Features of mobile diabetes applications: review of the literature and analysis of current applications compared against evidence-based guidelines

Taridzo Chomutare, Luis Fernandez-Luque, Eirik Arsand, Gunnar Hartvigsen, Taridzo Chomutare, Luis Fernandez-Luque, Eirik Arsand, Gunnar Hartvigsen

Abstract

Background: Interest in mobile health (mHealth) applications for self-management of diabetes is growing. In July 2009, we found 60 diabetes applications on iTunes for iPhone; by February 2011 the number had increased by more than 400% to 260. Other mobile platforms reflect a similar trend. Despite the growth, research on both the design and the use of diabetes mHealth applications is scarce. Furthermore, the potential influence of social media on diabetes mHealth applications is largely unexplored.

Objective: Our objective was to study the salient features of mobile applications for diabetes care, in contrast to clinical guideline recommendations for diabetes self-management. These clinical guidelines are published by health authorities or associations such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in the United Kingdom and the American Diabetes Association.

Methods: We searched online vendor markets (online stores for Apple iPhone, Google Android, BlackBerry, and Nokia Symbian), journal databases, and gray literature related to diabetes mobile applications. We included applications that featured a component for self-monitoring of blood glucose and excluded applications without English-language user interfaces, as well as those intended exclusively for health care professionals. We surveyed the following features: (1) self-monitoring: (1.1) blood glucose, (1.2) weight, (1.3) physical activity, (1.4) diet, (1.5) insulin and medication, and (1.6) blood pressure, (2) education, (3) disease-related alerts and reminders, (4) integration of social media functions, (5) disease-related data export and communication, and (6) synchronization with personal health record (PHR) systems or patient portals. We then contrasted the prevalence of these features with guideline recommendations.

Results: The search resulted in 973 matches, of which 137 met the selection criteria. The four most prevalent features of the applications available on the online markets (n = 101) were (1) insulin and medication recording, 63 (62%), (2) data export and communication, 61 (60%), (3) diet recording, 47 (47%), and (4) weight management, 43 (43%). From the literature search (n = 26), the most prevalent features were (1) PHR or Web server synchronization, 18 (69%), (2) insulin and medication recording, 17 (65%), (3) diet recording, 17 (65%), and (4) data export and communication, 16 (62%). Interestingly, although clinical guidelines widely refer to the importance of education, this is missing from the top functionalities in both cases.

Conclusions: While a wide selection of mobile applications seems to be available for people with diabetes, this study shows there are obvious gaps between the evidence-based recommendations and the functionality used in study interventions or found in online markets. Current results confirm personalized education as an underrepresented feature in diabetes mobile applications. We found no studies evaluating social media concepts in diabetes self-management on mobile devices, and its potential remains largely unexplored.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection process for online journal databases and online markets (SMBG = self-monitoring of blood glucose).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Glucose Buddy iPhone application screenshots showing the main menu (left), blood glucose logging (center), and medication logging (right).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Few Touch Windows Mobile application screenshots showing the main menu (left), food registration (center), and feedback on diet goals (right).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Arbitrary classification of functionality based on prevalence in the surveyed mobile applications (BP = blood pressure; PHR = personal health record).

