Clinical application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary infection pathogens: A prospective single-center study of 138 patients

Na Li, Xiaolong Ma, Jiaqi Zhou, Jingjing Deng, Chao Gu, Chunyuan Fei, Linfeng Cao, Qi Zhang, Feng Tao, Na Li, Xiaolong Ma, Jiaqi Zhou, Jingjing Deng, Chao Gu, Chunyuan Fei, Linfeng Cao, Qi Zhang, Feng Tao

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid and accurate pathogen identification is essential for the treatment of pneumonia. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a newly developed technology to obtain microbial nucleic acid sequence information quickly, efficiently, and without bias.

Methods: We performed shotgun metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) for pathogen identification in pneumonia in a prospective study with 138 patients from a single center. We compared the results of mNGS with standard methods including culture, staining, and targeted PCR and evaluated the clinical applicability of mNGS.

Results: Most of the patients (128/138, 92.75%) were cured or improved. One patient (1/138, 0.72%) died because of acute gastrointestinal bleeding, and 9 patients (9/138, 6.52%) showed no improvement. mNGS identified more bacteria (53 versus 27), fewer fungi (8 versus 31), and more viruses (16 versus 1) than standard methods. In total, treatment in 34 out of 138 cases (24.64%) was adjusted and optimized because of mNGS results. Positive mNGS results contributed to a definitive diagnosis in 23 cases (16.67%), which helped guide treatment decision by either adjusting the antibiotics without de-escalation or continuing the empirical treatment. mNGS also confirmed no active infection in 11 cases (7.97%) allowed for antibiotic de-escalation.

Conclusion: This prospective clinical study evaluated the clinical utility of mNGS for the diagnosis of pneumonia and showed that mNGS of BALF provides valuable information for effective treatment.

Keywords: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; metagenomic next-generation sequencing; pulmonary infection.

Conflict of interest statement

Na Li, Xiaolong Ma, Jiaqi Zhou, Jingjing Deng, Chao Gu, Chunyuan Fei, Linfeng Cao, Qi Zhang, and Feng Tao declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
mNGS identified more bacteria (53 versus 27), fewer fungi (8 versus 31), and more viruses (16 versus 1) than standard methods

References

    1. Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, et al. Management of adults with hospital‐acquired and ventilator‐associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:e61‐e111.
    1. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community‐acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(Suppl 2):S27‐S72.
    1. Remington LT, Sligl WI. Community‐acquired pneumonia. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2014;20:215‐224.
    1. Nair GB, Niederman MS. Nosocomial pneumonia: lessons learned. Crit Care Clin. 2013;29:521‐546.
    1. Wilson MR, Naccache SN, Samayoa E, et al. Actionable diagnosis of neuroleptospirosis by next‐generation sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2408‐2417.
    1. Forbes JD, Knox NC, Ronholm J, Pagotto F, Reimer A. Metagenomics: the next culture‐independent game changer. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1069.
    1. Hadziavdic K, Lekang K, Lanzen A, Jonassen I, Thompson EM, Troedsson C. Characterization of the 18S rRNA gene for designing universal eukaryote specific primers. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87624.
    1. Bellemain E, Carlsen T, Brochmann C, Coissac E, Taberlet P, Kauserud H. ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: an in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:189.
    1. Leo S, Gaia N, Ruppe E, et al. Detection of bacterial pathogens from Broncho‐alveolar lavage by next‐generation sequencing. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(9):2011.
    1. Pan T, Tan R, Qu H, et al. Next‐generation sequencing of the BALF in the diagnosis of community‐acquired pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. J Infect. 2019;79:61‐74.
    1. Zhou H, Larkin PMK, Zhao D, et al. Clinical impact of metagenomic next‐generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis and Management of Pneumonia: a multicenter prospective observational study. J Mol Diagn. 2021;23:1259‐1268.
    1. Fang X, Xu M, Fang Q, et al. Real‐time utilization of metagenomic sequencing in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of an invasive adenovirus B55 infection and subsequent herpes simplex virus encephalitis in an immunocompetent young adult. Open forum. Infect Dis. 2018;5:ofy114.
    1. Simner PJ, Miller S, Carroll KC. Understanding the promises and hurdles of metagenomic next‐generation sequencing as a diagnostic tool for infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:778‐788.
    1. Motro Y, Moran‐Gilad J. Next‐generation sequencing applications in clinical bacteriology. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2017;14:1‐6.
    1. Pendleton KM, Erb‐Downward JR, Bao Y, et al. Rapid pathogen identification in bacterial pneumonia using real‐time metagenomics. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:1610‐1612.
    1. Langelier C, Zinter MS, Kalantar K, et al. Metagenomic sequencing detects respiratory pathogens in hematopoietic cellular transplant patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197:524‐528.
    1. Parize P, Muth E, Richaud C, et al. Untargeted next‐generation sequencing‐based first‐line diagnosis of infection in immunocompromised adults: a multicentre, blinded, prospective study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(574):e1‐e6.
    1. Goldberg B, Sichtig H, Geyer C, Ledeboer N, Weinstock GM. Making the leap from research laboratory to clinic: challenges and opportunities for next‐generation sequencing in infectious disease diagnostics. MBio. 2015;6:e01888‐15.
    1. Martin TC, Visconti A, Spector TD, Falchi M. Conducting metagenomic studies in microbiology and clinical research. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:8629‐8646.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する