A pragmatic randomized trial evaluating pre-operative aqueous antiseptic skin solutions in open fractures (Aqueous-PREP): statistical analysis plan

Nathan N O'Hara, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Sofia Bzovsky, Shannon Dodds, Lehana Thabane, Mohit Bhandari, Gordon Guyatt, P J Devereaux, Gerard P Slobogean, Sheila Sprague, PREP-IT Investigators

Abstract

Background: Approximately 1 in 10 patients with a surgically treated open fracture will develop a surgical site infection. The Aqueous-PREP trial will investigate the effect of 10% povidone-iodine versus 4% chlorhexidine in aqueous antiseptic solutions in reducing infections after open fracture surgery. The study protocol was published in April 2020.

Methods and design: The Aqueous-PREP trial is a pragmatic, multicenter, open-label, randomized multiple period cluster crossover trial. Each participating cluster is randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to provide 1 of the 2 study interventions on all eligible patients during a study period. The intervention periods are 2 months in length. After completing a 2-month period, the participating cluster crosses over to the alternative intervention. We plan to enroll a minimum of 1540 patients at 14 sites.

Results: The primary outcome is surgical site infection guided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network reporting criteria (2017). All participants' surgical site infection surveillance period will end 30 days after definitive fracture management surgery for superficial infections and 90 days after definitive fracture management surgery for deep incisional or organ/space infections [1]. The secondary outcome is an unplanned fracture-related reoperation within 12 months of the fracture.

Conclusion: This manuscript serves as the formal statistical analysis plan (version 1.0) for the Aqueous-PREP trial. The statistical analysis plan was completed on February 28, 2022.

Keywords: Aqueous antiseptic solutions; Open fracture; Surgical site infection.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Slobogean reports editorial or governing board for the Journal of Orthopedic Trauma, board or committee member for the Orthopedic Trauma Association, paid consultant for Smith & Nephew, and paid consultant for Zimmer, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Sprague reports board or committee member for Orthopedic Trauma Association, employment from Global Research Solutions Inc. and consultant fees from the University of Sherbrooke and Platform Life Sciences, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Bhandari reports paid consultant from AgNovos Healthcare, research support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), board or committee member for the International Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SICOT), research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIAMS & NICHD), research support from Physicians’ Services Incorporated, paid consultant for Sanofi-Aventis, paid consultant for Smith & Nephew, and research support from the US Department of Defense, all outside the submitted work. Dr. O’Hara reports stock or stock options from Arbutus Medical Inc., all outside the submitted work. The other authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT Flowchart for Participants