References

    1. Lim S, Kang SM, Shin H, Lee HJ, Won Yoon J, Yu SH, Kim SY, Yoo SY, Jung HS, Park KS, Ryu JO, Jang HC. Improved glycemic control without hypoglycemia in elderly diabetic patients using the ubiquitous healthcare service, a new medical information system. Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):308–13. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1447. 34/2/308
    1. Lim S, Kim SY, Kim JI, Kwon MK, Min SJ, Yoo SY, Kang SM, Kim HI, Jung HS, Park KS, Ryu JO, Shin H, Jang HC. A survey on ubiquitous healthcare service demand among diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab J. 2011 Feb;35(1):50–7. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2011.35.1.50.
    1. Lyles CR, Harris LT, Le T, Flowers J, Tufano J, Britt D, Hoath J, Hirsch IB, Goldberg HI, Ralston JD. Qualitative evaluation of a mobile phone and web-based collaborative care intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 May;13(5):563–9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0200.
    1. Liang X, Wang Q, Yang X, Cao J, Chen J, Mo X, Huang J, Wang L, Gu D. Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2011 Apr;28(4):455–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03180.x.
    1. Giménez-Pérez G, Gallach M, Acera E, Prieto A, Carro O, Ortega E, González-Clemente JM, Mauricio D. Evaluation of accessibility and use of new communication technologies in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Med Internet Res. 2002 Dec;4(3):E16. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.3.e16.
    1. Smith JC, Schatz BR. Feasibility of mobile phone-based management of chronic illness. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010;2010:757–61.
    1. Tatara N, Arsand E, Nilsen H, Hartvigsen G. A review of mobile terminal-based applications for self-management of patients with diabetes. Proceedings; International Conference oneHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine (eTELEMED '09); 2009; Cancun, Mexico. New York, NY: IEEE Computer Society; 2009. Feb 1,
    1. Kouris I, Mougiakakou S, Scarnato L, Iliopoulou D, Diem P, Vazeou A, Koutsouris D. Mobile phone technologies and advanced data analysis towards the enhancement of diabetes self-management. Int J Electron Healthc. 2010;5(4):386–402.Q2H73M6761826326
    1. Kollmann A, Riedl M, Kastner P, Schreier G, Ludvik B. Feasibility of a mobile phone-based data service for functional insulin treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(5):e36. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.5.e36. v9i5e36
    1. Ramadas A, Quek KF, Chan CK, Oldenburg B. Web-based interventions for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of recent evidence. Int J Med Inform. 2011 Jun;80(6):389–405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.02.002.S1386-5056(11)00047-5
    1. Avdal EU, Kizilci S, Demirel N. The effects of web-based diabetes education on diabetes care results: a randomized control study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011 Feb;29(2 Suppl):TC29–34. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3182155318.00024665-201102001-00006
    1. Raiff BR, Dallery J. Internet-based contingency management to improve adherence with blood glucose testing recommendations for teens with type 1 diabetes. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010;43(3):487–91. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-487.
    1. Farmer AJ, Gibson OJ, Dudley C, Bryden K, Hayton PM, Tarassenko L, Neil A. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of real-time telemedicine support on glycemic control in young adults with type 1 diabetes (ISRCTN 46889446) Diabetes Care. 2005 Nov;28(11):2697–702. 28/11/2697
    1. Seto E, Istepanian RS, Cafazzo JA, Logan A, Sungoor A. UK and Canadian perspectives of the effectiveness of mobile diabetes management systems. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:6584–7. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333998.
    1. Lutes KD, Baggili IM. Diabetic e-management system (DEMS). Proceedings; Third International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations.; 2006; Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. New York, NY: IEEE Computer Society; 2006. Apr 10,
    1. Quinn CC, Gruber-Baldini AL, Shardell M, Weed K, Clough SS, Peeples M, Terrin M, Bronich-Hall L, Barr E, Lender D. Mobile diabetes intervention study: testing a personalized treatment/behavioral communication intervention for blood glucose control. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Jul;30(4):334–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.02.004.S1551-7144(09)00034-2
    1. Faridi Z, Liberti L, Shuval K, Northrup V, Ali A, Katz DL. Evaluating the impact of mobile telephone technology on type 2 diabetic patients' self-management: the NICHE pilot study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Jun;14(3):465–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00881.x.JEP881
    1. Årsand E, Tatara N, Østengen G, Hartvigsen G. Wireless and Mobile Technologies Improving Diabetes Self-Management: Handbook of Research on Mobility and Computing: Evolving Technologies and Ubiquitous Impacts. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2011.
    1. Clar C, Barnard K, Cummins E, Royle P, Waugh N, Aberdeen Health Technology Assessment Group Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2010 Mar;14(12):1–140. doi: 10.3310/hta14120.
    1. Davidson MB. Evaluation of self monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin-treated diabetic patients by randomized controlled trials: little bang for the buck. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2010 Sep;5(3):138–42.RRCT-0017
    1. Welschen LM, Bloemendal E, Nijpels G, Dekker JM, Heine RJ, Stalman WA, Bouter LM. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2005 Jun;28(6):1510–7. 28/6/1510
