Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation training on muscle size in collegiate track and field athletes

Taku Wakahara, Ayumu Shiraogawa, Taku Wakahara, Ayumu Shiraogawa

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation training for 12 weeks on the abdominal muscle size in trained athletes. Male collegiate track and field athletes participated in the present study and were randomly allocated to either training or control groups. Eleven participants of the training group completed a 60-session training program over a 12-week period (23 min/session, 5 days/week) involving neuromuscular electrical stimulation (mostly 20 Hz) for the abdominal muscles in addition to their usual training for the own events. The participants of the control group (n = 13) continued their usual training. Before and after the intervention period, cross-sectional areas of the rectus abdominis and abdominal oblique muscles (the internal and external obliques and transversus abdominis) and subcutaneous fat thickness were measured with magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging. There were no significant changes in cross-sectional area of the rectus abdominis or abdominal oblique muscles or in subcutaneous fat thickness in the training or control groups after the intervention period. The change in cross-sectional area of the rectus abdominis in each participant was not significantly correlated with pre-training cross-sectional area and neither was the mean value of fat thickness at pre- and post-training. These results suggest that low-frequency (20 Hz) neuromuscular electrical stimulation training for 12 weeks is ineffective in inducing hypertrophy of the abdominal muscles in trained athletes, even when they have a thin layer of subcutaneous fat.

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: This study received funding from MTG Co., Ltd., which made the NMES device used in the present study. However, the authors do not have any personal relationships or competing interests to the funder. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1. A typical magnetic resonance image…
Fig 1. A typical magnetic resonance image of the trunk.
The white broken lines are the borders of muscles. RA, rectus abdominis; AO, abdominal oblique muscles (internal and external obliques and transversus abdominis).
Fig 2. A typical ultrasound image of…
Fig 2. A typical ultrasound image of the abdomen.
The white broken line shows the border between subcutaneous fat and the rectus abdominis.
Fig 3. The level of neuromuscular electrical…
Fig 3. The level of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in each training session.
The participants selected the maximum stimulation intensity that they could tolerate for each session. Intensity levels ranged from 1 to 15. NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
Fig 4. The relationship between cross-sectional area…
Fig 4. The relationship between cross-sectional area of the rectus abdominis at pretraining and its changes after training.
RA, rectus abdominis; CSA, cross-sectional area. (A) The relationship between RA CSA at pretraining and the absolute change in the CSA. (B) The relationship between RA CSA at pretraining and the relative change in the CSA.
Fig 5. The relationship between mean fat…
Fig 5. The relationship between mean fat thickness of pre- and post-training and changes in cross-sectional area of the rectus abdominis after training.
RA, rectus abdominis; CSA, cross-sectional area. (A) The relationship between mean fat thickness and the absolute change in RA CSA. (B) The relationship between mean fat thickness and the relative change in the CSA.

