Reporting Discrepancy Resolved by Findings and Time in 2947 Emergency Department Ankle X-rays
Thomas James York, P J Jenkins, A J Ireland, Thomas James York, P J Jenkins, A J Ireland
Abstract
Aims: To identify common errors in ankle X-ray reporting between initial interpretation and final assessment at the virtual fracture clinic. Also, to assess time of initial reporting as a causative factor for discrepancy.
Methods: Two thousand nine hundred forty-seven final reports were reviewed by standard of agreement to the initial interpretation. Where discrepancy was found, it was classified and collated by specific finding. Comparison was made between reports with discrepancy and the complete dataset, allowing rates of error by finding to be established. The reports containing discrepancy were further classified by time period, this was compared against an expected value to establish if initial reporting outside of routine working hours was as accurate as that conducted within routine working hours.
Results: 94.4% of reports were in agreement with the initial interpretation, 2.9% contained minor discrepancy, and 2.7% major discrepancy. In 45.6% of reports there was no radiologically observable injury. 16.4% of reports contained a lateral malleolar fracture, most commonly Weber type B. 40.0% of all navicular fractures, and 33.3% of all cuboidal fractures were not commented upon in the initial reporting. Lower rates of more frequently observed findings were missed with 2.5% of Weber type B fractures not commented upon. An increased proportion of major discrepancy reports were generated from 00:00 to 07:59 (expected = 15.0%, observed = 22.2%; p = 0.07908). Similarly, a greater than expected number of minor discrepancy reports were found between 20:00 and 23:59 (expected = 18.0%, observed = 34.1%, p = 0.00025).
Conclusions: The initial reporting of ankle X-rays in the emergency department is performed to a high standard, however serious missed findings emphasise the need for timely senior review. Reporters should increase their awareness of navicular, cuboid, talar, and Weber A fractures which were missed at disproportionate rates. This study also finds evidence to support increased rates of error in initial reporting of ankle X-rays outside of normal working hours (17:00-07:59), particularly with a significantly increased rate of minor discrepancy seen from 20:00 to 23:59.
Keywords: Ankle fractures; Reporting discrepancy; Reporting errors; Time resolved discrepancy; X-ray reporting.
References
- Strudwick Kirsten, McPhee Megan, Bell Anthony, Martin-Khan Melinda, Russell Trevor. Review article: Best practice management of common ankle and foot injuries in the emergency department (part 2 of the musculoskeletal injuries rapid review series) Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2017;30(2):152–180. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12904.
- Bruno F, Arrigoni F, Splendiani A, Di Cesare E, Zappia M, Guglielmi G, et al. Emergency and trauma of the ankle. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2017;21(03):282–289. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1602408.
- Elsoe Rasmus, Ostgaard Svend E., Larsen Peter. Population-based epidemiology of 9767 ankle fractures. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2018;24(1):34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.11.002.
- Kadakia R, Ahearn B, Schwartz A, Tenenbaum S, Bariteau J. Ankle fractures in the elderly: risks and management challenges. Orthop Res Rev. 2017;9:45–50.
- Stiell I. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. JAMA. 1993;269(9):1127–1132. doi: 10.1001/jama.269.9.1127.
- Bachmann L. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326(7386):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7386.417.
- Mangwani Jitendra, Mehta SaurabhSagar, Rees Kishan, Cutler Lucy. Understanding risks and complications in the management of ankle fractures. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2014;48(5):445. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.139829.
- Kramer M. Sleep loss in resident physicians: the cause of medical errors? Front Neurol. 2010;1.
- Barger L, Ayas N, Cade B, Cronin J, Rosner B, Speizer F, et al. Impact of extended-duration shifts on medical errors, adverse events, and attentional failures. PLoS Med. 2006;3(12):e487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030487.
- Juto H, Nilsson H, Morberg P. Epidemiology of Adult Ankle Fractures: 1756 cases identified in Norrbotten County during 2009–2013 and classified according to AO/OTA. BMC Musculoskelet. 2018;19(1).
- Court-Brown C, McBirnie J, Wilson G. Adult ankle fractures—an increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69(1):43–47. doi: 10.3109/17453679809002355.
- Mitchell M, McKinley J, Robinson C. The epidemiology of calcaneal fractures. Foot. 2009;19(4):197–200. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2009.05.001.
- Griffin D., Parsons N., Shaw E., Kulikov Y., Hutchinson C., Thorogood M., Lamb S. E. Operative versus non-operative treatment for closed, displaced, intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2014;349(jul24 5):g4483–g4483. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4483.
- Snaith Beverly, Hardy Maryann. Emergency department image interpretation accuracy: The influence of immediate reporting by radiology. International Emergency Nursing. 2014;22(2):63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2013.04.004.
- Eichenholtz S, Levine D. Fractures of the tarsal navicular bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1964;34:142–160.
- Penner M. Late reconstruction after navicular fracture. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11(1):105–119. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2005.11.003.
- Lee Yu Jin, Sadigh Sufi, Mankad Kshitij, Kapse Nikhil, Rajeswaran Gajan. The imaging of osteomyelitis. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. 2016;6(2):184–198. doi: 10.21037/qims.2016.04.01.
- Ruutiainen A, Durand D, Scanlon M, Itri J. Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight. Acad Radiol. 2013;20(3):305–311. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.09.028.
- Ehsani SR, Cheraghi MA, Nejati A, Salari A, Esmaeilpoor AH, Nejad EM. Medication errors of nurses in the emergency department. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2013;6:11.
- Lam V., Stephenson J.A. A retrospective review of registrar out-of-hours reporting in a university hospital: the effect of time and seniority on discrepancy rates. Clinical Radiology. 2018;73(6):590.e9-590.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.01.012.
Source: PubMed