    1. Paulweber B, Valensi P, Lindström J, Lalic NM, Greaves CJ, McKee M, Kissimova-Skarbek K, Liatis S, Cosson E, Szendroedi J, Sheppard KE, Charlesworth K, Felton AM, Hall M, Rissanen A, Tuomilehto J, Schwarz PE, Roden M, Paulweber M, Stadlmayr A, Kedenko L, Katsilambros N, Makrilakis K, Kamenov Z, Evans P, Gilis-Januszewska A, Lalic K, Jotic A, Djordevic P, Dimitrijevic-Sreckovic V, Hühmer U, Kulzer B, Puhl S, Lee-Barkey YH, AlKerwi A, Abraham C, Hardeman W, Acosta T, Adler M, AlKerwi A, Barengo N, Barengo R, Boavida JM, Charlesworth K, Christov V, Claussen B, Cos X, Cosson E, Deceukelier S, Dimitrijevic-Sreckovic V, Djordjevic P, Evans P, Felton AM, Fischer M, Gabriel-Sanchez R, Gilis-Januszewska A, Goldfracht M, Gomez JL, Greaves CJ, Hall M, Handke U, Hauner H, Herbst J, Hermanns N, Herrebrugh L, Huber C, Hühmer U, Huttunen J, Jotic A, Kamenov Z, Karadeniz S, Katsilambros N, Khalangot M, Kissimova-Skarbek K, Köhler D, Kopp V, Kronsbein P, Kulzer B, Kyne-Grzebalski D, Lalic K, Lalic N, Landgraf R, Lee-Barkey YH, Liatis S, Lindström J, Makrilakis K, McIntosh C, McKee M, Mesquita AC, Misina D, Muylle F, Neumann A, Paiva AC, Pajunen P, Paulweber B, Peltonen M, Perrenoud L, Pfeiffer A, Pölönen A, Puhl S, Raposo F, Reinehr T, Rissanen A, Robinson C, Roden M, Rothe U, Saaristo T, Scholl J, Schwarz PE, Sheppard KE, Spiers S, Stemper T, Stratmann B, Szendroedi J, Szybinski Z, Tankova T, Telle-Hjellset V, Terry G, Tolks D, Toti F, Tuomilehto J, Undeutsch A, Valadas C, Valensi P, Velickiene D, Vermunt P, Weiss R, Wens J, Yilmaz T. A European evidence-based guideline for the prevention of type 2 diabetes. Horm Metab Res. 2010 Apr;42 Suppl 1:S3–36. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1240928.
    1. Sibal L, Home PD. Management of type 2 diabetes: NICE guidelines. Clin Med. 2009 Aug;9(4):353–7.
    1. Funnell MM. Standards of care for diabetes: what's new? Nursing. 2010 Oct;40(10):54–6. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000388314.83393.bd.00152193-201010000-00019
    1. ACCORD Study Group. Cushman WC, Evans GW, Byington RP, Goff DC, Grimm RH, Cutler JA, Simons-Morton DG, Basile JN, Corson MA, Probstfield JL, Katz L, Peterson KA, Friedewald WT, Buse JB, Bigger JT, Gerstein HC, Ismail-Beigi F. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 29;362(17):1575–85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001286. NEJMoa1001286
    1. van Deursen AJ, van Dijk JA. Internet skills performance tests: are people ready for eHealth? J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(2):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1581. v13i2e35
    1. Stephens JW, Carman JE, Brooks CJ, Lyons RA, Ford DV, Price DE, Bain SC. Comment on: Polonsky et al. Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the structured testing program study. Diabetes Care 2011;34:262-267. Diabetes Care. 2011 May;34(5):e57; author reply e58. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0258. 34/5/e57
    1. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Schikman CH, Hinnen DA, Parkin CG, Jelsovsky Z, Petersen B, Schweitzer M, Wagner RS. Response to Comment on: Polonsky et al. Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the structured testing program study. Diabetes Care 2011;34:262–267. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:e58. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0365.
    1. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Schikman CH, Hinnen DA, Parkin CG, Jelsovsky Z, Petersen B, Schweitzer M, Wagner RS. Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the Structured Testing Program study. Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):262–7. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1732. 34/2/262
    1. Bonomo K, De Salve A, Fiora E, Mularoni E, Massucco P, Poy P, Pomero A, Cavalot F, Anfossi G, Trovati M. Evaluation of a simple policy for pre- and post-prandial blood glucose self-monitoring in people with type 2 diabetes not on insulin. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;87(2):246–51. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.021.S0168-8227(09)00469-0
    1. García-Mayor R. [Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetic patients non treated with insulin] Med Clin (Barc) 2010 May 22;134(15):688–91. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2009.11.022.S0025-7753(09)01584-X
    1. Chen Y. Take it personally: accounting for individual difference in designing diabetes management systems. Proceedings; The 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems; August 16 - 20; Aarhus, Denmark. 2010.
    1. Frost JH, Massagli MP. Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another's data. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1053. v10i3e15
    1. Wicks P, Massagli M, Frost J, Brownstein C, Okun S, Vaughan T, Bradley R, Heywood J. Sharing health data for better outcomes on PatientsLikeMe. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1549. v12i2e19
    1. Wiesner M, Pfeifer D. Adapting recommender systems to the requirements of personal health record systems. Proceedings; The 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium; November 11-12, 2010; Arlington, Virginia, USA. 2010.
    1. Fernandez-Luque L, Karlsen R, Vognild LK. Challenges and opportunities of using recommender systems for personalized health education. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:903–7.
    1. Wiljer D, Urowitz S, Apatu E, DeLenardo C, Eysenbach G, Harth T, Pai H, Leonard KJ, Canadian Committee for Patient Accessible Health Records Patient accessible electronic health records: exploring recommendations for successful implementation strategies. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(4):e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1061. v10i4e34
    1. Liu LS, Shih PC, Hayes GR. Barriers to the adoption and use of personal health record systems. Proceedings; The 2011 iConference; February 8-11, 2011; Seattle, Washington. 2011.
    1. Weitzman ER, Adida B, Kelemen S, Mandl KD. Sharing data for public health research by members of an international online diabetes social network. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e19256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019256.
    1. Buranarach M, Thatphithakkul N, Supnithi T, Phetsawat R, Phienphanich P, Kawtrakul A, Wongrochananan S, Kulnawan N, Jiamjarasrangsi W. Development of a personalized knowledge portal to support diabetes patient self-management. Proceedings; International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems; October 26-29, 2010; Bangkok, Thailand. 2010.
    1. Chang IC, Shih-Jung H, Hui-Mei H, Tzu-Hsuan C. Building mPHR to assist diabetics in self-healthcare management. Proceedings; 7th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM); June 28-30, 2010; Tokyo. 2010.
    1. Klonoff DC. Benefits and limitations of self-monitoring of blood glucose. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007 Jan;1(1):130–2.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する