References

    1. Filipovic A, Kleinöder H, Dörmann U, Mester J. Electromyostimulation—a systematic review of the effects of different electromyostimulation methods on selected strength parameters in trained and elite athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26: 2600–2614. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823f2cd1
    1. Maffiuletti N, Pensini M, Martin A. Activation of human plantar flexor muscles increases after electromyostimulation training. J Appl Physiol. 2002;92: 1383–1392. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00884.2001
    1. Gondin J, Duclay J, Martin A. Soleus- and gastrocnemii-evoked V-wave responses increase after neuromuscular electrical stimulation training. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95: 3328–3335. 10.1152/jn.01002.2005
    1. Hortobágyi T, Maffiuletti NA. Neural adaptations to electrical stimulation strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111: 2439–2449. 10.1007/s00421-011-2012-2
    1. Ruther CL, Golden CL, Harris RT, Dudley GA. Hypertrophy, resistance training, and the nature of skeletal muscle activation. J Strength Cond Res. 1995;9: 155–159.
    1. Stevenson SW, Dudley GA. Dietary creatine supplementation and muscular adaptation to resistive overload. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33: 1304–1310. 10.1097/00005768-200108000-00010
    1. Gondin J, Guette M, Ballay Y, Martin A. Electromyostimulation training effects on neural drive and muscle architecture. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37: 1291–1299. 10.1249/01.mss.0000175090.49048.41
    1. Natsume T, Ozaki H, Kakigi R, Kobayashi H, Naito H. Effects of training intensity in electromyostimulation on human skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018;118: 1339–1347. 10.1007/s00421-018-3866-3
    1. Cabric M, Appell HJ, Resic A. Fine structural changes in electrostimulated human skeletal muscle. Evidence for predominant effects on fast muscle fibres. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57: 1–5. 10.1007/bf00691229
    1. Pérez M, Lucia A, Rivero JL, Serrano AL, Calbet JA, Delgado MA, et al. Effects of transcutaneous short-term electrical stimulation on M. vastus lateralis characteristics of healthy young men. Pflugers Arch. 2002;443: 866–874. 10.1007/s00424-001-0769-6
    1. Gondin J, Brocca L, Bellinzona E, D'Antona G, Maffiuletti NA, Miotti D, et al. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation training induces atypical adaptations of the human skeletal muscle phenotype: a functional and proteomic analysis. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110: 433–450. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00914.2010
    1. Singer KP. The influence of unilateral electrical muscle stimulation on motor unit activity patterns in atrophic human quadriceps. Aust J Physiother. 1986;32: 31–37. 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60641-3
    1. Martin L, Cometti G, Pousson M, Morlon B. Effect of electrical stimulation training on the contractile characteristics of the triceps surae muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;67: 457–461. 10.1007/bf00376463
    1. Eriksson E, Häggmark T, Kiessling KH, Karlsson J. Effect of electrical stimulation on human skeletal muscle. Int J Sports Med. 1981;2: 18–22. 10.1055/s-2008-1034578
    1. Kim CK, Takala TE, Seger J, Karpakka J. Training effects of electrically induced dynamic contractions in human quadriceps muscle. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1995;66: 251–255.
    1. Thériault R, Boulay MR, Thériault G, Simoneau JA. Electrical stimulation-induced changes in performance and fiber type proportion of human knee extensor muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;74: 311–317. 10.1007/bf02226926
    1. Maffiuletti NA. Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;110: 223–234. 10.1007/s00421-010-1502-y
    1. Filipovic A, Kleinöder H, Dörmann U, Mester J. Electromyostimulation—a systematic review of the influence of training regimens and stimulation parameters on effectiveness in electromyostimulation training of selected strength parameters. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25: 3218–3238. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212e3ce
    1. St Pierre D, Taylor AW, Lavoie M, Sellers W, Kots YM. Effects of 2500 Hz sinusoidal current on fibre area and strength of the quadriceps femoris. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1986;26: 60–66.
    1. Delitto A, Brown M, Strube MJ, Rose SJ, Lehman RC. Electrical stimulation of quadriceps femoris in an elite weight lifter: a single subject experiment. Int J Sports Med. 1989;10: 187–191. 10.1055/s-2007-1024898
    1. Petrofsky J. The effect of the subcutaneous fat on the transfer of current through skin and into muscle. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30: 1168–1176. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.02.009
    1. Schoenfeld B. Factors in maximal hypertrophic development In: Schoenfeld B. Science and development of muscle hypertrophy. Champaign USA: Human Kinetics; 2016. pp. 105–113.
    1. Abe T, Kumagai K, Brechue WF. Fascicle length of leg muscles is greater in sprinters than distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32: 1125–1129. 10.1097/00005768-200006000-00014
    1. Tanaka NI, Komuro T, Tsunoda N, Aoyama T, Okada M, Kanehisa H. Trunk muscularity in throwers. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34: 56–61. 10.1055/s-0032-1316316
    1. Takai Y, Nakatani M, Akamine T, Shiokawa K, Komori D, Kanehisa H. Effect of core training on trunk flexor musculature in male soccer players. Sports Med Int Open. 2017;1: E147–E154. 10.1055/s-0043-115377
    1. Kubo J, Ohta A, Takahashi H, Kukidome T, Funato K. The development of trunk muscles in male wrestlers assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21: 1251–1254. 10.1519/R-19815.1
    1. Abe T, Kondo M, Kawakami Y, Fukunaga T. Prediction equations for body composition of Japanese adults by B-mode ultrasound. Am J Hum Biol. 1994;6: 161–170. 10.1002/ajhb.1310060204
    1. Kanehisa H, Miyatani M, Azuma K, Kuno S, Fukunaga T. Influences of age and sex on abdominal muscle and subcutaneous fat thickness. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;91: 534–537. 10.1007/s00421-003-1034-9
    1. Tanaka NI, Yamada M, Tanaka Y, Fukunaga T, Nishijima T, Kanehisa H. Difference in abdominal muscularity at the umbilicus level between young and middle-aged men. J Physiol Anthropol. 2007;26: 527–532.
    1. Häkkinen K, Komi PV, Alén M, Kauhanen H. EMG, muscle fibre and force production characteristics during a 1 year training period in elite weight-lifters. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1987;56: 419–427. 10.1007/bf00417769
    1. Sillen MJ, Franssen FM, Gosker HR, Wouters EF, Spruit MA. Metabolic and structural changes in lower-limb skeletal muscle following neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8: e69391 10.1371/journal.pone.0069391
    1. Nishikawa Y, Watanabe K, Kawade S, Takahashi T, Kimura H, Maruyama H, et al. The effect of a portable electrical muscle stimulation device at home on muscle strength and activation patterns in locomotive syndrome patients: A randomized control trial. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019;45: 46–52. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.02.007
    1. Alon G, McCombe SA, Koutsantonis S, Stumphauzer LJ, Burgwin KC, Parent MM, et al. Comparison of the effects of electrical stimulation and exercise on abdominal musculature. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1987;8: 567–573.
    1. Kraemer WJ, Patton JF, Gordon SE, Harman EA, Deschenes MR, Reynolds K, et al. Compatibility of high-intensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol. 1995;78: 976–989. 10.1152/jappl.1995.78.3.976
    1. Putman CT, Xu X, Gillies E, MacLean IM, Bell GJ. Effects of strength, endurance and combined training on myosin heavy chain content and fibre-type distribution in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;92: 376–384. 10.1007/s00421-004-1104-7
    1. Kikuchi N, Yoshida S, Okuyama M, Nakazato K. The effect of high-intensity interval cycling sprints subsequent to arm-curl exercise on upper-body muscle strength and hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30: 2318–2323. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001315

Source: PubMed

3
購読する