maintenance therapy or observation (MT/O).
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Overall survival (OS) from time of progression, for patients who did or did not receive late local consolidation therapy (LCT) for that progression. “Complete” LCT designates radiation therapy or surgery to all active sites of disease at the time of progression.

References

    1. Weichselbaum RR, Hellman S. Oligometastases revisited. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:378–382.
    1. Hellman S, Weichselbaum RR. Oligometastases. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:8–10.
    1. Iyengar P, Wardak Z, Gerber DE, et al. Consolidative radiotherapy for limited metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer: A phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:e173501.
    1. Gomez DR, Blumenschein GR, Jr, Lee JJ, et al. Local consolidative therapy versus maintenance therapy or observation for patients with oligometastatic non–small-cell lung cancer without progression after first-line systemic therapy: A multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1672–1682.
    1. Ost P, Reynders D, Decaestecker K, et al. Surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence: A prospective, randomized, multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:446–453.
    1. Ruers T, Van Coevorden F, Punt CJ, et al. Local treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases: Results of a randomized phase II trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109:109.
    1. Palma DA, Olson RA, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic tumors (SABR-COMET): Results of a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102:S3–S4.
    1. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975;31:103–115.
    1. Patel JD, Hensing TA, Rademaker A, et al. Phase II study of pemetrexed and carboplatin plus bevacizumab with maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3284–3289.
    1. Ciuleanu T, Brodowicz T, Zielinski C, et al. Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non–small-cell lung cancer: A randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2009;374:1432–1440.
    1. Perol M, Chouaid C, Milleron, BJ, et al: Maintenance with either gemcitabine or erlotinib versus observation with predefined second-line treatmetn after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502 phase III study. J Clin Oncol 28, 2010 (suppl; abstr 7507)
    1. Paz-Ares LG, De Marinis F, Dediu M, et al. PARAMOUNT: Phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care immediatly following induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29 (suppl; abstr CRA7510)
    1. Cappuzzo F, Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, et al. Erlotinib as maintenance treatment in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: A multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:521–529.
    1. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. New York: Springer; 2000.
    1. Gundem G, Van Loo P, Kremeyer B, et al. The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nature. 2015;520:353–357.
    1. Kim MY, Oskarsson T, Acharyya S, et al. Tumor self-seeding by circulating cancer cells. Cell. 2009;139:1315–1326.
    1. Twyman-Saint Victor C, Rech AJ, Maity A, et al. Radiation and dual checkpoint blockade activate non-redundant immune mechanisms in cancer. Nature. 2015;520:373–377.
    1. Sheu T, Heymach JV, Swisher SG, et al. Propensity score-matched analysis of comprehensive local therapy for oligometastatic non–small-cell lung cancer that did not progress after front-line chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90:850–857.
    1. Petty WJ, Urbanic JJ, Ahmed T, et al. Long-term outcomes of a phase 2 trial of chemotherapy with consolidative radiation therapy for oligometastatic non–small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102:527–535.
    1. Xu Q, Zhou F, Liu H, et al. Consolidative local ablative therapy improves the survival of patients with synchronous oligometastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR activating mutation treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13:1383–1392.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する