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event; 2017.
    1. Darouiche RO, Wall MJ, Itani KMF, et al. Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(1):18–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810988.
    1. Tuuli MG, Liu J, Stout MJ, et al. A randomized trial comparing skin antiseptic agents at cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(7):647–655. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511048.
    1. Swenson BR, Sawyer RG. Importance of alcohol in skin preparation protocols. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(9):977. doi: 10.1086/655843.
    1. Swenson BR, Hedrick TL, Metzger R, Bonatti H, Pruett TL, Sawyer RG. Effects of preoperative skin preparation on postoperative wound infection rates: a prospective study of 3 skin preparation protocols. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(10):964–971. doi: 10.1086/605926.
    1. Investigators FLOW, Bhandari M, Jeray KJ, et al. A trial of wound irrigation in the initial management of open fracture wounds. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(27):2629–2641. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508502.
    1. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(4):453–458. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197658040-00004.
    1. Orthopaedic trauma association: open fracture study group. A new classification scheme for open fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(8):457–64. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c7cb6b.
    1. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(1):147–179. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.1.147.
    1. Kunisada T, Yamada K, Oda S, Hara O. Investigation on the efficacy of povidone-iodine against antiseptic-resistant species. Dermatol Basel Switz. 1997;195(Suppl 2):14–18. doi: 10.1159/000246025.
    1. Gamble C, Krishan A, Stocken D, et al. Guidelines for the content of statistical analysis plans in clinical trials. JAMA. 2017;318(23):2337. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18556.
    1. Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, Elbourne D. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ. Published online July 31. 2019:l4378. 10.1136/bmj.l4378.
    1. Sprague S, Scott T, Dodds S, et al. Cluster identification, selection, and description in cluster randomized crossover trials: the PREP-IT trials. Trials. 2020;21(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04611-9.
    1. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hébert P. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ. 2002;325(7365):652–654. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652.
    1. Investigators FAITH. Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2017;389(10078):1519–1527. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30066-1.
    1. Investigators HEALTH, Bhandari M, Einhorn TA, et al. Total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(23):2199–2208. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1906190.
    1. the CONSORT Group, Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT. Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials. 2010;2010;11(1):32. 10.1186/1745-6215-11-32.
    1. Morgan KE, Forbes AB, Keogh RH, Jairath V, Kahan BC. Choosing appropriate analysis methods for cluster randomised cross-over trials with a binary outcome: K. E. MORGAN ET AL. Stat Med 2017;36(2):318-333. 10.1002/sim.7137.
    1. Hemming K, Kasza J, Hooper R, Forbes A, Taljaard M. A tutorial on sample size calculation for multiple-period cluster randomized parallel, cross-over and stepped-wedge trials using the shiny CRT calculator. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(3):979–995. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz237.
    1. Hemming K, Taljaard M, Weijer C, Forbes AB. Use of multiple period, cluster randomised, crossover trial designs for comparative effectiveness research. BMJ. Published online November 4. 2020:m3800. 10.1136/bmj.m3800.
    1. Wise BT, Connelly D, Rocca M, et al. A predictive score for determining risk of surgical site infection after orthopaedic trauma surgery. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(10):506–513. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001513.
    1. Thompson DD, Lingsma HF, Whiteley WN, Murray GD, Steyerberg EW. Covariate adjustment had similar benefits in small and large randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(9):1068–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.001.
    1. Program of Randomized Trials to Evaluate Pre-operative Antiseptic Skin Solutions in Orthopaedic Trauma (PREP-IT) Investigators, Slobogean GP, Sprague S et al. Effectiveness of iodophor vs chlorhexidine solutions for surgical site infections and unplanned reoperations for patients who underwent fracture repair: the PREP-IT Master Protocol. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(4):e202215. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2215.
    1. Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, CONSORT Group. Consort Statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;2012(345):e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661.
    1. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for survey nonresponse. Published online. 1987.
    1. Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH, Hunter DJ, Drazen JM. Statistics in medicine--reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2189–2194. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr077003.
    1. Sun X, Ioannidis JPA, Agoritsas T, Alba AC, Guyatt G. How to use a subgroup analysis: users’ guide to the medical literature. JAMA. 2014;311(4):405–411. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.285063.
    1. Sun X, Briel M, Walter SD, Guyatt GH. Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses. BMJ. 2010;340:c117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c117.
    1. Sun X, Briel M, Busse JW, et al. Subgroup analysis of trials is rarely easy (SATIRE): a study protocol for a systematic review to characterize the analysis, reporting, and claim of subgroup effects in randomized trials. Trials. 2009;10:101. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-101.
    1. Schandelmaier S, Briel M, Varadhan R, et al. Development of the instrument to assess the credibility of effect modification analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can. 2020;192(32):E901–E906. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200077.
    1. Wj M, Morgenstern M, McNally MA, et al. Fracture-related infection: a consensus on definition from an international expert group. Injury. 2018;49(3):505–510. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.040.
    1. Metsemakers WJ, Kuehl R, Moriarty TF, et al. Infection after fracture fixation: current surgical and microbiological concepts. Injury. 2018;49(3):511–522. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.019.
    1. Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures Investigators, Bhandari M, Guyatt G et al. Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Jt Surg-Am Vol. 2008;90(12):2567–2578. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01694.
    1. Zampieri FG, Casey JD, Shankar-Hari M, Harrell FE, Harhay MO. Using Bayesian methods to augment the interpretation of critical care trials. An overview of theory and example reanalysis of the alveolar recruitment for acute respiratory distress syndrome trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203(5):543–552. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2381CP.

Source: PubMed

3
購読する