High patient satisfaction with telehealth in Parkinson disease: A randomized controlled study
Jayne R Wilkinson, Meredith Spindler, Stephanie M Wood, Steven C Marcus, Daniel Weintraub, James F Morley, Margaret G Stineman, John E Duda, Jayne R Wilkinson, Meredith Spindler, Stephanie M Wood, Steven C Marcus, Daniel Weintraub, James F Morley, Margaret G Stineman, John E Duda
Abstract
Background: Parkinson disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder that benefits from specialty care. Telehealth is an innovative resource that can enhance access to this care within a patient-centered framework. Research suggests that telehealth can lead to increased patient satisfaction, equal or better clinical outcomes, and cost savings, but these outcomes have not been well-studied in PD.
Methods: We conducted a dual active-arm 12-month randomized controlled trial to assess patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, travel burden, and health care utilization in PD using video telehealth for follow-up care with specialty providers. Telehealth visits took place either at a facility nearer to the patient (satellite clinic arm) or in the patient's home (home arm). Each control group received usual in-person care. Patient satisfaction, assessed by quantitative questionnaires, was the primary outcome.
Results: Eighty-six men were enrolled (home arm: 18 active, 18 control; satellite clinic arm: 26 active, 24 control) with a mean age of 73 years (range 42-87). There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the active group and the controls in each arm (p > 0.05). A significant difference in overall patient satisfaction was not found; however, high levels of patient satisfaction were found in all groups. Greater satisfaction for the telehealth modality was found in assessments of convenience and accessibility/distance. Clinical outcomes were similar between groups, travel burden was reduced using telehealth, and health care utilization was largely similar in both groups.
Conclusions: As the need for PD subspecialty care increases, innovative patient-centered solutions to overcoming barriers to access, such as video telehealth, will be invaluable to patients and may provide high patient satisfaction.
Figures
References
- Willis AW, Schootman M, Evanoff BA, Perlmutter JS, Racette BA. Neurologist care in Parkinson disease: a utilization, outcomes, and survival study. Neurology 2011;77:851–857.
- Willis AW, Schootman M, Tran R, et al. . Neurologist-associated reduction in PD-related hospitalizations and health care expenditures. Neurology 2012;79:1774–1780.
- Cheng EM, Swarztrauber K, Siderowf AD, et al. . Association of specialist involvement and quality of care for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2007;22:515–522.
- Dorsey ER, Constantinescu R, Thompson JP, et al. . Projected number of people with Parkinson disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030. Neurology 2007;68:384–386.
- Dorsey ER, George BP, Leff B, Willis AW. The coming crisis: obtaining care for the growing burden of neurodegenerative conditions. Neurology 2013;80:1989–1996.
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The National Veterans Affairs Telehealth Services Website. Available at: . Accessed May 19, 2015.
- Stange KC, Nutting PA, Miller WL, et al. . Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:601–612.
- Levine ME. This I believe… about patient-centered care. Nurs Outlook 1967;15:53–55.
- Achey M, Aldred JL, Aljehani N, et al. . International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Telemedicine Task Force. The past, present, and future of telemedicine for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2014;29:871–883.
- Samii A, Ryan-Dykes P, Tsukuda RA, Zink C, Franks R, Nichol WP. Telemedicine for delivery of health care in Parkinson's disease. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12:16–18.
- Venkataraman V, Donohue SJ, Biglan KM, Wicks P, Dorsey ER. Virtual visits for Parkinson disease: a case series. Neurol Clin Pract 2014;4:146–152.
- Dorsey ER, Deuel LM, Voss TS, et al. . Increasing access to specialty care: a pilot, randomized controlled trial of telemedicine for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2010;25:1652–1659.
- Dorsey ER, Venkataraman V, Grana MJ, et al. . Randomized controlled clinical trial of “virtual house calls” for Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol 2013;70:565–570.
- Abdolahi A, Scoglio N, Killoran A, Dorsey ER, Biglan KM. Potential reliability and validity of a modified version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale that could be administered remotely. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2013;19:218–221.
- Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. The accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinicopathological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:181–184.
- Martínez-Martín P, Gil-Nagel A, Gracia LM, Gómez JB, Martínez-Sarriés J, Bermejo F. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale characteristics and structure .The Cooperative Multicentric Group. Mov Disord 1994;9:76–83.
- Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 1967;17:427–442.
- Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In: Brink TL, editor. Clinical Gerontology: A Guide to Assessment and Intervention. New York: The Haworth Press; 1986:165–173.
- Agha Z, Schapira RM, Laud PW, McNutt G, Roter DL. Patient satisfaction with physician-patient communication during telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2009;15:830–839.
- Hall JA, Irish JT, Roter DL, Ehrlich CM, Miller LH. Satisfaction, gender, and communication in medical visits. Med Care 1994;32:1216–1231.
- Peto V, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R. PDQ-39: a review of the development, validation and application of a Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire and its associated measures. J Neurol 1998;245(suppl 1):S10–S14.
- Rothman KJ. No adjustments needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1990;1:43–46.
- Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
Source: PubMed